Search content
Sort by
Showing 19 of 19 results by needhelp2
I was thinking I am on the Zcash miner thread, apparently I was wrong. 
+1
just comparing profitability and card performances.
I've had a look on pool.to.be.com XMR pool and they have had a massive spike in hashrate. I wonder if this is due to people moving away from ZEC now that the price has dropped to literally just over $50 a coin?
Is monero now the coin to mine now that ZEC and ETH seem to be in decline (although XMR is not exactly holding its price in the market right now it does seem more stable than those two)?
link for xmr miner https://mega.nz/#F!e4JVEAIJ!l1iF4z10fMyJzY5-LnyC2A
If the RX 480 gets 800H/s with XMR then mine XMR since its more profitable then ZEC.
https://www.whattomine.com/coins
is XMR more Profitable???
You complain about NEWBIES, but why mislead them,
Seems more profitable to me. However never knew they could hit 800h/s.
Cards available: 6
GPU #0: name: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 units
Total cards: 1
Catalyst 13.12 is REQUIRED for best performance and compatibility
At least 16 GB of Virtual Memory is required for multi-GPU systems
Make sure you defined GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests
Initializing...
POOL version
1 pool specified.
Stratum - connecting to 'pool.minexmr.com' <37.59.49.7> port 7777
Stratum - connecting to 'pool.minexmr.com' <37.59.49.7> port 7777
Stratum - Connected
Stratum - Connected
Pool Diff 15000
DevFee: Pool Diff 15000
12/06/16-02:02:24 - SHARE FOUND (target 15000) - (GPU 0)
12/06/16-02:02:37 - SHARE FOUND (target 15000) - (GPU 0)
12/06/16-02:02:48 - SHARE FOUND (target 15000) - (GPU 0)
12/06/16-02:02:48 - SHARE FOUND (target 15000) - (GPU 0)
12/06/16-02:02:52 - New job received from pool.minexmr.com:7777
Speed: 531 h/s, TotalHashes: 20K, DevHashes: 1K Mining time: 00:00
just a quick check all stock RX-480 8GB getting 531 h/s
check with all my rigs and atm it would not be more profitable for me
If the RX 480 gets 800H/s with XMR then mine XMR since its more profitable then ZEC.
https://www.whattomine.com/coins
is XMR more Profitable???
You complain about NEWBIES, but why mislead them,
Some of these comments are just ridiculous, way too many noobs getting involved in mining.
Yes, Claymore V9 will make ZEC price go up! ZEC Difficulty will go down! Zec block reward will also go up! Because that's the way it works.
Yes, Claymore V9 will make ZEC price go up! ZEC Difficulty will go down! Zec block reward will also go up! Because that's the way it works.
Everyone is a Newbie sometime
V9 will increase Network HashRate > Difficulty will go up
Mining software has no affect on Block rewards this is controlled by Coin Developers Algo
Price is not directly affected by the mining software. It is purely Supply and Demand, If you are willing to sell your coins CHEAP someone will buy them cheaply...
I'm just curious, how did you know then that someone is trying to hack you? And what kind of firewall do you use?
After login was asking about admin password for install 3rd party software, and found was services what was not installed by me, now reinstalling whole rig
I use comodo on rig, and fireeye on nat
Can I ask where you downloaded the file from?
There is a fake version of the file someone has put up on mega that is a virus.
The correct address to download from is
GOOGLE: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B69wv2iqszefdmJickl5MF9BOEE?usp=sharing
MEGA: https://mega.nz/#F!P0ZjFDjC!Cmb-ZRqlbAnNrajRtp4zvA
I have been using Claymore's Zec miners from the first version and it has never asked for me to download 3rd party software.
When installing NiceHashes new miner it ask for your confirmation on using 3rd party Claymore miner this is probably what he is talking about???
Is it legal to mine with both amd and nvidia?
To be on topic, I am still mining zec with one gpu (7970), clay 8 works really well.
