Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 427 results by hroub
Hello Everyone,
Bank Society Coin is here for good!!
We are currently swapping the following coins and would also invite others to talk with us about
rescues:
GPTC [COMPLETED]
Skullnodes [IN PROGRESS]
GoatChees [IN PROGRESS]
xGox [SWAP RATIO DISCUSSION]
We are producing a new white paper to decide on Masternode Technologies, Dynamic Rewards looks
obvious for the future.
New products are coming...
Our Community is growing.
Be part of Bank Society Coin
Jimmy
Bank Society Coin is here for good!!
We are currently swapping the following coins and would also invite others to talk with us about
rescues:
GPTC [COMPLETED]
Skullnodes [IN PROGRESS]
GoatChees [IN PROGRESS]
xGox [SWAP RATIO DISCUSSION]
We are producing a new white paper to decide on Masternode Technologies, Dynamic Rewards looks
obvious for the future.
New products are coming...
Our Community is growing.
Be part of Bank Society Coin
Jimmy
Any updates about the XGOX swap for SOCI? I saw the SWAP announcement in the XGOX thread but no instructions:
Since xgoxdev left us, Bank Society Coin founder/developer would like to offer us a coin swap from XGOX to SOCI coin, if you don't know about SOCI, here's the links of the coin and make sure to check it all:
Official Site: http://www.banksociety.co/
Roadmap: http://www.banksociety.co/page3.html
Whitepaper: https://github.com/RGPickles/BankSocietyCoin/blob/master/Bank%20Society%20Coin.pdf
Bitcointalk: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5111513.0
Github: https://github.com/RGPickles/BankSocietyCoin
Coin Specs
Coin Info:
Algorithm: Scrypt
Max Supply: 75,000,000 SOCI
Premine: 20,000,000 SOCI ( Premine 20M -> Banknotes swap 5M, Airdrop 1M, marketing/exchange use 4M+ )
(Bank Society workers, as required translaters, help support, marketing. 2M+ )
ICO: No
Air Drop: 1M max
Block Spacing: 60 Seconds (1 minute)
Staking Minimum Amount: 1000 SOCI
Master-node Collateral: 20,000 SOCI
Reward Distribution: 80% to Master-nodes while 20% to Staking wallets.
Coin Phases:
Premine Phase Block 1 to 100 [Completed]
PoW Phase Start Block 101 to 50000 Reward = 5 [Completed]
PoW Phase Block 50001 to 250000 Reward = 25
PoW Phase Block 250001 to 500000 Reward = 35
PoW ends 750001
PoS Phase Start Block 101 to 50000 Reward 50% [Completed]
PoS Phase Block 50001 to 250000 Reward 250%
PoS Phase Block 250001 to 500000 Reward 360%
PoS Phase Block 500000 Reward 500%
Take note: This offer is only voluntary, it's your choice if you want to stick with XGOX or swap with SOCI, all are welcome to their decisions.
Official Site: http://www.banksociety.co/
Roadmap: http://www.banksociety.co/page3.html
Whitepaper: https://github.com/RGPickles/BankSocietyCoin/blob/master/Bank%20Society%20Coin.pdf
Bitcointalk: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5111513.0
Github: https://github.com/RGPickles/BankSocietyCoin
Coin Specs
Coin Info:
Algorithm: Scrypt
Max Supply: 75,000,000 SOCI
Premine: 20,000,000 SOCI ( Premine 20M -> Banknotes swap 5M, Airdrop 1M, marketing/exchange use 4M+ )
(Bank Society workers, as required translaters, help support, marketing. 2M+ )
ICO: No
Air Drop: 1M max
Block Spacing: 60 Seconds (1 minute)
Staking Minimum Amount: 1000 SOCI
Master-node Collateral: 20,000 SOCI
Reward Distribution: 80% to Master-nodes while 20% to Staking wallets.
Coin Phases:
Premine Phase Block 1 to 100 [Completed]
PoW Phase Start Block 101 to 50000 Reward = 5 [Completed]
PoW Phase Block 50001 to 250000 Reward = 25
PoW Phase Block 250001 to 500000 Reward = 35
PoW ends 750001
PoS Phase Start Block 101 to 50000 Reward 50% [Completed]
PoS Phase Block 50001 to 250000 Reward 250%
PoS Phase Block 250001 to 500000 Reward 360%
PoS Phase Block 500000 Reward 500%
Take note: This offer is only voluntary, it's your choice if you want to stick with XGOX or swap with SOCI, all are welcome to their decisions.
