Search content
Sort by
Showing 13 of 13 results by leo996
Did happened to someone else to deposit on wrong network, because is now nearly one year and they had no news. The depo was of 200$ (usually I buy from moonpay and normally the 1st network is the etherum not the arbitrum but in that case seem was arbitrum so I don't mind was my mistake), but they asking 200$ fee to get a 200$ depo so it doesn't make much sense... is about 4 days of work losed. Also what I don't understand at all is why it is a multichain portofoglio if they allow just etherum network? I also tried to say to the support, i agree to pay 50-100$ to get the other moved to my balance but still no response !
200 $ fee? Is there a screenshot that really needs to be given a fee? Though, in my idea, it really takes a fund to provide a fund for a fund that you have on a platform.
Then another one is the culprit, you admit it too.
If Rolbit is not a big and successful casino, scammers will have no or very little reasons to copy Rollbit in order to find victims and scam them. It is hard for successful companies to have no impersonating websites that launched by scammers with hope of finding naive people and steal money from victims.
It is excellent that community quickly detected that scam website and ruined their scam efforts to save many people.
It is excellent that community quickly detected that scam website and ruined their scam efforts to save many people.
So it's still good to play gambling with reputed online casinos in the crypto gambling business, so just in case we have a problem, they can solve it well,
and I have seen many of other stable casinos here in the crypto gambling business
Hi obviously I admitted is my fault so I asked to get just 100$ paying 97$ of fee for my mistake. I just think they should be more reasonable cuz paying 200$ for 197$ doesn't make a damm sense.
https://ibb.co/C3zMFdCX
Did happened to someone else to deposit on wrong network, because is now nearly one year and they had no news. The depo was of 200$ (usually I buy from moonpay and normally the 1st network is the etherum not the arbitrum but in that case seem was arbitrum so I don't mind was my mistake), but they asking 200$ fee to get a 200$ depo so it doesn't make much sense... is about 4 days of work losed. Also what I don't understand at all is why it is a multichain portofoglio if they allow just etherum network? I also tried to say to the support, i agree to pay 50-100$ to get the other moved to my balance but still no response !
I see two reason on why they ask that amount for funds recovery.
First is recovery needs effort and time especially that their wallet used is not configure for the network on where you sent your funds.
Second is to discourage people to commit mistake on sending their funds on wrong network since they might think about the consequences of what possible to happen if they made this mistake.
I also send my funds on wrong network before on other platform. Then try to contact their support for possible recovery but they just said that they didn't support that network that's why its close to impossible for them to recover the funds I wrongly sent. So I'd move on in that chapter and make sure that I won't sent on wrong network again. Yeah its costly mistake and we need to learn a lesson in hard way with the incident we experience.
That "impossible" make non-sense at all, you better complain about at a multichain portafoglio they can easily access it , there's no efforts at least (I doubt you know how it work since you write that). Point is to be a % in my opnion of the depo and not a fixed amount. Paying 200$ fee for 5 mins job is little crazy in my opinion obviously.
Maybe because if they frequently forgive mistakes of users, they'll face mistakes from them regularly and it will turn into a mess for them. To my mind, in such a case, it's better to block users from depositing in this specific network than not to refund them when you have access to that network.
How do you block a user from depositing in a certain network if they are going to copy an Ethereum address and the deposit USDT on Optimism, of which Optimism network may not yet be supported but the ETH address is compatible with that of Optimism.My point is people will still make mistakes whether there are blocks or even warnings.
Like rollbit doing asking for 200$ for wrong network depo. Happened to me on a 170$ on arbitrum network but it didn't worth to pay 200$ to get 170$ so I just give up. So there's lot of ways such:
- rollbit one
or
- if kyc is done on that account to have at least 1 time the possibility to a refund
or
- minimum deposit amount
so there's quite a lot of solutions atleast if they don't want to keep for them that funds
.
