Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 22 results by kamakura
Re: Cryptopia Cryptocurrency Platform Services and Development
What did I say from the beginning? HAIRCUT. H A I R C U T. The "funny" thing is, my mgo tokens (affected) have not been cut, the BTC (theorically not affected) were cut.
Who wants mgo today?
If you want gamers coin just go for ENJ
Re: The Cypherfunks[FUNK]: a coin for a global band! Talking v2. Join! 80+ songs
https://res.cloudinary.com/db6ijvxdz/image/upload/v1533056848/Screenshot_2018-07-31_18.18.48.png
Why swap period got extended?
I understand this call we made turned out a bit lame, but i need to stress out it wasn't an easy decision. Our team (myself mostly) received more than a dozen requests to extend the swap period. More than a few FUNK holders experienced difficulties withdrawing FUNK from Cryptopia (which is now solved for good) so we wanted to give everyone more maneuvering space. We all understand you are all keen to receive your SONIQ but it doesn't mean a lot without a decent exchange, right? Therefore we're working hard on securing a decent exchange for our beloved Soniq.
This decision will likely dilute everyone who followed the rules of the swap, not cool imo, changing rules kills trust, especially in crypto.
Now we know rule changes are possible, what a shame!
I bet you go always bu the rules, that's why you are in crypto.
Do not make elephant out of this, they were kind and gave a chance to more community members to join. That's beneficial for the project.
What do you expect, next week price of 1000 sat?
Common
Re: The Cypherfunks[FUNK]: a coin for a global band! Talking v2. Join! 80+ songs
It just that transactions form cryptopia to soniq swap site are not working.
Seems like cryptopia is not pushing coins out.
Could you please talk to them.
Thank you.
Seems like cryptopia is not pushing coins out.
Could you please talk to them.
Thank you.
I'm in touch with their representative, trying to sort out why withdrawals are working for some people and not for other.
Anyway, since the swap window is about to end in couple of days, and if withdrawal issue don't get resolved soon, we might extend the deadline for swap.
None of us would like to leave anyone behind.
OK then, you made me believe.
Please, don't just take my word for it - question, do your due diligence, consult some blockchain people.
If you could extend for one or even two more weeks that would be awesome! Thanks a lot!
I hope other members of community that are anxiously waiting will be ok and understanding.
In 5 years life of the project one or two weeks up or down is nothing especially for such important moment.
I got replay form Cryptopia, they said initial attempt to broadcast failed and they will have to do it again manually. So Lets see.
Re: The Cypherfunks[FUNK]: a coin for a global band! Talking v2. Join! 80+ songs
Let me clarify some things. When you burn a coins supply, it reduces it's supply it doesn't eliminate it. In this case due to the low volume of FUNK, a supply reduction will actually solve a lot of it's economic problems. FUNK will continue to exist, merely it's supply will be reduced, making each FUNK more rare and hence potentially more valuable.
Airdrops are nice for investors, or people who don't want to take any risks but they also encourage dumping which can harm the economics of the coin. We prefer an EarnDrop where each person that does something to support the project is rewarded with some tokens. It encourages people as an incentive to do something beneficial to support the project. It's not something we have decided yet, however it's an important consideration.
Airdrops are nice for investors, or people who don't want to take any risks but they also encourage dumping which can harm the economics of the coin. We prefer an EarnDrop where each person that does something to support the project is rewarded with some tokens. It encourages people as an incentive to do something beneficial to support the project. It's not something we have decided yet, however it's an important consideration.
So we'll send FUNK tokens to a burn address (good for the remaining FUNK) and get SONIC for them (good for new project).
Sounds like a win-win for both projects
Beside coins are not actually burned, they are just going to be held by whoever has 'burning' address, and could be brought back to the market (at the higher price).
They kind of enforcing sonic, which is not good for people that want to hold coin (funk) instead of token (sonic).
Why not have both?
EDIT:
Lets use appropriate terms first. There is no burn at all, there is a COLLECTION and that is different.