Re: [ANN]XGOX (XGOX) ANN Updated (New exchange market) [6/17/18]
Since xgoxdev left us, Bank Society Coin founder/developer would like to offer us a coin swap from XGOX to SOCI coin, if you don't know about SOCI, here's the links of the coin and make sure to check it all:
Official Site: http://www.banksociety.co/
Roadmap: http://www.banksociety.co/page3.html
Whitepaper: https://github.com/RGPickles/BankSocietyCoin/blob/master/Bank%20Society%20Coin.pdf
Bitcointalk: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5111513.0
Github: https://github.com/RGPickles/BankSocietyCoin
Coin Specs
Coin Info:
Algorithm: Scrypt
Max Supply: 75,000,000 SOCI
Premine: 20,000,000 SOCI ( Premine 20M -> Banknotes swap 5M, Airdrop 1M, marketing/exchange use 4M+ )
(Bank Society workers, as required translaters, help support, marketing. 2M+ )
ICO: No
Air Drop: 1M max
Block Spacing: 60 Seconds (1 minute)
Staking Minimum Amount: 1000 SOCI
Master-node Collateral: 20,000 SOCI
Reward Distribution: 80% to Master-nodes while 20% to Staking wallets.
Coin Phases:
Premine Phase Block 1 to 100 [Completed]
PoW Phase Start Block 101 to 50000 Reward = 5 [Completed]
PoW Phase Block 50001 to 250000 Reward = 25
PoW Phase Block 250001 to 500000 Reward = 35
PoW ends 750001
PoS Phase Start Block 101 to 50000 Reward 50% [Completed]
PoS Phase Block 50001 to 250000 Reward 250%
PoS Phase Block 250001 to 500000 Reward 360%
PoS Phase Block 500000 Reward 500%
Take note: This offer is only voluntary, it's your choice if you want to stick with XGOX or swap with SOCI, all are welcome to their decisions.
Official Site: http://www.banksociety.co/
Roadmap: http://www.banksociety.co/page3.html
Whitepaper: https://github.com/RGPickles/BankSocietyCoin/blob/master/Bank%20Society%20Coin.pdf
Bitcointalk: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5111513.0
Github: https://github.com/RGPickles/BankSocietyCoin
Coin Specs
Coin Info:
Algorithm: Scrypt
Max Supply: 75,000,000 SOCI
Premine: 20,000,000 SOCI ( Premine 20M -> Banknotes swap 5M, Airdrop 1M, marketing/exchange use 4M+ )
(Bank Society workers, as required translaters, help support, marketing. 2M+ )
ICO: No
Air Drop: 1M max
Block Spacing: 60 Seconds (1 minute)
Staking Minimum Amount: 1000 SOCI
Master-node Collateral: 20,000 SOCI
Reward Distribution: 80% to Master-nodes while 20% to Staking wallets.
Coin Phases:
Premine Phase Block 1 to 100 [Completed]
PoW Phase Start Block 101 to 50000 Reward = 5 [Completed]
PoW Phase Block 50001 to 250000 Reward = 25
PoW Phase Block 250001 to 500000 Reward = 35
PoW ends 750001
PoS Phase Start Block 101 to 50000 Reward 50% [Completed]
PoS Phase Block 50001 to 250000 Reward 250%
PoS Phase Block 250001 to 500000 Reward 360%
PoS Phase Block 500000 Reward 500%
Take note: This offer is only voluntary, it's your choice if you want to stick with XGOX or swap with SOCI, all are welcome to their decisions.
Has anyone figured out how/where to swap our XGOX for SOCI ?
Re: [ANN]HashCard: Revolutionising HOW You Use Credit & Debit Cards
Most of all I like that there will be an opportunity of exchange of different currencies for exact interbank rates
a good potential to exchange their currency, and HashCard makes it easy to Transact anywhere, may be successfulLol. What are u idiots babling about. This was a scam and has been shut down already!
Better an better! 
Cloud mining maintenance fees were recently reduced from $0.27 to $0.25 per day.
Owners of hashpower received bonuses according to their mining power because there was some extra coins accumulated by the cloud mining reserve.
Mining hash prices were reduced because BTC and BCH prices dropped as well as the market hash prices.
The other day there was a Russian hacker that managed to empty the hot wallet, which was quickly re-filled and a lot of users might not even know this because it didn't affect them in any way (Pop took full responsibility and covered the losses)
There are less scammers on Pop due to security measures and community hates them and calls them out... You should check it out!
Still no minimum BTC needed to sign up, look around, or chat
EDIT: $0.27 to $0.25 per day per TH/s. Now that sha256 hashes are sold in GH/s instead of TH/s, the fee is $0.00025 per GH/s per day
Cloud mining maintenance fees were recently reduced from $0.27 to $0.25 per day.
Owners of hashpower received bonuses according to their mining power because there was some extra coins accumulated by the cloud mining reserve.
Mining hash prices were reduced because BTC and BCH prices dropped as well as the market hash prices.
The other day there was a Russian hacker that managed to empty the hot wallet, which was quickly re-filled and a lot of users might not even know this because it didn't affect them in any way (Pop took full responsibility and covered the losses)
There are less scammers on Pop due to security measures and community hates them and calls them out... You should check it out!