$200 is too much but I understand them, if someone intentionally makes that mistake multiple times, it will cost casino a lot but I think that the fee should be more reasonable, for example similar to car fines, like $20-50. It's a pity to lose $170, that's 1 week's salary for some people.- rollbit one
or
- if kyc is done on that account to have at least 1 time the possibility to a refund
or
- minimum deposit amount
so there's quite a lot of solutions atleast if they don't want to keep for them that funds
.Hi I was just curious about what happened to the depo, just looked and it is 197$ was quite old depo and I didn't remembered well ( https://arbiscan.io/address/0x7B7EB47275048a5c8988Bc7E95c742D1a5Aa468F ). Anyway I've texted them to see if they wanna provide any support.
Did happened to someone else to deposit on wrong network, because is now nearly one year and they had no news. The depo was of 200$ (usually I buy from moonpay and normally the 1st network is the etherum not the arbitrum but in that case seem was arbitrum so I don't mind was my mistake), but they asking 200$ fee to get a 200$ depo so it doesn't make much sense... is about 4 days of work losed. Also what I don't understand at all is why it is a multichain portofoglio if they allow just etherum network? I also tried to say to the support, i agree to pay 50-100$ to get the other moved to my balance but still no response !
Re: Rollbit.com able to access wallet but they stole my deposit
Any news about this, happened same to me with about 170$ ?
Maybe because if they frequently forgive mistakes of users, they'll face mistakes from them regularly and it will turn into a mess for them. To my mind, in such a case, it's better to block users from depositing in this specific network than not to refund them when you have access to that network.
How do you block a user from depositing in a certain network if they are going to copy an Ethereum address and the deposit USDT on Optimism, of which Optimism network may not yet be supported but the ETH address is compatible with that of Optimism.My point is people will still make mistakes whether there are blocks or even warnings.
Like rollbit doing asking for 200$ for wrong network depo. Happened to me on a 170$ on arbitrum network but it didn't worth to pay 200$ to get 170$ so I just give up. So there's various solutions such:
- rollbit one
or
- if kyc is done on that account to have at least 1 time the possibility to a refund
or
- minimum deposit amount
so there's quite a lot of solution atleast if they don't want to keep for them that funds
.Maybe because if they frequently forgive mistakes of users, they'll face mistakes from them regularly and it will turn into a mess for them. To my mind, in such a case, it's better to block users from depositing in this specific network than not to refund them when you have access to that network.
How do you block a user from depositing in a certain network if they are going to copy an Ethereum address and the deposit USDT on Optimism, of which Optimism network may not yet be supported but the ETH address is compatible with that of Optimism.My point is people will still make mistakes whether there are blocks or even warnings.
He will end up losing the funds. A similar thing happened to me, I depo 170$ on rollbit but on arbitrum network by mistake (in-case you want them refunded you've to pay rollbit 200$ so sometimes it not worth), so sometimes we've just to give up.
Casino area is fair and good, sportsbet is a "mess" & "scam" due to their provider. In-case you wanna bet on sports, stay away from Roobet.
Every casino has their area of focus, not sure your the first to make such a complain but calling Roobet a scam is a very big accusations, I'm not saying it not possible as I'm not a representative of the casino but if you think for sure that it's a scam then you should make an official thread to make complains about it in the scam and accusation board then it could be treated better. Just to provide an update: Roobet has successfully credited my account and allowed me to withdraw without wager requirement!
Thanks again guys, couldn't be a better timing!
This is my most considered interest in casinos, there is this casino that I have about $20 stuck in it because they couldn't allow mean withdrawal my win saying its not enough. I hate such a thing in a casino and this is going to make me consider Roobet hence forth. Thanks again guys, couldn't be a better timing!
Hi, obviously. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5550102
Hi, the match format was played exactly as was scheduled one (x2 half of 40 minutes). So is a "scam" because as far as I know the "change" definition means a change during the match (even if they don't understand the change definition and was this the reason, they shouldn't allow us to bet on such events and I gonna give a simple example: If I won 1K USD for such error and I'm going to lose them in their casino area or another sports bet then I go to finish in debt with them for 1K USD because their own error, I'm not in a casino to borrow some money, that's not a bank!).
I won't use anymore their sportsbet area so I'm not going to test anymore, I just moved to another casino provider. All i wanted is to warn about their unfair sportsbet provider.