Burn would consider releasing a new wallet with updated core. Such release would have to be a hard fork, and require exchanges update as well. Cryptopia would have to update the wallet too. That would be a burn.
What they are doing is COLLECTING the FUNK coins. If something is collected it means it could be released back to the market.
So what they are trying to do is to collect as much FUNK as possible to have control over it, and then to give newly printed tokens to the people in some ratio.
Once FUNK is collected it could be easily pumped, and it will look that some other guys and not SONIC team is doing it.
It is not the most honest way of doing things.
Wrong. FUNK will be burned for real actually. Those who decide to burn it for Soniq will have to send FUNK to unspendable address. Those addresses will be published and they lack private key, so the coins will be deducted from supply for good.
So what happened with unsependable addresses
I assume you're looking for a proof. All the deposit addresses are generated outside of elliptic curve, meaning the private key can not be generated by any means. That's what makes all deposits unspendable.
https://res.cloudinary.com/db6ijvxdz/image/upload/v1532641951/Unspendable_address.png
OK then, you made me believe.
It just that transactions form cryptopia to soniq swap site are not working.
Seems like cryptopia is not pushing coins out.
Could you please talk to them.
Thank you.
Re: The Cypherfunks[FUNK]: a coin for a global band! Talking v2. Join! 80+ songs
Let me clarify some things. When you burn a coins supply, it reduces it's supply it doesn't eliminate it. In this case due to the low volume of FUNK, a supply reduction will actually solve a lot of it's economic problems. FUNK will continue to exist, merely it's supply will be reduced, making each FUNK more rare and hence potentially more valuable.
Airdrops are nice for investors, or people who don't want to take any risks but they also encourage dumping which can harm the economics of the coin. We prefer an EarnDrop where each person that does something to support the project is rewarded with some tokens. It encourages people as an incentive to do something beneficial to support the project. It's not something we have decided yet, however it's an important consideration.
Airdrops are nice for investors, or people who don't want to take any risks but they also encourage dumping which can harm the economics of the coin. We prefer an EarnDrop where each person that does something to support the project is rewarded with some tokens. It encourages people as an incentive to do something beneficial to support the project. It's not something we have decided yet, however it's an important consideration.
So we'll send FUNK tokens to a burn address (good for the remaining FUNK) and get SONIC for them (good for new project).
Sounds like a win-win for both projects
Beside coins are not actually burned, they are just going to be held by whoever has 'burning' address, and could be brought back to the market (at the higher price).
They kind of enforcing sonic, which is not good for people that want to hold coin (funk) instead of token (sonic).
Why not have both?
EDIT:
Lets use appropriate terms first. There is no burn at all, there is a COLLECTION and that is different.
Burn would consider releasing a new wallet with updated core. Such release would have to be a hard fork, and require exchanges update as well. Cryptopia would have to update the wallet too. That would be a burn.
What they are doing is COLLECTING the FUNK coins. If something is collected it means it could be released back to the market.
So what they are trying to do is to collect as much FUNK as possible to have control over it, and then to give newly printed tokens to the people in some ratio.
Once FUNK is collected it could be easily pumped, and it will look that some other guys and not SONIC team is doing it.
It is not the most honest way of doing things.
Wrong. FUNK will be burned for real actually. Those who decide to burn it for Soniq will have to send FUNK to unspendable address. Those addresses will be published and they lack private key, so the coins will be deducted from supply for good.
So what happened with unsependable addresses
Re: The Cypherfunks[FUNK]: a coin for a global band! Talking v2. Join! 80+ songs
Let me clarify some things. When you burn a coins supply, it reduces it's supply it doesn't eliminate it. In this case due to the low volume of FUNK, a supply reduction will actually solve a lot of it's economic problems. FUNK will continue to exist, merely it's supply will be reduced, making each FUNK more rare and hence potentially more valuable.
