Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 51 results by koinjoin75
Re: [ANN] CommunityCoin (COMM) Fair & FREE Distribution | Pure PoS | Join Community
How to run LINUX communitycon-qt in Ubuntu? Which command to type? Thank you.
I normally used ./communitycoind to run.
There are a lot of commands:
./communitycoind getbalance
./communitycoind listtransactions
....
I think run qt use ./communitycoind-qt ? Not sure.
Re: [ANN] CommunityCoin (COMM) Fair & FREE Distribution | Pure PoS | Join Community
voted! 6282-6287 
Guys! keep going!
Guys! keep going!
Yes, it's the Community Time!
vote 6332-6337
Re: [ANN] CommunityCoin (COMM) Fair & FREE Distribution | Pure PoS | No Premine!
Count me in:)
I will always support the community.
I posted my bitcointalk ID koinjoin75 here.
https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/9028-communitycoin-comm-information/?p=77577
Thank you very much,I like this coin.
I will always support the community.
I posted my bitcointalk ID koinjoin75 here.
https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/9028-communitycoin-comm-information/?p=77577
Thank you very much,I like this coin.
Re: [ANN] BlackCoin (BC) | on exchanges | PoS | No premine
I Wounder if that is being Planned all along!??
I mean i dont say its a conspiracy,but it sems a bit odd that now the whales can get in cheap,where they before can´t (or not like with other coins)
Dont Know but..........its smells fishy?!!
I mean i dont say its a conspiracy,but it sems a bit odd that now the whales can get in cheap,where they before can´t (or not like with other coins)
Dont Know but..........its smells fishy?!!
Does look like a conspiracy
The murder of a lot of people
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
Just popped in this thread for the time in about a week. In seeing the last few posts, let me just say that CHAOSiTEC has a very sound character, and I doubt he would be cheating anyone.
I think he should deceive us
Hope is a joke to
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
Well that's what happends when 80% focus is on back-end with no marketing in a high pace development environment.
I agree with you, but then, this is a community-driven coin where most of the work is done by volunteers. So feel free to step up.
I also agree to do
What do you have a better offer
I mean let us more favorable
Re: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty Protocol, Client and Coin (built on Bitcoin) - Official
How much of this proposal, and of other similar proposals, can be handled by the asset description field? (Not much space is needed to store a URL.).I love namespaces, etc., but I want to keep the protocol-level as simple and as stupid as possible. We could do this sort of thing is Counterwallet and BootleXCP themselves, for example.
Extremely good point and porqupine has also communicated the same to me.
We would only need a naming convention on how to format the asset description field. The rest can be up to the client side to parse it.
As long as there was some defacto which was perhaps outlined by the Counterparty team but not necessarily enforced, then everyone would be a happy camper.
Eg Lets just use the tilde as a delimiting character in the description. Field 1 = namespace, field 2 = description, field 3 = url
It needs to be a new long asset name field that is enforced by the protocol for long names. A description will not work because users can put anything in there.
My understanding (a dev can correct me) is that the description field can be modified for an asset.
So lets just say we all agree on a defacto standard for the description field. There are 3 fields delimited by a tilde.
Each of the clients can just invalidate and fail to show any asset in their list where 3 tildes aren't found. The asset owner would have motivation to get it right.
I think you understand very well
That's perfectly correct
I said I agree with you
Re: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty Protocol, Client and Coin (built on Bitcoin) - Official
Does anyone know the legality of the devs getting rid of something within the protocol which is non consentual to other users of bitcoin, it can;t be legal
there must be regulations in place
there must be regulations in place
Not kidding, I honestly did laugh while reading this.
XCP people threatening lawsuits over their choice of poor design implementation that leaves them vulnerable to any whim the BTC devs might have for changing protocol.
Counterparty might provide benefits, so it would probably be good if it succeeds, but this is not a viable argument route haha.
See this article
I also can't help laughing
Re: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty Protocol, Client and Coin (built on Bitcoin) - Official
Asset fees should not be burned because then we are diminishing the total supply. Since there is no mining, or additionally BTC burning going on, why don't we change the protocol to distribute asset fees among all holders of XCP?
1) Distributing the XCP is very difficult technically, because of rounding issues.
2) The two possibilities are economically equivalent, and the total number of XCP doesn't matter so much, because of the divisibility.
You don't think a higher escrow amount would have worked better than a 5 xcp asset fee? We have hundreds of Asset names already parked - imagine what it will be like when the user base is 50x ?
The vast majority of those assets were created before the fee was put in place.
