Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 156 results by jch9678
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Ethereum: Welcome to the Beginning
by
jch9678
on 04/10/2015, 03:03:03 UTC
did this coin gives anyone free lube at least??

i mean they all took it up the ass pretty good thus far.

HA

The funny miner does not hide his jokes
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Expanse (EXP) - Fair Launch, No ICO, Community DAO, based on Ethereum
by
jch9678
on 19/09/2015, 17:20:21 UTC
I would be great to see EXPANSE 'Dagger' Algo added to NiceHash..   Grin

I wonder what the consensus among the mining community is for something like this?

I cant wait to see what the next batch of goodies the Dev team have plans for releasing next?

I'm sure you don't need me to say this but i'll say it anyway: good luck & great job!



That sounds like a good idea. Im surprised betarigs hasnt stepped up too.

+1 sounds good


Sure, we're very much interested in adding Dagger Ethereum-based algorithm. We have actually already spent quite some time on researching this matter. The issue is that Ethereum want their own way with mining protocol and they only included Getwork-like protocol for mining. There is no stratum support and therefore including Dagger Ethereum-based algorithm into our service is not trivial (that's also the reason why there aren't any renting service available whatsoever). Basically there are two options:

1. Either Ethereum includes stratum protocol into their stack: we have already been asking the community https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/3068/stratum-support-for-pooled-mining-support-decentralization#latest -> zero response; and we've also contacted StephanTual of Ethereum, he said he will check with devs, but there was no further response.

2. Someone writes Ethereum's Getwork-like -> Stratum mining protocol proxy. That would require some programming effort, but is doable. If this proxy would exist, then the system would work like this:

Code:
miner -> local (lightweight) stratum-proxy -> NiceHash -> any Dagger Ethereum-based algorithm pool

This would yield significant boost to any Dagger Ethereum-based coin since NiceHash is by far the most widely used system for renting and buying hashing power. Think about our proposals and let us know if you can find someone for the Dagger stratum-proxy job ... we're even willing to partially finance the development.

For 2) maybe this is a place to start, https://github.com/sammy007/ether-proxy

Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (official thread)
by
jch9678
on 09/09/2015, 04:49:02 UTC
And in general, how goes the fight for true decentralization?

Not too shabby. The potential of Mr Spread’s “anti-pool” innovation has been noted, borrowed, adopted, adapted and is now obliquely traceable via  reference #34 to Ziftrcoin (*) in Andrew Miller et als' preprint paper (PDF) Nonoutsourceable Scratch-Off Puzzles to Discourage Bitcoin Mining Coalitions.

So there ya go.

Cheers

Graham

(*) Spreadcoin repos was created well before Ziftrcoin.

Not trying to nit pick but I just wanted to point out it's actually #44.  Interesting find.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [UNOFFICIAL] VNL | Vanillacoin 0.3.2 | DarkPP/MinerPP/CoinPP | ZeroTime BETA!
by
jch9678
on 26/08/2015, 18:45:29 UTC
I do not fudding! I want justice!

Ha

Did you get your 30,000 VNL from a faucet that doesn't work?

"Why does not work the faucet ?! John promised all the coins will be distributed from the faucet! Huh"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1064326.msg12248128#msg12248128

Go away, you're boring.  Or get creative because you suck at fud.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [UNOFFICIAL] VNL | Vanillacoin 0.3.2 | DarkPP/MinerPP/CoinPP | ZeroTime BETA!
by
jch9678
on 26/08/2015, 18:35:29 UTC
POS  is not working, what to do?

Are you using desktop, android, or iOS?  How many coins?  How long have they been at that address?  How long do you keep the wallet open for every day?
Win7 64bit, wallet open for every day, 30000 coins, 9 month.
Wallet unlocked?

He's fudding, see this

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1064326.msg12248128#msg12248128
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [UNOFFICIAL] VNL | Vanillacoin 0.3.2 | DarkPP/MinerPP/CoinPP | ZeroTime UPDATE!
by
jch9678
on 23/08/2015, 16:44:55 UTC
Anyone else having trouble downloading the latest wallet? I click on the wallet links at http://vanillacoin.net/wallets.php and keep getting an error page.