Airdrops are nice for investors, or people who don't want to take any risks but they also encourage dumping which can harm the economics of the coin. We prefer an EarnDrop where each person that does something to support the project is rewarded with some tokens. It encourages people as an incentive to do something beneficial to support the project. It's not something we have decided yet, however it's an important consideration.
Airdrops are nice for investors, or people who don't want to take any risks but they also encourage dumping which can harm the economics of the coin. We prefer an EarnDrop where each person that does something to support the project is rewarded with some tokens. It encourages people as an incentive to do something beneficial to support the project. It's not something we have decided yet, however it's an important consideration.
So we'll send FUNK tokens to a burn address (good for the remaining FUNK) and get SONIC for them (good for new project).
Sounds like a win-win for both projects
Beside coins are not actually burned, they are just going to be held by whoever has 'burning' address, and could be brought back to the market (at the higher price).
They kind of enforcing sonic, which is not good for people that want to hold coin (funk) instead of token (sonic).
Why not have both?
EDIT:
Lets use appropriate terms first. There is no burn at all, there is a COLLECTION and that is different.
Burn would consider releasing a new wallet with updated core. Such release would have to be a hard fork, and require exchanges update as well. Cryptopia would have to update the wallet too. That would be a burn.
What they are doing is COLLECTING the FUNK coins. If something is collected it means it could be released back to the market.
So what they are trying to do is to collect as much FUNK as possible to have control over it, and then to give newly printed tokens to the people in some ratio.
Once FUNK is collected it could be easily pumped, and it will look that some other guys and not SONIC team is doing it.
It is not the most honest way of doing things.
Re: The Cypherfunks[FUNK]: a coin for a global band! Talking v2. Join! 80+ songs
Things are setting into place within Soniq team. Soon we'll open our Discord for community. Within a month we will launch a website, publish the whitepaper, open up for community, introduce our current team to y'all here, start a separate thread, and finally start burn process. It's quite likely we will also announce Soniq's first exchange but nothing is set in stone yet.
Ah, also, our devs will fix current FUNK source and provide you with updated version of clients. That doesn't mean we'll continue FUNK development, it's just a bug they spotted and intend to fix.
Again, whoever is willing and competent enough to take over FUNK development is more than welcome.
Ah, also, our devs will fix current FUNK source and provide you with updated version of clients. That doesn't mean we'll continue FUNK development, it's just a bug they spotted and intend to fix.
Again, whoever is willing and competent enough to take over FUNK development is more than welcome.
Great news, both to SONIQ and FUNK.
I think both swapping FUNK for SONIQ and keeping FUNK alive will be good for the community.
Ain't gonna happen.They want to burn FUNK. Read 2 posts above.
Re: The Cypherfunks[FUNK]: a coin for a global band! Talking v2. Join! 80+ songs
Hi everyone,
I would like to take over and develop the FUNK Coin.
According to a post by shavers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=469407.1820) i should contact Simondlr, but i get error message while i try
to send PM :-(
"User 'simondlr' has not chosen to allow messages from newbies. You should post in their relevant thread to remind them to enable this setting."
@Simondlr: Would you give the FUNK Coin to me?
Thanks & best regards
ZeroCool
I would like to take over and develop the FUNK Coin.
According to a post by shavers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=469407.1820) i should contact Simondlr, but i get error message while i try
to send PM :-(
"User 'simondlr' has not chosen to allow messages from newbies. You should post in their relevant thread to remind them to enable this setting."
@Simondlr: Would you give the FUNK Coin to me?
Thanks & best regards
ZeroCool
Why not fork FUNK, then you don't need anyone's permission and you can do what you want?
Are you interested just in the coin, or the music too? I can't see the point of FUNK without the music.
I guess anyone can create a fork of any coin!!!! Why one needs permission?
Moreover, ppl like these airdrops, see ZCL case when they created BTCP!!!!
If there is a developer team anyone can do that!!!! But without active devs noting happens!!!!
The most valuable thing about FUNK atm is the Cryptopia listing. That's 5 BTC's worth. Anyone considering to fork/swap would probably need their support, because if they keep the old chain on Cryptopia, I'm guessing that will remain more popular because it has the best exchange.
