Search content
Sort by
Showing 3 of 3 results by jovi99
Re: [ANN][ICO] 📱 AppCoins - The New Blockchain-Based Protocol For The App Stores 🔋
I have a question to Appcoins team,
AppCoins manipulated the bounty campaign section allocations after the ICO.
I asked this question twice in the bounty thread and I didn't get any answer from the bounty manager and he went silent.
Previous allocations were
Campaign 1: Signature campaign : 42% allocation
Campaign 2: Articles campaign : 37% allocation
Campaign 3: Twitter campaign : 5% allocation
Campaign 4: Translations campaign : 10% allocation
Campaign 5: Telegram campaign : 2 % allocation
Campaign 6: Reddit campaign : 4 % allocation
You have changed it to,
Campaign 1: Signature campaign : 40% allocation
Campaign 2: Articles campaign :42.5% allocation
Campaign 3: Twitter campaign : 6% allocation
Campaign 4: Translations campaign : 8% allocation
Campaign 5: Telegram campaign : 2% allocation
Campaign 6: Reddit campaign : 1.5% allocation
It 's really UNPROFESSIONAL and UNETHICAL to do so. You increased the allocation for articles campaign by doing that which has a totally private spreadsheet.
It seems you cheated bounty hunters without noticing this section allocation change.
Now they got less number of tokens than they expected to get except articles and twitter campaign participants.
How stakeholders really trust this project if you already did such a horrible thing to bounty hunters who helped to reach the ICO hard cap?
I need an answer.
AppCoins manipulated the bounty campaign section allocations after the ICO.
I asked this question twice in the bounty thread and I didn't get any answer from the bounty manager and he went silent.
Previous allocations were
Campaign 1: Signature campaign : 42% allocation
Campaign 2: Articles campaign : 37% allocation
Campaign 3: Twitter campaign : 5% allocation
Campaign 4: Translations campaign : 10% allocation
Campaign 5: Telegram campaign : 2 % allocation
Campaign 6: Reddit campaign : 4 % allocation
You have changed it to,
Campaign 1: Signature campaign : 40% allocation
Campaign 2: Articles campaign :42.5% allocation
Campaign 3: Twitter campaign : 6% allocation
Campaign 4: Translations campaign : 8% allocation
Campaign 5: Telegram campaign : 2% allocation
Campaign 6: Reddit campaign : 1.5% allocation
It 's really UNPROFESSIONAL and UNETHICAL to do so. You increased the allocation for articles campaign by doing that which has a totally private spreadsheet.
It seems you cheated bounty hunters without noticing this section allocation change.
Now they got less number of tokens than they expected to get except articles and twitter campaign participants.
How stakeholders really trust this project if you already did such a horrible thing to bounty hunters who helped to reach the ICO hard cap?
I need an answer.
Re: [BOUNTY] [ICO] 📱 AppCoins: The New Blockchain-Based Protocol For The App Stores
Thanks to all uncivilised people from bounty campaign participants community, I will lock all campaigns spreadsheets again, until token distribution.
I'm tired of getting my PM box spammed by people who don't know how to properly check spreadsheets before posting complains.
This rule will be effective for all of my future campaigns.
You can thank some of this thread last posters, they are perfect representatives of uncivilised bounty campaign participants.
I'm tired of getting my PM box spammed by people who don't know how to properly check spreadsheets before posting complains.
This rule will be effective for all of my future campaigns.
You can thank some of this thread last posters, they are perfect representatives of uncivilised bounty campaign participants.
Hello
I asked a civilized and valid question. I didn't spam your inbox too. But you didn't answer.
Let me repeat the question.
Why did you change section allocations after the ICO?
Please answer.
Thanks in advance.
Re: [BOUNTY] [ICO] 📱 AppCoins: The New Blockchain-Based Protocol For The App Stores
Sylon
Why did you change the bounty campaign section allocations after the ICO? That's unprofessional.
Previous allocations were
Campaign 1: Signature campaign : 42% allocation
Campaign 2: Articles campaign : 37% allocation
Campaign 3: Twitter campaign : 5% allocation
Campaign 4: Translations campaign : 10% allocation
Campaign 5: Telegram campaign : 2 % allocation
Campaign 6: Reddit campaign : 4 % allocation
You have changed it to,
Campaign 1: Signature campaign : 40% allocation
Campaign 2: Articles campaign :42.5% allocation
Campaign 3: Twitter campaign : 6% allocation
Campaign 4: Translations campaign : 8% allocation
Campaign 5: Telegram campaign : 2% allocation
Campaign 6: Reddit campaign : 1.5% allocation
Why special treatment for article campaign? It's a private spreadsheet. No transparency.
You reduced the bounty tokens receivables to bounty hunters by significant amount with this change. It is so unprofessional to change the allocations after end of the ICO.
Need a proper valid answer.
Why did you change the bounty campaign section allocations after the ICO? That's unprofessional.
Previous allocations were
Campaign 1: Signature campaign : 42% allocation
Campaign 2: Articles campaign : 37% allocation
Campaign 3: Twitter campaign : 5% allocation
Campaign 4: Translations campaign : 10% allocation
Campaign 5: Telegram campaign : 2 % allocation
Campaign 6: Reddit campaign : 4 % allocation
You have changed it to,
Campaign 1: Signature campaign : 40% allocation
Campaign 2: Articles campaign :42.5% allocation
Campaign 3: Twitter campaign : 6% allocation
Campaign 4: Translations campaign : 8% allocation
Campaign 5: Telegram campaign : 2% allocation
Campaign 6: Reddit campaign : 1.5% allocation
Why special treatment for article campaign? It's a private spreadsheet. No transparency.
You reduced the bounty tokens receivables to bounty hunters by significant amount with this change. It is so unprofessional to change the allocations after end of the ICO.
Need a proper valid answer.