So, what kind of Bitcoin reserve management might we need in this situation?

I agree that limiting the investment into shitcoins as compared with bitcoin to something like 10% is acceptable, yet I don't agree with your assertion that suggests that there is any thing helpful in fucking around with shitcoins.. since you are proclaiming that "it won't hurt" to have up to 10% in various shitcoins.

Of course, you can do whatever you want, but the idea of diversification for the sake of it, seems pretty retarded to me. especially if you might have some clues about what bitcoin is and unless you have some kind of specific reasons to hold any of those shitcoins..

For sure, this is a bit of an evolving situation since there are some elements in which bitcoiners are getting their dreams to come true with the level of attention towards bitcoin and so many governments, institutions and even status quo rich folks seem to be changing some of their tunes around bitcoin, including acting like they like bitcoin, at least for the purpose of their own hoarding of it, yet I doubt that they are excited about the various individual sound money and individual financial freedom aspects of bitcoin, which seems to be part of where bitcoin bringing power to the people, so I am not sure which parts they are wanting to bring in while excluding other parts, and surely there is a bit of a likely fine dance going on that continues to have a lot of uncertainties, including the various ways that aspects of the new areas of bitcoin adoption are likely to experience some blowing ups.

I am not claiming to know how it is all going to play out, even though each person is likely going to be better off to make sure that he is continuing to stack bitcoin rather than ignoring bitcoin and/or refusing to get off of zero, which happens to be the position and/or posture of around 99% of the world's population.  They will likely end up coming in at a higher price..and there is ONLY so much any of us as individuals can do in order to help individuals to help themselves, even if some of us (as individuals who already own some bitcoin) are likely going to prosper from the extent that governments, institutions and/or status quo rich are pumping our bags to the extent that we have accumulated bitcoin rather than sitting on our hands in the past years (to the extent we have known about bitcoin for a while, and even you nikola22 may well have had some time to accumulate some bitcoin already since you have a mid-2017 forum registration date.

We should be figuring out how to devise plans and to execute strategies to protect ourselves and our bitcoin, even if we might have some bitcoin held by third parties, we may well likely realize that we should be aiming towards maintaining much of our BTC stash privately and protecting ourselves as much as we can, which may also involve ongoing attempts at learning, too..

Anyone living in countries with hostility towards bitcoin holders still have to  figure out how to protect themselves, and the government is not necessarily helping them to be able to make the right choices if they are restricted from being able to accumulate and even transact in bitcoin, and I am not going to claim to understand all of the various obstacles that individuals are going to face to be able to make sure that they are able to hold bitcoin without overly suffering risks of getting locked out of their coins or otherwise rug pulled by their government or some supposedly credible 3rd party custodian.  Rug pulling can happen in rich and poor countries.

But, yeah, you are free to invest (or diversify) into inferior assets merely because you are having difficulties figuring out how bitcoin differentiates itself from them.
Wasn't it Warren Buffet who said that diversification for the sake of it likely demonstrates that the person has not done enough homework.
Good luck. You are likely going to need it.

Don't think anything else, it will be a bigger risk for the company, LTC and also BCH are old coins too but they are not worthy of being strategic reserve funds (in my opinion), in fact it will increase the big risk if a company buys altcoin as an alternative to their reserve funds, in my opinion it is better to do a DCA strategy on buying Bitcoin, sometimes you have to focus on long-term accumulation not on how much you can buy, and we need to remember that only a few companies and governments have adopted Bitcoin as their reserve funds, this has an opportunity for small companies to enter early before the price is much more expensive (that is if you think long term).

Sure you can put your time, energy and/or value anywhere that you like, even into inferior investments, products, assets, currencies, and sure sometimes, you might have temporary overperformance of inferior assets, yet it seems that within the dynamics outlined by Gresham's law, value is going to continue to gravitate towards the superior assets (bitcoin in this case).

There also likely continue to be roles for various inferior assets, including like you suggest, some of them could have utility value, yet many of us recognize/appreciate that bitcoin is the best of monies, and surely currently there are assets in which monetary value is held such as in real estate, art, stocks, etc, yet bitcoin is a better money, to the extent that some of those assets might be merely be serviing as places to store monetary value...

The safe bet is USDC. At this point, company integrates stablecoin is hardly a blip on the radar of the headline chasers. The bill will pass, businesses will comply, and suddenly half the payments in the world will be frictionless, auditable, programmable. Ordinary, until you look twice. Everybody is talking about common case as if it is the end of the story, but the real power is in the boring stuff. Today it is a new button in the app. The next, the business model of Visa is bleeding out the back door, and remittance shops begin closing up shop since drivers are paid immediately across continents

The Bitcoin reserve angle is spicy. Uber as quasi-central bank, piling satoshis as strategic ballast. When they do, it is not so much about possessing a digital gold but being at the next table where the rules of money are made rather than obeyed. Platforms that determine their own monetary policy, in silence, balance sheet by balance sheet. Stablecoins will be everywhere, but the truly crazy future is when just payments become Uber having a parallel economy that outstrips half the countries they are in. The new normal is only normal until you realize who’s actually controlling the narratives

You see, on the surface, Uber “adding stablecoins” looks like a technical footnote. But peel back a few layers and it’s less about payments, more about rewriting the underlying rules of global commerce. Dara isn’t just cutting fees; he’s quietly redrawing borders

Uber’s scale isn’t a detail. With 170 million active users and over $40B+ in quarterly transactions, when they shift their money rails (even “just for study”) it’s a planetary-scale stress test for the old order. Visa and Mastercard lose $60B in market cap in a week, and that’s just from rumors. Imagine what happens when Uber flips the switch for real