I won't use anymore their sportsbet area so I'm not going to test anymore, I just moved to another casino provider. All i wanted is to warn about their unfair sportsbet provider.
Hi, yes you right. I don't think they understood the definition of the word "change", if it was scheduled as x2 half of 45 minutes then yes then the void decision was fine but isn't the case. I tried to explain it to them but it seems like you're talking to a wall, isn't about the bet money is about being unfair with their players.
Today I just get a "answer" from their team saying is their provider decision and they cannot change it.
Obviously without answering to my questions:
1) Why let the users bet on it if from start was x2 half of 40 minutes.
2) What mean format "changed" if it starts with x2 half of 40 minutes and end like this.
3) Already knowing that on "friendly" matches sometimes format isn't x2 half of 45 minutes why they add those friendly matches on the sports bet window.
Anyway I decided to deposit back 57$ so the account can be on positive balance, once I found another match that have x2 half of 40 minutes I will bet on over 4.5 on first half to check out if I lose, if is losed or the bet stake gonna be refunded (if gonna be losed it means is a scam strategy), I will keep the topic updated once I bet on a similar match.
Obviously without answering to my questions:
1) Why let the users bet on it if from start was x2 half of 40 minutes.
2) What mean format "changed" if it starts with x2 half of 40 minutes and end like this.
3) Already knowing that on "friendly" matches sometimes format isn't x2 half of 45 minutes why they add those friendly matches on the sports bet window.
Anyway I decided to deposit back 57$ so the account can be on positive balance, once I found another match that have x2 half of 40 minutes I will bet on over 4.5 on first half to check out if I lose, if is losed or the bet stake gonna be refunded (if gonna be losed it means is a scam strategy), I will keep the topic updated once I bet on a similar match.
Hi everyone, I would like to report a "scam" that happened to me. On 13/07 I have place a bet on: Ceuta - UD Leiria.
Match informations:
- x2 half
- 40 minutes each half
- 1st half score: 3 - 0
- 2st half score: 1 - 1
As I'm always looking on 2-3 sources before place a bet, I ensure that the match format was x2 half of 40 minutes each. So after 1st half end, I just get the bet payed so I withdraw the money. Then 1 hour later, they voided it saying: the match format was changed so my account get in negative balance.
It seem to me, they let you bet on, if was a losing bet was okay, but in-case you won it got voided with the reason: match format was changed.
Even if I cannot understand "match format was changed" due to three reasons:
1) Match started with x2 half of 40 minutes each (so it wasn't "changed")
2) There's no limits in this format rules (such x 45 minutes at least): https://i.ibb.co/5Xxv1NH9/gsd1.png
3) My bet was on a friendly match (it ended after 80 minutes): https://i.ibb.co/hFs4wyKL/gsd2.png
4) Why they let us bet on match that gonna be voided anyway? Is maybe because in-case we lose is okay, if we won is voided?
Sources:
- Flashscore
- Google
I attached the bet proof too: https://i.ibb.co/Pv7nLJKs/2aaaa.png
Did this happen to someone else?
Match informations:
- x2 half
- 40 minutes each half
- 1st half score: 3 - 0
- 2st half score: 1 - 1
As I'm always looking on 2-3 sources before place a bet, I ensure that the match format was x2 half of 40 minutes each. So after 1st half end, I just get the bet payed so I withdraw the money. Then 1 hour later, they voided it saying: the match format was changed so my account get in negative balance.
It seem to me, they let you bet on, if was a losing bet was okay, but in-case you won it got voided with the reason: match format was changed.
Even if I cannot understand "match format was changed" due to three reasons:
1) Match started with x2 half of 40 minutes each (so it wasn't "changed")
2) There's no limits in this format rules (such x 45 minutes at least): https://i.ibb.co/5Xxv1NH9/gsd1.png
3) My bet was on a friendly match (it ended after 80 minutes): https://i.ibb.co/hFs4wyKL/gsd2.png
4) Why they let us bet on match that gonna be voided anyway? Is maybe because in-case we lose is okay, if we won is voided?
Sources:
- Flashscore
I attached the bet proof too: https://i.ibb.co/Pv7nLJKs/2aaaa.png
Did this happen to someone else?