Also, if I go to https://vanillacoin.net/ I end up on a page for Tealc's WebShop, is the site hacked?

huh... are you sure you're entering everything right and don't have any adware or anything?  Maybe try clearing your cookies, search vanillacoin on google, and then click the www.vanillacoin.net link

I get the same thing if I use https. That's strange, that can't be proper behavior right?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Vertcoin - 1 | ASIC - 0 | Lyra2RE | Decentralised | GPU Mineable | Open Source
by
jch9678
on 23/07/2015, 14:01:43 UTC
Then Danila launches a botnet for GPUs.

1) that type of botnet is tougher
2) he would have to get the new payload to the already infected machines
3) people are more apt to notice when their video card sounds like a jet engine and remove the malware
4) it may not be an ideal solution but the important thing is to adapt, sitting on your ass doing nothing gets vertcoin no where
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Miner Control 1.6.1 - Auto profit switching miner controller
by
jch9678
on 21/07/2015, 15:21:31 UTC
I don't use parameters, I prefer this way, it works but does not switch most of the time, even when it receives error getting json data and gets 0,000 value it keeps mining

 { "algo": "x11", "folder": "D:\\data\\MinerControl165\\sgminer", "command": "sgminer.exe", "arguments": "-c x11FF.conf", "usewindow": true },

what is "btcfee":2, ?

uh oh, This is how I'm implementing Miner Control.  Does it ever seem to work?  I'm confused as to why it wouldn't work, is it something to do with detectstratum?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Miner Control 1.6.1 - Auto profit switching miner controller
by
jch9678
on 18/07/2015, 06:51:19 UTC
Wow, amazing update guys.  Thank you.

Thanks, now to compile the various miner programs and do tests on each algo to get some more accurate hash speeds for the .conf. The current defaults are based on 2 gtx 750 Ti's and are fairly up to date, but I want to be completely updated Wink


I'm in the same boat, I haven't used miner control in a while but I'm excited about these changes and need to get it going again. 

In addition to miningpoolhub, another pool (re)opened up.  dashminer.com  It's the same type of pool as wepaybtc (pool specific miner).  I'm pretty sure it's their sister site wepaydash just rebranded.  Apparently they are paying decently well now.  I know you guys worked hard on this update and need a break, I just wanted to point it out, not begging for them to be included.  Thanks again.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Miner Control 1.6.1 - Auto profit switching miner controller
by
jch9678
on 18/07/2015, 05:08:41 UTC
*** Miner Control 1.6.5 (Mod) ***

KBomba and myself have been working on bringing Miner Control up to speed with all the recent changes like YAAMP shutting down and NiceHash changing their stratum urls. We've reached the point where we are ready to offer up an official updated package for everyone.

Changelog:
  • Updated NiceHash detectstratum, now correctly guesses the full URL. No need for URLs or ports when detectstratum=true.
  • Removed WestHash completely, as the NiceHash entry will detect (even with detectstratum=false) if you're using Westhash and grab the balance info from WH.
  • Removed YAAMP, but made it easy to add YAAMPclones
  • Removed Hamsterpool.
  • Added visual representation of the history. Doubleclick on the chart to get all history, but it might take some time to load after several days of mining non-stop.



NiceHash Detectstratum:
With this version, detectstratum=true is the default and preferred method of mining on NiceHash. This method will check all the various geo-location stratum servers that NiceHash offers (eu, usa, hk, jp) and return the fastest connection for you1. This check is done on initial startup, and periodically to ensure you're still on the right server. Using the provided example config, the ONLY thing you'd need to change for this section is the account to reflect your BTC payout address.

WestHash Removed:
With the above change, the inclusion of a dedicated WestHash section in the .conf is no longer necessary. The default method will still allow you to mine on what is considered to be "WestHash" (aka, usa/hk/jp stratum servers), but for all intents and purposes, WestHash is now the same as NiceHash2.

YAAMP Clones:
As many are aware, YAAMP officially shut down, but has offered up it's source code for anyone to setup a YAAMPClone pool. Instead of hard coding each clone as it pops up, Miner Control now allows dynamic addition of any YAAMPClone (provided the clone uses the EXACT same API as YAAMP). The included sample .conf file illustrates how to setup both FFPool.net and Hashpower.co as YAAMPClones. Adding a new YAAMPClone is as easy as following the example in the .conf (or use the new url parameter described in the readme).