But don’t get too excited about buying your ride with Bitcoin. They want stability, not the volatility with high transaction fee. This is Uber’s chance to build its own internal nervous system

Regulators are right to sweat: the geopolitical chessboard is fracturing, with every country dreaming of its own programmable digital coin. Uber, meanwhile, aims for a universal lubricant, a frictionless rail that no central bank can pull off the tracks. If this works, Uber might turn from gig-economy app to something closer to a “platform-state”, where the driver is both labor and citizen, the ride is both work and remittance, and the app is the bank

Maybe it sounds far-fetched. Maybe it’s inevitable. And what happens to the millions whose economic lives now flow through its software, and the governments that suddenly realize the pipes are being rerouted right under their noses

So, governments, institutions and even individuals may well start out considering that they will just accumulate 1% or some modest amount in their budget (investment portfolio allocation), and then they continue to find more and more and more reasons to increase their cornz allocation and it becomes a bit of an unstoppable snowballing of the accumulation of bitcoin.

We likely can logically deduce that many countries, institutions and/or individuals are going to end up suffering some kind of bitcoin rug pull, yet at the same time, they also may be screwing their own little selfies in some of their own cashflow management practices... and yeah, some of the countries will be printing their fiat to buy bitcoin and others may well not be advantaged by bitcoin in terms of their own inabilities to spend within their means, so they will continue to abuse debt like they have historically done, and bitcoin may not end up advantaging them if they don't figure out how to manage their budgets even within a state actor or even large corporation kind of way, and it seems that bitcoin will still reward the prudent rather than the reckless. .... including recognizing and/or appreciating the power of holding your own keys (to at least a decently large proportion of your stash), yet we are still witnessing how these matters are going to play out in the coming years as larger and larger players are coming to bitcoin, yet some of the same fundamentals about bitcoin still apply to them, even if some of the larger entities have been so spoiled by fiat and their status in the fiat debt system, that they might not recognize the power of sound money and/or following prudent cashflow management practices.

That seems to be pointing out the level of early that we continue to be, and surely some sovereigns and/or quasi-governmental bodies might find it more convenient to get exposure through ETFs, and others might consider some form of self-custody or ways to have strong checks on their custodians (private custodial arrangements), so the solutions in regards to how they hold their bitcoin might not be clear, and even Bhutan does not seem to be completely transparent regarding their bitcoin holdings. and they seem to have a lot, relative to their size (GDP, budget and population).

You are expressing a truth that seems to apply whether you are a government, institution or individual.  Those with greater discretionary income have more options to buy bitcoin and even more options to screw things up but still end up accumulating more bitcoin than those with smaller levels of discretionary income..... yet at the same time, it seems to me that a decent number of governments, institutions and individuals are going to get ahead of the similarly-situated (or better off) status quo governments, institutions and individuals based on their level of aggressiveness in accumulating bitcoin within their means and without screwing things up, so they may well be way smaller and with fewer resources, yet bitcoin may well end up contribute towards their relative advancement in the pack of relative comparisons.

As many of us likely realize, there can be a bit of a mal-incentive for countries and local governments to be accumulating bitcoin (and/or shitcoins) through confiscation.... Many of the laws around confiscation can be unjust, yet it is also unjust for countries to print money and steal from the population by diluting the currency, even though many countries do engage in printing and currency dilution.

That's because it makes 0 sense to make a digital asset strategy other than Bitcoin, and if you really want to gamble, perhaps Ethereum if you think it will have a role long term for smart contracts which I doubt since it cannot seem to scale, but nontheless, an ETH strategy is better than XRP. SOL is just like a faster, even more centralized ETH. The strategy only makes sense with BTC because it's the only digital asset (or any asset type) strictly limited in amount and decentralized, the rest of these companies making reserve strategies on altcoins will just dump as altcoins do against BTC long term, so only buy companies that have a serious strategy to buy and hold BTC, and so far MSTR is the best one.

How can you seize Bitcoins?
You can make it illegal, or try to make it difficult to off-ramp, but seizing Bitcoin is no easy feat.
Ok, Ukrainian Government officials, aren't exactly smiling welcoming people, I guess, but we are speaking of seizing private key by private key? OR am i misinterpreting something?

The option is to maximize the seized bitcoin, if they talk about buying, of course it is very difficult for now because they also still need funds to run and maintain their government, but maybe it is projected for their future, and they make the legislation today, that is also okay, it is much better when they already have clear regulations about strategic reserve funds in bitcoin even though it relies on seized goods because they cannot buy it yet.

I hope they don't Fomo. LOL

I don't exactly know what an Ethereum Strategic reserve is, but today Sharplink NASDAQ: SBET announced some clarification over their ETH trasury plans.
Stock down 70%.

I guess this is a warning for every corporation willing to pump their share price by announcing silly Bitcoin Strategy Plans, without a clear rationale, implementation, and procedures, like Staregy has been building over the years.

Crypto asset reserve bill lands in Ukraine Parliament.

https://ground.news/article/crypto-asset-reserve-bill-lands-in-ukraines-parliament.

Ukraine have officially considered adding crypto to their state reserve. It only allows the National bank to include crypto to their state reserve by the lawmakers draft bill on state asset reserve Parliament.

I hope it's only bitcoin that they're considering and let them not add shitcoins to their crypto reserve like Trump did.

Also I'm amaze with this seeing that US military leadership support and see the importance of Bitcoin Strategic Reserve as Senator Cynthia Lummis stated.

Germany keep making chances, but France is getting better in second half, France will win.