To be on topic, I am still mining zec with one gpu (7970), clay 8 works really well.
if not illegal at least immoral, or possibly unethical
as mixing red and green would be brown and that is just ( well you know ) Funny, so I've installed windows on one rig, Win 10 Pro, especialy for Claymore 8 and my 480's and like 10 years go, Win freezes completely on a random basis 
Just one of the many reasons serious miners prefer LINUX.
1) LINUX is infinitely more stable than Windows (which isn't saying much).
I have LINUX machines that have run with no outages (hardware failure, shut down to physically MOVE the machine, and power outages excluded) since before Windows XP EXISTED - literally.
The only Windows machine I've EVER had go a year without crashing was a NT 3.51 SP5 machine - vs MORE THAN 20 YEARS for some of my LINUX machines that were running the same user programs.
2) If you have a power outage, your miner running under Windows won't restart when power comes back on 'till you LOG IN MANUALLY (I have yet to see any miner program that could be run a a service).
LINUX makes it easy to set up so the miner will restart automatically after a power outage.
IMO the only thing Windows has going for it are that the overclock/fan control programs available for it like Afterburner are a lot better.
So you have 20 years of practice and still haven't learned to use search engines? Or linux aces who never update their machines never update their brain content too?
2) BitMoose and/or built in Task Scheduler
Warning: Enable Automatic logon only if you are the sole user of your computer.Your password helps keep your account secure, no matter what PC you sign in to or what apps, settings, and services you use while you're signed in.
1. Right click on Start and select Run, type Netplwiz and then press Enter key.
2. In the resulting User Accounts dialog, select your user account first and then uncheck the option labelled Users
must enter a user name and password to use this computer. Click Apply button to see Automatically sign in
box.
3. In the Automatically sign in dialog, type your password and then re-enter the password to confirm the same.
4. Click on OK to save the changes.
5. Restart your PC to see your Windows 10 automatically logging into your account without asking you to enter the password.
Put shortcuts for batch files you use to start your miners in this directory : C:\Users\(your user name)\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs\Startup
use a timeout command as first line in batch file so windows can get fully loaded and stable before miner is started > like this
timeout 120
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 -zwal your t address.worker name -zpsw z ( any command variables you use )
this way if windows restarts for any reason it will log in automatically and start mining after the timeout # of seconds
Earning a little less everyday, added a brand new RX 480 8 GB $249 . Payrate jumped up for about 30 minutes now it is lower than before I added the new card. Went from 1kH/s to 1.2kH/s but now earning less. Is it just down hill from here?
with the slow start now being over I think more people will be switching over. It was mentioned yesterday I believe that the DAG for ETH has got too big now for those using 2GB cards so they will be now moving across to the next most profitable which I do believe is ZEC.
Network Hashrate increase = lower profit for miners???
Earning a little less everyday, added a brand new RX 480 8 GB $249 . Payrate jumped up for about 30 minutes now it is lower than before I added the new card. Went from 1kH/s to 1.2kH/s but now earning less. Is it just down hill from here?
I'm not understand for mining zec that server Asia us China... I'm can is better use.. Please help me
Try each of the pools and see which one was lowest #
ZEC: 11/25/16-13:28:55 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (125 ms)! <<<<<<<<<<<<< HERE
Did ZEC's difficulty just double? I'm literally submitting half as many shares than I was an hour ago with the same hashrate. Or is it just flypool?
