Do you have a minimum amount of letters/words of a review?
I think that some users can write reviews of a few words for getting reward. Such reviews will be useless for other participants.

The idea of the project is interesting and promising.
I like MVP though it's only on the site (no demo download link available). It looks convenient.
But I see that you are falling behind your schedule (roadmap). So is the project still alive?

Why do you think so? It depends on what you consider to be a mainstream. The quantity of ICOs is growing every year. So I think that crypto can highly possible be mainstream.
But this will not be as great mainstream as some off-line ones are. Because there are still many countries where even other digital money are not used. So crypto will be too difficult for them to understand and accept.
And I see a great disadvantage of crypto mainstreaming. That's where quantity doesn't result in quality There are still not so many teams/managers who can lead an ICO to a desired result. Many ICOs still fail nowadays.

You project is very interesting and promising.
Will you have a phone app or only web?
It'll be complicated to find out who of your friends uses Adamant if there is no access to an address book. It's just my opinion. Maybe someone can find it to be convenient. 

Bernadin91, Do you have your own mind (brains)?
Why do you copy-paste other users post?

Devs, how many countries do you plan to work with?
Do you already have partners in this sphere?

Ut's more likely that they don't devide tokens but simply create separate tokens with the names of platform token + startup name.
e.g. HAC_HE (for Hand Energy). It's just en example. I don't like such old kickstarter's scheme. May be acceptable only after product's release.

The project looks interesting but I've got too many questions.
I think I'll better wait for a whitepaper.
When will your whitepaper be released? How can a project be started without wp?

The page is much better than previous version.
There is useful info and charts on it.
I'll be able say more after creating my account.

At last you started!
I'll join you soon too.
Good luck!

I think that could be a good idea for:

• Very big Cap projects (realty, etc.).
• A product with super high demand.
• A separate hackspace/s (e.g. in one country or part of world, mainland).

But creating and selling separate coins would take a very long time.

I agree with some of posts above.
1. There is no real demand for such pairing.
2. There are more disadvantages in it than benefits.

Yes, long-term investments are usually profitable.
But if the price isn't moving during some years isn't it better to admit your mistake in coins' choice, to sell those coins and try others?

That's up to a person whether to use it or not. It's on his own risk.

You may be right. This is long-term project and such projects always take much time and efforts from devs.

Youtube is used mostly for entertaining people. Crypto is too serious for it.
Try to create forum threads for your crypto. Referral program (bounty) can also give you clients if you set right conditions for webmasters/referees.

Only if I'm sure of the project.
e.g. If ICO or bounty program is running and tokens are already on exchange then I will fill out KYC. It shows some reliability for me.
But if the proj has just started and they require KYC I will think it over very precautiously. Because the tokens may never even come to exchange and I'll lose my personal data.

That's a pity. But hard-wallets have also many advantages. They are safer and more convenient.
You could have only part of money there if you are afraid of losing it.

I understand you point of view.
I think you are right. It must be my previous trader's experience interfering

I also found HAC there
Why do you think that it's better to begin sales on the rise?
It seems somehow illogical for me.

As I understand it's done for more people to take part in ICO.
I've already registered. Shall I have to register again?