Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 713 results by jayguar
Re: [Multimedia Design] Graphic Design, Web Design, Signature Design (Special offer)
service still available? I need a logo design. PM me if you are around.
Service is still available. PM sent.
The free logo offer has been claimed by babo. With this the free offer no longer exists. Any logo creation henceforth will cost a minimum of $25 up to $150 based on design elements. There is however a new offer for signatures. Till January 05, 2020 the cost for creating a signature set is $35 after which price will by $50. Do note that any slight modifications or corrections in signature designs in the future will be done with no additional cost.
nice signature and service!
if i can request a logo, for fun
you are freedom, only 1 constraints (full black or full white)
the topic of logo is
'promise studios'
I've PM'd you for more details. I would be starting the work on the 26th and delivering by the 27th. if i can request a logo, for fun
you are freedom, only 1 constraints (full black or full white)
the topic of logo is
'promise studios'
Re: Indian Govt. committee is proposing 10 years jail for dealing in crypto
It is the mindset more than the education that plays a role in decision making. If for example a senior politician say something, the others in the same party agree to it even if they do not. Legalizing crypto currency or not, India has already embraced the technology behind it.
⭐ Merited by cryptoaddictchie (2)
The free signature has been claimed by cryptoaddictchie and will be delivered in the next 24 hours.
The free logo offer is still open.
The free logo offer is still open.
Re: [Multimedia Design] Offering a free logo/signature [1/1 remaining]
Looks like no one is interested in a free logo / signature design set. The offer is still open if anyone is interested.
I would like to try the free logo or signature if this still available how can I proceed? Should I Pm you? Thanks.
Re: Indian Govt. committee is proposing 10 years jail for dealing in crypto
There was news about introducing a law on cryptocurrency in the Parliament's winter session. Not sure what happened or is happening on that front?
...
Because it doesn't matter to the advertiser.
The important thing for the advertiser is to advertise under quality messages.
This can only be achieved using the merit system.
I think campaign managers should look for these terms.
It doesn't make sense to set a counter-rule for something the forum allows.
It is also not true to give negative trust because of this counter-rule.
Thank you Yahoo.
My friends, just try to understand what I'm saying.
It does matter to an advertiser more since no advertiser would want 1 individual posing as multiple individuals. Why does it not get to you that there is no need for multiple accounts for things you can do with 1 account. You seem to ignore this completely. Campaign managers are not against any forum rules. If a campaign wants only 10 individuals of a particular rank, what is the point when 1 individual fills all the 10 positions available? Why are you ignoring the fact that joining a campaign with multiple accounts is UNETHICAL? No one would give a negative trust if the campaign allows multiple account usage. Negative trust is a must if a user joins with multiple accounts when the campaign does not allow. Even if the campaign allows multiple accounts, I would still say that joining a bounty campaign with multiple accounts is unethical. Give a genuine reason what you are trying to prove by joining a bounty campaign with multiple accounts. An user who joins a bounty campaign with multiple accounts when he/she is not supposed to as per the campaign rules can be tagged as a scammer. Don't bring in forum rules here. It has nothing to do with bounty campaigns. Its simple. If you are paid to post as 1 user, follow and post as per the rules of the person paying you. If you don't agree to the campaign rules, you are free to not join the campaign. You want to get paid more so you want to scam the bounty campaign with multiple accounts. What is wrong in tagging with a negative trust for such scams?Because it doesn't matter to the advertiser.
The important thing for the advertiser is to advertise under quality messages.
This can only be achieved using the merit system.
I think campaign managers should look for these terms.
It doesn't make sense to set a counter-rule for something the forum allows.
It is also not true to give negative trust because of this counter-rule.
Thank you Yahoo.
My friends, just try to understand what I'm saying.
Additional:
The forum rules say "you can use alternative accounts".
Rules don't say, "You can't join the same ad campaign."
So you can use your account as you like.
