Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 136 results by mzforfree
Post
Topic
Board Services
Re: Looking for investors
by
mzforfree
on 14/07/2017, 20:05:11 UTC
lol
Post
Topic
Board Armory
Re: come home to see armory all wallets deteled
by
mzforfree
on 14/07/2017, 16:25:52 UTC
anyone?
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Your plans for 1st august?
by
mzforfree
on 14/07/2017, 15:46:35 UTC
I'm going to sell a little bit and buy just to see how the market reacts. Mostly sell
Post
Topic
Board Legal
Re: Money Transmitter License for a Crypto Exchange Required by Every US State?
by
mzforfree
on 28/06/2017, 20:50:53 UTC
So does anyone know if just an individual who day trades from multiple exchanges.. does he need one of these?
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
coinbase vs gemini
by
mzforfree
on 28/06/2017, 18:19:07 UTC
I've had awful exp with coinbase but have never heard of gemini. Can anyone please explain
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: localbitcoins.com banned my account when a fraud account use my ID to scam
by
mzforfree
on 28/06/2017, 18:14:47 UTC
mine too! And i have proof including police reports, bank report of me reporting ID theft as well as witnesses such as my employer and other employees who saw me go through this AS WELL as a check made out from my boss to me for "advance: ID theft issues". They are still refusing to unban my account.. If one of the most reputable sites of BTC exchange can't be trusted who can?
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: COINBASE SCAM ALERT!!!!............
by
mzforfree
on 28/06/2017, 18:12:06 UTC
lot of greys still with bitcoin...

https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurashin/2015/12/16/bitcoin-at-tax-time-what-you-need-to-know-about-trading-tipping-mining-and-more/#4e521ced6bde

Forbes themselves said coinbase has filed all necessary paperwork but they are awful
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: sent bitcoins to wallet, charged me transaction fee but sent back bitcoins
by
mzforfree
on 27/06/2017, 20:11:53 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
sent bitcoins to wallet, charged me transaction fee but sent back bitcoins
by
mzforfree
on 27/06/2017, 09:14:02 UTC
sent bitcoins to wallet, charged me transaction fee but sent back bitcoins
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: weird happenings with software wallets
by
mzforfree
on 27/06/2017, 07:52:10 UTC
Did you check transaction fees? Your transaction fee can be set high, which can be the cause of your loss. Go to the Tools/Preferences and check your transaction fee per kigabyte. I hope it is not the case.

nothing.. and this was sent via a usb drive on a different laptop.

another culprit maybe is that when everything failed me in terms of restoring my corrupted wallet on armory a friend referred me to another friend who does legit IT work for different business near me.. he did use a thumb drive full of recovery tools to recover my corrupted armory wallet but he had no access to my electrum wallet which the rootkey/private keys on only on the tails usb drive.. he said he would run the recovery tools on RAM while I go to work to see if he can spot the wallet and either still this was 20 minute (even more AFTER I sent the transaction to the dnm wallet). furthermore it was exactly x10 in scale it was around a .05 transaction while i had .69 in my wallet
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: weird happenings with software wallets
by
mzforfree
on 27/06/2017, 07:16:34 UTC
well i don't want to say anything that would be too implicit but it was into a trusted darkmarket wallet, but it was only for about 0.06, instead my entire electrum wallet gets deposited which held about .6... this is also using tails using a tor proxxy connection.

Also this happened after i coincidentally deposited a good about of btc from my paxful account into several software/offline wallets

Still confused about the problem, but i'm guessing here:

You were depositing funds from your electrum wallet to a darknet wallet, and you're confused because you only deposited 0.06 instead of 0.6.

