Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 52 results by josg21
Re: [OPEN Batch#2] Gridseed hosted(or not) groupbuy 190$/unit or 150$ with hosting
You guys should be asking some really important questions......
For example. The name and location of his data center. Some pictures of the data center, or if its even a real data center.
What long-haul providers is he using? A Comcast connection? Or a fiber drop with redundancy and an 5 9 SLA.
Is his data center insured and bonded? Whats happens to your gear if the building burns down? Or the sprinkler comes on?
These are super important questions.
For example. The name and location of his data center. Some pictures of the data center, or if its even a real data center.
What long-haul providers is he using? A Comcast connection? Or a fiber drop with redundancy and an 5 9 SLA.
Is his data center insured and bonded? Whats happens to your gear if the building burns down? Or the sprinkler comes on?
These are super important questions.
So stepped things up dual mining SHA and Scypt to 800Mhz, and I am getting 6.4GH/s and 340Mh/s avg per gridseed, they get mildly warm but nothing that i would be concerned about.
Anyone try dual mining under windows at 850Mhz yet, I dont want to push them too far when mining sha alongside scrypt as the sha asics can get fairly warm.
Anyone try dual mining under windows at 850Mhz yet, I dont want to push them too far when mining sha alongside scrypt as the sha asics can get fairly warm.
850 is about the safe limit for these in dual mode, anything above that might be too hot for the chip.
should get about 340 on scrypt at 850. What do you get at 850 in dual mode?
Quote
Once more again, please read and understand what am I talking about.
We do not compensate BTC in any way. We do not compensate your lost shares count. We do not compensate your lost blocks count. We compensate hash rate. It is stated in our Terms of Service, which you have read, understood and agreed during your registration procedure here.
Best Regards,
Matthew, CEX.IO support
We do not compensate BTC in any way. We do not compensate your lost shares count. We do not compensate your lost blocks count. We compensate hash rate. It is stated in our Terms of Service, which you have read, understood and agreed during your registration procedure here.
Best Regards,
Matthew, CEX.IO support
So how is it our lost shares, when its your hardware that had the issues?
Dear Users,
Tha pool is up again.
We had difficulties with electricity, which caused hardware failure and stratum server problems.
The issue is fixed now.
Accidents like this do happen, we apologize for the inconvenience.
Tha pool is up again.
We had difficulties with electricity, which caused hardware failure and stratum server problems.
The issue is fixed now.
Accidents like this do happen, we apologize for the inconvenience.
You say the issue is fixed, but we still have not been paid out on those blocks. When is that going to happen?
Look, this is the bottom line. In business you should never change a deal you already made. Period.
I have run many companies (50m plus), and I have made many deals I did not like. But I always homered a deal once I made it.
These guys caused the exact opposite of what they wanted. They wanted to attract new miners and create trust and loyalty. Heck, I was even thinking about even staying longer term (have over 100mh). But I will never do business with them again. They have no integrity
I have run many companies (50m plus), and I have made many deals I did not like. But I always homered a deal once I made it.
These guys caused the exact opposite of what they wanted. They wanted to attract new miners and create trust and loyalty. Heck, I was even thinking about even staying longer term (have over 100mh). But I will never do business with them again. They have no integrity
If you don't like the amount of free ltc you are getting, go elsewhere
Cex got just what they want, lots of publicity.
I completely understand why they have restricted their offer, and if you can't then their is something fundamentally wrong with you
I can go in to a ton of reasons as to why your response is total bogus. But given how unreasonable of your response, its unlikely you will understand.
More to come soon.
Any resellers you can vouch for?
Yes, how many do you need?
Not sure yet, would depend on the price.
Small time at least, so probably half a dozen.
Just wouldn't mind hearing from a satisfied customer about some companies that aren't a scam
Your setup looks amazing.
Because of our volume, we are being set up as a USA distributor. We just have not made any official announcements.
Are you in the US?
How are the grid seeds holding up? I heard they had reliability issues.
perfectly, we run 100 on each computer
More to come soon.
Any resellers you can vouch for?
Yes, how many do you need?
Aren't the center ones getting pretty hot like that?
Marginally above room temp
8 miners per column * 6 columns per shelf * 4 shelves + ones the floor looks like you've got 250-300 of them = 90-100MH/s?
