Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 798 results by gwestcot
Re: [ANN][Main] Bitcore-BTX- Bitcoin UTXO Fork 2017 - Bridge BTX <->SBTX (BSC2)
Being dropped by pools means a lot about the future of this coin. It is still on exchange and yet zergpool has let it go.
Many same aspects of LTC but 1/4 the time for halving to occur... and yet worth pennies. Now do you see halving means squat?
The only reason you see a blip in mining is due to your post. Waking people up to the coin. Marketing is the ONLY way a coin grows in value. Nothing else.
Many same aspects of LTC but 1/4 the time for halving to occur... and yet worth pennies. Now do you see halving means squat?
The only reason you see a blip in mining is due to your post. Waking people up to the coin. Marketing is the ONLY way a coin grows in value. Nothing else.
Hello elmo40, thank you for your message. The idea behind Bitcore is to emulate Bitcoin during the halving process. Therefore, Bitcore will always halve in the same year as Bitcoin. We are aware that this alone is not enough to build a large community. That’s why we are also attempting to burn excess BTX with the resources available to us. However, even burning coins may only have an effect in the long term. We can only strive to provide a solid framework for crypto enthusiasts.
I am in contact with Zergpool. Alternatively, I can also recommend aikapool.com/btx.
Hi Limxdev,
after years of being completely absent from Bitcointalk (I can no longer recover my legendary account), I can only confirm that community building involves much more than just burning coins, graphic design, or technical innovation.
A strong community thrives on consistent engagement, open communication, and shared goals. It requires fostering an environment where members feel valued and have opportunities to actively participate in shaping the project. Initiatives like educational content, partnerships, real-world use cases, and transparent updates can create lasting trust and interest.
Community building is as much about people as it is about the project itself—providing not just a solid framework, but also meaningful reasons for people to be a part of it.
Greetz
Wow it has been awhile! How have you been?
Small communities or nations can also do some things that don't necessarily scale at large. An example of this would be Singapore and a few others I am sure we can create a short list of. I imagine tourism, banking, bitcoin mining are all possible industries if infrastructure is planned properly. I haven't gotten to the comprehensive list of the cost of infrastructure on the island itself but from preliminary calculations and research I believe that the dredging would likely be more expensive than the infrastructure itself. However, my idea is that everything would be circular and self sufficient in nature. Basically, near zero waste and life essential items such as water and food are mostly created or grown on the island. This would require a lot of forethought in the zoning and city planning department but it is not outside the realms of possibilities given that we can learn from previous examples of island nations.
You see, this is the problem, you take only the good parts from everything and ignore the rest.
Singapore is a 6 million poeple nation which is in the middle of all trading routes and it imports 90% of its food and 97% of its energy.
You can't have a thing that is in the middle of nowhere become both a tourist attraction and a banking center, you can't have both tourism and self-sufficiency in food on a small island (both Maldive and Seychelles import tons of it) and you will not get mining going with solar panels.
Not even going to mention the other fact, and this is coming from the black sheep of a 4 generation farmer family you won't get crops from that thing, not with a ton of potassium-rich fertilizer. Of course, it can be done, but the bill is going to be insane.
Btw, what is the cost for dredging enough soil to make a 47 sq miles island, even if we assume what, 1-2 meters deep ocean at that place?
Fine lets use the Cayman Islands as an example then? Are they sufficiently small? You can definitely get mining going with solar panels, a tidal array, wind power, and even biogas would be on the table. You can have strict zoning district for farming, industrial, tourism/shopping, and an urban center. It all really depends on the city planning. I mean the dutch turned the flevopolder into arable farmland and this is nowhere on the scale of that. In all honesty, you would create a zero waste environment in which everything is composted and that does also include the sludge from wastewater treatment. That is the part in which when treated properly you get nutrient rich compost and also biogas to be used for power generation. It is basically a win/win scenario. Modern agricultural practices of using chemical fertilizers are pretty damaging and do nothing to maintain the fertility of the soil in which you are growing in. Also, if you are worried about the salinity of the soil, I have grown food in an almost identical climate and soil conditions as would be present there. I basically just amended the sand with 6-8 inches of compost while adding compost made from my yard, garden, kitchen, and animal waste. After awhile you end up with a very fertile layer of topsoil that is also very well draining. As far as the dredging, it is too early to really say how much material is going to be needed to be dredged. The entire area is about 46 square miles but you wont be able to use it all. Maybe only 29 or so is usable and the rest will be used for material to create the island. The first four phases which would maybe be around 18 square miles in total and would be the most shallow areas. Possibly, with the state of the art process using cofferdams and vibro compaction, you could do it for maybe around a billion dollars. The price tag sounds pretty steep but its not really all that bad in regards to material moved nor price. There have actually been dredging projects that have moved more material than this one. You would likely need to presell lots among other things to get money flowing. Possibly this could be done by first doing a small proof of concept. At any rate, this is all preliminary as I have to wait for the survey to be conducted first before I can even really definitively say its possible on any level.