My first guess would be that the base unit in electrum was set to something else instead of BTC... In this case your wallet wouldn't have contained 0.6 but 0.06.... you just tought your wallet contained 0.6 btc because the base unit wasn't correct. This is only my first guess tough.
Can you see other transactions in your electrum history, does your electrum wallet still have any balance left?

no balance, these are rough estimates. I deposited around .067 or something, my full funds with was around .69 and were deposited 20 min after my deposit into a darkweb wallet

So, to sum it up
- you had an electrum wallet, you're sure the sum of the unspent outputs (the wallet balance) was 0.69 BTC
- you deposited 0.067 BTC to a webwallet
- now, it looks like your electrum wallet is empty, while it should have +0.6BTC left

My idear still remains that you actually only had 0.069BTC, but had a different base unit so it looked as if you had 0.69BTC. But just in case:

- did you try to restart electrum?
- did you try to switch servers (green button in the right bottom corner)?
- did you see any other "outgoing" transactions in your history tab?

there is no way, i even asked the dnm wallet support team about it and they said the receiving address matches none of their generated addresses for my wallet. It also doesn't make sense that my armory wallets were deleted a day before as well as soon as i bought and withdrew from paxful.. could maybe someone on paxful have done it? Although I have a copy of the wallet on my computer/desktop I used the usb on my laptop to boot up tails wallet.. sounds like someone got my IP address?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: weird happenings with software wallets
by
mzforfree
on 27/06/2017, 07:15:32 UTC
no other transactions, just this one and it was right after i sent the transaction from my tails usb to the dnm
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: weird happenings with software wallets
by
mzforfree
on 27/06/2017, 06:58:39 UTC
well i don't want to say anything that would be too implicit but it was into a trusted darkmarket wallet, but it was only for about 0.06, instead my entire electrum wallet gets deposited which held about .6... this is also using tails using a tor proxxy connection.

Also this happened after i coincidentally deposited a good about of btc from my paxful account into several software/offline wallets

Still confused about the problem, but i'm guessing here:

You were depositing funds from your electrum wallet to a darknet wallet, and you're confused because you only deposited 0.06 instead of 0.6.

My first guess would be that the base unit in electrum was set to something else instead of BTC... In this case your wallet wouldn't have contained 0.6 but 0.06.... you just tought your wallet contained 0.6 btc because the base unit wasn't correct. This is only my first guess tough.
Can you see other transactions in your electrum history, does your electrum wallet still have any balance left?

no balance, these are rough estimates. I deposited around .067 or something, my full funds with was around .69 and were deposited 20 min after my deposit into a darkweb wallet
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: weird happenings with software wallets
by
mzforfree
on 27/06/2017, 06:20:48 UTC
well i don't want to say anything that would be too implicit but it was into a trusted darkmarket wallet, but it was only for about 0.06, instead my entire electrum wallet gets deposited which held about .6... this is also using tails using a tor proxxy connection.

Also this happened after i coincidentally deposited a good about of btc from my paxful account into several software/offline wallets
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
weird happenings with software wallets
by
mzforfree
on 27/06/2017, 06:02:20 UTC
also it makes me wonder if it has anything to do with my possible being hacked?

https://blockchain.info/tx/f5a4a02add4af3f4fe8ed1b7275347b1fd3658c56237be6b43652cb90c71adfe

transaction ID.

This was right about the same time also i made a deposit into tor for around .0067, instead of that going to the .onion my entire account gets deposited. Mind you this is off of tails using persistent storage but only with wallet.

this was done mind you off a usb drive using persistent storage but how did someone get the private key to do this, who do you think the culprit is?

https://blockchain.info/tx/f5a4a02add4af3f4fe8ed1b7275347b1fd3658c56237be6b43652cb90c71adfe

this is transaction id

went to this wallet:

1AtAEzLsSSuSjcjaSW5AzyH7hQaG6y1Dhf


, at a weird transaction rate.    1BWo6D86YojPRiR38v2i4Dnn3epqZJttkz
Post
Topic
Board Armory
Re: come home to see armory all wallets deteled
by
mzforfree
on 27/06/2017, 04:45:42 UTC
thanks.. also it makes me wonder if it has anything to do with my possible being hacked? Recently another wallet of mine was entirely deposited into a .tor site which was run completely from a USB drive, encrypted, using persistent storage.

transaction is this

https://blockchain.info/tx/f5a4a02add4af3f4fe8ed1b7275347b1fd3658c56237be6b43652cb90c71adfe

also please if anyone has any idea what's going on i can provide full details.