Same here, I could not understand it and then I saw they are showing the shares for less than an hour. Check the bars and you will see the time of each share count. Number of shares PER HOUR is more but they are counting in less than hour blocks ?? Why idk
I was wrong, the less than hour count was only during transition in how the shares are counted
606 shares 2016 - 11 - 25 - 09:09 ( UTC - 06:00 )
601 shares 2016 - 11 - 25 - 10:11 ( UTC - 06:00 )
307 shares 2016 - 11 - 25 - 10:37 ( UTC - 06:00 )
284 shares 2016 - 11 - 25 - 11:38 ( UTC - 06:00 )
289 shares 2016 - 11 - 25 - 11:52 ( UTC - 06:00 )
299 shares 2016 - 11 - 25 - 12:51 ( UTC - 06:00 )
same for everyone
GPU #0: Pitcairn, 3072 MB available, 16 compute units
GPU #1: Tonga, 4096 MB available, 32 compute units
GPU #2: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 44 compute units
GPU #3: Tonga, 4096 MB available, 28 compute units
GPU #4: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 836.620 H/s, Total Shares: 59, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
ZEC: GPU0 104.585 H/s, GPU1 133.607 H/s, GPU2 290.131 H/s, GPU3 132.362 H/s, GPU4 175.936 H/s
Pool switches: ZEC - 0
Current ZEC pool share target: 0x00418937 (diff: 1000H)
GPU0 t=74C fan=60%, GPU1 t=75C fan=56%, GPU2 t=59C fan=35%, GPU3 t=55C fan=47%, GPU4 t=61C fan=52%
Thank You, Mr Claymore
GPU #1: Tonga, 4096 MB available, 32 compute units
GPU #2: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 44 compute units
GPU #3: Tonga, 4096 MB available, 28 compute units
GPU #4: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 836.620 H/s, Total Shares: 59, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
ZEC: GPU0 104.585 H/s, GPU1 133.607 H/s, GPU2 290.131 H/s, GPU3 132.362 H/s, GPU4 175.936 H/s
Pool switches: ZEC - 0
Current ZEC pool share target: 0x00418937 (diff: 1000H)
GPU0 t=74C fan=60%, GPU1 t=75C fan=56%, GPU2 t=59C fan=35%, GPU3 t=55C fan=47%, GPU4 t=61C fan=52%
Thank You, Mr Claymore
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:22:54 - New job from equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357
ZEC - Total Speed: 160.397 H/s, Total Shares: 177, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:17
ZEC: GPU0 160.397 H/s
GPU0 t=72C fan=29%
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:23:04 - New job from equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357
ZEC - Total Speed: 161.002 H/s, Total Shares: 177, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:17
ZEC: GPU0 161.002 H/s
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:23:06 - New job from equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357
ZEC - Total Speed: 160.920 H/s, Total Shares: 177, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:17
ZEC: GPU0 160.920 H/s
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:23:13 - New job from equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357
ZEC - Total Speed: 161.232 H/s, Total Shares: 177, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:17
ZEC: GPU0 161.232 H/s
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:23:18 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (157 ms)!
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:23:23 - New job from equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357
ZEC - Total Speed: 161.526 H/s, Total Shares: 178, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:17
ZEC: GPU0 161.526 H/s
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:23:25 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (172 ms)!
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:23:28 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (172 ms)!
GPU0 t=72C fan=30%
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:23:33 - New job from equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357
ZEC - Total Speed: 162.271 H/s, Total Shares: 180, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:17
ZEC: GPU0 162.271 H/s
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:23:37 - New job from equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357
ZEC - Total Speed: 162.490 H/s, Total Shares: 180, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:17
ZEC: GPU0 162.490 H/s
Anyone seen this behavior the miner is being flooded with new jobs faster than it can produce shares almost
ZEC - Total Speed: 160.397 H/s, Total Shares: 177, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:17
ZEC: GPU0 160.397 H/s
GPU0 t=72C fan=29%
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:23:04 - New job from equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357
ZEC - Total Speed: 161.002 H/s, Total Shares: 177, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:17
ZEC: GPU0 161.002 H/s
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:23:06 - New job from equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357
ZEC - Total Speed: 160.920 H/s, Total Shares: 177, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:17
ZEC: GPU0 160.920 H/s
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:23:13 - New job from equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357
ZEC - Total Speed: 161.232 H/s, Total Shares: 177, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:17
ZEC: GPU0 161.232 H/s
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:23:18 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (157 ms)!
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:23:23 - New job from equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357
ZEC - Total Speed: 161.526 H/s, Total Shares: 178, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:17
ZEC: GPU0 161.526 H/s
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:23:25 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (172 ms)!
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:23:28 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (172 ms)!
