Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 109 results by hokus_pokus
Vcash is the fastest, most secure, lightweight crypto in existence. And now with the ZeroLedger release it will dominate the smartphone and integrated device markets.
https://v.cash/forum/threads/version-0-5-0-zeroledger-alpha-2-release.678/#post-7970
https://v.cash/
https://v.cash/forum/threads/version-0-5-0-zeroledger-alpha-2-release.678/#post-7970
https://v.cash/
Re: GOLDBLOCKS x11 [pow/pos] ►► Real GOLD backup crypto ◄◄ 1gr & 2.5gr bars
At current pace GB will be 24hr top volume currency on BleuTrade.
What are your predictions for a Top today? I say 1750IDK for today, but as current minig price is ~900-950 sat this what looks like pump is actually finding flor level.
In ~7 days mining rewards will drop 2x but as it seems that GB attracting attention and getting momentum IMHO mining cost and corelating exchange price wont stay long at current levels.
Than next 2.5x mining reward drop which will folow in ~13 days after this first one IMO will only keep price high and market which is announced by DEV should/will only push price up.
Re: GOLDBLOCKS x11 [pow/pos] ►► Real GOLD backup crypto ◄◄ 1gr & 2.5gr bars
At current pace GB will be 24hr top volume currency on BleuTrade.
What are your predictions for a Top today? I say 1750Re: [UNOFFICIAL] [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.4.0 RC3 | Instant ▱ Incentivized ▱ Innovative
Yeah I could see how that could be confusing to the the guy who originally wrote the article. It does look like the VNL logo but regardless. A question was asked and I think we should all reply. https://twitter.com/ziggamon/status/671031199079485444
@ChrisPacia @JustusRanvier Do you have one example of working zeroconf impl without quasi-centralized, third-party solutions?
@ChrisPacia @JustusRanvier Do you have one example of working zeroconf impl without quasi-centralized, third-party solutions?
Re: [UNOFFICIAL] [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.4.0 RC3 | Instant ▱ Incentivized ▱ Innovative
Wow, this is verrry interesting. Here is a link to the other article linked from the other
http://coincidental.eu/2015/12/02/vanillacoin-vnl-is-the-elephant-in-the-room/
http://coincidental.eu/2015/12/02/vanillacoin-vnl-is-the-elephant-in-the-room/
Re: [UNOFFICIAL] [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.4.0 RC1 | Instant ▱ Incentivized ▱ Innovative
Re: [UNOFFICIAL] VNL | Vanillacoin 0.3.1 | DarkPP/MinerPP/CoinPP | ZeroTime TestNet
Re: [UNOFFICIAL] VNL | Vanillacoin 0.3.1 | DarkPP/MinerPP/CoinPP | ZeroTime TestNet
Nice try, but your DISINFO is not going to work here.
P.S.
You skipped numbers - 1, 2, 5, and 9 - "Presumably" on purpose
P.S.
You skipped numbers - 1, 2, 5, and 9 - "Presumably" on purpose
Not really sure what DISINFO you mean; can you elaborate please?
"1. Early on you mentioned getting your friend to do a code review on Vanilla...(This was pre ZeroTime back then)"
It's not my friend; I don't really know about this.
"2. You mentioned that your friend looked over the code and could see NO reason why it wasn't original with all the detailed code"
I don't know about this as it wasn't my friend or me who were involved.
"5. Did your friend then look over neutered code on git without even talking to IRC crowd and John...lets just go blind on this...lol"
I don't know about this, but it doesn't really seem like IRC is the place for sensible discussion. I've seen logs and it's just like this thread -- Hypers or zombies caught in a cult of personality rabidly attacking anyone with questions or criticism, shouting "FUD FUD FUD!" with no clue of what they're talking about. And dev isn't much better in that regard.
"9. I will continue to laugh at people like you who want to be crypto famous on twitter and facebook(barf) while standing on the skulls of others"
Doesn't sound like you're very grateful to him for attempting to get a code review organised. Are code reviews of VNL code unwelcome?
