Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 54 results by kyne
Re: Gateless Gate Sharp 1.2.17: Fastest AMD NeoScrypt Miner, ETH dual, CryptoNight
Alright, on-the-fly memory timing mods are working reasonably well on my PC's, so I am going to release a new version today.
Equihash and better support for Vega are coming next.
Equihash and better support for Vega are coming next.
yeah, waiting for your vega optimize version!
Re: Gateless Gate Sharp 1.2.17: Fastest AMD NeoScrypt Miner, ETH dual, CryptoNight
Zawawa,Thanks for your miner. i'm waiting for optimize miner for AMD vega. Vega got very poor performance on neoscrypt but hope you can bring the light.
Re: Gateless Gate Sharp 1.2.13: zawawa's open-source dual ETH/XMR/PASC/LBC/FTC miner
Yeah, I can see that an *extended* period of disconnection can be very problematic with the current implementation.
See, details are very important in problem reporting... I was also able to reproduce the problem with scaling after hours of head-scratching.
Hopefully I will push fixes later today.
On a more positive note, remote monitoring with an sgminer-compatible API is coming soon.
I was finally able to have Awesome Miner recognize GGS.
One last thing. Vega 56 arrived at last this afternoon. This means that Vega cards will get the same level of optimizations as RX [45][78]0.
See, details are very important in problem reporting... I was also able to reproduce the problem with scaling after hours of head-scratching.
Hopefully I will push fixes later today.
On a more positive note, remote monitoring with an sgminer-compatible API is coming soon.
I was finally able to have Awesome Miner recognize GGS.
One last thing. Vega 56 arrived at last this afternoon. This means that Vega cards will get the same level of optimizations as RX [45][78]0.
Looking forward with your optimization about vega!
My rig contains 5 Rx470. I'm reduced voltage offset from wattools at -15 (15*6.25mv). Power draw from the wall for full rig @560-570W.
XMR use the lowest power my full rig (5*700H/s) draw power at wall @460-470W.
Hi, I would like to share my information
A) Sapphire Nitro OC AMD RX470 (Core/Mem 1100/300) only core clock will effect the hashrate
B) 600MH/s
C) 100W from the Wall
Whoa, 100W?? That sounds crazy low. I thought Pascal consumes more power than ZEC or ETH, and those draw ~140-150W on the 470. Any crazy bios mod or undervolt?A) Sapphire Nitro OC AMD RX470 (Core/Mem 1100/300) only core clock will effect the hashrate
B) 600MH/s
C) 100W from the Wall
Hey guys,
I run www.mycryptobuddy.com - a site which displays which coins are most profitable to mine for a given GPU (or for a custom setup). I'm in the process of adding PascalCoin to the list of coins, but I need some more information about the mining speed and power consumption for different cards.
If you've tried mining PascalCoin, could you please share the following?
A) Video card (rx 470, r9 7950 etc) and brand
B) PascalCoin mining speed
C) Power consumption, if available
Thanks!
I run www.mycryptobuddy.com - a site which displays which coins are most profitable to mine for a given GPU (or for a custom setup). I'm in the process of adding PascalCoin to the list of coins, but I need some more information about the mining speed and power consumption for different cards.
If you've tried mining PascalCoin, could you please share the following?
A) Video card (rx 470, r9 7950 etc) and brand
B) PascalCoin mining speed
C) Power consumption, if available
Thanks!
wattools is a software that can modify voltage without flashing you RX400 card. you can try by this link http://www.overclock.net/t/1609782/watttool-a-simple-tool-that-combines-overclocking-with-vrm-monitoring-tweaking-for-rx-400-series. Flashing VBios require for Memory strap to change memory timing at higher memory clock to increase ethash rate with the same power usage.
