I agree with you. If you have a mentor, you will always look up to him and do whatever he does without you knowing the reason for such actions. Youths are easily carried away with what they see on social media and they will think it's for real, unknown to them that these influencers are only doing it to get paid. Most of them are not gamblers but they easily lure their followers into gambling.

I understand that with loot boxes in some video games, these items like skins, weapons, tools, among others, can be traded for real money. However, there are others that are equally addictive without any monetary benefit. On the other hand, with casinos, in general, you can win money 100% of the time. Therefore, these cases of addiction are not strictly related to money, but the loss of money would be more of a consequence. So, to what degree is money a stimulating factor in addictions?

Is the loss of money just collateral damage?

Yes, you may be right in your judgment. If the fight was a set-up, I was still interested in seeing the legend Tyson back in the ring. It was incredibly impressive. I think it was really worth it. Besides, where else can you make so much money at that age? And here was such an opportunity. Wow, I was really excited to watch that fight. I loved the show.

Puting myself in the position of the casino, why the heck would I allow you to create two different accounts with same name doing same thing with the accounts perhaps it's must be for a suspicious reason that's why you would need double accounts hence it's included in all must all casinos TOS.

I believe this is one of the reasons why KYC was first introduced in the first place because it might have occurred to the casinos what some people might be miss using their bonuses and other things in their advantages hence it's very important for casino to include that as a term of service.

Anyone of your ever get interested so much that an obsessive wish to try appeared, after watching something? I am just trying to find out how many of you will believe that gambler on a video won in a fair way, and you then had a wish to try it yourself.

Yesterday I have found an interesting video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRkotvU9fPQ, $1 to $1000 challenge. Everyone can afford to spend $1 on gambling, so this video might trigger someone to start playing. Twice in the video a person caught big multipliers with his last money. Do you think it is luck or rigged gaming?

I agree that if tokens get listed on exchanges and the team is public, then the market will likely support the project more but this comparison is a bit off IMO since Monero is a privacy coin instead of a casino token. People who use it should've expected that exchanges or any business needing government approval would drop them sooner or later. Not to mention its main appeal is the privacy feature, not necessarily profit like many casino tokens.

This is a rather strange event. I read that Polymarket does not have a license in Thailand... But, in my opinion, you should not equate this prediction platform with a regular casino. After all, it is a largely decentralized platform. Trying to ban it on the basis that it does not have a license is the same as trying to ban Bitcoin because Bitcoin does not have a license in a particular country, lol. The gaming industry does not stand still and gradually more and more elements of decentralization are beginning to penetrate it. Sooner or later, national governments will abandon the idea of ​​​​licensing everything.

This is a very good attitude especially for a conservative gambler, if you are on the conservative side, you can see this as the best to explore but for an aggressive gambler who believes they can make the money literally from almost any game, they don't really put that to consideration and so they aren't advantaged on that side but having a good knowledge keeps u a step ahead in the better bet on such games.

There are two ways that can make the token more attractive. List it in well known Centralized Exchanges where people can buy and sell. Then another way is the price. Those who got it at the first time, if they make good profit from it then others will follow up and those who make profit from it will tell others to invest and also using it to gamble in the casino site can make people to participate in the token and the casino. Let be that the transaction for the first half year should be free .and that will also make people in the exchange to use the token very well. Since we are the participants here, we will suggest a possible ways for the company to succeed in their businesses.
I am very much happy that niyvi is very active and responding to questions and bringing more information. Activeness in the forum bring more benefits to the casino.

Everyone have their reasons why they are gambling most are gambling because of the money or should profit they think they can make from it , and some are gambling for fun ( especially those that financially stable), but those that are doing it for money they can get from gambling are more common than those doing it for fun , most folks are addicted to gambling because of the way or the mentality they use to approach it , some gain such mentality from things they came across, like those showcasing their winnings via social medias just to get more engagement not knowing they are endangering Young folks lives , because they have given them the mindset of believing gambling is the easiest and fastest way to eradicate poverty, which it's isn't because it can also lead to that same poverty if is not being approached wisely.

It is good to see you making more clarifications on this, many do not believe that a casino token will be a reliable token one can use and have this notion that it is only secluded to the casino all the time. Those that were introduced in the past and weren’t successful has been used to judge the idea of Niyvi introducing their own token, that’s why people are most sceptical and watching to see what is coming from the casino and how they tend to achieve this in the future.

I saw a news today about a person who decided to end his life after losing around 150K in a single bet, the person is an average middle class with a wife and baby and his annual income will be around 40K (max) then why on earth he decided to bet that big amount on a single bet. It's evident that his greed forced him to take such decision but as a result he lost the life and leaving the loved ones stranded. What's your take on this matter?

For streamers, this is just a job, a way to earn money, and clicks or views are not always important to them (although they choose those with a large audience), sometimes it is important for them to simply create a video in which they win a big prize. In fact, I think that such a prize is very difficult to win, and it is almost impossible for an ordinary player to achieve this, but there are many who are able to believe that they can also win, after such a motivating video, this is what it is designed for.

Observation - It’s been going on as a gossip or will I say argument.
That players of nowadays are more focus on making money rather than playing for passion like the old days.

I also can strongly say that passion for football ends in Ronaldo and Messi ERA.

So many headlines has been flying around, about players either wanting to change clubs because they want to secure a huge paycheck. While others still in their current club demanding a pay rise to a new contract.

The Saudi Arabia side has now made it more obvious by opening the door to players who are more interested in money than passion to come in.

I need more clarity on this matter, which is the reason I brought it on here.
Please when commenting let there fact that will be helpful

in sports betting, people often stick to what they know and what has been known in the past people tend to analyze results of the past and tend to apply it again in recent and most of the time it pays off

aside from the live matches there are also bets that do not really involve the match at all like for example teams and players’ contracts

if someone had betted on luka dončić being traded and everyone would have betted against that then that person would have made some good money but seeing as the news has been surprising for almost everyone it is quite a reach to make bets this unrealistic

sometimes though it seems to pay off to take some big risks and make outrageous predictions

People are encouraged to cheat the government because of their unfair policies and restrictions. Of course, I won't say it is a good idea, but if we think this could give fairness, then I support it.

Indeed, the government doesn't consider how it affects people's lives like they own it. I understand their interest in doing this, but they also have to consider people who want to gamble. Because the more they become strict on gambling, the more people think they are abused and will find ways (illegal) to pursue their wants.