Your biggest problem it seems to me is that the upfront costs are going to be very large and very real, whereas your benefits seem rather vague and ill-defined.
How did you come to your estimate of a billion dollars? Its hard to find reasonable numbers for this sort of thing but the "World" the artificial islands that Dubai was (are?) building were meant to cover a total of 20 sq miles (rather less than your expected area) with a projected budget of $14billion. They of course were close to a developed country and were actually part of an already functioning country.
They also used the Dutch which are probably the best but also the absolute most expensive option you could have taken for such a project. Additionally, I imagine there are other factors that made it that expensive. One of the major factors is that the maximum depth was greater at the world islands as opposed to the location I am thinking about.
Fine lets use the Cayman Islands as an example then?
Net importer of food, total imports of energy, 100% depended on fossil fuel.
You can definitely get mining going with solar panels, a tidal array, wind power, and even biogas would be on the table
Can you get energy for those at 2.5 cents per kWh, that's the price coal and gas flaring gets you?
Of course, you can get it with government subsidies, but in this case, the government will be you, so more money to throw away.
I mean the dutch turned the flevopolder into arable farmland and this is nowhere on the scale of that.
With the difference that most of those that are suited for agriculture are the podlers and fenlands along some marshes, much of the land used to compact the drained soil was rich land from the estuaries, of which there are a ton, on your land, you won't have one!
I'll not cover the other part about soil since you're talking about home gardening I'm talking about feeding thousands, once you go out of your garden and try to do the same on at least 1ha of land you're going to see the limits of home-brewed compost and no pesticides
Possibly, with the state of the art process using cofferdams and vibro compaction, you could do it for maybe around a billion dollars. The price tag sounds pretty steep but its not really all that bad in regards to material moved nor price.
Seeing how 45m mc3 project costs 1.2 billion and your island would need that only for one foot depth (or height) at 49 square miles I think you've missed a zero
Small communities or nations can also do some things that don't necessarily scale at large. An example of this would be Singapore and a few others I am sure we can create a short list of. I imagine tourism, banking, bitcoin mining are all possible industries if infrastructure is planned properly. I haven't gotten to the comprehensive list of the cost of infrastructure on the island itself but from preliminary calculations and research I believe that the dredging would likely be more expensive than the infrastructure itself. However, my idea is that everything would be circular and self sufficient in nature. Basically, near zero waste and life essential items such as water and food are mostly created or grown on the island. This would require a lot of forethought in the zoning and city planning department but it is not outside the realms of possibilities given that we can learn from previous examples of island nations.
You see, this is the problem, you take only the good parts from everything and ignore the rest.
Singapore is a 6 million poeple nation which is in the middle of all trading routes and it imports 90% of its food and 97% of its energy.
You can't have a thing that is in the middle of nowhere become both a tourist attraction and a banking center, you can't have both tourism and self-sufficiency in food on a small island (both Maldive and Seychelles import tons of it) and you will not get mining going with solar panels.
Not even going to mention the other fact, and this is coming from the black sheep of a 4 generation farmer family you won't get crops from that thing, not with a ton of potassium-rich fertilizer. Of course, it can be done, but the bill is going to be insane.
Btw, what is the cost for dredging enough soil to make a 47 sq miles island, even if we assume what, 1-2 meters deep ocean at that place?