Eth is probably better, don't forget that XMR has huge fees! Have a look at the side by side comparison for your setup
http://www.MyCryptoBuddy.com/path?hardware=custom&selectedCoins=ETH,XMR&Ethash=135&Equihash=1100&Cryptonote=3450&powerEthash=750&powerEquihash=750&powerCryptonote=750
http://www.MyCryptoBuddy.com/path?hardware=custom&selectedCoins=ETH,XMR&Ethash=135&Equihash=1100&Cryptonote=3450&powerEthash=750&powerEquihash=750&powerCryptonote=750
Cryptonote powers usage is not accurate. It should draw power less against ethash. It's use the lowest power for those three of that algo.
My rig (Voltage offset @ -15)
ETH (27*5) Power usage 660W-670W
XMR (700*5) Power usage 460-470W
My rig contains 5 Rx470. I'm reduced voltage offset from wattools at -15 (15*6.25mv). Power draw from the wall for full rig @560-570W.
XMR use the lowest power my full rig (5*700H/s) draw power at wall @460-470W.
Hi, I would like to share my information
A) Sapphire Nitro OC AMD RX470 (Core/Mem 1100/300) only core clock will effect the hashrate
B) 600MH/s
C) 100W from the Wall
Whoa, 100W?? That sounds crazy low. I thought Pascal consumes more power than ZEC or ETH, and those draw ~140-150W on the 470. Any crazy bios mod or undervolt?A) Sapphire Nitro OC AMD RX470 (Core/Mem 1100/300) only core clock will effect the hashrate
B) 600MH/s
C) 100W from the Wall
Hey guys,
I run www.mycryptobuddy.com - a site which displays which coins are most profitable to mine for a given GPU (or for a custom setup). I'm in the process of adding PascalCoin to the list of coins, but I need some more information about the mining speed and power consumption for different cards.
If you've tried mining PascalCoin, could you please share the following?
A) Video card (rx 470, r9 7950 etc) and brand
B) PascalCoin mining speed
C) Power consumption, if available
Thanks!
I run www.mycryptobuddy.com - a site which displays which coins are most profitable to mine for a given GPU (or for a custom setup). I'm in the process of adding PascalCoin to the list of coins, but I need some more information about the mining speed and power consumption for different cards.
If you've tried mining PascalCoin, could you please share the following?
A) Video card (rx 470, r9 7950 etc) and brand
B) PascalCoin mining speed
C) Power consumption, if available
Thanks!
Hi, I would like to share my information
A) Sapphire Nitro OC AMD RX470 (Core/Mem 1100/300) only core clock will effect the hashrate
B) 600MH/s
C) 100W from the Wall
A) Sapphire Nitro OC AMD RX470 (Core/Mem 1100/300) only core clock will effect the hashrate
B) 600MH/s
C) 100W from the Wall
Hey guys,
I run www.mycryptobuddy.com - a site which displays which coins are most profitable to mine for a given GPU (or for a custom setup). I'm in the process of adding PascalCoin to the list of coins, but I need some more information about the mining speed and power consumption for different cards.
If you've tried mining PascalCoin, could you please share the following?
A) Video card (rx 470, r9 7950 etc) and brand
B) PascalCoin mining speed
C) Power consumption, if available
Thanks!
I run www.mycryptobuddy.com - a site which displays which coins are most profitable to mine for a given GPU (or for a custom setup). I'm in the process of adding PascalCoin to the list of coins, but I need some more information about the mining speed and power consumption for different cards.
If you've tried mining PascalCoin, could you please share the following?
A) Video card (rx 470, r9 7950 etc) and brand
B) PascalCoin mining speed
C) Power consumption, if available
Thanks!
Quote
Yes, 2G Memory is not enough to mine ETH right ?
Sometimes enough, sometimes not (especially if the card is one and the same desktop on it)You can try a different currency with Etash algo which less epoch. Expanse for ex.
And redownload v1.9 slightly faster.
