Don't mine Scrypt with a GPU. You're wasting your money.
You'll be certain to pay more for electricity than you'll earn.

If you want to mine Scrypt, get an ASIC.
If you want to mine with GPUs, mine something else like X11, X13 or one of the many others that have varying profitability over time.

It's interesting how you're resorting to insults.

It has been pointed out several times (and even before the airdrop started) that there were absolutely no mechanics that showed the airdrop is actually legitimate.
The amount of coins claimed is suspiciously high and it would have been absolutely trivial for a large portion of those to go into dev hands.

This has been a scam right from the start. The only difference is, devs put a good amount of time into making it appear legitimate to boost the value.

What did you expect? PBmining to step up and admit it's a scam?
Of course not, they're going to run with this as long as people keep throwing money at it.

But hey, that's the bitcoin world. People blinded by greed throwing money at services with not a single shred of evidence of their legitimacy.


Apples and oranges.. your Antminer won't mine Scrypt.

The correct answer is: RTFM
As a *nix user you should know this by now.

https://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin/blob/master/doc/build-unix.md

Honestly, you're completely overstating the importance of Auroracoin.

In a giant sea of other shitcoins and scamcoins, Auroracoin is just another water drop.
No damage was done to crypto currency in general.

Bag holders have been warned right from the start this coin wasn't going anywhere.

For X11 on nvidia cards you have to use ccminer. Which this thread is about.

Auroracoin bag holder detected.

The only new thing this coin brought to the table is a new method to have a giant premine for devs to sell while still making people think the coin has merit.

Except he's been mining for months. By that logic you should never buy hardware as there will always be more cost efficient hardware in the future.

Truthfully, don't mine with that.
It'll cost you a ton more in electricity than even the most optimistic gains you'll get from that card.

It's simply too old.

Yes, I'm talking about ccminer. I'm guessing it's as cbuchner1 says.

Are you using a version compiled by a 3rd party?


I've got the other versions through a msdn subscription, but you're not missing out on much.
At least there's no noticeable performance difference. (it would be very surprising if there was, either way).

And it's not like you really need the improved c++11 support

Did someone somewhere post some guide incorrectly involving the 2012 redist somewhere?
I've seen this come across this thread way too many times now.

I really don't understand where this assumption that 2012 redist is needed is coming from.

http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=8328

As mentioned countless times: 2010 SP1

You're missing a Raspberry Pie

I don't mean repair. I mean completely uninstall it, and then install it again.

Try reinstalling the 2010 redist, as something has gone wrong somewhere.

That DLL it's missing is part of Visual Studio 2010's redist.
It is the "pro" answer and the correct answer.

Because you need 2010 SP1

I'm getting almost 7 times my scrypt hashrate on X11, on a 670

Actually, nvidia is where it's at atm for X11.

The algorithm, etc is all intentionally private.
It has to be for clevermining to stay competitive.

It's a black box, you give it hash, clevermining gives you btc.
You can check the daily stats to see if that's something you want to participate in.

I'm impressed people still think there's hardware.

There has been no indication whatsoever they're actually mining.
Their entire setup is based around hiding where the coins come from.
From the way they allocate "mining rewards" (formula based instead of based on actual blocks mined) to the way they pay out (sending coins through a mixer first).

All they have (and really need for this setup to work) is a website that keeps track of fake hashrates and what to pay out.
They pay out to appear legitimate, and the amount they pay out is only a really small fraction of what a costumer paid to get in.
Then they'll just keep upping their hashrate and sucker new "customers" into their scam, and only pay them fractions of the money they gave em as well.

They're running a ponzi that is sustainable even without a very high rate of new customers.
Which is why they'll keep this scam up for as long as they can.

Hell, even if they intended to be legitimate, actually mining is simply less profitable.
Why take a small profit margin, when you can take a large margin and still be able to pay out all your customers?