Seems like you are just trying to spread DISINFO which means Disinformation (look it up ) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disinformation
Re: [UNOFFICIAL] VNL | Vanillacoin 0.3.1 | DarkPP/MinerPP/CoinPP | ZeroTime TestNet
This does not make any sense. After talking to John "Who says I am anonymous" Conner, I have sold. I went to trouble to get someone to code review, and there is fake code? It was embarrassing, and I don't even grasp why anyone would do that. This might be the most amazing coin ever, but with him being anon and not wanting anyone else on the team, and being manic depressive, or autistic, or something, it will make things very difficult. Maybe he is a true genius, but these are very bad decisions and they cast too much reasonable doubt about the project. Why would he get more attention after he wasted people's time? That isn't how the world works.
1. Early on you mentioned getting your friend to do a code review on Vanilla...(This was pre ZeroTime back then)
2. You mentioned that your friend looked over the code and could see NO reason why it wasn't original with all the detailed code
3. There was never an official report released by "your friend"
4. Where is there fake code? The ZeroTime branch on git is from like a month ago. We all knew that John was still working on it and uploading content.
5. Did your friend then look over neutered code on git without even talking to IRC crowd and John...lets just go blind on this...lol
6. The ZeroTime code is on testnet right now...and there is a bounty to prove a double-spend attack
7. John has 50,000 lines of ZeroTime code to upload and is currently doing so on git
8. Don't character attack people that you don't know...it's rude
9. I will continue to laugh at people like you who want to be crypto famous on twitter and facebook(barf) while standing on the skulls of others
I'm not CryptoClub, but:
3. There was never an official report released by "your friend"
Presumably his friend did not bother finishing a report, if he was writing one, as the code was revealed to be 'fake'.
4. Where is there fake code? The ZeroTime branch on git is from like a month ago. We all knew that John was still working on it and uploading content.
The fake code was on github: https://twitter.com/john_a_connor/status/629905689075253248
Quote
I've never seen so many #shitcoin #liars ever. I post fake ZT code to call them out and it worked. Show me this non-exploit LOLZ.
6. The ZeroTime code is on testnet right now...and there is a bounty to prove a double-spend attack
The 'code' is not now on testnet per se, but the binaries. The code is not available.
7. John has 50,000 lines of ZeroTime code to upload and is currently doing so on git
50,000 lines sounds like a lot, but it should take less than 10 minutes to upload.
8. Don't character attack people that you don't know...it's rude
Looks to me like John A. Connor's being the rude one. Look at his tweets.
P.S.
You skipped numbers - 1, 2, 5, and 9 - "Presumably" on purpose
Re: [UNOFFICIAL] VNL | Vanillacoin 0.3.1 | DarkPP/MinerPP/CoinPP | ZeroTime TestNet
Quote
There are also some false claims such as their staking being more energy efficient, when it is an exact line for line clone of Peercoin, just rewritten in C++ 11.
Videlicet was referring at that time to the code that John Connor had uploaded to github. John later revealed that it was 'fake' code designed to throw off haters or whatever.
So, videlicet was correct about the code that he saw. But it turned out that it wasn't the actual code of the coin. Just a trick to throw off haters/catch people out/waste the time of code reviewers.
No, john was referring to the zerotime test code and fake whitepaper for zerotime, not the committed code that has been open sourced and able to be compiled for some time.
why would a dev post a fake whitepaper / code? fudding his own project? its been bothering me since i read that.
If he's just one person, with the speed he pumps out lines of code, he's truly a genius in my opinion; but sometimes he does things I don't understand, like that.
I believe his reasoning was that he would get a lot of devs to attack him because of obvious flaws and then when the real paper and code were released, they'd have to really look into it.
hmmmm. well its his call, he is the dev, but seems foolish to post fake code, because then you have a 100% chance of bringing FUD to your doorstep.
This does not make any sense. After talking to John "Who says I am anonymous" Conner, I have sold. I went to trouble to get someone to code review, and there is fake code? It was embarrassing, and I don't even grasp why anyone would do that. This might be the most amazing coin ever, but with him being anon and not wanting anyone else on the team, and being manic depressive, or autistic, or something, it will make things very difficult. Maybe he is a true genius, but these are very bad decisions and they cast too much reasonable doubt about the project. Why would he get more attention after he wasted people's time? That isn't how the world works.