History Charts:
A new tab has been added to the UI that shows the top pools/algos price history over time. You can double click the chart to get an even larger chart that includes EVERY pool/algo combo you have defined, but do note that this is quite resource intensive and may take some time to show if Miner Control has been running for over 24 hours.



Known Issues:
FFPool.net and Hashpower.co currently have a divergence from original YAAMP API code that is causing those pools to report a MUCH higher price for Actual_last24h. Still waiting for conformation from both pools as to if this is an intentional change. Until the issue is resolved, balancemode = 2 won't work properly. balancemode = 0 or 1 still works without issue.

NiceHash detectstratum does not yet have real-time failover between eu/usa/hk/jp stratum servers. If the server you are using goes down, Miner Control will report the algo/pool as "Dead" until the next round of detectstratum checks. Occurrence of this should be rare and short lived. Fix is planned for the next release.



1. Detectstratum results will add 150ms to hk servers and 100ms to jp servers due to proxy connections in use by NiceHash.
2. NiceHash merged prices between NH/WH and have unified their stratum urls, however balances are still separate. We have contacted NiceHash about this and it is on their roadmap now.

Wow, amazing update guys.  Thank you.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Vertcoin - 1 | ASIC - 0 | Lyra2RE | Decentralised | GPU Mineable | Open Source
by
jch9678
on 14/07/2015, 15:20:06 UTC
Well, looks like Ipominer doesnt offer VTC anymore for regular folks, if it is enabled as he said, its now for Danila only. Btw, since that discovery, he cancelled his name in his stats, so now Danila==Anonymous. Just check the stats for neoscrypt (ftc - 95% of reward for danila), zifr(zrc - 100% Danila), X11 (switching, mostly DASH and START - 86% Danila).

..........


Ha, so it really should be called DanilaPool.

What a joke of a pool.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Miner Control 1.6.1 - Auto profit switching miner controller
by
jch9678
on 14/07/2015, 14:43:54 UTC
Any plans on adding the YAAMP clones that are popping up?
Should be pretty easy since they expose the same API.

KBomba or StuffOfInterest:  Will/Could anyone of you update MinerControl so that it could be used with the different yaamp clones?  That would be awesome!  Smiley

I know it might be a big job to do, especially with families and a day job, etc.

If you are capable of compiling Miner Control yourself, it isn't really too difficult to add your choice of YAAMP clone (with the exception of YIIMP, due to no auto-conversion). I've modified KBomba's fork and have FFPool, Hashpower, and (very) basic YIIMP support.
Would you mind sharing your version? Maybe even make a pull request for StuffOfInterest or KBomba?

Here is a build of KBomba's latest 1.6.4 fork that I added support for Hashpower and FFPool to. As stated, there is also VERY basic support for YIIMP*. I have also included a sample config file (MinerControl.sample.conf). Recommended that you read over my sample and make adjustments to your own config as necessary. Also, there are no miners included in this zip, JUST the MinerControl exe and sample conf. You can drop both files into your existing MinerControl folder after renaming your original exe.

I'll see if I can get a pull request over to KBomba's fork on github later today.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/jskannpp9d9uxqn/MinerControl.zip?dl=0

*Due to the modifications to YIIMP, and the way MinerControl is coded, this "Pool" would require extensive re-coding to fully implement. As YIIMP is designed to be a test bed, I'm not sure it would be worth the time to fully code support for MinerControl.

I haven't made any changes to the donation addresses or settings in my build, but if you would like to donate anything I'll gladly accept any donations at the following BTC address: 1C5X7k7gt9KteVaWrfp1nN8MguivTK2S1X

Thank you Fuzzbawls, and as always KBomba and StuffOfInterest
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (official thread)
by
jch9678
on 11/07/2015, 19:29:32 UTC
Good post jjjordan.  Coins101, stonehedge, and crysx, you guys bring up good points and I like this discussion but I want to share my thoughts. 

The thing that attracted me to this coin was the no pools characteristic.  As much as I don't want to admit it, crysx is right, that is gone now.  I think the ANN page needs to reflect that this coin is pool resistant and list ocminer's pool.  I don't think that's a big deal, it really doesn't change the direction this coin has now taken.  A pool exists, therefore it is not "No Pools" as it states.  The price isn't going to move and we aren't going to lose any contributor because we change that.  Being pool resistant is a good thing, it seems like it's a pain to setup. 

