Search content
Sort by
Showing 18 of 18 results by hoosierdoc
ceo & founder @sas is badass or waf lool scrolled in the chat and shes banning ppl posting warnings because ppl are voicing their opinion or maybe its a good thing you wanna hide smth
https://imgur.com/a/JyjFv
https://imgur.com/a/JyjFv
Warning people to stop spreading false information is banning them?
The difference between an opinion and a false fact is rather clear. Who has been banned troll?
In pretty sure its been listed on a number of pools since the mining began in early Feb.
Yep.
I am trying to figure out the rules here. If you hype something without a project that is a scam. If you have a project but do not hype it, that is also scam? Invest in what you want to invest in. Because of the projects that want you to purchase coin without showing you development.
CMM developers are listed on the website, they are present on media platforms, and have asked for nothing from me. I see nothing here that suggests a scam. The only odd thing about it is people claiming something is weird because no post has been made on this forum.
How exactly do you expect someone to prove they are not a fake project? I would think posting a major announcement and asking people to spend money on a coin without platform development sounds a lot more like a fake project than we have here. There are hundreds of examples of people doing that. This project is working to create something real before the hype. I think that would be embraced.
You could have simply started a thread and general discussion, but you decided to make an announcement of something you admit you know nothing about. What exactly is your motive here? It does not seem to simply inform others, it seems to be something else entirely.
Bitcointalk is by no means compulsory and i agree, it doesn't make it a legitimate coin simply by posting an ANN, however, having a website, discord and slack (which i can have ready in literally 10 min) doesn't make it a legit coin either...
My point is that posting here makes it fair and square for the mining community. its simple, posting here is a courtesy to include all miners to have an equal shot.
public knowledge - knowledge that is available to anyone, something that people know because it has been reported in the news/i]
CMM was NOT public knowledge.
You could have simply started a thread and general discussion, but you decided to make an announcement of something you admit you know nothing about. What exactly is your motive here? It does not seem to simply inform others, it seems to be something else entirely.
Quote
It has a website. It has discord and slack. Its public knowledge. Bitcointalk is not a required first step in a platform development. The plans are to make an announcement at the proper time, which is not now according to public discussions on other platforms.
If you look at the coins making huge announcements and blowing up the media scene at block one, how have their values held? In the toilet? Yep. So perhaps your method is not the best? Huh
If you look at the coins making huge announcements and blowing up the media scene at block one, how have their values held? In the toilet? Yep. So perhaps your method is not the best? Huh
Bitcointalk is by no means compulsory and i agree, it doesn't make it a legitimate coin simply by posting an ANN, however, having a website, discord and slack (which i can have ready in literally 10 min) doesn't make it a legit coin either...
My point is that posting here makes it fair and square for the mining community. its simple, posting here is a courtesy to include all miners to have an equal shot.
public knowledge - knowledge that is available to anyone, something that people know because it has been reported in the news/i]
CMM was NOT public knowledge.
i dont get it, why wasnt there an official ANN in the first place? do they give preference to certain miners over others that had no clue mining was happening?
It has a website. It has discord and slack. Its public knowledge. Bitcointalk is not a required first step in a platform development. The plans are to make an announcement at the proper time, which is not now according to public discussions on other platforms.
If you look at the coins making huge announcements and blowing up the media scene at block one, how have their values held? In the toilet? Yep. So perhaps your method is not the best?
https://discord.gg/NEuH2aU
There is a very active community on discord. Why did you feel the need to make an announcement? You could have just started a thread.
Devs are aware of this forum and will announce their project when they want. This is ridiculous.
There is a very active community on discord. Why did you feel the need to make an announcement? You could have just started a thread.
Devs are aware of this forum and will announce their project when they want. This is ridiculous.
I thought it was nonsense that the exchange was taking coins and making a master-node. Then it happened to me. My CBS has not shown up for 14 hours now yet they have transferred it 3 times and now it's sitting in a MN with IP Address 80.64.131.241.
Their wallet address is: Cfes7ac1XqM24JriTLxsfyVu66HtMEGZrE
Here's a list of wallets they stole from to make that node:
http://exp.cerberuscoin.com/tx/84adec4fbd930b43a107f9725a8e849666727bd42500d1ad51cfe276fc761039
Their wallet address is: Cfes7ac1XqM24JriTLxsfyVu66HtMEGZrE
Here's a list of wallets they stole from to make that node:
http://exp.cerberuscoin.com/tx/84adec4fbd930b43a107f9725a8e849666727bd42500d1ad51cfe276fc761039
Re: [ANN][ZEL] Zelcash : INNOVATIVE-INTELLIGENT-INSPIRING Cryptocurrency - zkSNARKs
Anonymous devs with no surnames and no phtoos. Nothing different to ZenCash. Very poor English all over the website. I will avoid this coin at all costs.
The privacy concern was addressed in the conference call on youtube. Did you watch?
Re: [ANN] Onex Cash / Masternodes 5000 (50% Reward) / ASIC Resistance / [NEOSCRYPT]
Please switch over to this thread. New development team.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2813621.0;all
onex.network is their website now
onex.cash is the old team
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2813621.0;all
onex.network is their website now
onex.cash is the old team
Re: [ANN] Onex Revival !!! / Masternodes 5000 (50% Reward) / NEOSCRYPT
I got my node up and running. Pretty simple. It will take about 1.3G of file space. Keep that in mind if it's an additional node for you, or you might run out of room during install like I did 
Re: [ANN][GOA] GoaCoin - PoW, Masternodes, ASIC Resistance, NeoScrypt
Here is my error:
and the issue of no target for "make", the next command. Is that because I'm erroring out at the berkeley DB stage? Is there something I need to download?