Fine lets use the Cayman Islands as an example then? Are they sufficiently small? You can definitely get mining going with solar panels, a tidal array, wind power, and even biogas would be on the table. You can have strict zoning district for farming, industrial, tourism/shopping, and an urban center. It all really depends on the city planning. I mean the dutch turned the flevopolder into arable farmland and this is nowhere on the scale of that. In all honesty, you would create a zero waste environment in which everything is composted and that does also include the sludge from wastewater treatment. That is the part in which when treated properly you get nutrient rich compost and also biogas to be used for power generation. It is basically a win/win scenario. Modern agricultural practices of using chemical fertilizers are pretty damaging and do nothing to maintain the fertility of the soil in which you are growing in. Also, if you are worried about the salinity of the soil, I have grown food in an almost identical climate and soil conditions as would be present there. I basically just amended the sand with 6-8 inches of compost while adding compost made from my yard, garden, kitchen, and animal waste. After awhile you end up with a very fertile layer of topsoil that is also very well draining. As far as the dredging, it is too early to really say how much material is going to be needed to be dredged. The entire area is about 46 square miles but you wont be able to use it all. Maybe only 29 or so is usable and the rest will be used for material to create the island. The first four phases which would maybe be around 18 square miles in total and would be the most shallow areas. Possibly, with the state of the art process using cofferdams and vibro compaction, you could do it for maybe around a billion dollars. The price tag sounds pretty steep but its not really all that bad in regards to material moved nor price. There have actually been dredging projects that have moved more material than this one. You would likely need to presell lots among other things to get money flowing. Possibly this could be done by first doing a small proof of concept. At any rate, this is all preliminary as I have to wait for the survey to be conducted first before I can even really definitively say its possible on any level.
I will be brief: it’s a bonkers idea.
I agree
I see no reason to do such a thing, there are already countries, cities, towns, villages why not focus on convincing these people to use bitcoin as a means of payments and investments? creating an island and taking them away from where they live to go live on an island, I don't see how that could be good. who would leave his house, town, friends to go live on an island just because he's a bitcoin fan if he can be in his house, in his town, with his friends and be using bitcoin?
Well because said countries will never give up their power over currency nor will they allow their citizens to live free or truly own anything. I mean we all have opinions and many would not want to come but I am sure there are others that would willingly do so given the current political climate.
Besides, I am not entirely naïve in the thinking that bitcoiners uniting makes some utopian society. I just think the current ones are too broken and starting anew with a stronger foundation would have greater chances of success than staying within the rotting legacy system.
Stronger foundation..
Take a look at the Bitcoin foundation and what happened and who its members were, just because you replace the current governing body with a brand new one that is full of revolutionary ideas it means nothing, how many revolutions were triggered by the same "unfair" and "rotten" system have ended costing more lives than the previous? And you're going to build it with the same people, the poeple who have been actually been advantaged by the current system since the ones who will afford to move there are the ones who could afford things previously too.
Sorry , but an utopia is an utopia
I would like to think there are many people willing to venture into the unknown. It is definitely fraught with risk but the payout is immense.
Rather the bill is immense, let's forget about the island itself and the whole infrastructure you're going to have to build.
Everything that is at a small scale is losing money economically when providing basic services, for example, you're going to have to build hospitals with every doctor for every major disease otherwise it would make no sense, right, for everything you need to take the plane and fly 1000 km to receive treatment. And with a small community of <25 000 you won't be able to do it, neither will you manage to get the education right, and a lot of other things, no small community will ever be independent, you can see this in small towns that rely completely on the major metropolis close by for everything.
And the payout? Payout in what?
Quantify this payout in anything cause I'm really curious about it.
But yes this location is not close to any world power at all. It is exceedingly remote and is not near any fault lines, volcanoes, or storm prone areas.
Hmm, so we delete locations near fault lines, we cut seas close to US, EU, IN, CN, we stay between the tropics lines, we ditch the Atlantic area, so what is left is the western Indian ocean or Polynesia. For the second I don't see anyone letting you build something there, not with the current geopolitics and all the eco-movement drama. If you're wondering why not, simply, because nobody wants to have an island popping out of nowhere that can be taken over by a foreign power and drive a wedge on the current influence map.
Well you fill in the discovered vulnerabilities in the structure of existing governments that cannot now be patched due to political reasons. That is what I meant in regards to building a stronger foundation. However, there may be some yet unforeseen vulnerabilities in a particular constitutional structure so sure it could, with enough time, end up in the same place as today. That being said, that is basically the summation of the entirety of human history with human civilization repeating the same basic patterns over and over.