GTX660 -exp1 -int 20 -wsz 128 no overclocking - 11,5MX/c
GTX660 -exp1 -int 20 -wsz 128 Core+80, Memory +150, 12+MX/c
GTX1060 3GB (Palit, Inno) -exp0 -int 20 -wsz 64 Memory +500, Power Limit 75% - 20,5MX/c
GTX1060 3GB (Palit, Inno) -exp0 -int 20 -wsz 64 Memory +700, Power Limit 100% - 21,5MX/c
ok, Thank you for your help. I'll try to test it.
Hello Etar, I got an error can't run. I'm using GTX660
your gtx 660 maybe have only 2Gb memory?Code:
24/11/13:44:47:Start miner
24/11/13:44:50:Gpu0 error cuMemAlloc(Dag)-2
1479995090GPU0 error in dagfunction
24/11/13:44:50:Gpu0 error cuMemAlloc(Dag)-2
1479995090GPU0 error in dagfunction
Yes, 2G Memory is not enough to mine ETH right ?
Hello Etar, I got an error can't run. I'm using GTX660
Code:
24/11/13:44:47:Start miner
24/11/13:44:47:Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz
NvAPI device[0] GeForce GTX 660
NvAPI device[0] bid:1
NvAPI device[0] sid:0
24/11/13:44:47:Driver version API: 8.0
24/11/13:44:47:Parametrs command line: -url http://daggerhashimoto.eu.nicehash.com:3353 -wlt 19XA1XiEafCzdNEqefds4mVcG7pNKMtUMn.gtx660 -eml 1
Cuda device[0]:GeForce GTX 660
Cuda device[0] bid:1
Cuda device[0] sid:0
24/11/13:44:47:Start stat server
24/11/13:44:48:
24/11/13:44:48:SEND: {"method": "mining.subscribe", "params": ["MinerName/1.0.0", "EthereumStratum/1.0.0"], "id": 100}
24/11/13:44:48:SEND: {"method": "mining.extranonce.subscribe", "params": [], "id": 101}
24/11/13:44:48:SEND: {"method": "mining.authorize", "params": ["19XA1XiEafCzdNEqefds4mVcG7pNKMtUMn.gtx660", "1"], "id": 2}
24/11/13:44:48:BUF: {"id":100,"error":null,"result":[["mining.notify","d4a392634935baf6cb6f9d8f7dfa68f2","EthereumStratum/1.0.0"],"2129d3"]}
24/11/13:44:48:New extranonce <2129d3>
24/11/13:44:48:BUF: {"id":2,"result":true,"error":null}
24/11/13:44:48:BUF: {"id":null,"method":"mining.set_difficulty","params":[0.05]}
24/11/13:44:48:Target for next job:00000013ffec0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
24/11/13:44:48:BUF: {"params":["0000003cff268adb","0518e1373ff88ccabb28493cac10cb0731313135d880dae0d846be6016ab9acf","622993ce6a4c2b82a0c3076165ea967bb7c85f49736c25417a96f49ffee247ea",true],"id":null,"method":"mining.notify"}
24/11/13:44:48:**New Epoch**
24/11/13:44:48:BUF: {"id":101,"result":true,"error":null}
24/11/13:44:48:Thread for gpu0 create.
24/11/13:44:50:Cache for epoch 89 create.