I agree with you
I believe many people have this idea
Re: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty Protocol, Client and Coin (built on Bitcoin) - Official
Newbie here. So is proof-of-burn still how people are buying these? Or should I buy through Poloniex? 
I was a rookie
Hope to get help from others
Someone to help us?
Re: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty Protocol, Client and Coin (built on Bitcoin) - Official
I think that the ability of getting XCP with proof-of-burn should be postponed to the time when there will be a stable client. It will help the distribution of the coin. If not there will be another distributed exchange with large-holders(who risked their money into a thing that didn't worked at the time) which will be very unhealthy for the counterparty system.
I think your suggestion is very good very correct
The proposal should get their research
Hoping to solve
Re: [ANN][DOGE] Dogecoin - very currency many coin - v1.6 HARDFORK MANDATORY UPDATE
i can t use my dogewallet anymore , it says that i have to make an conf file with a new pass and user , some help please 
It seems you're the same as me is a rookie
PM I tell you the process
Re: [ANN][DOGE] Dogecoin - very currency many coin - v1.5.2 Released, please update!
that sell wall at 200 
Better look at what is happening with bitcoin , some nasty storm will come from there.
If btc takes a dive there will be a bank run to transform the doge into fiat.
Bit position is a little disturbance can not be shaken or will return to its orbit
Refueling bit with you
Re: [ANN][DOGE] Dogecoin - very currency many coin - v1.5 Released!
some pool promo
dude, could you pls stop flooding this thread with some promo of mining pools? honestly, it's become really annoying and pool list is well known.
thanks.
I also think very annoying
As everyone knows things also repeatedly stressed that boring
Re: [ANN]Faircoin - The First Fairly Distributed coin. New exchanges added!
FairCoin needs pool like the one for BlackCoin
http://www.blackcoinpool.com/
That would drive the price up no doubt, don't think another exchange will do much good for now!
http://www.blackcoinpool.com/
That would drive the price up no doubt, don't think another exchange will do much good for now!
Yes this is defnitly a great idea if any pool admins is able to do something like this for faircoin!
Considering the circumstances, I think we should donate money to mintpal
So we will have a great deal of trading platform as the support.
My friends, you are from American or Europe, are you than those Chinese is poor?
Actually i believe waiting after poc to get in will be of more benefits to faircoin.
Having Faircoin first on mintpal voting for the next 4-6 days will give us more visibility before we actually hit the market.
Then if som1 can really manage that genius idea of multipool this could be truly an amazing feature.
Creating constant buy orders and demand this is going to be good.
I have to admit that what you said is very reasonable
So let us wait quietly, have a look what the future will bring!
Re: [ANN] H2O Coin | *Adaptive -N* & *D_GW* -----RELAUNCH X/3/2014 - 7PM GMT
Oh, I think this topic is really good water.
But I still wouldn't buy this coin you
Because now it has too many coins.
I can't waste my money
But I wish you good luck.
But I still wouldn't buy this coin you
Because now it has too many coins.
I can't waste my money
But I wish you good luck.
Re: [ANN]Faircoin - The First Fairly Distributed coin. New exchanges added!
FairCoin needs pool like the one for BlackCoin
http://www.blackcoinpool.com/
That would drive the price up no doubt, don't think another exchange will do much good for now!
http://www.blackcoinpool.com/
That would drive the price up no doubt, don't think another exchange will do much good for now!
Yes this is defnitly a great idea if any pool admins is able to do something like this for faircoin!
Considering the circumstances, I think we should donate money to mintpal
So we will have a great deal of trading platform as the support.
My friends, you are from American or Europe, are you than those Chinese is poor?
Re: [ANN] CommunityCoin (COMM) Fair & FREE Distribution | Pure PoS | No Premine!
the rule is not fair to everone .
so , it is just a joke!
keep calm list is big and we check each people one by one!so , it is just a joke!
some senders not have bitcointalk user name
some senders less then 50 posts
some senders has not good quality posts
some senders not even read OP and posted this thread
we disqualifies those to protect crypto from lazy bears!
I support the dev as this kind of qualification method is rather fair.
There is no absolutely fair on the earth. But I think this one is doing a great thing for Active Cryptocoin Community.
That's enough!
Hello, dear development team. I think you need Is it right? Too strict.
The release of 50 quality reply is this really necessary? Is it right? Can consider can reduce a little the audit criteria
I believe that if you do this, then this coin will have better development space.
I suggest, 50 recovery increased to 80 or 100, we can in the quality of this issue slightly lower standard of audit.
Do you think how this idea?