Still no minimum BTC needed to sign up, look around, or chat
EDIT: $0.27 to $0.25 per day per TH/s. Now that sha256 hashes are sold in GH/s instead of TH/s, the fee is $0.00025 per GH/s per day
Re: [ANN]HashCard: Revolutionising HOW You Use Credit & Debit Cards
info ICO is SUSPENDED! Fudsters and trolls made it happen. First, they spammed bancor and cancelled the listing.
visit the most famous bitcointalk thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3336703.0 and say thank you
visit the most famous bitcointalk thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3336703.0 and say thank you
I think you got the wrong link. This is most likely "the most famous bitcointalk thread" that they are referring to: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3365068.0
And here is a screenshot for legal proof purposes:
Also, their Dashboard page no longer works: https://dashboard.hashcard.io
Same with the Sign In page: https://dashboard.hashcard.io/user/login
Very legit bruh!
Re: [ANN]HashCard: Revolutionising HOW You Use Credit & Debit Cards
What other foodsters and trolls??? What does this sad team and project managers say? It's kindergarten! If they can't work and keep their mouths shut while they negotiate and sign a non-disclosure agreement, why open your mouth??? This is normal when investors are looking for confirmation of agreements. It's clear as white day! Everyone is looking to protect their deposits! And if the project team has no education and does not know the basic principles of psychology, they need to work as loaders and unload train cars in warehouses, and not to engage in high technology!!! They are just trying to shift their blame to investors who were looking for confirmation and protected their investments!!! This project is definitely a Scam!!! My team of lawyers will form an application and will decide the issue in court. And at the moment I demand compensation of damage and return of investments to investors urgently!!!
I invested only about $120, because I was too skeptical, but I would be interested to follow any lawsuit against them. Please include me in any legal action updates. Thanks and all the best!
I just got 0.048049 BTC lost/stolen because I entered my private keys online trying to sign transactions to spend 0.1999 BTC I had stuck in a 3-of-3 multi-sig address. I managed to receive only
0.131 and 0.008 from https://blockchain.info/tx/bcbd90c0a4d198206865b8cccb227d6166d9b78b3c45d4ee66f8d83c6b69422f
and then from the 0.06 (that wasn't created by me), I received 0.011951 from https://blockchain.info/tx/fea862bdc6e827a0b25ad2d53a64cc3b5d408e27011a01adfbef165b643e8219
The remaining 0.0480377 BTC was sent to https://blockchain.info/address/1KT7sG84birTF2YvW5yP7G4NPeMs7Fcdbh and is lost/stolen
Also, they stole ALL of my 0.1999 BCH that was in https://blockdozer.com/address/33RZTwkqqixKySFim1oSXVcFFBAPUiBwLG
0.131 and 0.008 from https://blockchain.info/tx/bcbd90c0a4d198206865b8cccb227d6166d9b78b3c45d4ee66f8d83c6b69422f
and then from the 0.06 (that wasn't created by me), I received 0.011951 from https://blockchain.info/tx/fea862bdc6e827a0b25ad2d53a64cc3b5d408e27011a01adfbef165b643e8219
The remaining 0.0480377 BTC was sent to https://blockchain.info/address/1KT7sG84birTF2YvW5yP7G4NPeMs7Fcdbh and is lost/stolen
Also, they stole ALL of my 0.1999 BCH that was in https://blockdozer.com/address/33RZTwkqqixKySFim1oSXVcFFBAPUiBwLG
2 out of 3 outputs are yours: 3Lzs3s6p (0.131 BTC) and 1MoTG1qn (0.008 BTC)
but the 3rd isn't? however you've received 0.011951 BTC back to your address 3Lzs3s6p
so the thief sent you back 0.011951 BTC and only stole 0.0480377 BTC
this just doesn't make sense, and why wouldn't he just steal all of them at the first chance he got?
One reason could be that the perpetrator was coinb.in site itself and did that so it can ask the same question you did as self-defense and keep me occupied (trying to figure out what happened) while they steal all the BCH and other forks.
how exactly you created the multisig address in the first place? in 2015
Using Dark Wallet stealth addresses. The three participants (not stealth) can be seen under RELATIONS tab in https://oxt.me/address/33RZTwkqqixKySFim1oSXVcFFBAPUiBwLGBTW feel free to check out https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/8i1ev8/help_please_i_have_btc_stuck_in_dark_wallet_080/ Your questions are answered here as well as more info.
why 3-of-3 multi-sig? do you hold all the private keys?
I was a newb back then (still not a pro currently) and was experimenting with Dark Wallet and multi-sig. Of course I have the 3 private keys and that's why I was able to sign and broadcast the transaction with all 3 private keys.and how did you compose/sign the transaction before broadcasting it?