1479995090GPU0 temp.off set:85
1479995090GPU0 smtarget set:30
1479995090.version 5.0
.target sm_30
1479995090.version 5.0
.target sm_30
1479995090GPU0 intensity :18
1479995090GPU0 worksize :128
24/11/13:44:50:Gpu0 error cuMemAlloc(Dag)-2
1479995090GPU0 error in dagfunction
24/11/13:44:47:Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz
NvAPI device[0] GeForce GTX 660
NvAPI device[0] bid:1
NvAPI device[0] sid:0
24/11/13:44:47:Driver version API: 8.0
24/11/13:44:47:Parametrs command line: -url http://daggerhashimoto.eu.nicehash.com:3353 -wlt 19XA1XiEafCzdNEqefds4mVcG7pNKMtUMn.gtx660 -eml 1
Cuda device[0]:GeForce GTX 660
Cuda device[0] bid:1
Cuda device[0] sid:0
24/11/13:44:47:Start stat server
24/11/13:44:48:
24/11/13:44:48:SEND: {"method": "mining.subscribe", "params": ["MinerName/1.0.0", "EthereumStratum/1.0.0"], "id": 100}
24/11/13:44:48:SEND: {"method": "mining.extranonce.subscribe", "params": [], "id": 101}
24/11/13:44:48:SEND: {"method": "mining.authorize", "params": ["19XA1XiEafCzdNEqefds4mVcG7pNKMtUMn.gtx660", "1"], "id": 2}
24/11/13:44:48:BUF: {"id":100,"error":null,"result":[["mining.notify","d4a392634935baf6cb6f9d8f7dfa68f2","EthereumStratum/1.0.0"],"2129d3"]}
24/11/13:44:48:New extranonce <2129d3>
24/11/13:44:48:BUF: {"id":2,"result":true,"error":null}
24/11/13:44:48:BUF: {"id":null,"method":"mining.set_difficulty","params":[0.05]}
24/11/13:44:48:Target for next job:00000013ffec0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
24/11/13:44:48:BUF: {"params":["0000003cff268adb","0518e1373ff88ccabb28493cac10cb0731313135d880dae0d846be6016ab9acf","622993ce6a4c2b82a0c3076165ea967bb7c85f49736c25417a96f49ffee247ea",true],"id":null,"method":"mining.notify"}
24/11/13:44:48:**New Epoch**
24/11/13:44:48:BUF: {"id":101,"result":true,"error":null}
24/11/13:44:48:Thread for gpu0 create.
24/11/13:44:50:Cache for epoch 89 create.
1479995090GPU0 temp.off set:85
1479995090GPU0 smtarget set:30
1479995090.version 5.0
.target sm_30
1479995090.version 5.0
.target sm_30
1479995090GPU0 intensity :18
1479995090GPU0 worksize :128
24/11/13:44:50:Gpu0 error cuMemAlloc(Dag)-2
1479995090GPU0 error in dagfunction
Re: [ANN] [RBY] ★★ Rubycoin ★★ A precious gem for the digital age
If you have a time could you please take a look about slow reponsive gui of TD.
What computer brand/model/os are you using? Anyone else experiencing a slow GUI, please post or pm your computer brand/model/os as well.
My PC is DIY.
OS: Windows 7 64 Bits
CPU Core i5-2500K
RAM DDR3 8GB
It take a few seconds when i trying to change Menu/Select some Coin to trade/Change Option to Sell or Buy.
Re: [ANN] [RBY] ★★ Rubycoin ★★ A precious gem for the digital age
ok noticed something weird the past few days TD has been constantly moving my sell orders instead of allowing them to hit...basically just stuck in a buy cycle and I only have the "Thor" level unlocked anyone else experience this issue??
Thanks for pointing this out. I looked into it and made adjustments in the next version to fix this issue. In the mean time, you can partially work around it by setting a lower Risk Tolerance, which will give sells (and buys) more time between adjusting their placement.
If you have a time could you please take a look about slow reponsive gui of TD.
Re: [ANN] SuperNET trades on Poloniex as UNITY, asset id 12071612744977229797
Hi James,
This look great for decentralize exchange. Is it possible to add some technical indicator like EMA SMAV MACD RSI or STO to the trading graph ?