Listing on Cryptopia is more than 5btc-s, it is 5M of DOTs, at the current price of 262 sat it is about 13btcs, and most likely it will go up.
In terms of advertising it is easier to continue with old chain and history.
The idea is to FORK FUNK before Airdrop. This way SONIC team is completely clean and more trustful, and if they make any apps, or platforms they can include both coins, why not?
If you hold both chains, your interest is that both chains rise in value.
If ZeroCool is a good dev, why not. Let him run original chain. I would just like to know who he is. It helps credibility.
Re: The Cypherfunks[FUNK]: a coin for a global band! Talking v2. Join! 80+ songs
Hi everyone,
I would like to take over and develop the FUNK Coin.
According to a post by shavers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=469407.1820) i should contact Simondlr, but i get error message while i try
to send PM :-(
"User 'simondlr' has not chosen to allow messages from newbies. You should post in their relevant thread to remind them to enable this setting."
@Simondlr: Would you give the FUNK Coin to me?
Thanks & best regards
ZeroCool
I would like to take over and develop the FUNK Coin.
According to a post by shavers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=469407.1820) i should contact Simondlr, but i get error message while i try
to send PM :-(
"User 'simondlr' has not chosen to allow messages from newbies. You should post in their relevant thread to remind them to enable this setting."
@Simondlr: Would you give the FUNK Coin to me?
Thanks & best regards
ZeroCool
Who are you?
Do you have a public profile?
Please provide your references.
Re: The Cypherfunks[FUNK]: a coin for a global band! Talking v2. Join! 80+ songs
I have a good idea,
how about FUNK does fork first, and then ERC20 AirDrop on forked chain , so we keep both, original FUNK and SONIC?
So no one is in risk, and fork will also drive price up for both coins.
If later FUNK dies, let it die naturally.
how about FUNK does fork first, and then ERC20 AirDrop on forked chain , so we keep both, original FUNK and SONIC?
So no one is in risk, and fork will also drive price up for both coins.
If later FUNK dies, let it die naturally.
Re: The Cypherfunks[FUNK]: a coin for a global band! Talking v2. Join! 80+ songs
FUNK devs, why not to try to list FUNK in some small exchanges, in order to try to get some more people involved in trading the coin?
I recommend: Trade Satoshi, BTC-Alpha, Stocks.Exchange, ...
I recommend: Trade Satoshi, BTC-Alpha, Stocks.Exchange, ...
Well there are no active FUNK devs i know of. Unless someone take over it.
I thought you are the dev!?
Re: The Cypherfunks[FUNK]: a coin for a global band! Talking v2. Join! 80+ songs
Alright, a couple things strike me as necessary.
First, though minor, those of you with sells at 1 satoshi really ought to cancel them. People are buying it in trickles every day. If that's all it's worth to YOU, why would it be worth more to them? I'm buying at that rate, not selling.
Second.
Use cases. If this coin is to go places, something more needs to be done than having it listed on an exchange. While I know that Soundposition and several others are working on that behind the scenes, those of us who are involved but not part of development should be having that discussion too.
Cypherfunk is a cool name. This shouldn't be too hard to promote. So, with that in mind, let's open the discussion both for promotion and use cases.
I think one obvious use is tipping musicians. There are a LOT of collaborations on Youtube and other such venues between some pretty damn good musicians. If we started asking them to put up a FUNK address, or giving them some way to claim some funk, they would likely spread the word to others.
Of course, merchandising in various ways. If you make music, sell it for FUNK instead of dollars. In the short run, it would take rather a large amount to be worth anything, but then again, it would drive traffic to the exchange(s). Bear in mind that Nova will be reopening at some point, plus the more the coin's name gets around, the more likely other exchanges will pick it up. FOMO affects institutions as well as individuals, and can be a great tool.
That's just a couple things. What y'all got to add?
