I think it's something we should be concerned about when Bitcoin is at $500,000 or $1 million, so in the next 4 years we might be at levels below $150,000 and so mBTC (mBTC) is the appropriate symbol.

Bitcointalk Username: hugeblack
BTC segwit address: I'm doing some research about the service but consider me in for now.

The problem with eXch is that it's a centralized service in an environment hostile to privacy, or at least to no-KYC exchange. If I were them, I'd simply comply with court orders (ignoring government requests), or at least restrict/review some transactions (flows above $50,000), or temporarily restrict the service when such events occur. While the above solutions aren't ideal, they're much better than losing eXch; we've lost a good service.

When we have something decentralized then we can do whatever we want.

Dark mode is good but it's hard to read the quote when it's on.

I can confirm that it does not work, but by reviewing the code, its purpose is to make the OP post color #ff9c59 font-weight: bold

which one FIODNederland (UID: 3593363)^*or FIOD Netherlands(UID: 3705361)?
Without official confirmation, we cannot trust these accounts.

---

Compared to what happened with Sinbad, many positive changes have occurred:
1. US law enforcement authorities were not part of the investigation.
2. The forum was not mentioned or any user addresses blacklisted.
3. Investigations began after what happened with byBit.

No, I don't think anything will change. they won't pursue decentralized services like the CoinJoin protocol, privacy wallets, or the actions of end users and developers.
However, they will pursue:
1) Centralized services that engage in criminal activities.
2) Individuals who use decentralized services for criminal activities.


How did I miss this quote? Why didn't you use this account ---> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3593363 ?
If you have time, creating a Q&A list would be helpful for the forum.

This is probably a message to anyone who has access to .pw

~ 371 bitcoins were seized, and this may appear to be their reserves. The question is what they will do with this money: will they return it to byBit or sell it at auction?
+If this happened 10 days ago, why wait so long before announcing it?

The good thing is that the United States wasn't part of it, and neither the forum nor the signature campaign was mentioned.

Continuing to read, I found:


So the coming days/weeks will tell. If they manage to catch more scammers, then eXch was storing the logs/IP/metadata.

---

I always assumed that the eXch account was being managed by multiple users, so it's likely that someone testified against them.

I can confirm that this happened to me once this month and several times in the last 6 months. The solution was to log out, then log in and the problem was solved.

1. Do not use an alt account to boost your DT1 Rank.
2. Do not add positive trust to your account or exchange merits with it.
3. You can add neutral trust to prove account ownership or sign a message.

FixedFloat has been hacked twice so that's enough to avoid them, sorry for your loss but their policy of confiscating funds and using them indicates fraudulent behavior and they won't refund your money even if you send them all the necessary data.

Regardless of what @OP thinks, I support the suggestion to remove it from that board. Usually, the responses to scam cases are general (it's paid) and don't help much in solving the problem.

So you admit that the primary reason is paid posts? In my opinion, in cases of scam, getting three helpful replies (advice) is better than 100 generic replies.

AFAIK, They do not have a reserve and therefore the service uses Binance,WhiteBit APIs.
Since escrow has been withdrawn I don't think this service can be taken seriously. In the past I could trust them up to ~$500, but after reading this it might go down to zero if they don't give @OP a refund.

Is it possible to complete a SOL refund? Not to complete the transaction process. + I thought this option was always available even if the transaction was *high-risk.*

Sounds like a good suggestion, I support it on  Scam Accusations board but there is no need for such restrictions on the reputation board.

account

---

The BTC/USD Wall Observer is usually an unknown place for beginners. Your posts there sound like a well-known account farming pattern, so stop.

Can you request a SOL refund? not processing your TX
Many refuse to submit their information and are successful in receiving a refund, so I hope this happens to you.

I remember a similar case where I received a refund when I contacted the support team, but since they requested your information, I'm no longer recommending this service.

I hope you get your money back, but creating a flag is even more necessary than negative trust.

I believe the lion's share of cryptocurrency fraud is due to ransomware, which typically demands payments in Bitcoin and Monero.
$16 billion is not a small amount, especially considering the losses in a single year. Yet, efforts are moving in the opposite direction.
+The largest number of complaints came from those over 60 years old.