As for banned accounts. I've played with these guys at 6max and joined HU hairrypotter. If I knew 2-3 persons at the table were friends, play the same time, same location, "work with the people behind the other 2 accounts on a day to day basis (and have done for years)", have same stats, 86% of hands play with each other I would never sit in. Who would?
I also start 6max tables and multitable and on this site I cant remember a single person I would play 90% of hands. You advise people to read before depositing links but what do we see there? Weak accusation of scams in freeroll. In my opinion your reply to evidence is also weak.
Just wanted to comment on this.
You haven't played with Richard_geil since he only plays eth and higher stakes than you.
He is the person who is
A. Not from the same location as me, but with the same internet provider
B. Has similar preflop (3% vpip difference is quite large) stats over a 2000 hand sample, despite me playing heads up for part of that sample.
C. Played less than 20% of his hands with me at the table.
86% of hands are played with mosty Tao_Dang at the table because we play during the same times and he sits every table (just like you, we probably played a lot together too). And the number is a lot because it was very few sessions - I'm sure he played large volume without me.
The person who you played with me at the same table is Tao_Dang who:
A. Has different login times than me.
B. Did not play 86% of his hands with me
C. Does not have similar stats to me.
D. Is from a different location
This is what I mean when I say that cryptopokerclub is twisting facts and showing partial information.
Are we friends? Yes. Is that a reason to confiscate over 10000$ worth of money from me, most of which I deposited - certainly not.
Are you saying otherwise?
In order for there to be collusion there needs to be proof, and that can only be found in handhistories, not in circumstancial evidence that only shows that people know each other and played together. Knowing someone that you play with is not a crime. Collusion is communicating while playing in order to gain an unfair advantage - this didn't happen and if it had I wouldn't be asking for the hand histories to be made public.
The accusations against cryptopokerclub are mostly about botting and collusion, and from my end about unfairly stealing user funds. I'm happy they are letting you withdraw so far - I felt quite safe/happy until they took my money as well. It's everyone's decision to make what risk they are willing to take with their money, and I sincerely hope that you don't live to regret the decision to keep money there.
Adding this just so there is no mixup about my motivations here:
If the money is ever returned (which it won't be) I would be happy for it to be held in escrow by a reputable community member and donated to charity.