Small communities or nations can also do some things that don't necessarily scale at large. An example of this would be Singapore and a few others I am sure we can create a short list of. I imagine tourism, banking, bitcoin mining are all possible industries if infrastructure is planned properly. I haven't gotten to the comprehensive list of the cost of infrastructure on the island itself but from preliminary calculations and research I believe that the dredging would likely be more expensive than the infrastructure itself. However, my idea is that everything would be circular and self sufficient in nature. Basically, near zero waste and life essential items such as water and food are mostly created or grown on the island. This would require a lot of forethought in the zoning and city planning department but it is not outside the realms of possibilities given that we can learn from previous examples of island nations. Additionally, the area is rather large being 46 square miles in total but I am fairly confident that not all of it would be usable due to some of it being needed for dredging material. It would likely need to be done in 2 year phases due to the enormity of the task. As far as location, you are indeed terribly off base. However, the eco-movement would surely be an inhibiting factor as it is with everything but there are definitely ways to assuage the eco-crazies. Admittedly, I haven't thought much about the geopolitical aspects but I do know it holds absolutely zero strategical advantage to anyone. I have also looked at fishing vessel traffic to the location and it is extremely sparse to the point that only a few ships have visited there in the past year with none staying longer than a few hours. If there is a location it is possible to do this, then it is definitely the one that I have discovered. There is one other area that is possible but it would likely cause a greater uproar given the fishing traffic there. Additionally, there are 8 others in which it is technically possible but are too cold for anyone to really want to live there. Anyways, I enjoy the constructive criticism so please do give me more. Additionally, take the very quick survey above to provide me with a little feedback.
I will be brief: it’s a bonkers idea.
Well history is littered with successes that were bonkers ideas. From an engineering perspective, the person that built the Florida Keys Overseas Railroad was thought to be certifiably insane but the task was accomplished. I suppose it did get partially destroyed during a very strong and almost unprecedented hurricane but the point still stands.
Well I certainly admire tenacity … though you pick an unusual example of a “success” … wasn’t the railway company already bankrupt at the time much of the Overseas Railroad was destroyed by the hurricane you mention? Perhaps a not wholly encouraging comparison to draw?
Haha not exactly the point I was trying to make. The point is that people thought it was impossible from an engineering perspective but now some of it serves as the highway to the Florida Keys. What many think is impossible is simply something that hasn't been done yet. But honestly, the engineering side of this might actually be easier than I at first thought. The other aspects may prove somewhat more challenging.
Pertaining to your first comment that is indeed permitted under UNCLOS if you are talking about international law. However, under international law the artificial island will not get territorial waters which are 12 nmi or an EEZ which is 200 nmi. Don't quote me on this but I believe these created island would only get 500m of protection from the baseline. T
After what happened to Elwar, it's not a case about distance but about from who you are 12 miles away..
While I doubt the danish navy will start firing cruise missiles at you, Thailand we already know how it deals with this and I think both cases like Somalia or Iran would be clear no.
But that aside, the biggest problem would be to convince poeple to move there, and the reasons are pretty simple, why would somebody leave their country for this? All these types of projects have attracted millions of tweets and thumbs up but almost no clients.
Just because it's a country or small nation full of poeple who like Bitcoin it doesn't mean it will be heaven on Earth, you can see even in this forum we're not all friends, we have different opinions, we have different views on the economy or society, not even mentioning our language, culture and many other small things that would lead to poeple calling it Babel's Island.
I would like to think there are many people willing to venture into the unknown. It is definitely fraught with risk but the payout is immense. Besides, I am not entirely naïve in the thinking that bitcoiners uniting makes some utopian society. I just think the current ones are too broken and starting anew with a stronger foundation would have greater chances of success than staying within the rotting legacy system. But yes this location is not close to any world power at all. It is exceedingly remote and is not near any fault lines, volcanoes, or storm prone areas. I have already requested a quote for satellite bathymetric data and it is actually very cheap. Preliminary findings are that there are potentially areas that are already sticking above the ocean. However, satellite bathymetry is not terrible accurate so my guess is that it is a meter or two below the ocean because it is hard for me to believe that any piece of land sticking out is unclaimed in this day and age.
I will be brief: it’s a bonkers idea.
