Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 271 results by minerapia
SUBSIDY_FUNC=lambda height: 0.25*1000000 >> (height + 1)//1051200,
so its 'block reward' * 'satoshies' >> (height + 1)//'height where block halves'.
you only need get_subsudy func is theres some special way how the blocks rewards is calculated.
so its 'block reward' * 'satoshies' >> (height + 1)//'height where block halves'.
you only need get_subsudy func is theres some special way how the blocks rewards is calculated.
Re: warning miners,, coinchoose not show right,, killing coins now,, cgb & phx
Also I would use http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expected_value
for the coins with variable coin subsidy, imo its somewhat "stupid" to have some coins jump up and down the charts.
ps. I guess, sal002 you could remove hypercoin since its unminable (blockchain has been stuck for ages)
for the coins with variable coin subsidy, imo its somewhat "stupid" to have some coins jump up and down the charts.
ps. I guess, sal002 you could remove hypercoin since its unminable (blockchain has been stuck for ages)
Re: [ANN] [CPR] | Copper Bars | Scrypt-Jane | GPU Efficiency JUST DROPPED
Quote
First, orphan rate is so high that there won't be anywhere close to 512 million.
Orphans doesnt affect coin cap anyway, the block created just isnt in main blockchain.Quote
The p2p pool is down?
since source is up, and I'm really fed up with this project (p2pool project i mean). Im taking the pool down, I need the hardware elsewhere atm. Theres atleast 2 dudes who have been asking for the source, so I guess theres gonna be p2pool up soon.Quote
Ok, thanks. Another dumb question: How do I mine it with CPUs?
I guess you can find one somewhere earlier in the posts. (prolly win64 only)Re: [ANN] [CPR] | Copper Bars | Scrypt-Jane | GPU Efficiency JUST DROPPED
Coin just is too fast to get stale rates at any proper rate, maybe if we could triple lightspeed or sommit would help.
since source is up, and I'm really fed up with this project (p2pool project i mean). Im taking the pool down, if someone else wants trouble, can host one of these.
since source is up, and I'm really fed up with this project (p2pool project i mean). Im taking the pool down, if someone else wants trouble, can host one of these.
Re: [ANN] [CPR] | Copper Bars | Scrypt-Jane | GPU Efficiency JUST DROPPED
p2pool source is now at:
https://github.com/urpoapina/cpr-p2pool.git
mine is running in EU so maybe pools at another continents would be nice addition.
Theres some problems for every share to get propagated because coin is just damn fast. I had to lower sharing time to 1 secs because otherwise slower pools wouldnt have any payout whatsoever.
on side note: with current rate of CPR all the debugging etc netted me around $3 wuhuu (prolly not enought to pay even the electricity)
https://github.com/urpoapina/cpr-p2pool.git
mine is running in EU so maybe pools at another continents would be nice addition.
Theres some problems for every share to get propagated because coin is just damn fast. I had to lower sharing time to 1 secs because otherwise slower pools wouldnt have any payout whatsoever.
on side note: with current rate of CPR all the debugging etc netted me around $3 wuhuu (prolly not enought to pay even the electricity)
Re: [ANN] [CPR] | Copper Bars | Scrypt-Jane | NOW ACCEPTED for real Copper Bars
p2pool back online, now with upgraded hardware
Could I get a link to the p2pool-cpr source? I think I'd get less rejects with a local node...
Pushing source into github is second in my priority list atm, it requires cleaning and lil tweaking, but I'll try to get it done today.
p2pool fee is 3.5%
PLZ notice
PLZ notice
its setup to run with -f 1 (1% fee), reason for it to go up and down is beyond me (its akwardly calculated from shares, and not as fixed percentage).
python just is BS in projects like this. I don't have time to rewrite whole concept with c++ with proper DB
Quote
all Bitcoin ASIC companies had to derive their works from existing the current SHA-2 ASICs, starting from scratch would have cost far more than the Bitcoin economy could have supplied, and far more than ASIC companies could afford to spend at their current price points. Its like if current ASIC companies decided to start using 14nm chips. It would be unimaginably expensive to create a technology that doesn't exist yet, its far cheaper to modify existing designs.
Starting from scratch is equally expensive, FYI your analogy is totally wrong. They didnt create or modify any 'technology' for the their asics, its matter of coding and tools.
next time try using google first before "I'd say its a pretty strong gut feeling."
even reading simple wiki article helps,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application-specific_integrated_circuit
My pool is 1000 blocks ahead on a different chain. Someone's pulling shenanigans.
I was able to restart the daemon after a few attempts and it processed the funky blocks, back at a normal block height now. I assume the attack isn't over however.
I was able to restart the daemon after a few attempts and it processed the funky blocks, back at a normal block height now. I assume the attack isn't over however.
SetBestChain: new best=5af8c2c1f4d54cf07b25 height=91906 trust=49587556456 date=08/24/13 07:19:30
There's no attack afaik, reason for these blockchain forks is that PoS is broken. It generates blocks that arent accepted by whole network, thus generating private or semi-private blockchains.Yesterday, the time was finally there. After being announced for a few weeks now, Baritus (the creator of DigitalCoin) introduced us to his newest creation : SecureCoin.
This coin is meant to be mined on CPUs only, either with the regular cpuminer, or the QuarkCoin miner. No word on any GPU support, but im fairly certain we might never see it being mined on GPUs.