Crysx, at this point in time there is nothing wrong with spreadx11 mining (even if it's inefficient, it's the same for everybody).  It's rather a problem you are having.  Just as Just2laff said anybody with any size farm can mine this coin.  It's the way you guys are implementing the miner is the problem.  Your machines are capable of mining spr just fine.

But notice I said "at this point in time".  I think crysx is right about making a change at some point.  With spreadx11 being pool resistant most people will solo mine.  When (and if) service nodes are implemented and the price rises, spr will attract attention but the only people that will be able to mine will be the farms, like crysx's.  The casual miner or one that has 1-5 cards will not be able to grab any blocks.  They will need to join a pool to get in on the action.  If we don't change anything we risk all the blocks ending up in the hands of large farms, not decentralized at all. 

Switching to x11 is one way to get this done as crysx suggested (or someone did).  I don't think there is a rush to do this.  If we switch to x11 now, we risk spr being added to autoconverting multipools and getting lost in that mess of ordinary coins when service nodes are not implemented yet.  If this is the way we go I say we wait until after service nodes are implemented.  It's kind of analogous to btc mining moving from cpu->gpu->fpga->asic to help secure the bigger and bigger network.  As we grow, our network of miners can grow by switching to an algo that is friendly to pool mining.  That being said I'd like us to figure out some kind of mechanism to prevent spr being added to autoconverting multipools.  (Ironically I use those pools sometimes but I don't think they are good for a coin's health) 

After rereading this maybe spreadx11 is still the way to go as long as it's autoconverting multipool resistant.  Ocminer just needs to show how he accomplished this so other pools open up.  He may have already, I don't know. And now we can change the Title and ANN page to read 'Zero Multipools'   I like that.

Crysx, I don't how you can write so much all the time, my brain is mush now....
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] sgminer v5 - optimized X11/X13/NeoScrypt/Lyra2RE/etc. kernel-switch miner
by
jch9678
on 11/07/2015, 16:32:58 UTC
Hello AMD GPU miners!

I know you are all looking for better income and faster kernels...

Our algorithm switching multipool dashminer.com with BTC and DASH payouts makes it easy for you to get the most income from your hardware.

We already have an optimized kernel built in (it is faster than Wolf's leaked BINs). So you no longer need to search for a faster driver or download binaries.
Our custom open source miner (based on sph-sgminer) is very simple to tweak (as we removed most parameters and you just need to set intensity and overclocking params) and it even shows your daily income in DASH. It also shows speed not in megahashes but rather in % of R9 290. This way we can keep this value constant when we switch to a different algorithm (as all algos have different speeds in megahashes)

With our current promotion you would be earning 0.4 DASH per day or approximately 0.004 BTC per day (if you are paid in BTC) per each AMD R9 290 (R9 280X is about 85% of that, R9 270X is 50% and so on).
If this is a good price for you, please join DashMiner.com asap!
Note: Our pool only works with AMD GPUs. Nvidia or CPUs are not supported.

* Excellent profits: we quickly add new coins, we have a fast mining kernel, we can switch between coins and algorithms.
* Custom miner software optimized for speed and simplicity. No need to install special drivers, search for faster kernels or fiddle with parameters for sgminer. Just install and start mining. Our miner also shows you base rate payout in DASH so you know how much to expect.
* We pay miners once a day. Payouts are in BTD and DASH.
* No registration is required, just your wallet address.
* We have a unique payouts scheme: there is a base rate plus bonus (bonus depends on pool luck, coin prices, etc) . You will never receive a payout which is less than the base rate, unlike other multipools where sometimes you’re getting extra low payment (because of bad luck, wrong fork or something like that).
* We have 3 high performance stratum servers: San Francisco, New York and Amsterdam. We will add more servers if there are enough miners.
* We support DASH community by paying 1% of DASH miner profits to DASH donation address (XpAy7r5RVdGLnnjWNKuB9EUDiJ5Tje9GZ8).

This is DashMiner.com BitcoinTalk thread. Feel free to post there directly instead of polluting this thread.