Re: [ANN] $XQN Quotient Financial Network | PoW Scrypt, PoS Blake-256 | UPDATE NOW
Price would not go anyway with this type of POS. I try to keep the coin in wallet but the stake did not make any profit for me like before. Hold about 30K but git stake less than 100XQN and the price 
Trying to think of a way to explain what we mean. I guess even thought you are developing 2 coins, you haven't really lived in this world very long. Have you ever heard that thing people say about learning spanish in a classroom environment? I've always heard that if you learn spanish in the classroom, then go to Mexico and try to communicate with native spanish speakers, neither of you will understand each other even though you are both technically speaking the same language. You are like the guy that learned spanish in the classroom and we are like the natives. This isn't the point of my post, just thought it was an interesting and apt analogy.
When we say blocks of coins we mean all of our chunks of coins that are eligible for staking. All of our stake eligible inputs you could also say.
This would be what happens in a standard PoS transaction. Coins stake, the single (chunk, block, input) of coins splits and becomes 2.
http://i.imgur.com/QAggzEX.jpg
In this one, for some reason it was decided that these inputs would be too small if the block of coins were allowed to split into 2, so the coins stake and the earned stake is added but we only end up with 1 block of coins rather than the standard 2.
http://i.imgur.com/mNOm27p.jpg
Now this is the one that really bugs the piss out of me. Here, for some reason it is decided a whole group of inputs are too damn small, so the client sweeps them all into one during the stake transaction. I have never seen this happening before.
http://i.imgur.com/4D6Emkw.jpg]
Yes, exactly this happened to me too, I made small groups, like 178 XQN x 3, 200 XQN x 10 and so on....and it took my whole group of coins, like 8 groups, 1600 XQN and calculate like one, 16.18....personally, I don't like that, and before was much more better, and as I can notice many people left XQN because of that, I hope that solution will come very fast, or turn back to old, will be the best !!
Maybe to make like 10 addresses and send to every address 200 coins, anybody try that ?
Could you guys provide me with a couple of example transactions where this is occurring, a couple links to the block explorer? I guess I'm getting caught up semantically with the terminology, but when I think of blocks I'm thinking of....well, blocks in the blockchain. When you are talking about splitting and auto-recombining of blocks, I think you mean that your UTXO's (unspent tx outputs) are getting combined in the stake transaction, but from quickly clicking through a few blocks in the block explorer I haven't been able to track down a live example of this happening.
I'd like to see it in the block explorer...
I'd like to see it in the block explorer...
Trying to think of a way to explain what we mean. I guess even thought you are developing 2 coins, you haven't really lived in this world very long. Have you ever heard that thing people say about learning spanish in a classroom environment? I've always heard that if you learn spanish in the classroom, then go to Mexico and try to communicate with native spanish speakers, neither of you will understand each other even though you are both technically speaking the same language. You are like the guy that learned spanish in the classroom and we are like the natives. This isn't the point of my post, just thought it was an interesting and apt analogy.
When we say blocks of coins we mean all of our chunks of coins that are eligible for staking. All of our stake eligible inputs you could also say.
This would be what happens in a standard PoS transaction. Coins stake, the single (chunk, block, input) of coins splits and becomes 2.
http://i.imgur.com/QAggzEX.jpg
In this one, for some reason it was decided that these inputs would be too small if the block of coins were allowed to split into 2, so the coins stake and the earned stake is added but we only end up with 1 block of coins rather than the standard 2.
http://i.imgur.com/mNOm27p.jpg
Now this is the one that really bugs the piss out of me. Here, for some reason it is decided a whole group of inputs are too damn small, so the client sweeps them all into one during the stake transaction. I have never seen this happening before.
http://i.imgur.com/4D6Emkw.jpg]
![http://i.imgur.com/4D6Emkw.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/4D6Emkw.jpg]){kind=link}
Yes, exactly this happened to me too, I made small groups, like 178 XQN x 3, 200 XQN x 10 and so on....and it took my whole group of coins, like 8 groups, 1600 XQN and calculate like one, 16.18....personally, I don't like that, and before was much more better, and as I can notice many people left XQN because of that, I hope that solution will come very fast, or turn back to old, will be the best !!
Maybe to make like 10 addresses and send to every address 200 coins, anybody try that ?