Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 247 results by manchester93
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
Better get those possible future subversives on a list before they even know there are lists and make sure to make the parents the ones turning them in just for the lulz.
The Brits are so fucked. It reminds me of Too Much Bling, Give us a Ring!
Re: Bitcointalk Poker Night @ Sportsbet (Private game exclusively for forum members)
Any time from 4pm GMT to 8pm GMT is good for me. Let's hear from others.
I'm in if it starts ~6-8pm GMT.
How long did the last one run? Probably just an hour or two?
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
Cool I might try it out.
Leverage input does not automatically update your contract cost :/ They should fix this....
Careful if you are in the US. No idea what would happen if you try to use it through API without VPN. Might get your account banned if Bitmex sniffs it out.
Actually, I've heard from more than one trader that Bitmex allows users to log in from the USA as long as they registered from somewhere else. I haven't wanted to risk testing that out for myself though.
Re: [2018-11-29] Trending: Google Searches for Bitcoin Surges to 8-Month High
Interest probably surged because of all the media attention to the crash. It's not too surprising after the market bored everyone to death this year. The rise probably isn't indicative of a new wave of adoption.
Re: ☑☑☑[ANN][BSD] BitSend -The first Segwit Masternodecoin
the current bitsend price continues to decline in the last 4 months, I miss bitsend prices will rise, I see rising bitcoin prices currently affect the rise altcoin, still optimistic bitsend prices will rise
BTC has been in a bear market for 6+ months, what do you expect? And when BTC turns bullish, alts usually have one more swing down, because altcoin holders start chasing BTCUSD gains.
Just be patient for altcoin season. It could be a year away for all I know, but the gains will be massive from these price points.
Re: ☑☑☑[ANN][BSD] BitSend -The first Segwit Masternodecoin 0.14.0.5 New Version
Any update on the governance system idea?
I imagine it might be perceived by the market as a catalyst to move up, as it'll mean less available supply on the market.
Makes me wonder what will happen after the airdrop faucet drop ends in 2019.
I imagine it might be perceived by the market as a catalyst to move up, as it'll mean less available supply on the market.
It's a trap, anyway. If this thing can pump through the $11,800 double top, I'm gonna build a nice hedge short a few thousand bucks higher.
Embrace the correction. Bitcoin is boring. I'm back to trading forex.
Embrace the correction. Bitcoin is boring. I'm back to trading forex.
Re: ☑☑☑[ANN][BSD] BitSend -The first Segwit Masternodecoin 0.14.0.5 New Version
+1 on adding a governance mechanism. That way, people will naturally crowd-source marketing efforts, apps/features, etc.
Looks good from here.
Any feedback on Ann OP post?
Is it comfortable, loading OK, etc?
Is it comfortable, loading OK, etc?
Looks good from here.
Re: ☑☑☑[ANN][BSD] BitSend -The first Segwit Masternodecoin 0.14.0.5 New Version
Given that BSD and BTX have the same core dev and he also took the core dev position for ERC... I expect interesting things in the future.
What is ERC?
bitsend current price 0.00007xx btc. already a month more I wait for bitsend prices to rise at least 0.00011btc.
Patience. If BTC breaks down from this bear flag, alts might be in for a long winter. Learn to baghold.
Re: It is NOT secure to use hardware wallets (and it never was)
And you are also right with the USB drive being the attack vector which would probably be the first one abused.
And it is indeed independent from your network adapters.
But there are other possibilities to transfer your unsigned TX to your offline machine and move your signed TX to your online pc.
The simpliest would probably be witht he help of two webcams:
Note that to be on the safe side, you should NOT connect your webcam to an online PC after connecting it to your offline storage.
This attack vector (flashing webcam firmware with malicious version) is pretty unlikely.. but it also does exist.
And it is indeed independent from your network adapters.
But there are other possibilities to transfer your unsigned TX to your offline machine and move your signed TX to your online pc.
The simpliest would probably be witht he help of two webcams:
- Create unsigned TX on online pc
- Display QR code of this TX
- Scan the QR code with webcam connected to your offline machine
- Sign the TX
- Display the QR code of the signed TX
- Scan this QR code with your webcam connected to your online PC
- Broadcast transaction
Note that to be on the safe side, you should NOT connect your webcam to an online PC after connecting it to your offline storage.
This attack vector (flashing webcam firmware with malicious version) is pretty unlikely.. but it also does exist.
Thanks, I hadn't considered using a setup with photos/QR codes. Interesting. Definitely seems more secure than a thumb drive (although I think a thumb drive attack on an offline/encrypted wallet has got to be a really sophisticated and targeted attack).
Re: It is NOT secure to use hardware wallets (and it never was)
Don't just disable the networking, break or remove the adapter. Then you have a machine that can only be interfaced with through the USB or other ports.
But how do you actually do that? You need to do it physically?
I've been using an offline wallet to sign for a while, but I just disabled network adapters. I figured it was kinda bullshit, but the reality is that the risk is already pretty low. The offline machine was formatted clean and never connected to the internet. It seems to me that in either case (networking disabled vs. actually removed) the thumb drive you use for transporting raw transactions is a required attack vector.
Let's say Windows forces a shutdown/update and re-enables network adapters. What then? Some malware from the thumb drive keylogs my wallet password, swipes my private keys and......but there's no unprotected network to connect to. I'm not crazy for thinking the risk is low here am I? If there's malware sophisticated enough to do the above, then copy itself to the thumb drive and push the data from the online computer, then it seems like a PC with network adapter removed is prone to the same attack.