Hi Bill, apologies, I wasn't aware of the 2 other exchanges, been really busy the last year of so and those are "newer exchanges", as I was mentioning, I am "not entitled" to request the listing as one of the dev needs to do it, I though it was worth mentioning(I have no affiliation with Nova exchange, I am just a user and I believe they sent that email to all users)

Keep up the good work

Regards,
Georgyous

Not sure if you are aware but nova exchange are offering free listing for former Cryptopia listed coins

Not sure if you are aware but nova exchange are offering free listing for former Cryptopia listed coins

Not sure if you are aware but nova exchange are offering free listing for former Cryptopia listed coins, I believe Cryptopia was the only exchange that Dinasty coin was listed on, maybe it is worth a ask

Could you elaborate on the why? I am genuinely interested

Is it still alive?

From my point of view a more clean way of dealing with it from a exchange point of view would be this (simple example to make a point, do not take the numbers literal):
exchange 1
- 1000000 - coins in current users balances (basically in the 2.x chain and includes fake coins, whatever)
- 10000 - coins in the exchange wallet after downgrade and resync the wallet from scratch (coins in the 1.x version)
- 1000000/10000 = 100 this is the value to which the balances need to be devided by
- user 1 balance 500 now -> will have 500/100=5 after downgrade

exchange 2 might be different
- 100000 - coins in current users balances (basically in the 2.x chain and includes fake coins, whatever)
- 50000 - coins in the exchange wallet after downgrade and resync the wallet from scratch (coins in the 1.x version)
- 1000000/50000 = 20 this is the value to which the balances need to be devided by
- user 2 balance 500 now -> will have 500/20=25 after downgrade

Is this fair to everyone?
Most likely not

Will everyone be happy with this approach?
Most probably not

Is it simple to implement?
Most probably yes as most exchanges have such possibility as it is more or less the same path used when there are swaps (swaps that need to be done in place without changing the ticket )

Is is a win - win or win - loose or loose - loose situation?
Most likely it is at the border between loose - loose and win - loose, but at least it does not loose the exchanges and does not make absolutely all coins worthless and without any exchanges

What do you gents think?

I am in the same boat, any way to swap them? Yesterday the wallet on coinexchange was in mentenance so I could not move anything

As I see it, a community takeover is already happening, as community members are organising to fix the problem.

This is the spirit of crypto, decentralised and community driven

You never know what happens, cryptos are so unpredictable, that is why it is not for people with a weak heart. For the moment although price has gone down I see trading happening, the network is working the price is solely based on "what people chose to believe as being the future"

Hi Thanks, that worked.

Hello,

Either I am missing something or there is a issue with the chain

I just got the code from git and compiled, synchronizing from scratch. It gives the following error, in my experience this is due to some issue with the difficulty calculation.

