I notified S.Law on the 5th or so when I first heard. They were already aware.

Nothing ever came from those transactions as without the database we couldn't even prove they were stolen. They almost certainly were but we cant prove it definitively.

Paul never even disclosed those transactions to me. I have my doubts if he ever even monitor for unapproved withdrawals like he claimed.

He let them walk right in and they gave him many opportunities to stop the bleeding. Based on that timeline I was awake upgrading the reddcoin wallet as they launched their pos upgrade that night. I could have responded immediately had I been notified or had the tools to even know what was going on. Believe it or not even I never knew the full extent of what was lost.

Authorities & S.law aware of this situation.

hmmm are there not taint analysis companies that would be jumping at the bit?...did the fearofmongooses secret agent guy get out the slammer?    ~stay tuned!?

Can someone post a summary of these recent transactions?

Stolen Cryptsy funds are beginning to move.

A link back to the old blog outlining "hacked" transactions:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160325013714/http://blog.cryptsy.com/


Those in bold have had SPENT transactions within the past 8 weeks after sitting idle since 2014.

THIS WOULD SUGGEST THAT THE FUNDS ARE NOT LOST.

Edit: Are those transactions linked to Cryptsy?  I thought the BTC addresses were from this transaction, none of which seems to have been withdrawn from ever.
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/c7b46a79fd8887038bd3a8e884b04820038415a60e0b9d2c2f5bcff68a2687bf

– Update 2016/01/17 9:51pm –

Additional BTC transactions taken from another wallet on the same day:

https://blockchain.info/tx/e68f52a38f58e71b951a08650e20aea3f62f7331a3f548e99181f6dbf1cc1d51

https://blockchain.info/tx/48721871b11f716688fcf80a91a5c7586a1dddee83d90b84b564f3f29e11504c

https://blockchain.info/tx/790aa7ec2678552c88cf95110c0df4bcc16a72b8f7e6f331292b977cc6e481df

https://blockchain.info/tx/e8bb46bc6ea5f4580dd2b73f5d6a116e9023c84eb7c0fd4f34bcef3aca606fad

https://blockchain.info/tx/f3998a7e2e8b451106327d2c6e7f73ba58c2fd54b4bb3595b18a2d76e7d15f44

Coinbase has lost another appeal in a lawsuit brought by former customers of the defunct cryptocurrency exchange Cryptsy, and the case will now proceed to a jury trial.

An appeals court in Georgia on Monday affirmed a lower court's denial of Coinbase's appeal of the case, which blames the company for failing to stop Cryptsy's chief executive from allegedly absconding with his customers' money.

In the case, plaintiff Brandon Leidel, who was a Cryptsy customer, claims that Coinbase should have actively helped prevent Cryptsy CEO Paul Vernon from laundering the funds through a Coinbase wallet.

Vernon allegedly used Coinbase to launder millions of dollars he is accused of stealing from his customers prior to Cryptsy's collapse, as previously reported.

Coinbase tried to negotiate the case in arbitration by pointing at user agreements Vernon signed when he first began using the wallet. However, a judge ruled last year that Cryptsy's customers are not bound by the same agreements that Vernon was, and therefore are not required to arbitrate the case.

Coinbase appealed this decision, but the appeal was denied by a district court.

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that decision Monday, writing that "Leidel does not seek to enforce the terms of the User Agreements, nor does he allege any tort rooted in an allegation that Defendant breached or facilitated a breach of any obligation uniquely imposed by those agreements." The decision went on to say:

"In other words, Leidel's claims are viable, if at all, without reference to the User Agreements, as the duties Defendant allegedly breached were not imposed by those agreements."

As a result, the court has opened the door for a jury trial in the class action lawsuit, which can now proceed to discovery.

In a statement, David Silver, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, said "we are pleased, though not surprised, the appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision to keep this dispute in the public view ... We look forward to having Coinbase answer for its role in the millions of dollars in harm suffered by our clients; and we look forward to resolving these claims in court."

Coinbase did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

nothing at all just noting a coincidence

glad you back

any insinuation is unwarranted, apologies

PAUL VERNON
Attended Shanghai Sharks v Shandong Golden Stars

currently in thread 12/17/17 -
(01.01.18) Last Active: 12-17-2017


as soon as I mentioned the above,
this account stops posting and does not return

mallocdotc
(reference to c+ programming I think)

I hate coincidence

YW   


Most of us get kicked around a piece as Noobs.

Enjoy your 15 minutes of.....ooops, gone!

Noobie Savant.

Approved.

But if they recovered the stolen cryptsy funds, they would have to be returned to the origional owners... they should not become property of the government.

Should.. Key term

You means dudes with soft pillows and a comfy chair will be looking for Paul Vernon to exact U$200M from his scammy ass?

The reason he is not on those lits is because... he might be. But at the end of the day, China and the US have no extradition treaty so if he was on that list, there is nothing anyone can do about it.
 

...read the first post and you'l see the differences, and yes uv missed the launch, the space shuttle has taken off...and we will be exiting the atmosphere pretty soon...you can still get in with some btc coz there are noobs dumping for crumbs... but unless uv got serious hash power, diff is gona b at 8.68811473 very soon so easy coins are gone im affraid...