1) Samurai Wallet dev gave me a redeem script for my multi-sig wallet.
2) I went to https://coinb.in/#newTransaction
3) Entered the redeem script and clicked on Load
4) I entered my outputs and amounts as seen in this screenshot: (screenshot was taken during the process, as I was preparing a guide to help others trying to do the same as me in the future)
5) I recorded the encoded transaction from above and went to the Sign tab (https://coinb.in/#sign)
6) I signed my transaction with all three private keys, one-by-one
7) then I broadcasted the 3 signed transactions
8 ) 0.06 BTC went to the unauthorized output causing 0.0480377 BTC to go "poof" as well as the full 0.1999 BCH amount
Thank you for your input.
EDIT May 23rd, 2018:
After some further research, I discovered that someone else other than coinb.in may have had access to a private key.
I will update here once I compile some proof and reveal the identity of the scam artist. Sorry if my original post implied that coinb.in was the perp as it doesn't seem very likely anymore.
1) Samurai Wallet dev gave me a redeem script for my multi-sig wallet.
2) I went to https://coinb.in/#newTransaction
3) Entered the redeem script and clicked on Load
4) I entered my outputs and amounts as seen in this screenshot: (screenshot was taken during the process, as I was preparing a guide to help others trying to do the same as me in the future)
5) I recorded the encoded transaction from above and went to the Sign tab (https://coinb.in/#sign)
6) I signed my transaction with all three private keys, one-by-one
7) then I broadcasted the 3 signed transactions
8 ) 0.06 BTC went to the unauthorized output causing 0.0480377 BTC to go "poof" as well as the full 0.1999 BCH amount
edit: just noticed... both BTC and BCH transactions used the same tx fee of 0.0009
As seen in the above screenshot, the tx fee that I assigned was 0.00001 BTC which was supposed to be 4 sats/byte and more than enough at the time. 1 sat/byte would have worked too...Thank you for your input.
EDIT May 23rd, 2018:
After some further research, I discovered that someone else other than coinb.in may have had access to a private key.
I will update here once I compile some proof and reveal the identity of the scam artist. Sorry if my original post implied that coinb.in was the perp as it doesn't seem very likely anymore.
Hi,
After going through all the process I wrote about here: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/8i1ev8/help_please_i_have_btc_stuck_in_dark_wallet_080/
I just got 0.048049 BTC lost/stolen because I entered my private keys online trying to sign transactions to spend 0.1999 BTC I had stuck in a 3-of-3 multi-sig address. I managed to receive only
0.131 and 0.008 from https://blockchain.info/tx/bcbd90c0a4d198206865b8cccb227d6166d9b78b3c45d4ee66f8d83c6b69422f
and then from the 0.06 (that wasn't created by me), I received 0.011951 from https://blockchain.info/tx/fea862bdc6e827a0b25ad2d53a64cc3b5d408e27011a01adfbef165b643e8219
The remaining 0.0480377 BTC was sent to https://blockchain.info/address/1KT7sG84birTF2YvW5yP7G4NPeMs7Fcdbh and is lost/stolen
Also, they stole ALL of my 0.1999 BCH that was in https://blockdozer.com/address/33RZTwkqqixKySFim1oSXVcFFBAPUiBwLG
I am trying to find out how this happened since I never shared my private keys with anyone other than Coinb.in
Could this have been some coding issue and maybe coinb.in can send my coins back to me?
I sent an elaborate email to Support with all the steps I did including my signed transactions and some error message "18: txn-mempool-conflict" that I got while broadcasting the 3 signed transactions.
Hopefully, they can provide a solution, otherwise, I would strongly recommend that everyone stays away from this site or use only a downloaded offline version if they need to sign transactions with their private keys.
I am using a MacBook Pro and have no malware or viruses that I know of.
Now I am trying to figure out if I can save any of the rest forked coins (since November 2015) before the perpetrator does the same with them.
After going through all the process I wrote about here: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/8i1ev8/help_please_i_have_btc_stuck_in_dark_wallet_080/
I just got 0.048049 BTC lost/stolen because I entered my private keys online trying to sign transactions to spend 0.1999 BTC I had stuck in a 3-of-3 multi-sig address. I managed to receive only
0.131 and 0.008 from https://blockchain.info/tx/bcbd90c0a4d198206865b8cccb227d6166d9b78b3c45d4ee66f8d83c6b69422f
and then from the 0.06 (that wasn't created by me), I received 0.011951 from https://blockchain.info/tx/fea862bdc6e827a0b25ad2d53a64cc3b5d408e27011a01adfbef165b643e8219
The remaining 0.0480377 BTC was sent to https://blockchain.info/address/1KT7sG84birTF2YvW5yP7G4NPeMs7Fcdbh and is lost/stolen
Also, they stole ALL of my 0.1999 BCH that was in https://blockdozer.com/address/33RZTwkqqixKySFim1oSXVcFFBAPUiBwLG
I am trying to find out how this happened since I never shared my private keys with anyone other than Coinb.in
Could this have been some coding issue and maybe coinb.in can send my coins back to me?
