Hello, sorry for waking an old thread. It come to my awareness that this case and the casino are currently not on my list yet. I guess I must have someow missed it. Apology for that.

I did a quick re-reading the whole case and get myself re-acquainted. I think it's safe to assume that for this case, there is no scam happened since the bet was returned. And thus, I am marking this as resolved on my list.

OP, if you feel that this status is unjustified, you're more than welcome to argue, accompanied with valid reason, and I am more than happy to reconsider the situation from your angle.

DexWin Sportsbook is the first web3 sports betting platform to offer gas-free betting transaction. It is also the first sportsbook to offer Live Betting in a web3 environment - paving the way for the best betting odds in the world!

You encounter 2/2 same issue on different casino that related to sportsbook. One from Bc.game and the other one is from Dexsports. You manage convince BC.game to pay you at their own expense by pressuring them using this scam accusation but I wonder how come you will experience same issue on different sportsbook if you really doesn’t violate the casino ToS.

I don’t know what you are doing behind but you have something shit going or else you will not have any issue. Your account was created just file a scam accusation to the casino that you have problem. Are you using the forum to get sympathy and pressure casino to get your way?

The violation was not of our terms and conditions. This decision was made by a third party risk management team. We ultimately decided that we don't always agree with other platforms terms of use. Since a player was affected by this through our platform, we felt it was the right thing to do. We are able to learn and change so this type of situation will not happen again.

You detected that the user was a victim of multi-accounting, which is against your ToS. Technologies are technologies, and sometimes there might be an error (I'm not saying your system is not working correctly), but it could have been nicer if the Casino gave the user a chance to prove himself innocent of the allegation by whatever means of verification could be used. Instead of drawing judgment from your end, you decided to return the players deposit or wage amount.

You have posted an image where it is mentioned that you have multi accounts. Multi-account cant be considered the maximum of the platform. If you really have multi accounts then they are not scammers. And if you don't have a multi-account then you should prof that you don't have a multi-account. You should provide KYC documents and others for that.

just curious, when they said you were multi-accounting did they restrict your account? I mean, not being able to bet or withdraw or being able to access the account at all? because from what I have seen here in the forum people who are accused of multi-account get their account restricted of some kind, it would be weird if they only voided your bet as a punishment for multi-accounting. By the way, their forum representative just went online earlier but didn't address anything.

If you read through the Ann thread of the site being accused you’ll noticed that the first reply that was made there was an accusation against them, so also was the next followed by some observation of forum members, but admist all of that the representative never came to the forum or the thread to address anything that was said about them, so that should have given everyone that wants to use Bitcointalk as a research site to choose which gambling site they should use a clue on what “Dexsport.io” really is.

And I see that you have made a reply on their thread already but it’s good to know that the probability of them replying to your post there is close to zero, because if they can ignore all that has been laid against them until now they can still ignore your accusation cause that’s what scammers do.

I think they deserve some negative tags to warn others about the risks of using their service.