Search content
Sort by
Showing 7 of 7 results by lvt
I have a DSi listed up there and GTA 4 for PS3.
some other things I don't remember off the top of my head but it's like people completely ignore the old listings and only view the newer stuff.
some other things I don't remember off the top of my head but it's like people completely ignore the old listings and only view the newer stuff.
You mean like in real life?
yes.
bought the DSi on amazon and realized I gave my R4 card to my ex's sister a couple years ago.
Has everything I got with it, stylus, charger, in pretty good condition.
Re: I am pretty confident we are the new wealthy elite, gentlemen.
That would be pretty insane to see BTC climb to $10k a piece.
But, it's certainly another thing when you don't tell all your friends about it and ruin it for yourself.
I have all my BTC into LTC right now, but I'm going to push it all back in BTC soon to come.
If there was a site for BTC like litecoinglobal (that isn't going to shut down after a month or two), we'd be in business.
But, it's certainly another thing when you don't tell all your friends about it and ruin it for yourself.
I have all my BTC into LTC right now, but I'm going to push it all back in BTC soon to come.
If there was a site for BTC like litecoinglobal (that isn't going to shut down after a month or two), we'd be in business.
lvt here.
Web and desktop developer and hobbyist music producer. Sometimes I can be a troll but that is reserved for when it is allowed.
I'm strictly business-only and would love to contribute.
Web and desktop developer and hobbyist music producer. Sometimes I can be a troll but that is reserved for when it is allowed.
I'm strictly business-only and would love to contribute.
true, from what I was reading, I took it as since the funds were sent, and (collected) at the same time, both parties would actually have such in their balance. It was a theory but a long way from the truth I guess o;
afaik, this is not possible.
addresses are never duplicated, that's the whole thing about bitcoin algos and p2p - period.
unless you were actually controlling a remote pc holding one of the addresses on it, there is no way in hell you'd ever see random donations/transfers
addresses are never duplicated, that's the whole thing about bitcoin algos and p2p - period.
unless you were actually controlling a remote pc holding one of the addresses on it, there is no way in hell you'd ever see random donations/transfers
That is incorrect. There is no network validation of addresses. They are completely "random" by the node who generated them. There is a very non-0 chance that two nodes can generate the same address, and nobody would be none the wiser.
taking this as constructive criticism, let's say your quote was the case (Could be, or may not be - I'm not saying anyone is wrong)
A good example would be the only one I can currently think of. If I (person A) were to generate a new address, and person B (in another state or country), were to already have this address, and a bitcoin transaction was made to the address, would the end result be double of what the original transaction was?
If so, I was trying to point out that bitcoin addresses take a long time to generate and hence that,
I figured it would check the network if the address was already validated or not.
afaik, this is not possible.
addresses are never duplicated, that's the whole thing about bitcoin algos and p2p - period.
unless you were actually controlling a remote pc holding one of the addresses on it, there is no way in hell you'd ever see random donations/transfers
addresses are never duplicated, that's the whole thing about bitcoin algos and p2p - period.
unless you were actually controlling a remote pc holding one of the addresses on it, there is no way in hell you'd ever see random donations/transfers