I sent an elaborate email to Support with all the steps I did including my signed transactions and some error message "18: txn-mempool-conflict" that I got while broadcasting the 3 signed transactions.
Hopefully, they can provide a solution, otherwise, I would strongly recommend that everyone stays away from this site or use only a downloaded offline version if they need to sign transactions with their private keys.
I am using a MacBook Pro and have no malware or viruses that I know of.
Now I am trying to figure out if I can save any of the rest forked coins (since November 2015) before the perpetrator does the same with them.
I just got 0.048049 BTC stolen because I entered my private keys online trying to sign transactions to spend 0.1999 BTC I had stuck in a multi-sig address. I managed to receive only
0.131 and 0.008 from https://blockchain.info/tx/bcbd90c0a4d198206865b8cccb227d6166d9b78b3c45d4ee66f8d83c6b69422f
and then from the 0.06 (that wasn't created by me) I received 0.011951 from https://blockchain.info/tx/fea862bdc6e827a0b25ad2d53a64cc3b5d408e27011a01adfbef165b643e8219
The remaining 0.0480377 BTC was sent to https://blockchain.info/address/1KT7sG84birTF2YvW5yP7G4NPeMs7Fcdbh and is lost/stolen
Also, they stole ALL of my 0.1999 BCH that was in https://blockdozer.com/address/33RZTwkqqixKySFim1oSXVcFFBAPUiBwLG
I am trying to find out how this happened since I never shared my private keys with anyone other than Coinb.in
I should have downloaded the offline version and used it only offline or avoided it all together. I didn't think of going offline because it was recommended by 2 savvy users and one of them was chatting with me online guiding me through the process...
0.131 and 0.008 from https://blockchain.info/tx/bcbd90c0a4d198206865b8cccb227d6166d9b78b3c45d4ee66f8d83c6b69422f
and then from the 0.06 (that wasn't created by me) I received 0.011951 from https://blockchain.info/tx/fea862bdc6e827a0b25ad2d53a64cc3b5d408e27011a01adfbef165b643e8219
The remaining 0.0480377 BTC was sent to https://blockchain.info/address/1KT7sG84birTF2YvW5yP7G4NPeMs7Fcdbh and is lost/stolen
Also, they stole ALL of my 0.1999 BCH that was in https://blockdozer.com/address/33RZTwkqqixKySFim1oSXVcFFBAPUiBwLG
I am trying to find out how this happened since I never shared my private keys with anyone other than Coinb.in
I should have downloaded the offline version and used it only offline or avoided it all together. I didn't think of going offline because it was recommended by 2 savvy users and one of them was chatting with me online guiding me through the process...
As I can see, many people are talking about this service and I get some requests to escrow with
https://coinb.in/#newMultiSig. I would like to know from bitcoin experts that how reliable is https://coinb.in ?
https://coinb.in/#newMultiSig. I would like to know from bitcoin experts that how reliable is https://coinb.in ?
I just got 0.048049 BTC stolen because I entered my private keys online trying to sign transactions to spend 0.1999 BTC I had stuck in a multi-sig address. I managed to receive only
0.131 and 0.008 from https://blockchain.info/tx/bcbd90c0a4d198206865b8cccb227d6166d9b78b3c45d4ee66f8d83c6b69422f
and then from the 0.06 (that wasn't created by me) I received 0.011951 from https://blockchain.info/tx/fea862bdc6e827a0b25ad2d53a64cc3b5d408e27011a01adfbef165b643e8219
The remaining 0.0480377 BTC was sent to https://blockchain.info/address/1KT7sG84birTF2YvW5yP7G4NPeMs7Fcdbh and is lost/stolen
Also, they stole ALL of my 0.1999 BCH that was in https://blockdozer.com/address/33RZTwkqqixKySFim1oSXVcFFBAPUiBwLG
I am trying to find out how this happened since I never shared my private keys with anyone other than Coinb.in
I should have downloaded the offline version and used it only offline or avoided it all together. I didn't think of going offline because it was recommended by 2 savvy users and one of them was chatting with me online guiding me through the process...
Wow! Well done Gleb Gamow and his friend! Is there a lawsuit taking place already? Where can I find more info and participate?
Now that the "cat's out of the bag" and since Pawel Goch hasn't used his Telegram account since May 6th, 2018, I guess now it would be a good time to share this DM conversation that I had with him and has been ignoring since May 8th:
Now that the "cat's out of the bag" and since Pawel Goch hasn't used his Telegram account since May 6th, 2018, I guess now it would be a good time to share this DM conversation that I had with him and has been ignoring since May 8th:
If you still have any doubts, just watch their announcement video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8hE6Rc3L_U
They clearly have no clue what they are talking about, you can see clearly as they read the text. Clueless. Eh, we'll see tomorrow which rout they're taking with this. I have my popcorn ready.