Well history is littered with successes that were bonkers ideas. From an engineering perspective, the person that build the Florida Keys Overseas Railroad was thought to be certifiably insane but the task was accomplished. I suppose it did get partially destroyed during a very strong and almost unprecedented hurricane but the point still stands.
You are talking about forming your own micronation and as other similar experiments have shown before, this is bound to fail, if you want to be free and lay low I cannot think of a worst way to do it than this, by doing this you will immediately become a target of every single country of the world, after all forming a country is not something that happens in such arbitrary fashion, and even if you think you got all your bases covered and you think you can do it there is nothing stopping the governments to change those same laws and regulations to give themselves permission to appropriate any land you happen to bring to the surface.
All other attempts were inside the territorial waters of another nation. The most prominent example was probably Minerva Atolls and Tonga. This is dissimilar to that right from the get go. It is 600 miles away from the next closest EEZ. Laying low is not being free it is simply hiding. That is the life of a rat and they will come for you eventually with the full power of the intelligence community and military when the time comes. The narrative within a country is a lot different than if one is outside said country. To me, the worst thing to do is to "lay low" in a western country.
I have two doubts about what you are raising.
The first is whether one can effectively "appropriate" what are international waters and establish an artificial island and a system of government there. I doubt it, because if that were the case, many countries could expand their territories by doing the same.
The other is about the sustainability of creating an artificial island there. We would have to transport everything on a regular basis. Starting with drinking water.
I don't see it.
The first is whether one can effectively "appropriate" what are international waters and establish an artificial island and a system of government there. I doubt it, because if that were the case, many countries could expand their territories by doing the same.
The other is about the sustainability of creating an artificial island there. We would have to transport everything on a regular basis. Starting with drinking water.
I don't see it.
Pertaining to your first comment that is indeed permitted under UNCLOS if you are talking about international law. However, under international law the artificial island will not get territorial waters which are 12 nmi or an EEZ which is 200 nmi. Don't quote me on this but I believe these created island would only get 500m of protection from the baseline. That being said, international law does not have any real enforcement arm and the only thing that would matter would be recognition from other nations.
As far as drinking water is concerned, You could establish rain water collection systems on every roof which would likely be more than sufficient for personal consumption. However, I am guessing some level of desalination would also be needed for commercial interests. Additionally, it is very likely that a fresh water reservoir would begin to form under the island seen on one of China's artificial island in the South China Sea. Look at the source below.
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3090761/freshwater-reservoir-found-one-beijings-artificial-islands-south
⭐ Merited by hugeblack (4)
I am a land surveyor by profession and current events led me to looking for a suitable citadel to be free and to lay low. I discovered, by looking through open source bathymetric data, an area that is highly suitable for dredging up an artificial island and also not in any national EEZ. Basically, the area is extremely shallow but also located in international waters. At any rate, below is a link to a survey that will aid me in planning for the project to create a citadel for bitcoiners and even altcoiners alike. If you are interested then please spread the survey link so that I can get the maximum amount of feedback.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/6DJQRPC
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/6DJQRPC
Bitcoin evangelist has always attributed Bitcoin to be a safe-haven asset, while extreme fanatics believe that Bitcoin is far better than gold. Bitcoin was born in the wake of the 2008 financial crash as a libertarian currency and as an instrument that could help cushion the event of a future financial crisis.
Since Bitcoin is purely a speculative risk asset, many people have doubted its position as a purported safe-haven asset, I am not one of them anyways. However, since Bitcoin hasn't witnessed a global recession yet, I feel Bitcoin hasn't sufficiently defended its narrative as a safe-haven asset.
As the possibility of a global recession intensifies, what's your take on the possible performance of Bitcoin? will it go down with the traditional market or will it defend its name? I am very much interested to know.
Since Bitcoin is purely a speculative risk asset, many people have doubted its position as a purported safe-haven asset, I am not one of them anyways. However, since Bitcoin hasn't witnessed a global recession yet, I feel Bitcoin hasn't sufficiently defended its narrative as a safe-haven asset.
As the possibility of a global recession intensifies, what's your take on the possible performance of Bitcoin? will it go down with the traditional market or will it defend its name? I am very much interested to know.