EDIT: Google took care of the problem. Here are a few more things to install
https://cryptoandcoffee.com/mining-gems/install-berkeley-4-8-db-libs-on-ubuntu-16-04/
Next error... after the "make" command runs I do not have .goacoincore/
any thoughts? I had no errors I saw during the make command that took 10-15 mins to run
Quote
checking for Berkeley DB C++ headers... default
configure: error: Found Berkeley DB other than 4.8, required for portable wallets (--with-incompatible-bdb to ignore or --disable-wallet to disable wallet functionality)
configure: error: Found Berkeley DB other than 4.8, required for portable wallets (--with-incompatible-bdb to ignore or --disable-wallet to disable wallet functionality)
and the issue of no target for "make", the next command. Is that because I'm erroring out at the berkeley DB stage? Is there something I need to download?
EDIT: Google took care of the problem. Here are a few more things to install
https://cryptoandcoffee.com/mining-gems/install-berkeley-4-8-db-libs-on-ubuntu-16-04/
Quote
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:bitcoin/bitcoin
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install libdb4.8-dev libdb4.8++-dev
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install libdb4.8-dev libdb4.8++-dev
Next error... after the "make" command runs I do not have .goacoincore/
any thoughts? I had no errors I saw during the make command that took 10-15 mins to run
guys, I'm trying to mine GUN but cannot seem to get a neoscrypt miner working. I Tried SG miner with these settings:
sgminer.exe -k neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://stratum.gun.theblocksfactory.com:3330 -D -u docsaidic.miner5 -p
can someone give me some advice to get up and running?
I tried hrsm miner or whatever it's called and got a LOT of memory errors on my 1080Ti rigs but the 1070 rig worked fine
sgminer.exe -k neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://stratum.gun.theblocksfactory.com:3330 -D -u docsaidic.miner5 -p
can someone give me some advice to get up and running?
I tried hrsm miner or whatever it's called and got a LOT of memory errors on my 1080Ti rigs but the 1070 rig worked fine
Re: █▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][FlexFee™][SegWit] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█
trying to start mining Gobyte but failing to get data. Here's my command
ccminer-x64 -o stratum+tcp://neoscrypt.mine.zpool.ca:4233 -u GLiuKcnctDCEeYxLvnnzMKmLVqz1GWGhsk.miner1 -p c=GBX -D
here's the result. Any ideas???
ccminer-x64 -o stratum+tcp://neoscrypt.mine.zpool.ca:4233 -u GLiuKcnctDCEeYxLvnnzMKmLVqz1GWGhsk.miner1 -p c=GBX -D
here's the result. Any ideas???
Quote
C:\mine\ccminer>ccminer-x64 -o stratum+tcp://neoscrypt.mine.zpool.ca:4233 -u GLiuKcnctDCEeYxLvnnzMKmLVqz1GWGhsk.miner1 -p c=GBX -D
*** ccminer 2.2.4 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 9.0 64-bits
Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
Include some kernels from alexis78, djm34, djEzo, tsiv and krnlx.
BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] POOL 0: neoscrypt.mine.zpool.ca:4233 USER GLiuKcnctDCEeYxLvnnzMKmLVqz1GWGhsk.miner1 -s 10
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] Starting on stratum+tcp://neoscrypt.mine.zpool.ca:4233
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] restart_threads
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] CUDA GPU 0 matches NVML GPU 0 by busId 1
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] CUDA GPU 1 matches NVML GPU 1 by busId 4
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] CUDA GPU 0 matches NVAPI GPU 0 by busId 1
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] CUDA GPU 1 matches NVAPI GPU 1 by busId 4
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] 2 miner threads started, using 'auto' algorithm.
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 (mask 1)
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 (mask 2)
[2018-01-13 02:02:34] sleeptime: 500 ms
[2018-01-13 02:02:34] sleeptime: 500 ms
[2018-01-13 02:02:35] GPU #0: no data
[2018-01-13 02:02:35] GPU #1: no data
*** ccminer 2.2.4 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 9.0 64-bits
Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
Include some kernels from alexis78, djm34, djEzo, tsiv and krnlx.
BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] POOL 0: neoscrypt.mine.zpool.ca:4233 USER GLiuKcnctDCEeYxLvnnzMKmLVqz1GWGhsk.miner1 -s 10
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] Starting on stratum+tcp://neoscrypt.mine.zpool.ca:4233
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] restart_threads
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] CUDA GPU 0 matches NVML GPU 0 by busId 1
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] CUDA GPU 1 matches NVML GPU 1 by busId 4
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] CUDA GPU 0 matches NVAPI GPU 0 by busId 1
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] CUDA GPU 1 matches NVAPI GPU 1 by busId 4
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] 2 miner threads started, using 'auto' algorithm.
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 (mask 1)
[2018-01-13 02:02:33] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 (mask 2)
[2018-01-13 02:02:34] sleeptime: 500 ms
[2018-01-13 02:02:34] sleeptime: 500 ms
[2018-01-13 02:02:35] GPU #0: no data
[2018-01-13 02:02:35] GPU #1: no data
Anyone having trouble with the windows wallet? I keep getting "Access denied" when I try to run it
edit: I added the .conf file and rebooted, seems to be working now if I just click the GUI executable. BUT... how long does it take to sync up and generate a wallet address?
another edit... working now. had to restart again. I had to tell avast to stop blocking the files
edit: I added the .conf file and rebooted, seems to be working now if I just click the GUI executable. BUT... how long does it take to sync up and generate a wallet address?
another edit... working now. had to restart again. I had to tell avast to stop blocking the files