The purpose of advertising campaigns is to show more people.
Researching people like the police is not the goal.
...
Why isn't it considered ethical to participate in the same ad campaign?
Whose ethical judgments will we accept? There is no such jurisdiction in the forum rules.
This is not fraud. This situation does not deserve negative trust.
Because the rules fit this situation. We're just discussing ethically.
...
Neither users nor bounty managers are owners of the forum. Bounty threads are managed by bounty managers on behalf of the respective coin/token owners. The bounty campaign rules are put forth by the respective coin/token owners or the campaign manager approved by the respective coin/token owners and has nothing to do with the Bitcointalk forum, the rules of the forum or the owner of the forum. Since an user participating in a bounty campaign is paid for his/her participation, it is only ethical if the user follows all the rules of the campaign. Just because an user is allowed to create multiple accounts does not mean he/she can use this liberty to cheat (SCAM) bounty campaigns. Why is there a need to enter a bounty campaign with multiple accounts when you can post the same thing with 1 account? Isn't that FRAUD against the campaign owners. If an user purposely joins a bounty campaign with multiple accounts he/she definitely deserves a negative trust for scamming or trying to scam the campaign owners. Why should it be considered ethical when you are trying to scam a bounty campaign? Sure, the purpose of advertising is to show more people and you can do that with a single account. If you are going to get paid for doing something, do what the person who pays tells you to do. Its their money, their rules. Either follow it or don't join the campaign. You are not doing a favor to the campaign owners by posting with multiple accounts in the same campaign. If you are confusing this with certain programs paying a handful of people posing as hundreds of people promoting the same program in multiple places, you are wrong. That is unethical as well.The forum rules say "you can use alternative accounts".
Rules don't say, "You can't join the same ad campaign."
So you can use your account as you like.
The purpose of advertising campaigns is to show more people.
Researching people like the police is not the goal.
...
Why isn't it considered ethical to participate in the same ad campaign?
Whose ethical judgments will we accept? There is no such jurisdiction in the forum rules.
This is not fraud. This situation does not deserve negative trust.
Because the rules fit this situation. We're just discussing ethically.
...
It is a meetup organized not by any commercial organization but by an exchange and one which is not p2p. Hence people will be wary to attend such meetups. There would be better participation / attendance if it were to be organized by any cryptocurrency or blockchain clubs or alliances.
Re: Self-styled Indian Guru has floated his own country allowing CryptoCurrency
Anything announced by Nithyananda shouldn't be believed at all. News like this are just for a good laugh. He is a wanted criminal and is on the run. He had claimed he purchased an island from Ecuador and formed his own country but Ecuador has denied it announcing, "Nithyananda has not been given asylum by Ecuador or has been helped by the government of Ecuador in purchasing any land or island in South America near or far from Ecuador." There are rumors that he is trying to seek asylum in Haiti or Mauritius.
Re: [Multimedia Design] Graphic Design, Infographic, Image Editing, Web Design
To get things started, I would like to offer a logo for free to 1 user and a signature for free to another 1 user.
I had requested DireWolfM14 to be the escrow and DireWolfM14 has accepted.
This is DireWolfM14's Escrow ANN thread. I'll bear the escrow fees.
I had requested DireWolfM14 to be the escrow and DireWolfM14 has accepted.
This is DireWolfM14's Escrow ANN thread. I'll bear the escrow fees.
As is there are plenty of spams and plagiarism already in the forum. Tokenizing the forum would simply increase it multi fold. There is only one authority for Bitcointalk.org and that is Theymos. Hence, there is no point of extending the authority. There are quite a few other more important things to implement than something like tokenizing the forum. I vote for 'No'.
Re: [INTEREST CHECK] Group Buy for 10th anniversary Bitcointalk Coldkey collectible
I thought only the 3 winners of the contest would have their designs made for the limited edition coldkeys. Glad to see the designs of all finalists are being made.