1. Early on you mentioned getting your friend to do a code review on Vanilla...(This was pre ZeroTime back then)
2. You mentioned that your friend looked over the code and could see NO reason why it wasn't original with all the detailed code
3. There was never an official report released by "your friend"
4. Where is there fake code? The ZeroTime branch on git is from like a month ago. We all knew that John was still working on it and uploading content.
5. Did your friend then look over neutered code on git without even talking to IRC crowd and John...lets just go blind on this...lol
6. The ZeroTime code is on testnet right now...and there is a bounty to prove a double-spend attack
7. John has 50,000 lines of ZeroTime code to upload and is currently doing so on git
8. Don't character attack people that you don't know...it's rude
9. I will continue to laugh at people like you who want to be crypto famous on twitter and facebook(barf) while standing on the skulls of others
~poke
Re: [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.3.1 | Hybrid TCP/UDP | ECDHE | O(1) | DarkPP/MinerPP/CoinPP
How much VNL would one need to stake 1 365 VNL/yr or basically 1 VNL a day at current PoS rate?
50,015 VNL @ .7% compounded interestRe: [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.3.1 | Hybrid TCP/UDP | ECDHE | O(1) | DarkPP/MinerPP/CoinPP
Wow there seems to be a lot of excitement in the VNL world. That is awesome. Thanks to John and team for dev'ing the hell out of this project
1k here we come....lol
On a side note: As I was typing this I noticed that we are at 2 TH/s mining with a Diff of over 77K
1k here we come....lol
On a side note: As I was typing this I noticed that we are at 2 TH/s mining with a Diff of over 77K
Re: [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.2.8 | WPX | ECC | O(1) routing | Miner/CoinPP | Fast TXs
ill just leave this here 
"if you follow the design i have put in front you'll see i created an encrypted dark net"
"vanilla with UDP will be 100% a dark network"
Wow...I knew about this from the beginning but with UDP implementation that takes this to another level. Darker than dark baby! And phone application lite...excellent work "if you follow the design i have put in front you'll see i created an encrypted dark net"
"vanilla with UDP will be 100% a dark network"
Re: [VNL] Vanillacoin | WPX | ECC | O(1) routing | Random ports | CoinPP | POW/POS
price ~9k, not bat
very bad , considering what this coin have compared to others.I think we will see a completely different price in a few months
Re: [VNL] Vanillacoin | WPX | ECC | O(1) routing | Random ports | CoinPP | POW/POS
this is a great "white paper" "Vanillacoin: An efficient decentralized currency for the internet."
http://vanillacoin.net/papers/vanillacoin.pdf
eyeing exchange prices. you saw what happened with paypal Today ? blockchain tech is now reviewed by SEC (Security and Exchange commission)
has to do with the technology and sophisticated people are taking deep look of what it can do for the entire financial landscape
keep above in mind when quarreling about minor details
ref. SEC paper for reference if you are interested, this is a great news for the entire landscape and technology in general which is vanillacoin behind the scenes
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1633917/000119312515124337/d877527dex991.htm
Thanks for the updatehttp://vanillacoin.net/papers/vanillacoin.pdf
eyeing exchange prices. you saw what happened with paypal Today ? blockchain tech is now reviewed by SEC (Security and Exchange commission)
has to do with the technology and sophisticated people are taking deep look of what it can do for the entire financial landscape
keep above in mind when quarreling about minor details
ref. SEC paper for reference if you are interested, this is a great news for the entire landscape and technology in general which is vanillacoin behind the scenes
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1633917/000119312515124337/d877527dex991.htm
Re: [VNL] Vanillacoin | WPX | ECC | O(1) routing | Random ports | POW/POS | 0.2.6
hardcore diff... but why ? 
It's block to block...look at it now. It's working perfectlyNetwork: 399.80 GH/s | PoW: 19454.90 | PoS: 0.20 | Blocks: 88622