EDIT:
Scratch that, I've found the best proof you possible to debunk their so-called 'live' cards: https://www.imageworksdirect.com/blog/new-mastercard-brand-requirements
Their cards still have the old logo, so either they already made the deal before July 4th last year and already started printing before then, or they just didn't do their research well enough. I think it's the latter
No way in hell Mastercard would have approved this graphic to be printed (which they most certainly need to give permission on before this can go into production), so these cards are just a printed piece of plastic.
They clearly have no clue what they are talking about, you can see clearly as they read the text. Clueless. Eh, we'll see tomorrow which rout they're taking with this. I have my popcorn ready.
EDIT:
Scratch that, I've found the best proof you possible to debunk their so-called 'live' cards: https://www.imageworksdirect.com/blog/new-mastercard-brand-requirements
Quote
All Mastercard and Debit Mastercard cards printed on or after July 4, 2017, must include the new Brand Mark.
Their cards still have the old logo, so either they already made the deal before July 4th last year and already started printing before then, or they just didn't do their research well enough. I think it's the latter
No way in hell Mastercard would have approved this graphic to be printed (which they most certainly need to give permission on before this can go into production), so these cards are just a printed piece of plastic.
Nice find, bud ...
https://www.imageworksdirect.com/blog/new-mastercard-brand-requirements
Quote
What are you doing this Fourth of July? Along with grilling out and watching fireworks, youll also need to make sure your financial marketing and communications materials meet the new Mastercard® Brand Mark Guidelines.
Mastercard has been featuring its new look (see logo above) and name format (Mastercard with a lowercase c) for some time. However, the company is starting to require use of their new brand requirements as of July 4, 2017.
At image.works, we have a team of copywriters, proofers and designers to help your financial institution meet the marketing and communications guidelines on projects we create for you. Please note the following information from Mastercard on the new requirements:
- All new marketing and communications materials published on or after July 4, 2017, must include the new Brand Mark.
- Your financial institution should update marketing and communications materials at the earliest opportunity in the normal course of business.
- Issuers may update their digital card imagery (for use in digital wallets) at any time. However, these images must be updated no later than the update of the companion card plastic.
- All new acceptance decals printed on or after July 4, 2017, must include the new Brand Marks.
- ATM Acquirers should update their Acceptance Marks at the earliest opportunity in the normal course of business.
- All Mastercard and Debit Mastercard card proofs submitted for review on or after July 4, 2017, must include the new Brand Mark.
- All Mastercard and Debit Mastercard cards printed on or after July 4, 2017, must include the new Brand Mark.
- Issuers do not need to reissue cards already issued.
- Card manufacturers may continue using card plastics already in inventory until the stock is depleted.
Note: An updated Card Design Standards Manual is also available on Mastercard Connect > Library > Publications > Card Design.
How should you use the Mastercard name in text?
Below is an excerpt from the Mastercard Brand Mark Guidelines:
Lettercase
When referencing the Mastercard name in text, use an uppercase M and lowercase c with no space between Master and card. The name should not appear with a capital C. The Mastercard name should appear in the same font as its surrounding text.
Registered trademark symbol (®)
In the first or most prominent text use of Mastercard on a page or screen (after use, if any, in a headline), the ® symbol is required. In subsequent use on that page or screen, the ® symbol may be omitted.
Read-through
The Mark may be used as a read-through in a headline, but may not be used as a read-through in the body of a communication. When used in text, it should be set in the same typeface as the surrounding text.
Trademark attribution notice
When the Mastercard name and/or Mark is used, the following trademark attribution notice (in a very small type size) should be included once in the communication: Mastercard is a registered trademark, and the circles design is a trademark of Mastercard International Incorporated.
Note: On digital communications and small-size marketing communications, the above trademark attribution notice is not required.
Mastercard has been featuring its new look (see logo above) and name format (Mastercard with a lowercase c) for some time. However, the company is starting to require use of their new brand requirements as of July 4, 2017.
At image.works, we have a team of copywriters, proofers and designers to help your financial institution meet the marketing and communications guidelines on projects we create for you. Please note the following information from Mastercard on the new requirements:
- All new marketing and communications materials published on or after July 4, 2017, must include the new Brand Mark.
- Your financial institution should update marketing and communications materials at the earliest opportunity in the normal course of business.
- Issuers may update their digital card imagery (for use in digital wallets) at any time. However, these images must be updated no later than the update of the companion card plastic.
- All new acceptance decals printed on or after July 4, 2017, must include the new Brand Marks.
