Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 38 results by lile
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I have a loan listed on BTCjam and am making the announcement here.
https://btcjam.com/listings/523
Any questions you have can be discussed here. It's a 22.2% annual yield
investment.
I'll be able to settle my PayPal account with 70% funding and can answer
any questions here. The loan is currently 23% funded and has 6 days left.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 10.0.3 (Build 1)
Charset: utf-8
wj8DBQFQqKwwq4If6+hHSx0RAkDiAKD4TwKOKkA6Sxa0sU3LrhkLIhONfgCgsoNS
w/uVS+1qssC5Ky1UJzkh/D0=
=Lf7c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA1
I have a loan listed on BTCjam and am making the announcement here.
https://btcjam.com/listings/523
Any questions you have can be discussed here. It's a 22.2% annual yield
investment.
I'll be able to settle my PayPal account with 70% funding and can answer
any questions here. The loan is currently 23% funded and has 6 days left.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 10.0.3 (Build 1)
Charset: utf-8
wj8DBQFQqKwwq4If6+hHSx0RAkDiAKD4TwKOKkA6Sxa0sU3LrhkLIhONfgCgsoNS
w/uVS+1qssC5Ky1UJzkh/D0=
=Lf7c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thanks. I missed the bit about it being signed by bitcoin-otc public key, so it wasn't even necessary, sorry
Just read their press announcement. The bitcoin option isn't meant for users like you. This is for people who have trouble using CC and paypal.
Yep. I do not have a credit card, so I also can't have a paypal account. If I want to buy something online, I can either wire the money, or beg one of my friends to order it for me (or go to the bank and get a credit card, but I am way too lazy for that). Using bitcoin for me is a total no-brainer, and I'm sure I'm not the only having this problem.According to the transaction fee rules, the size of the transaction is used to calculate fees (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_fees). From what I've read elsewhere, the size of the tx will be: 180 bytes per input + 34 bytes per output + 10 bytes.
However, while I've found that calculation to hold up most of the time, it doesn't seem to be accurate all of the time. Is there a more reliable way to know how large a transaction will be so that appropriate fees can be assigned when creating a raw transaction?
There is no way of knowing in advance how big the signatures are going to be. You can try making several transactions and based on the size of those figure out how large the fee must be.However, while I've found that calculation to hold up most of the time, it doesn't seem to be accurate all of the time. Is there a more reliable way to know how large a transaction will be so that appropriate fees can be assigned when creating a raw transaction?
You could also use a conservative estimate for the size and have users in some cases pay a little bit more.
Re: Find Trendon Shavers in person thread... [BTCST, BTS&T, pirateat40]
Someone in his home town reported that he bought his "wife" and a few of his family members brand new vehicles recently and evidently paid cash for them
What a waste of money...Re: Find Trendon Shavers in person thread... [BTCST, BTS&T, pirateat40]
Since it seems to have been a ponzi scheme, pirate likely has no money, paid it all out in interest to keep the scam going.
I doubt he paid out much since pretty much everyone has been "reinvesting" as far as I know.I describe a method by which this "reinvestment rate" can be estimated from the information we have on Bitcoinmax here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=120119.msg1331862#msg1331862
From here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=83904.msg1302303#msg1302303
We can see that the amount on deposit at Bitcoinmax at the time of closure was: 167728.74239044 + 110.74501165, this includes all interest to that date.
Now someone can dig up their deposit and withdrawal addresses and we can calculate exactly how much was actually on depost.
I see, I got the wrong impression then, thanks.
Re: Find Trendon Shavers in person thread... [BTCST, BTS&T, pirateat40]
Since it seems to have been a ponzi scheme, pirate likely has no money, paid it all out in interest to keep the scam going.
I doubt he paid out much since pretty much everyone has been "reinvesting" as far as I know.Re: Find Trendon Shavers in person thread... [BTCST, BTS&T, pirateat40]
Since it seems to have been a ponzi scheme, pirate likely has no money, paid it all out in interest to keep the scam going.
I doubt he paid out much since pretty much everyone has been "reinvesting" as far as I know.I am thinking that perhaps the server that the electrum client uses could be used for something like this?
Certainly, electrum servers are easy to use, but unfortunately not (yet) very stable. You would also need to code the actual creation of a transaction (although electrum code is easy to read so that shouldn't be a big problem).
I wouldn't really call Pirate a victim.
Exactly. That's why it doesn't matter.Since there is no transparency, we can assume his inner circle received their loans back, leaving everyone else empty handed.
His inner circle? Who would that be? Like in every ponzi those who invested early had the chance to make a profit, but probably didn't since pretty much everyone "reinvested", as far as I can see.
I have no idea who they are.
Since there is no transparency, we can assume his inner circle received their loans back, leaving everyone else empty handed.
His inner circle? Who would that be? Like in every ponzi those who invested early had the chance to make a profit, but probably didn't since pretty much everyone "reinvested", as far as I can see.
I have no idea who they are.
Since there were no confirmations of those payouts I'd say it's entirely likely that there actually were no payouts whatsoever. And in case they were, as far as I can see those were (supposedly) all very small accounts, most likely paid out as a stalling tactic. I wouldn't call those people "his inner circle".
Since there is no transparency, we can assume his inner circle received their loans back, leaving everyone else empty handed.
His inner circle? Who would that be?
Like in every ponzi those who invested early had the chance to make a profit, but probably didn't since pretty much everyone "reinvested", as far as I can see.
Yes, of course. It wouldn't be very convenient otherwise. You can even go one step further, print the private key to paper and delete it from your computer, and you would still be able to get to all bitcoins that would eventually appear on the address.
To clarify a bit, there is no such thing as "bitcoins being sent to an address", per se. Bitcoins are there for the taking by everyone who has the appropriate private key.
To clarify a bit, there is no such thing as "bitcoins being sent to an address", per se. Bitcoins are there for the taking by everyone who has the appropriate private key.
None of those instawallet "accounts" (as far as I can see) has or ever had any bitcoins on them. Instawallet account identifiers have too high entropy for brute forcing them being profitable.
Instawallet is as safe as any other "shared wallet" out there.
Instawallet is as safe as any other "shared wallet" out there.
Re: [HELP]: mt.gox: "There are not enough bitcoins on this address" obwohl...
If I had to guess I'd say they expect only one transaction, and not two as in your case.
If you read the mtgox screenshot they say he can send the btc "from dozens of different addresses".
Any one willing to do this?
Date Registered: October 19, 2012Most likely not.
I was mining at about 500 MHs/s and wasn't worth it anymore months ago (in fact, it should probably be closer to a year now). This should give you a good perspective.
edit: checked when I stopped mining it was july 2011.
edit: checked when I stopped mining it was july 2011.