2018-Aug-27 05:42:50.161057 INFO    [103.30.144.31:19200 OUT] Sync data returned unknown top block: 110001 -> 111873 2018-Aug-27 05:42:50.161057 INFO    [protocol] SYNCHRONIZATION started
2018-Aug-27 05:42:54.749234 INFO    [Blockchain] Block 7dc3b2bb56fb356ff0271d370f1eaa50eef15ffbf5cc2420af32328265ba955e, has too weak proof of work: db6f9cb4dd25d02f777b3f2cf7aa83e1c7250c858e5415e2cdcf2b6702000000, expected difficulty: 2290943646
2018-Aug-27 05:43:00.449395 INFO    [protocol] [69.30.193.98:19200 OUT] Sync data returned unknown top block: 110001 -> 111873 [1872 blocks (2 days) behind]
2018-Aug-27 05:43:00.449395 INFO    [protocol] SYNCHRONIZATION started
2018-Aug-27 05:43:01.479989 INFO    [Blockchain] Block 7dc3b2bb56fb356ff0271d370f1eaa50eef15ffbf5cc2420af32328265ba955e, has too weak proof of work: db6f9cb4dd25d02f777b3f2cf7aa83e1c7250c858e5415e2cdcf2b6702000000, expected difficulty: 2290943646
2018-Aug-27 05:43:10.526922 INFO    [protocol] [195.201.32.245:19200 OUT] Sync data returned unknown top block: 110001 -> 111873 [1872 blocks (2 days) behind]
2018-Aug-27 05:43:10.526922 INFO    [protocol] SYNCHRONIZATION started
2018-Aug-27 05:43:10.978015 INFO    [Blockchain] Block 7dc3b2bb56fb356ff0271d370f1eaa50eef15ffbf5cc2420af32328265ba955e, has too weak proof of work: db6f9cb4dd25d02f777b3f2cf7aa83e1c7250c858e5415e2cdcf2b6702000000, expected difficulty: 2290943646
2018-Aug-27 05:43:20.815651 INFO    [protocol] [69.30.193.98:19200 OUT] Sync data returned unknown top block: 110001 -> 111873 [1872 blocks (2 days) behind]
2018-Aug-27 05:43:20.815651 INFO    [protocol] SYNCHRONIZATION started
2018-Aug-27 05:43:21.847022 INFO    [Blockchain] Block 7dc3b2bb56fb356ff0271d370f1eaa50eef15ffbf5cc2420af32328265ba955e, has too weak proof of work: db6f9cb4dd25d02f777b3f2cf7aa83e1c7250c858e5415e2cdcf2b6702000000, expected difficulty: 2290943646
2018-Aug-27 05:43:31.186878 INFO    [protocol] [139.99.106.25:19200 OUT] Sync data returned unknown top block: 110001 -> 111873 [1872 blocks (2 days) behind]
2018-Aug-27 05:43:31.186878 INFO    [protocol] SYNCHRONIZATION started
2018-Aug-27 05:43:32.506549 INFO    [Blockchain] Block 7dc3b2bb56fb356ff0271d370f1eaa50eef15ffbf5cc2420af32328265ba955e, has too weak proof of work: db6f9cb4dd25d02f777b3f2cf7aa83e1c7250c858e5415e2cdcf2b6702000000, expected difficulty: 2290943646
2018-Aug-27 05:43:41.474416 INFO    [protocol] [69.30.193.98:19200 OUT] Sync data returned unknown top block: 110001 -> 111873 [1872 blocks (2 days) behind]
2018-Aug-27 05:43:41.474416 INFO    [protocol] SYNCHRONIZATION started
2018-Aug-27 05:43:42.500863 INFO    [Blockchain] Block 7dc3b2bb56fb356ff0271d370f1eaa50eef15ffbf5cc2420af32328265ba955e, has too weak proof of work: db6f9cb4dd25d02f777b3f2cf7aa83e1c7250c858e5415e2cdcf2b6702000000, expected difficulty: 2290943646
2018-Aug-27 05:43:51.550830 INFO    [protocol] [78.47.100.215:19200 OUT] Sync data returned unknown top block: 110001 -> 111873 [1872 blocks (2 days) behind]
2018-Aug-27 05:43:51.550830 INFO    [protocol] SYNCHRONIZATION started
2018-Aug-27 05:43:52.046366 INFO    [Blockchain] Block 7dc3b2bb56fb356ff0271d370f1eaa50eef15ffbf5cc2420af32328265ba955e, has too weak proof of work: db6f9cb4dd25d02f777b3f2cf7aa83e1c7250c858e5415e2cdcf2b6702000000, expected difficulty: 2290943646
2018-Aug-27 05:44:01.626442 INFO    [protocol] [195.201.32.245:19200 OUT] Sync data returned unknown top block: 110001 -> 111873 [1872 blocks (2 days) behind]
2018-Aug-27 05:44:01.626442 INFO    [protocol] SYNCHRONIZATION started
2018-Aug-27 05:44:02.063092 INFO    [Blockchain] Block 7dc3b2bb56fb356ff0271d370f1eaa50eef15ffbf5cc2420af32328265ba955e, has too weak proof of work: db6f9cb4dd25d02f777b3f2cf7aa83e1c7250c858e5415e2cdcf2b6702000000, expected difficulty: 2290943646

Mate the problem is with your computer, or your internet connection, not sure what does not work for you, I just used the last mined block as an example:
https://imgur.com/a/53qvjlE

I don't really know why the image is not showing in the thread the link is https://imgur.com/a/53qvjlE

Don't know if you noticed but all crypto prices are down at the moment so there is no surprise that this coins is down also.

I tried to ask you nicely to change the attitude, this is the last reply that I will give you as I don't have time to waste, change the attitude, do you homework and we can talk more.

One things that I failed to mention is that I am no way associated with this coin, I am not a developer or anything, just a community member.

Mate, stop panicking, this coin is not going away any time soon and Cryptopia has not reason to delist it.

I understand that you are more or less new to crypto(based on your rating on this forum), but no need to initiate panic on other new comers.

I know the coin is community driven so everything that is done is by one person or another, is by their good will, you can't "demand" for someone to do something in this situations, if you ask nicely maybe someone will help.

Many pools have block explorers builtin, especially the ones that are using "cryptonote-forknote-pool" as a software, here is one example http://coal.mypool.online/#blockchain_blocks , fully working block explorer

I also have the same question

Am I the only one that receives this?
2018-Feb-25 21:49:25.908970 ERROR   difficulty overhead.
2018-Feb-25 21:49:25.909128 ERROR   Failed to create block template

Compiling you code from source does not seem to work. When I try to start the daemon I get

GENESIS_COINBASE_TX_HEX constant has an incorrect value.....

Is there a link to the source code anywhere? on linux it is generally easier to just compile because of different distributions and dependencies.

Thank you

Thanks for the confirmation. Yes it is on linux. At least I know I am not doing something wrong and it is reproducible.

Hello,

Does anyone else get a seg fault on forknote with the provided config?, it stays a few seconds, it syncs completely and then it crashed with a seg fault.

Does anyone else have this problem?

Thanks