First, though minor, those of you with sells at 1 satoshi really ought to cancel them. People are buying it in trickles every day. If that's all it's worth to YOU, why would it be worth more to them? I'm buying at that rate, not selling.
Second.
Use cases. If this coin is to go places, something more needs to be done than having it listed on an exchange. While I know that Soundposition and several others are working on that behind the scenes, those of us who are involved but not part of development should be having that discussion too.
Cypherfunk is a cool name. This shouldn't be too hard to promote. So, with that in mind, let's open the discussion both for promotion and use cases.
I think one obvious use is tipping musicians. There are a LOT of collaborations on Youtube and other such venues between some pretty damn good musicians. If we started asking them to put up a FUNK address, or giving them some way to claim some funk, they would likely spread the word to others.
Of course, merchandising in various ways. If you make music, sell it for FUNK instead of dollars. In the short run, it would take rather a large amount to be worth anything, but then again, it would drive traffic to the exchange(s). Bear in mind that Nova will be reopening at some point, plus the more the coin's name gets around, the more likely other exchanges will pick it up. FOMO affects institutions as well as individuals, and can be a great tool.
That's just a couple things. What y'all got to add?
unknown future, lack of leadership ... 1sat is like fortune for this coin
better let unhappy people out at 1 sat than at 100
Re: The Cypherfunks[FUNK]: a coin for a global band! Talking v2. Join! 80+ songs
Hi everyone. i`m a beginner at this, and i have a question:
The funks i have at cryptopia, will the be switched to the new token?
Sorry for my bad english
The funks i have at cryptopia, will the be switched to the new token?
Sorry for my bad english
Your English is good actually
To answer your question - no, not by default. You will be able to convert your FUNK coin to Soniq token though, if you wish and as much as you wish.
We will allow up to 50 billion FUNK coins burned. The window will be open for at least several months, but that's yet to be decided.
Soon, Soniq project team will publish token burning app where you'll be able to submit your email, your soniq address and provide you with funk address.
FUNK coins you send will then be deducted from total supply (burned) and new, Soniq tokens will be sent your way.
I hope this helps clarify things a bit
That was very well explained! The app will be futuristic, and amazing most importantly able to exchange FUNK into SONIQ.
Win + Win is the future!
I think I already know the answer, but just to clarify:
Once Soniq is introduced, there will be a window in which it's available, at a price of 500 funk per Token. That part is perfectly clear, and what Shavers wrote above makes it crystal.
Where the ambiguity lies for me: Is FUNK planned to continue as a separate coin, and if so, are there plans for further development on it? Or is the idea to burn it down?
I'd like to play with the code (well, I am anyway), but not if it's going to be abandoned after Soniq is released.
If they are to both go on and become separate entities, that could be pretty interesting
What happened with AirDrop and keeping both? I thought it was a very good idea!
I really believe that both together, the coin and the token, aiming to serve the same idea can actually help each other
It would be like backup one to another
Re: The Cypherfunks[FUNK]: a coin for a global band! Talking v2. Join! 80+ songs
The token (Soniq) price will be much higher, at least at >1000 satoshi range. I can't reveal much but there's more than one reason i'm certain it'll be worth at least 1000 sats. Also, Soniq will be listed on solid exchange for a start. Moving to token will gave us various advantages given the upcoming regulations, over regular coins, we took many factors into consideration. Needless to say, Soniq team is taking the whole project as a legitimate business -well just like GameCredits / GNation did.
Was 10(ish) Litoshi buy to 1 satoshi sell a good profit - not at all, especially for those that realize it's potential. 1 satoshi is way undervalued. Keep in mind FUNK supply will decrease dramatically once FUNK to Soniq burn starts.
Was 10(ish) Litoshi buy to 1 satoshi sell a good profit - not at all, especially for those that realize it's potential. 1 satoshi is way undervalued. Keep in mind FUNK supply will decrease dramatically once FUNK to Soniq burn starts.
if sonig=funk and you are so sure that soniq will stay in 500~1000 range why don't you put huge buy wall on 5 sat now?
how going from the community coin to corporate coin can help us with regulations in the time when authorities will go after ICOs and tokens? I think they will favour grandfathered coins
Re: The Cypherfunks[FUNK]: a coin for a global band! Talking v2. Join! 80+ songs
Wow, I was wondering why FUNK was suddenly worth that much in my portfolio!