GPU0 t=72C fan=30%
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:23:33 - New job from equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357
ZEC - Total Speed: 162.271 H/s, Total Shares: 180, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:17
ZEC: GPU0 162.271 H/s
ZEC: 11/22/16-15:23:37 - New job from equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357
ZEC - Total Speed: 162.490 H/s, Total Shares: 180, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:17
ZEC: GPU0 162.490 H/s
Anyone seen this behavior the miner is being flooded with new jobs faster than it can produce shares almost
I am having a bit of trouble running a command in the bat for different intensity levels on 2 cards. One card runs a good bit higher in temp and i wanted to run that at a lower intensity level.
Can someone provide a example command line of how to run two cards on two different intensity levels?
This is what i try but it fails to work right...
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -zwal miner -zpsw pwpw -r 0 -mport 0 -i 4,0 -1 3,1
Should i put the GPU # before the intensity or what am i doing wrong here?
Can someone provide a example command line of how to run two cards on two different intensity levels?
This is what i try but it fails to work right...
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -zwal miner -zpsw pwpw -r 0 -mport 0 -i 4,0 -1 3,1
Should i put the GPU # before the intensity or what am i doing wrong here?
-i mining intensity. Possible values: 0...4. 0 - lowest intensity and CPU usage, 4 - maximal intensity. You can also specify values for every card, for example "-i 4,2,4". Default value is "4".
-i 4,2,4 would = i 4 for gpu0, i 2 for gpu1, i 4 for gpu2
the gpu # are not used in the command first i# is for gpu0, 2nd i# is for gpu1, and so on
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -zwal miner -zpsw pwpw -r 0 -mport 0 -i 4,3
example -i 3 = all gpu's intensity 3
if you have 10 gpu's and you want them all except # 10 to run at intensity 3, and the tenth one to run at intensity 2 = -i 3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,2
I do not know how to hook 10 gpu's to one mobo?
-i 3,2,2,3,2,2 1832
For those, who need comparison data.
version 7 speeds:
7870 - 95 sol/s
7950 - 145 sol/s
7970 - 165 sol/s
270x - 100 sol/s
280x - 165 sol/s
285 - 110 sol/s
470 4Gb - 155 sol/s
version 7 speeds:
7870 - 95 sol/s
7950 - 145 sol/s
7970 - 165 sol/s
270x - 100 sol/s
280x - 165 sol/s
285 - 110 sol/s
470 4Gb - 155 sol/s
Couldn't be more accurate. You can add
290 - 200 sol/s to complete the list
390x - 230 sol/s
GPU #0: Pitcairn, 3072 MB available, 16 compute units
GPU #1: Tonga, 4096 MB available, 32 compute units
GPU #2: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 44 compute units
GPU #3: Tonga, 4096 MB available, 28 compute units
GPU #4: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 687.917 H/s, Total Shares: 1045, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:14
ZEC: GPU0 79.619 H/s, GPU1 118.308 H/s, GPU2 229.261 H/s, GPU3 111.606 H/s, GPU4 149.123 H/s
Pool switches: ZEC - 0
Current ZEC pool share target: 0x000f0f0f (diff: 4352H)
GPU0 t=72C fan=55%, GPU1 t=77C fan=64%, GPU2 t=55C fan=32%, GPU3 t=57C fan=48%, GPU4 t=62C fan=53%
! GPU2 229.261 H/s at ONLY 55c
ALL STOCK ZERO O/C
GPU #1: Tonga, 4096 MB available, 32 compute units
GPU #2: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 44 compute units
GPU #3: Tonga, 4096 MB available, 28 compute units
GPU #4: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 687.917 H/s, Total Shares: 1045, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:14
ZEC: GPU0 79.619 H/s, GPU1 118.308 H/s, GPU2 229.261 H/s, GPU3 111.606 H/s, GPU4 149.123 H/s
Pool switches: ZEC - 0
Current ZEC pool share target: 0x000f0f0f (diff: 4352H)
GPU0 t=72C fan=55%, GPU1 t=77C fan=64%, GPU2 t=55C fan=32%, GPU3 t=57C fan=48%, GPU4 t=62C fan=53%
! GPU2 229.261 H/s at ONLY 55c
ALL STOCK ZERO O/C