Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 50 results by kactech
Btw, here's a second draft, a better worded and formatted one.
http://oleganza.com/blind-ecdsa-draft-v2.pdf
Great work Oleg, superb thing, here is your 4. Core protocol in Go language, w/ playground https://gist.github.com/kac-/a25e8410beb2d1514f2c.http://oleganza.com/blind-ecdsa-draft-v2.pdf
BTW:
Perhaps is the same as http://dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/625/1/IJCSNS-V7-I6.pdf (via http://dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/handle/2080/625 )
Has anybody tried to code it? It doesn't work for me.Re: Peershares Template Demonstration Network (v0.1.0) Released: Windows/Linux/OS X
Re: Peerunity v0.1.0 Has Just Been Released for Windows, Linux and OS X (FAQ Inside)
SunnyKing weekly update
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=114994.msg7100535#msg7100535
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=114994.msg7100535#msg7100535
Quote
...
Peercoin's merge with bitcoin v0.8 resumes testing. There should be a separate development branch on repository once tests complete to reasonable satisfaction. Once the development branch opens, requests would be reviewed for acceptance.
...
That means... we'll have both- new codebase and feature rich client! Great job guys, I bow to the ground.Peercoin's merge with bitcoin v0.8 resumes testing. There should be a separate development branch on repository once tests complete to reasonable satisfaction. Once the development branch opens, requests would be reviewed for acceptance.
...
Today we have Peerunity 0.1.0 release
https://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=2902
https://github.com/Peerunity/Peerunity/releases/tag/v0.1.0
Unfortunately getrawtransaction was moved to 0.2, tests and release can take 1-2 months for sure
I don't know what are your security requirements but I use glv patch, daemon run stable, I mint on it too - coins still there
https://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=2902
https://github.com/Peerunity/Peerunity/releases/tag/v0.1.0
Unfortunately getrawtransaction was moved to 0.2, tests and release can take 1-2 months for sure
I don't know what are your security requirements but I use glv patch, daemon run stable, I mint on it too - coins still there
Is there still no way to get transaction details for non-wallet transactions via ppcoind?
I am at a crossroads similar to crazydownloaded's situation a year ago. I would very much like to include peercoin in multiple ongoing projects but I'm having trouble getting transactional data from the daemon.
There is no getrawtransaction call and gettransaction only returns information for in-wallet transactions, even with txindex=1 in .conf and the index properly built.
Is anyone maintaining the peercoin code and if so, is a pull of the getrawtransaction code on the roadmap?
Also, how might current peercoin block explorers be parsing general transaction data?
I am at a crossroads similar to crazydownloaded's situation a year ago. I would very much like to include peercoin in multiple ongoing projects but I'm having trouble getting transactional data from the daemon.
There is no getrawtransaction call and gettransaction only returns information for in-wallet transactions, even with txindex=1 in .conf and the index properly built.
Is anyone maintaining the peercoin code and if so, is a pull of the getrawtransaction code on the roadmap?
Also, how might current peercoin block explorers be parsing general transaction data?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=634568.msg7088485#msg7088485
https://github.com/glv2/peercoin/commits/rpc-rawtransaction
It will be included in next Peerunity release https://github.com/Peerunity/Peerunity/pull/26
It will be included in next Peerunity release https://github.com/Peerunity/Peerunity/pull/26
https://github.com/glv2/peercoin/commits/rpc-rawtransaction
It will be included in next Peerunity release https://github.com/Peerunity/Peerunity/pull/26
It will be included in next Peerunity release https://github.com/Peerunity/Peerunity/pull/26
May 24, facebook.com/brock.rector pic
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BoaShxrCQAASEXt.jpg
Fatal1ty is also Rutkowsky's rockstar.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BoaShxrCQAASEXt.jpg
Fatal1ty is also Rutkowsky's rockstar.
Is coloring ok?
Ask wall biting, blood everywhere.
http://i.imgur.com/SmDGiG4.png
Same coin, same timespan, tradingview
http://i.imgur.com/plQvv1V.png
ppc/btc, 1m
Maybe just settings?
Thanks
P.
Ask wall biting, blood everywhere.
http://i.imgur.com/SmDGiG4.png
Same coin, same timespan, tradingview
http://i.imgur.com/plQvv1V.png
ppc/btc, 1m
Maybe just settings?
Thanks
P.
Re: Breaking News! Thief nabbed while breaking into SilkRoad's vault: Caught on film
Clearly dented.
Re: Peercoin Weekly Review: Cold Storage Minting - Bitshares chat - Raspberry Pi
Cold Storage Minting thread attracted also SK, I'm against this idea but it's interesting how it'll evolve.
Mutual mircopayment channels chains(net) would give Visa's throughput:
Alice <==> Bank/ProxyServiceA [<==> Bank/ProxyServiceB, ...] <==> Bob
or
Customer ---> Bank/ProxyServiceA [<==> Bank/ProxyServiceB, ...] ---> Merchant
where
<==>: long term(monthly, yearly?) mutual micropayment channel
--->: long term one way micropayment channel
requires malleability fix
Alice <==> Bank/ProxyServiceA [<==> Bank/ProxyServiceB, ...] <==> Bob
or
Customer ---> Bank/ProxyServiceA [<==> Bank/ProxyServiceB, ...] ---> Merchant
where
<==>: long term(monthly, yearly?) mutual micropayment channel
--->: long term one way micropayment channel
requires malleability fix
Thank you very much for building the example code kactech. Stuff like this is really helpful.
Perhaps I could get advice on how to experiment with scripting?
I have been using bitcoind and pybitcointools. I have been having trouble getting the transactions to Eligius, which is the only mining pool that accepts custom transactions?
Since broadcasting custom transactions is such a pain, maybe we can come up with a way to do all the custom transactions off-chain?
And then we broadcast the final standard transaction normally?
Once a transaction has been signed, it is easy for either of them to verify that the transaction is valid.
Instead of broadcasting it, they can make an standard transaction that does the same thing, and broadcast that instead.
Only in the case where one person disappears do you have to broadcast the custom transaction?
I am currently trying to write code to implement cross-chain transactions, as well as trustless distributed gambling. I use bitmessage so that users can talk to one another. bitmessage is a proof-of-work based communication system where you can't even tell which addresses are talking to each other.
The code is a big mess right now. https://github.com/zack-bitcoin/python-bitcoin-library
Hi, bail-in on the blockchain is fundamental here, now way to make it offline.Perhaps I could get advice on how to experiment with scripting?
I have been using bitcoind and pybitcointools. I have been having trouble getting the transactions to Eligius, which is the only mining pool that accepts custom transactions?
Since broadcasting custom transactions is such a pain, maybe we can come up with a way to do all the custom transactions off-chain?
And then we broadcast the final standard transaction normally?
Once a transaction has been signed, it is easy for either of them to verify that the transaction is valid.
Instead of broadcasting it, they can make an standard transaction that does the same thing, and broadcast that instead.
Only in the case where one person disappears do you have to broadcast the custom transaction?
I am currently trying to write code to implement cross-chain transactions, as well as trustless distributed gambling. I use bitmessage so that users can talk to one another. bitmessage is a proof-of-work based communication system where you can't even tell which addresses are talking to each other.
The code is a big mess right now. https://github.com/zack-bitcoin/python-bitcoin-library
Have you tried https://blockchain.info/pushtx for custom transactions?