- ATM Acquirers should update their Acceptance Marks at the earliest opportunity in the normal course of business.
- All Mastercard and Debit Mastercard card proofs submitted for review on or after July 4, 2017, must include the new Brand Mark.
- All Mastercard and Debit Mastercard cards printed on or after July 4, 2017, must include the new Brand Mark.
- Issuers do not need to reissue cards already issued.
- Card manufacturers may continue using card plastics already in inventory until the stock is depleted.
Note: An updated Card Design Standards Manual is also available on Mastercard Connect > Library > Publications > Card Design.
How should you use the Mastercard name in text?
Below is an excerpt from the Mastercard Brand Mark Guidelines:
Lettercase
When referencing the Mastercard name in text, use an uppercase M and lowercase c with no space between Master and card. The name should not appear with a capital C. The Mastercard name should appear in the same font as its surrounding text.
Registered trademark symbol (®)
In the first or most prominent text use of Mastercard on a page or screen (after use, if any, in a headline), the ® symbol is required. In subsequent use on that page or screen, the ® symbol may be omitted.
Read-through
The Mark may be used as a read-through in a headline, but may not be used as a read-through in the body of a communication. When used in text, it should be set in the same typeface as the surrounding text.
Trademark attribution notice
When the Mastercard name and/or Mark is used, the following trademark attribution notice (in a very small type size) should be included once in the communication: Mastercard is a registered trademark, and the circles design is a trademark of Mastercard International Incorporated.
Note: On digital communications and small-size marketing communications, the above trademark attribution notice is not required.
https://twitter.com/hashcard/status/992096966459850752
https://medium.com/@sm_46693/hashcard-cfo-pawel-goch-just-as-with-mastercard-issued-plastic-card-fc869d2ca856
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/XEMbEv2VI5mxN6fIEtoJifhJRAFNTqgh5LS_iV7XaMh2ddNSR9uk7lD6HpfWwo-SZg=w720-h310
i wanted to see a. actual card or an example card for us to see the full specification.. but the admin send me this
are they serious? it's a digital art.
and another thing is why do they keep covering the smart chip of that card?
It is normal to cover the card number because its the important part of a card but the smart chip? can someone explain that to me. i read some info about smart chip. "These tiny metal processors make cards more secure than traditional magnetic-stripe-only cards" how will I magnetize that thing on that picture. How will i get that specific frequency and hack your account by looking in that pic. Correct me if im wrong, im lack of knowledge about cards...
very suspicious..
are they serious? it's a digital art.
and another thing is why do they keep covering the smart chip of that card?
It is normal to cover the card number because its the important part of a card but the smart chip? can someone explain that to me. i read some info about smart chip. "These tiny metal processors make cards more secure than traditional magnetic-stripe-only cards" how will I magnetize that thing on that picture. How will i get that specific frequency and hack your account by looking in that pic. Correct me if im wrong, im lack of knowledge about cards...
very suspicious..
"HashCard, you have some 'splainin' to do!"
As for all them Investards who fell for this ruse ...
Well, at least it looks like someone has been watching this thread after all :-P
(From their Tweet: https://twitter.com/hashcard/status/992308766690324481)
tomos is married and having a baby ...so he decided to shut this down..and pay more attention to his family
How did you get that info?Is there anyway you can get him to log in make a statement, pay the miners and then lock this thread?
Re: [ANN]HashCard: Revolutionising HOW You Use Credit & Debit Cards
I got news from email if hashcard will be listed on Binance after ICO ends, is there any proof from Binance about this?
I am traumatized by the fraud committed by centra card, so now I am very cautious before investing into ICO with the concept of debit card
I believe it is against Binance's rule for a project to talk about listing on Binance before it really does.I am traumatized by the fraud committed by centra card, so now I am very cautious before investing into ICO with the concept of debit card
Yes it is really against the rules and condition from the side of Binance => https://support.binance.com/hc/en-us/articles/115003509652-Listing-a-Coin HashCard team really need to explain about this issue because it would ruin their reputation. we all want to have a better technology using blockchain in cryptospace but I hope that people would not use this as a chance to gain profit by using dirty tactics.
And Binance is asking @hashcard to stop illegally using the Binance name:
https://twitter.com/Teddy_Lin/status/997410681128300546
https://twitter.com/Jager_Binance/status/997373757520932866
Re: [ANN]HashCard: Revolutionising HOW You Use Credit & Debit Cards
Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.
not good
Quote
not good
With apologies to the mod who deleted my post above, it clearly negated the sentiment expressed by the poster whose post was also deleted. HashCard currently depicts a Bancor association which is not true, expressed by Bancor's camp.
@finaleshot2016 sorry to tell you this, but have you been Re-Reading your OP & posts after that lol. There is no single post you made (including your OP) with one single Good Proof about them being scam except your personal speculations or " hopes ".