PS: Kernel developers... If you have something interesting that is not publicly available - please contact us and we will make you an offer that you cannot refuse :-)

Thank you
dashminer.com

How are you guys any different than wepaybtc.com? Same Miner concept and almost same server locations. Even with your promotion going on, nicehash is equal to if not more than your payout.  The bin that you have is of no consequence to miners because your payout does not depend on speed. In fact if you have a higher speed bin than wolf0 but are paying out the same as nicehash then you are the only one profiting from the bin. I think you need to increase the payout to get miners to move over, especially when your promotion ends.
Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [POOL] YAAMP.COM multipool multialgo profit switch with exchange
by
jch9678
on 05/07/2015, 15:25:09 UTC

Again, statistically it doesn't matter, it's just an issue with people that want to always get paid even for small periods of time.
If a coin is profitable, it still is regardless of difficulty.

you have your math - i have my practical stats, and it says - don't mine when those coins are on yaamp,
both too fast or too slow, if you want to mine those coins themselves - go to coin's pool or solo, not yaamp

that is all good and well if that is YOUR opinion ...

especially when considering yaamp.com is actually gone ... it is no more ...

the pool that is being discussed at the moment is a NEW pool ...

how does that make mining at another pool or solo any different to mining using that pool that is being discussed ...

its not yaamp.com - its just using the code ...

#crysx

i mean yaamp's code, not site, just try and see for yourself,
multialgo switching makes huge difference

i see what you mean ...

on this fact alone - it does seem that way ...

multialgo switching has abrupt changes to contend with and so suffer share rejects everytime the switch happens ...

this is a loss of shares and productivity - even though they are small between switches ... we have seen this happen with our own miners / farm ...

but that is with ANY multialgo multipool - not just yaamp.com ...

look at epsylon3 .. he is one hell of a developer - and now running his own yaamp-coded pool with more algos added ...

it sort of goes to show that if even a seasoned developer like him is willing to look at - setup - and improve the code - then the pool code is still on a reasonably good level ...

nicehash has the same sort of issues ( though they dont mine coins - just divert hashrate ) with multialgo switching ...

so much so - that they devote an entire section on the website to it ...

single algo / single coin pools may be more 'efficient' ( for lack of a better word ) at mining - but we believe that the losses are so minimal thats its close to negligible ...

#crysx

We are not aware of latest sgminer having any issues with algo switching. There were issues at start, but these times are long gone. If you use any other software besides sgminer and getting rejects, then there is an issue with that software.

you are quite right ...

it is the earlier version ( 5.1.0-dev sgminer ) while using the amd cards - but mostly it is ccminer ( spmod fork in this case - as nvidia cards are the main miners we have in our farm ) ...

using just sgminer on ONE algo ( quark in this case ) also has a large number of share rejections ...

testing the latest that we have compiled ( sgminer 5.1.1.17-g6666 ) still manages to reject shares on the stratums ...

the stratums we have had the pleasure of testing here are x11 - x13 - x15 - neoscrypt - lyra2re - quark ...

currently - the share reject rate is nominal ( ie - small ) but at times jump into astronomical figures for short periods of time ...

we have a number of miners currently running on quark using your us-based startum ( westhash ) with both ccminer ( spmod fork 1.5.53-git - compiled under linux x64 and cuda 6.5 - ) and the russian sgminer miner ( untrusted but works - 5.1.1 - under windows ) as well as the latest sgminer git compile in linux ( sgminer 5.1.1-17-g666 ) and ALL of them show share rejects on a regular basis mining on quark.usa.nicehash.com:3345 ...

note - this is mining 'just' quark ... not algo switching ...

i have seen sgminer ( git ) show regular share rejects switching algos also - though the testing is no where near as comprehensive as what we have already done on each algo singularly ...

take a look at the current stats on the test bench as we chat  - https://www.westhash.com/?p=miners&a=12&addr=15umzHXF8NzXA4FywmeFbrDHgL8WcPs3wx ...

we are working alongside another long term respected user here on bct ( who we wont name for the moment ) on an algo switching script for linux using nicehash and ( originally ) yaamp ... obviously nicehash is the main testbed now until a new yaamp comes about ( which is currently planned ) - but these tests show proof that the farm in all its different incarnations and hardware / software makeup will never submit shares that are ALWAYS accepted ...

this is not to single out any one pool or another ... it is to show ( at least to us ) that rejected shares can only be minimized - not altogether eradicated ... no matter how 'good' the mining software - or mining hardware - or stratum software / pool software is ...

so even though you may not be aware of the share rejects - our mining proves otherwise ( at least for the miners we have tested internally ) ...

we are putting together all the donation links through nicehash - which means that even though share rejects happen - it is almost negligible in the long run ...

btw - havent heard back from support whether the other ip addresses we have submitted ( for the donation links ) have been whitelisted yet Wink ...