Great thing to see we're trading on the BTC market again.
Great thing to see we're trading on the BTC market again.
C'mon
Sold the bands Funk on both exchanges due to wallet issues, and now
I' cant afford to buy their coins back!
Is this a pump and dump? I feel bad because I used the bands money.
can it please take another dip?
no it is 1 sat, can be lower than that
so what happened is that funk was traded lately at around 10 lat rate, and now that is switched to btc market is 1 sat which is lets say 10 times more
it wen up 10 times in value, and it is sealed (cant go down)
if we are going to switch to ETH token (by the way EOS is going the opposite direction ) in the ratio 500:1 it means in order to have the same marketcap new token should be priced at about 500 sat. Am I correct?
I honestly doubt that new token could be held at 500 sat rate,
what do you think?
I still do not see benefit of moving form coin to token
Do we have enough technical talent here to maintain the coin and its network?
Re: The Cypherfunks[FUNK]: a coin for a global band! Talking v2. Join! 80+ songs
Hi Soundposition,
please provide some updates / information!
THX
Andy
please provide some updates / information!
THX
Andy
Yes, of course. The website is almost finished. It looks fantastic. Our very passionate web developer is doing a great job on it. I had hoped to launch the site before the end of 2017. The holidays slowed everything down a little bit, but now things are picking up pace again.
We have setup the domain name, twitter account, discord, reddit, FB etc.. We have recruited an excellent internet marketing analyst, and also a community manager. We have a developer consultant who helps guide our technical development. We also have a developer for the token. All of them are also working for GameCredits, so for them this is a side project they are interested in being involved in.
We have begun weekly team meetings, scheduled this time with a terrific developer next Saturday, and he's stoked to work on the token.
Finally... Cryptopia appears to be taking the necessary actions to restore the markets. There's nothing we can do about that at the moment as we are all simply waiting for the servers to upgrade.
There are lots of exciting developments to look forward to in 2018!!
P.S. Mike the new token is going to be gained by exchanging FUNK. 500 FUNK will equal 1 new token. There will be a supply reduction this way. We definitely care about the old chain, because people will have to exchange FUNK to obtain the new token.
I suggest reading the white paper on the website once launched. It will explain in much more detail.
You can't continue to fool everyone. You have posted about new Website around September 2017. I wonder why building a website will take forever.. Maybe you are hosting in the moon. Your sweet talks about the development on this project brought someone like me. I had to sold one of my investments which if I had leave would have worth much more.
Or better still, @soundposition, Can you discuss with your so called team.. They should give us dates to expects their updates, then if the dates are not met, other people can start working on the project. If this is a real community coin, This is what we need.
LoveandPeace2018
I have provided an update. The decisions you make are your own. If you sold one of your investments, that's your business. I don't think you will have the patience for this project, and I suggest you involve yourself with some other project.
I'm not sure what group you consider yourself to be a part of. You talk of 'us' and 'we' and really there is only you. You don't speak for other people on this forum. You are basically a troll and not a helpful community member. I am kindly requesting that you stop posting here.
Thank you.
You asked why I speaks for people. I have the same right as you. You are the only one here writing on the Devs behalf (We dont even know if the DEVS really exists, only you have been posting here for so long). If you want to be so sure how WE investors are not happy about your reactions, you can make a troll, If you win, I will dash you all my FUNK token and gladly leave here for life.
I can't believe a great project like this can be in the mold all because of someone's incompetence. Even the tokens we get for free as airdrop are doing fine not talking of what we paid for.
Am so used to your promises that I have to always consider them as lies.... I mean We cant wait on empty promises. I stand against this and we all do
Newcomers should please just read few threads back, then you will all understand what I mean.