It feels like it is impossible for Bitcoin to ever become a safe haven asset, because while it has shown resilience against bugs and hacking attacks, it lacks the key ingredient of stability in the price. People who buy gold will see peaks and troughs in the value of it, however if you go back long enough then you see a baseline trend going upwards. Since Bitcoin has only been around for just over a decade, it is almost impossible to judge that base line valuation. It's hardly a "safe haven" if you buy in at $50k and when you need to go spending it, the value has dropped in half. Things like cash accounts or bonds are the real safe haven people think of when discussing secure assets that are fairly predictable even if inflation will slowly eat them away.
I mean Bitcoin follows a log chart and volatility is statistically declining with every single cycle that occurs. Bonds are in a massive bubble and I believe they are about to burst so I do not consider them to be safe havens at all even if they traditionally have performed that function. Bitcoin is clearly a safe haven asset but maybe in a different way than others in the past. My guess that in 2-3 more cycle Bitcoin's volatility will have declined to a point in which it will be palatable to use as an every day currency for all.
In order to become a safe-haven asset like gold and the US dollar, Bitcoin price fluctuations must have a significant negative correlation with the price fluctuations of risky assets, that is, one of the two rises and the other falls, or one falls and the other rises. And this negative correlation must be long-term and stable. Although Bitcoin has shown hedging characteristics in the past year, the time frame has been expanded. In 3 years, 5 years or even longer, the hedging characteristics of Bitcoin are not obvious and unstable. It can be seen that Bitcoin's hedging characteristics have yet to be verified by time, and it is called "digital gold".
There is physical gold in your hand and their is ETF faux 'GOLD' on paper, where 100x paper is traded over holdings. Not unlike USDT which only holds 3% of its assets as USD, thus its really a USD derivative, just like GOLD is a derivative and not the real thing.
So what is BITCOIN, well its Valued in USDT which is 97% scam, ergo BITCOIN is not a 'safe haven', its a 'scam haven'.
Bitcoin at best can be called "Digital GOLD", where "GOLD" here means the GOLD-ETF, and not the real thing.
There is only one gold, and that the gold in your hand, under your control.
Bitcoin is just a number, backed by bullshit and conmen and liars.
It's important to remember if > 3% of the BTC community were to sell for hard currency, the entire system would fold, which is why everyday they tell morons to HODL.
Gold has been confiscated countless times in history. With Bitcoin I can hop across borders with my private keys backed up through a multitude of ways and there is nothing anybody can do to stop it. That is the biggest difference. The physical nature of gold compounded with most people buying from online dealers are its weakness. Not to mentions its heavy AF.
Re: [ANN][Main] Bitcore- BTX - Datacarriersize up to 220 bytes
When are we going back up to $40 ?
Gettin it hard to stay up around 40 cents right now bro
I think one of btx team's biggest mistakes was not paying Binance for a listing, the lack of exchanges has brought btx to the current price point imo.
Binance was uninterested at the time. I pretty much contacted every exchange known to man 4 years ago.
I definitely think Bitcoin has lost its original purpose was was a peer to peer currency. However, it will still have a purpose as a store of value and its my belief that one of or multiple altcoins will operate as a currency in concurrence with Bitcoin.
Re: What has been the most memorable Bitcoin upgrade to date?
*snip*
Imagine having to save each private key separately? I have dozens of addresses, I would go crazy It is even bad for security and privacy, as we would have an incentive to reuse addresses to avoid saving more private keys.
There can be more upgrades if network will be more friendly to updates
If you need to make sure that Bitcoin will be as secure and as bug-free as possible, we need to be extra extra strict with update proposals. If you want upgrades that are "more friendly", or those upgrades that are mainly just decided and automatically pushed by just a few people, go with centralized altcoins.Some level of centralization definitely has its advantages over pure decentralization. Besides, there are plenty of entities and people within Bitcoin that exert a considerable amount of soft influence over the entire ecosystem. It is done more in narrative formation than anything but that is still real power if people fall for it hook, line, and sinker.
Actually holding bitcoin will for surely help the ecosystem of it. The price of it is probably gonna rise up since it will lessen the supply in the market. The lower the supply, the higher chance that the price will rise up also. As long as the demand is higher than the supply, the price of it will become higher and higher every single day.
But that doesn't inherently mean anything positive other than superficial wealth increases that can also be lost just as fast as it is gained. I would much rather work towards having a functional currency even if it means replacing the block reward algo and total supply cap than to have "digital gold". Fiat is not going to last forever and Bitcoin is hardly a reasonable alternative in the event of a collapse.