#crysx

Strange, I'm using the Russian Miner at westhash and I have zero rejects over a long enough period of time to be significant. . Literally zero, I've never seen anything like it. I'm much closer to the server than you are, maybe it's the latency that's causing the rejects.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.3.0 | Hybrid TCP/UDP | ECDHE | O(1) | DarkPP/MinerPP/CoinPP
by
jch9678
on 04/07/2015, 21:32:10 UTC


Currently, I think R9 290 is ~475 MH/s.  What are people getting with smolen's miner?

Not sure on the GTX 750ti.  Anyone have one?

I just switched to smelter and I am getting around the same hash-rate (475 MH/s) with a 280x. I have 2 rigs with 2x R9280x in them and each is getting about 980 MH/s according to the miner. Pool is reporting anywhere from 800 MH to 1,200 MH each, depending on luck I suppose.

Does anyone know if the Smelter by Smolen miner does donation mining to a different address at times? I ask as watching my pool hash rate it seems to drop down quite a bit at regular intervals before returning to normal. Say 5 minutes out of the hour. It could be random luck I guess, but was curious as I cannot find a lot of information about this miner.

I don't know if it does, but the quark miner he released before that had that kind of fee in place.
Smolen please speak.
BTW, my miner is as fast, it's based on sgminer and doesn't have any fee.

I didn't realize you made a whirlpoolx miner, where can we download it?

It's not free.

Oh, ha.  I just assumed it was when you said no fee.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.3.0 | Hybrid TCP/UDP | ECDHE | O(1) | DarkPP/MinerPP/CoinPP
by
jch9678
on 04/07/2015, 21:23:00 UTC


Currently, I think R9 290 is ~475 MH/s.  What are people getting with smolen's miner?

Not sure on the GTX 750ti.  Anyone have one?

I just switched to smelter and I am getting around the same hash-rate (475 MH/s) with a 280x. I have 2 rigs with 2x R9280x in them and each is getting about 980 MH/s according to the miner. Pool is reporting anywhere from 800 MH to 1,200 MH each, depending on luck I suppose.

Does anyone know if the Smelter by Smolen miner does donation mining to a different address at times? I ask as watching my pool hash rate it seems to drop down quite a bit at regular intervals before returning to normal. Say 5 minutes out of the hour. It could be random luck I guess, but was curious as I cannot find a lot of information about this miner.

I don't know if it does, but the quark miner he released before that had that kind of fee in place.
Smolen please speak.
BTW, my miner is as fast, it's based on sgminer and doesn't have any fee.

I didn't realize you made a whirlpoolx miner, where can we download it?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Miner Control 1.6.1 - Auto profit switching miner controller
by
jch9678
on 04/07/2015, 15:33:59 UTC

Nope. I told them before that ain't gonna cut it. I just need an API that gives me the profit in BTC/MH/Day per algo in one simple overview. Not a huge list with every single coin in it...
I don't have much time anymore tbh, but I won't add them at all if they can't do this Tongue Maybe if StuffOfInterest has some interest *cough* ^^"

I contacted miningpoolhub support to join us here. Hopefully they will...
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Miner Control 1.6.1 - Auto profit switching miner controller
by
jch9678
on 03/07/2015, 19:05:42 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Miner Control 1.6.1 - Auto profit switching miner controller
by
jch9678
on 03/07/2015, 18:47:37 UTC
It seems that Hamsterpool is closing too.

One by one, the pools are going away.  Sad

For MinerControl, there's only Nice/Westhash, LTCRabbit and WePayBTC left.

The mining landscape is not the Klondike goldrush it used to be, and it will soon look like the Sahara Desert!

Just received the notifications from them.  Another one gone.  I haven't been watching too close lately but it doesn't appear any new, big pools are coming online.  NiceHash is going to pretty much own the market going forward from the looks of things.

What about adding https://miningpoolhub.com/

Is it compatible?