Good eye, but low guess
Seriously tho.. Why you still keep the christmas tree in?
We have over 15 rooms. So thats the seasonal room.
Well, at least thats what I tell my wife....because I dont want to take it down
Look, this is the bottom line. In business you should never change a deal you already made. Period.
I have run many companies (50m plus), and I have made many deals I did not like. But I always homered a deal once I made it.
These guys caused the exact opposite of what they wanted. They wanted to attract new miners and create trust and loyalty. Heck, I was even thinking about even staying longer term (have over 100mh). But I will never do business with them again. They have no integrity
I have run many companies (50m plus), and I have made many deals I did not like. But I always homered a deal once I made it.
These guys caused the exact opposite of what they wanted. They wanted to attract new miners and create trust and loyalty. Heck, I was even thinking about even staying longer term (have over 100mh). But I will never do business with them again. They have no integrity
I'm having some big issues with my Gridseed 5 chip miner.
The issues are:
1.When I used the official miner (CPUMiner one I think),no matter how many times it shows 'Dispatching new work...' I never see any shares submitted to the pools I use (no matter which pool I use and with their corrent URLs,clevermining.com,multipool.us and coinshift.com) so I gave up ever hoping I'd get the full 400+Kh/s as promised from my miner so I changed to CGminer 3.72 which does get shares submitted but I get much less than half of the total hashpower/coins I'm supposed to have mined on all the pools I've used.
2.CGminer often says accepted yet I never see the shares in my pool even though my internet connections ok and plugged in ok via the USB port.
I've tried everything I know of to remedy this but to no avail and am pretty frustrated now since there's no improvement and the instructions are even harder to understand than why I'm having issues in the first place.
If someone can just help me get back on track,I'd really apreciate this as I didn't spend nearly £300 for a miner that only performs at 50% or less of it's capacity (paperwight).Thanks
The issues are:
1.When I used the official miner (CPUMiner one I think),no matter how many times it shows 'Dispatching new work...' I never see any shares submitted to the pools I use (no matter which pool I use and with their corrent URLs,clevermining.com,multipool.us and coinshift.com) so I gave up ever hoping I'd get the full 400+Kh/s as promised from my miner so I changed to CGminer 3.72 which does get shares submitted but I get much less than half of the total hashpower/coins I'm supposed to have mined on all the pools I've used.
2.CGminer often says accepted yet I never see the shares in my pool even though my internet connections ok and plugged in ok via the USB port.
I've tried everything I know of to remedy this but to no avail and am pretty frustrated now since there's no improvement and the instructions are even harder to understand than why I'm having issues in the first place.
If someone can just help me get back on track,I'd really apreciate this as I didn't spend nearly £300 for a miner that only performs at 50% or less of it's capacity (paperwight).Thanks
They have to be plugged in to both the USB and power. If there is no power, it will appear it's working (lights will be on, etc) but it will not accept any shares
I'm running 19 miners currently on the Pi and it has not had any stability issues. As you can see in the screenshot below, system load is under 0.1, cgminer processes are mostly sleeping. Some differences from your setup: 1) I'm using scripta and a precompiled cgminer posted by someone initially on litecointalk; 2) I'm running two separate cgminer instances (10 and 9 miners). I would suggest for you to try the precompiled cgminer and see if that performs better. If that doesn't help I would start narrowing the problem by disconnecting half of your miners to see if there is one malfunctioning device that might be causing cgminer to misbehave.
Well it completely stopped so I switched back to Ubuntu server on the Thinkpad for now.
Will try again over the weekend but if it hashes less and produces more errors it's gone. Just communicating my results so far.
This graph shows that it hashes slower and the point where it died (12PM) before I switched back to the Thinkpad.
Looks like a lot of people are reporting freezes with the Pi here:
https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=9908.225
I should mention that this second "fix" was already applied before I tried to use cgminer for the first time on Pi:
Code:
sudo apt-get install rpi-update
sudo BRANCH=next rpi-update
sudo BRANCH=next rpi-update
Not sure if I will waste too much more time on the Pi...would be nice though. I believe that other are having success so it's almost a challenge...but not quite
my team runs 96 miners per server