Let me first say that your English is horrible, so I suggest brushing up on your English. Your name is LoveandPeace and you are anything except Love or Peace. I resent your insults, and suggest you live up to your name. Go be peaceful, quiet, and tranquil. Learn to love and have respect.
I have the blessing from the original developer of FUNK Simon de la Rouviere to continue this project, with the original support from the FUNK community (which you are not actually a part of). You are trying to usurp the project, which I will not allow you or anyone else to do.
I started contributing to this project back in 2014, and contributed a large collection of original music to the project. LoveandPeace is simply an 'investor' and not even a musician who is simply unhappy with the 15X increase in value of their FUNK holdings. It's called GREED.
Please do not support this troll, and if he convinces Mike from HashUnlimited to fork please don't run their wallet. HashUnlimited is a developer for Einsteinium coin. Einsteinium coin was taken over by the same person we fired at GameCredits for running GameCredits into the ground last year before we hired Sergey as our CEO. I strongly suspect LoveandPeace is that person.
What languages do you speak by the way? Crypto is international thing
Re: The Cypherfunks[FUNK]: a coin for a global band! Talking v2. Join! 80+ songs
I'm still hanging around on vacation (or held hostage by a well overpriced hotel like I would call it) but at least I was able to have a good look into the wallet / node code. The upgrade needs to be done in 2 steps, first one to sneak in BIP65 and BIP66 as they are still following Bitcoin's isSuperMajority rule and it wouldn't be worth the effort to change those to BIP9 as well IMO. The required hard forks can take place there as well. Second, we could simply upgrade to the latest version whatever this will be but I guess Litecoin 0.14 codebase is the way to go.
I also agree that the new specifications need to be fixed and frozen before actually getting some code out in the wild. There for feel free to discuss them and get us on thinking, coding and testing ;-)
I also agree that the new specifications need to be fixed and frozen before actually getting some code out in the wild. There for feel free to discuss them and get us on thinking, coding and testing ;-)
Hi Mike. After discussing everything with our devs, we have decided not to do any hard forking. The only option for a long term project is to create an ETH token, most likely using the ERC223 token standard. Right now we are working on a killer web design, and our devs are now looking directly at the project.
TSP
Hello HashUnlimited, I suggest you continue with this project, Better we get a fork of this project. This project is currently in the wrong hands. Soundposition has just been deceiving people all these while. Little spike in price was not because of development. It happens to all crypto.. I cant believe a project like this is not gaining traction when even the shittest of coin are gaining momentum presently.
Sound position have been posting about working on new website since more than 5 Months ago. If website takes a whole year to build, then working on the Coin itself will take a decade.
I joined this project because of the interesting update I got which am sure brought a lot of people too. You should not take us for granted.
Dear HashUnlimited, Please Let's fork this project and they should continue with whatever they want with this old shit.. I am so sure so many people will support you like I did.
Yup, 'little' spike in price of 15x in a month happens to all crypto, especially to those with no ongoing development, and those with no future.
No.
Many of the unpopular coins have showed such spike!!! And seems like many more will do, just watch!!!!
Well, the code itself if I remember right is plain bitcoin protocol without any fancy stuff inside, the only issue is that KGW which is basically acting like a handbrake. The code itself can be done in a week or less.
Please don't tamper with the code. We are working hard on launching the new token.
Who cares? If a large part of the community would like to see the chain continue, why not. For the ticker change you need to pay anyways.
The team that is working on this project care a lot. The chain has continued for almost 4 years now without any tampering. We are investing a lot of time and resources into this project, and have a lot of passion and talent driving this project forward. We are paying the costs for development, marketing and spending a great deal of time on this.
I don't get it, once you are working on a new token, next time you care about the then obsolete chain. What now? New Token or old Chain?
I am not comfortable swapping all my coins, but 50% yes.
Lets start core upgrade to see which road leads to success. No hard feelings, it is a side project for all of us. And is worth nothing.
I would say, Mike go ahead and fork the chain, you have my support.