Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 425 results by kache
On Windows I get 4.1 Mh/s with each of my 2 R9 290 non X, on a test run more than 6 hours.
Thank you!
Thank you!
Settings?
Re: [ANN][AC] AsiaCoin | MANDATORY Wallet 2.0 | Premine Voided | Back on Mintpal
Cool, and price hasn't dropped too much either.
WTB few AC coins, maybe 100,000 or more.
PM please with your offers.
PM please with your offers.
WTB is what??
I'm one of the AsiaCoin bagholders. If the dev does not come back with version #2, then we will have to come up with solutions to fix this.
I'm going to start adding names to this list who are bagholders that want this fixed. I'll start with my name.
AsiaCoin Bagholders who wants to see a fix:
CryptoSteam
Nicolaas.R
silencesilence
bluebit25
WildChaser777
istop08
GröBkAz
Maxikosw (Maxikose on freenode irc)
Me.I'm going to start adding names to this list who are bagholders that want this fixed. I'll start with my name.
AsiaCoin Bagholders who wants to see a fix:
CryptoSteam
Nicolaas.R
silencesilence
bluebit25
WildChaser777
istop08
GröBkAz
Maxikosw (Maxikose on freenode irc)
All funds are safe. Poloniex does use cold wallets.
What happened was an attacker used social engineering to gain root access to a wallet server. This was made possible by absolutely jaw-dropping negligence on the part of the hosting provider. Fortunately, I caught the attempt in time and was able to shut down the server before anything was taken. All BTC has been moved into cold storage, and then next step is to set up a new server with a different provider.
Please stop sending BTC to your old BTC deposit addresses. The funds will not be lost, but all new addresses must be generated, as I must assume the old wallet is compromised. It is very unlikely that it was, but "unlikely" is not good enough.
I appreciate everyone's patience while I take proper security measures before bringing the exchange back online.
What about BadgerCoin addresses? My pool has been automatically depositing on the old (frozen) address for more than a day already. Are those funds lost?What happened was an attacker used social engineering to gain root access to a wallet server. This was made possible by absolutely jaw-dropping negligence on the part of the hosting provider. Fortunately, I caught the attempt in time and was able to shut down the server before anything was taken. All BTC has been moved into cold storage, and then next step is to set up a new server with a different provider.
Please stop sending BTC to your old BTC deposit addresses. The funds will not be lost, but all new addresses must be generated, as I must assume the old wallet is compromised. It is very unlikely that it was, but "unlikely" is not good enough.
I appreciate everyone's patience while I take proper security measures before bringing the exchange back online.
X11 - DarkCoin...50% cooler and 50% less power than scrypt, which is better for the environment 
. 280x mines it at around 2.1mh/s
Combines the power of 11 hashing algorithms to make it resistant to ASIC.
Agreed. X11 is one of the best currently.. 280x mines it at around 2.1mh/sCombines the power of 11 hashing algorithms to make it resistant to ASIC.
Re: [ANN][KAR] KARPELESCOIN*3KARPE1ESwHERE1SoUrMoNEYxxxx8dXeC5*coinmarket*REHAB
How are you gonna deal with MtGox refunds? I had 0.1BTC there, which equals to 1KAR. How do I prove I had 0.1BTC on MtGox, though, since the site is down?
0.1 = 1 kar? where?
Re: [ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com
Yeah I giggled at this, mc dumped all its unexchanged it seems
Oh, when I saw the poolpicker graph I thought middlecoin followed this guy's suggestion and started renting their hashrate to 51% attackers:http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/22aw8c/most_altcoins_are_not_secure_enough_they_exist/
Re: [ANN][KAR] KARPELESCOIN*3KARPE1ESwHERE1SoUrMoNEYxxxx8dXeC5*coinmarket*REHAB
How are you gonna deal with MtGox refunds? I had 0.1BTC there, which equals to 1KAR. How do I prove I had 0.1BTC on MtGox, though, since the site is down?
Re: Poll on what algo will be GPU mined after ASIC's fully take over Scrypt mining.