The unique part about this coin is that it consists of several algorithms, which are : Grøstl, Skein, BLAKE, BLUE MIDNIGHT WISH, JH and SHA-3. Some of these names may sound familiar to you , because this coin lends some of the concepts from other coins. This list includes YaCoin (YAC), SIF, Digitalcoin(DGC) and, of course, Bitcoin(BTC).
Read more here: http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/2013/08/29/securecoin-is-taking-the-cryptoworld-by-storm-by-jdebunt/
This coin is meant to be mined on CPUs only, either with the regular cpuminer, or the QuarkCoin miner. No word on any GPU support, but im fairly certain we might never see it being mined on GPUs.
The unique part about this coin is that it consists of several algorithms, which are : Grøstl, Skein, BLAKE, BLUE MIDNIGHT WISH, JH and SHA-3. Some of these names may sound familiar to you , because this coin lends some of the concepts from other coins. This list includes YaCoin (YAC), SIF, Digitalcoin(DGC) and, of course, Bitcoin(BTC).
Read more here: http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/2013/08/29/securecoin-is-taking-the-cryptoworld-by-storm-by-jdebunt/
Quarkcoin allready has gpu miner fyi. Its just not released (or atleast one dude claims he has one)
Code:
received block 2b67ef1d6af71c77991b
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: check kernel failed on coinstake 00bac13f46293195e50833bd393c7ff5adb3415e811b584139d1643902222901, hashProof=f61f8725f58fb1571c837f02cc7a886c513bd1deafecdb6f5eea4ebea6371435
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 2b67ef1d6af71c77991bdc3e0b7e14b6ba2a334b1ff1d03aeb1dff8b1f855eb5
received block 161433758b1d5d214710
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: check kernel failed on coinstake e54689411df4b0357e7c8a891f992b3d680838e8b6f2cd046984f6c6bdf88560, hashProof=0800e0039f1e22167b228f8a32243cb1dee0c07af7d7488f96ce4209ee18ad7a
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 161433758b1d5d2147104da4808ac77960b7b6f2a2cdff7e1c252e8d69aa3015
received block f3eff7ccb6e8109665b6
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: check kernel failed on coinstake b966992e4b3f9ff8f1e311355bff2bac43a64651aa92c5a031378686dcb7d25e, hashProof=9b6088740a803212e6a369366fff084b17e4ab15c80c04e70635a9690576ae18
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block f3eff7ccb6e8109665b6fc88719057fd2eafbc0f7ab6920b675311ad01f5a949
Dunno whats broken, havent have time to look at it any closer, but if the guy whose supposed to fix it is on vacation, coin is kinda screwed meanwhileERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: check kernel failed on coinstake 00bac13f46293195e50833bd393c7ff5adb3415e811b584139d1643902222901, hashProof=f61f8725f58fb1571c837f02cc7a886c513bd1deafecdb6f5eea4ebea6371435
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 2b67ef1d6af71c77991bdc3e0b7e14b6ba2a334b1ff1d03aeb1dff8b1f855eb5
received block 161433758b1d5d214710
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: check kernel failed on coinstake e54689411df4b0357e7c8a891f992b3d680838e8b6f2cd046984f6c6bdf88560, hashProof=0800e0039f1e22167b228f8a32243cb1dee0c07af7d7488f96ce4209ee18ad7a
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 161433758b1d5d2147104da4808ac77960b7b6f2a2cdff7e1c252e8d69aa3015
received block f3eff7ccb6e8109665b6
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: check kernel failed on coinstake b966992e4b3f9ff8f1e311355bff2bac43a64651aa92c5a031378686dcb7d25e, hashProof=9b6088740a803212e6a369366fff084b17e4ab15c80c04e70635a9690576ae18
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block f3eff7ccb6e8109665b6fc88719057fd2eafbc0f7ab6920b675311ad01f5a949
Code:
REORGANIZE
REORGANIZE: Disconnect 1983 blocks; 000000017187f2d40de8..a35dab9fffcb1b14c8e6
REORGANIZE: Connect 211 blocks; 000000017187f2d40de8..bd7e0d645b4564c29069
etc....REORGANIZE: Disconnect 1983 blocks; 000000017187f2d40de8..a35dab9fffcb1b14c8e6
REORGANIZE: Connect 211 blocks; 000000017187f2d40de8..bd7e0d645b4564c29069
As I said before I wouldn't recommend mining this, only god knows what happens within blockchain.
Im gonna take the pool down for a maintenance in an hour or so, make sure that you got failover setted. Upgrading some hardware on the pool, I would expect it to take 30 minutes.
Pools back online now.
Pools back online now.
https://github.com/urpoapina/gil.git
source for 'working' client, at this time frame dont expect much of testing, tho Im sure I didnt break anything (atleast much
)
"blocks" : 83257,
I suppose thats what you're after.
(yes Im noob and dont know how to use pull request....etc...)
Dont have QT client at hand (which has most troubles) so can't verify everything
I Fail, wait a sec
Now it work, 03:02 gmt
source for 'working' client, at this time frame dont expect much of testing, tho Im sure I didnt break anything (atleast much
)"blocks" : 83257,
I suppose thats what you're after.
(yes Im noob and dont know how to use pull request....etc...)
Dont have QT client at hand (which has most troubles) so can't verify everything
Now it work, 03:02 gmt