If any developer/coder can please help I promise to hold funds in escrow
Post
Topic
Board Legal
Re: Localbitcoins and legal protections
by
mzforfree
on 26/06/2017, 05:44:14 UTC
What are you asking us in legal terms? I can understand the case, but if you want to know if they can legally keep your account banned even though you're explaining the situation, the answer is yes.

I think it should be moved to "service discussion" or "exchanges".
so in that case the case always goes to the vendor without a judiciary??
Post
Topic
Board Armory
Re: come home to see armory all wallets deteled
by
mzforfree
on 26/06/2017, 05:04:14 UTC
just pm'd someone btw if they can help with corrupted files, they are encrypted but if you can un- corrupte ill put btc in escrow or something.
Post
Topic
Board Armory
Re: come home to see armory all wallets deteled
by
mzforfree
on 26/06/2017, 03:18:34 UTC
so it couldn't be the platform? upgrading the client or trying it on another comp wouldn't work?
The platform doesn't matter. The Armory version might make a difference, but none of the wallet code as been changed in any of the latest versions.

the thing they are clearly marked .dat files for wallets for armory..
Armory doesn't use .dat files. If you are seeing .dat files that are supposedly for armory, those aren't Armory files.

if anyone can please help we can sign some agreement saying ill a % of the wallet. They don't seem all the way corrupted can someone please help.
How would you know they aren't corrupted? Do you happen to know the Armory binary file format? Armory uses a binary file format that you wouldn't know whether it was corrupted unless you examine it byte by byte.

Have you tried the Armory wallet recovery tool? It's in the software itself.

That's for wallet.dat files which are for Bitcoin Core only, not Armory.

i'm sure they might be but the error log says wrong path or wrong armory wallet.. even though i created this wallet and it's encryption using armory core.I did OFC try that as well as a number of other different things.

There's gotta be a way willing to pay through escrow to make sure the developing team has the funds that it deserves. I've been using armory since .88 same for this one breach to make it stop using it forever/

And as you can see this is clearly a systems error.. i i mean 3 wallets are randomly deleted from an OI issue? I'm a very much laymen but how would this happen?


Oh and I've read this python script helps you find it but how do i do this? I haveno exp in this please help

 #!/usr/bin/env python -u

# Read from stdin, corrupt/remove random bytes, write to standard out.

import optparse
import random
import sys

def main():
  parser = optparse.OptionParser(usage="%prog [options]")
  parser.add_option("--n", dest="n", type="int", default=1,
                    help="how many single-byte errors to introduce")
  parser.add_option("--r", dest="remove", type="int", default=0,
                    help="how many bytes to erase")
  parser.add_option("--verbose", dest="verbose", action="store_true",
                    help="be verbose")
  (options, args) = parser.parse_args()

  data = bytearray(sys.stdin.read())

  for i in range(0, options.n):
    position = random.randrange(0, len(data))
    oldbyte = data[position]
    newbyte = (oldbyte+random.randrange(1,256))%256
    data[position] = newbyte
    if options.verbose:
      print >> sys.stderr, "Replaced byte %d with %d at position %d"%(oldbyte,newbyte,position)

  for i in range(0, options.remove):
    position = random.randrange(0, len(data))
    oldbyte = data[position]
    del data[position]
    if options.verbose:
      print >> sys.stderr, "Deleted byte at position %d"%(position)

  sys.stdout.write(data)

if __name__ == '__main__':
  main()
Post
Topic
Board Armory
Re: come home to see armory all wallets deteled
by
mzforfree
on 26/06/2017, 02:08:36 UTC
so it couldn't be the platform? upgrading the client or trying it on another comp wouldn't work? the thing they are clearly marked .dat files for wallets for armory.. if anyone can please help we can sign some agreement saying ill a % of the wallet. They don't seem all the way corrupted can someone please help.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=25091.0

i've seen is another idea

edit: also there never says files are corrupted just that the wallets themselves are not acceptable wallet files

anyone help plz will be appreciated, dont mind putting out bounties or service fees.. i know there's a way I just read multiple programs including using pythonwallet itself to run a recovery.

also the exact reaosn as to why it won't recover is: Invalid path - or file is not a valid armory wallet?

wtf?