Every algorithm in X11 are able to create by ASIC since day one, and it is not high memory constraint like Scrypt. The darkcoin dev also said.
Here is my thread : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=540160.0
Here is my thread : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=540160.0
No need to post this, you posted in another topic. The point is what will people turn to while ASIC Scrypt miners flood the market. I give you due diligence to pointing your facts/opinion, but no need to over do it please.
Re: These new EFFICIENT x11 algos everyone is talking about ?? BULLSHIT or real?
I honestly wonder: why hasn't anyone created yet an algo that randomly changes parts of itself every x blocks? This would make ASICs impossible, and only FPGA possible to use, thus limiting the issue a lot...
Re: [ANN][EDU] EduCoin Makes Us Smarter. Digital Currency for Education.
@kache Thank you for your comment.
To clarify our earlier point about X11, we are not considering that or any other fork at this time. Our position is that we started with KGW as a hedge against multipools, and we don't see the need to react to every new feature that pops up in the crypto-ecosystem. In our analysis, forking is not something that is taken lightly. Many new coins seem to be all over the road with forking to what looks good, at the expense of adoption and community. We didn't create EduCoin just so we could be every miner's wet dream. We created EduCoin to move education forward.
Also, Litecoin's main developer (Charles Lee aka "Coblee") has made his views known in the link below. As a Scrypt-based coin we agree with his point of view.
At a much later time, when EduCoin becomes established and brings aboard higher education institutions to the foundation, developers will consider what technical innovations EduCoin can bring to the education world. On the horizon are all kinds of developments which may come to market such as colored coins, ethereum, public contracts. We could one day see EduCoin's blockchain being used to exchange research data between universities, as a means of retrieving electronically notarized credentials and grades, and as a way to do other educational computing tasks.
No, that litecoin developer explained PERFECTLY why you have to fork right now: because once you become bigger and more established it's gonna be far more difficult and far more problematic.To clarify our earlier point about X11, we are not considering that or any other fork at this time. Our position is that we started with KGW as a hedge against multipools, and we don't see the need to react to every new feature that pops up in the crypto-ecosystem. In our analysis, forking is not something that is taken lightly. Many new coins seem to be all over the road with forking to what looks good, at the expense of adoption and community. We didn't create EduCoin just so we could be every miner's wet dream. We created EduCoin to move education forward.
Also, Litecoin's main developer (Charles Lee aka "Coblee") has made his views known in the link below. As a Scrypt-based coin we agree with his point of view.
At a much later time, when EduCoin becomes established and brings aboard higher education institutions to the foundation, developers will consider what technical innovations EduCoin can bring to the education world. On the horizon are all kinds of developments which may come to market such as colored coins, ethereum, public contracts. We could one day see EduCoin's blockchain being used to exchange research data between universities, as a means of retrieving electronically notarized credentials and grades, and as a way to do other educational computing tasks.
Quote
In regards to X11 weve looked at the main discussion at the litecoin developers forum here: https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=18166.0
We are leaning toward Coblees viewpoint at the moment. Switching to X11 would more appealing if there was solid consensus. And if/when that becomes the case, then litecoin should be the first mover to change.
The EduCoin developers intent was to deploy proven tech over trendy tech, and we know that this has caused some individuals to label EduCoin as just another clone. There is truth to that, but its okay as long as EduCoin is a just another clone that works well for education. We are interested in moving cryptocurrency forward eventually, but right now we are more focused on moving education forward. We can't do that if we create/fork a new class of crypto that only Vitalik Buterin can understand.
We are leaning toward Coblees viewpoint at the moment. Switching to X11 would more appealing if there was solid consensus. And if/when that becomes the case, then litecoin should be the first mover to change.
The EduCoin developers intent was to deploy proven tech over trendy tech, and we know that this has caused some individuals to label EduCoin as just another clone. There is truth to that, but its okay as long as EduCoin is a just another clone that works well for education. We are interested in moving cryptocurrency forward eventually, but right now we are more focused on moving education forward. We can't do that if we create/fork a new class of crypto that only Vitalik Buterin can understand.