Already sent the first batch, people in Europe expected to get it in couple days max.
I just hope you don't delete this thread that proves you know nothing about how an ICO is scam or have Red Flags coz so far you gave us 0 PROOF.
Still waiting for Good Proofs about them being a scam besides your " hopes " & non sense talk with long quotes & useless talk.
Already sent the first batch, people in Europe expected to get it in couple days max.
I just hope you don't delete this thread that proves you know nothing about how an ICO is scam or have Red Flags coz so far you gave us 0 PROOF.
Still waiting for Good Proofs about them being a scam besides your " hopes " & non sense talk with long quotes & useless talk.
I'm in Eastern Europe (Greece). From the first 100 cards. Still haven't received anything
Although I've been warning people from this project reeking of scam, just in case anyone is questioning whether I am invested and "supposed" to receive the card "issued" by the "secret Asian bank":
Any idea why it says "temporary card"? lol
I just asked in hashcard chat about this issue and instant kick like everyone else i know who has tried to ask about it got kicked,,, so i doubt your statement is true...
FALSE "I have a conversation with many people in the telegram group chat of HASHCARD. I share this topic to them and they're aware about the issue and also observing hashcard but they're still being optimistic about the project. I wish you can be like that, not a guy who's keep sayin' that hashcard is not a scam blah blah blah, there's no proof blah blah..
you're super defensive, showin' that you're part of it. "
FALSE "I have a conversation with many people in the telegram group chat of HASHCARD. I share this topic to them and they're aware about the issue and also observing hashcard but they're still being optimistic about the project. I wish you can be like that, not a guy who's keep sayin' that hashcard is not a scam blah blah blah, there's no proof blah blah..
you're super defensive, showin' that you're part of it. "why it become false? Im laughing too much. Some members doesn't know what they're saying and just want to say something.
For clarification mr right, I pm'ed them one by one to share this topic. But now, i made it to share to the whole telegram group chat and all of them now are aware.
I hate those people on telegram group chat that they're so trying hard to protect the hashcard and saying that this person is just a Low Class Moderator of binance and the statement is fake > https://t.me/binanceexchange/1693994 Lmao.
I will also add to this. Contacted Binance about this listing or 'pre-approved' listing on the HashCard website. They said it was also not true. I posted this up in the group asking the admin to please explain themselves and they hustled me as a scammer? WTF am I trying to scam people for? the truth?
Obvs they insta banned me .
Obvs they insta banned me .
Too bad for you, im still in the telegram chat even though i ask them logical question many times about hashcard and they didn't kick me because if they kicked me they're guilty on it.
Old news!
Here is how they blocked me: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3336703.msg36578177#msg36578177
If I receive the card, how are they supposed to provide me with support if they are blocking me?
@finaleshot2016 sorry to tell you this, but have you been Re-Reading your OP & posts after that lol. There is no single post you made (including your OP) with one single Good Proof about them being scam except your personal speculations or " hopes ".
Already sent the first batch, people in Europe expected to get it in couple days max.
I just hope you don't delete this thread that proves you know nothing about how an ICO is scam or have Red Flags coz so far you gave us 0 PROOF.
Still waiting for Good Proofs about them being a scam besides your " hopes " & non sense talk with long quotes & useless talk.
Already sent the first batch, people in Europe expected to get it in couple days max.
I just hope you don't delete this thread that proves you know nothing about how an ICO is scam or have Red Flags coz so far you gave us 0 PROOF.
Still waiting for Good Proofs about them being a scam besides your " hopes " & non sense talk with long quotes & useless talk.
I'm in Eastern Europe (Greece). From the first 100 cards. Still haven't received anything
Had doubts about the site, so been trying to read through this forum.
Would be helpful if a few of the people who have taken withdraws from there are able to confirm it here. thanks for your time.
Mostly as a Pop investor, I don't withdraw much, but here are some withdrawals I've done:Would be helpful if a few of the people who have taken withdraws from there are able to confirm it here. thanks for your time.
https://blockchain.info/tx/f993f883d58547149adab7e7b7995fb8e77c291410b38aa8e28dca7d0869de12
https://blockchain.info/tx/d6fc0f5051d405162b4561f5ca39acc337f2b73b8b30e69e0e687a0d196e1ecc
http://blockdozer.com/tx/0d3eb28fff355f6f88bcf33e1f072a7073c01d97851aafa8c7b8399a875552fc
https://blockchain.info/tx/ff7a7e5d3aa6c9eb2abb33784b2451f764e8214e1a1345196d99dc2110e12224
https://blockchain.info/tx/39f0b859bd619decf0ea8e0aedff03ef19e15bc76d288969b2943013aa067454
http://blockdozer.com/tx/e26237341316430cad37db71888a1dff2a06361f9f748e0df40625c56ee4c22d