is 50gpu each  1 target 2886.49 MKey/s  enough i try RTX 5090
Initializing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
[2025-07-26.19:45:56] [Info] Generating 262,144 starting points (10.0MB)
[2025-07-26.19:45:56] [Info] Error: invalid device symbol anyone any idea what is the issue guys  Error: invalid device symbol

there is no other way but to invest in hardware, so give up

Support it. Everyone has their own GPU power, the pools have very long ranges, and can they be trusted.

We should make a list of scanned prefixes and upload them to the web daily, for example to google doc.

I have tested 3 apps, BitCrack 625MKeys/s, VanitySearch-BitCrack 1024MKeys/s but the problem is it gets hang multiple times in a day and forced to restart my PC, and KeyHunt-Cuda 945MKeys/s with these settings (KeyHunt-Cuda.exe -t 0 -g --gpui 0 --gpux 950,256 -m address --coin BTC...)

А какой на ваше мнение самый актуальный и безопасный холодный кошелёк, назовите производителя) 

While everything is ultimately binary, hexadecimal provides a balance of compactness, readability, analyzability, and compatibility with cryptographic tools, making it a logical and standard choice for such projects.

In theory, everything is simple, yes and no. You just need to create your own random generator, with all these exceptions, then no additional verification is needed. The generator is not needed numeric, but directly in hex

Imagine how much more quickly these keys would be solved if we teamed up resources/knowledge instead of constantly arguing about petty bs. It's embarrassing.

We have a cop, a philosopher and a preacher here. We just need a psychiatrist to come here and give us a diagnosis.

I based my statements on what you yourself said. The keyspace of Puzzle 71 is not particularly small either, but according to your claim, bots are capable of accessing the private key in a very short time simply by having the public key. Now, considering that Puzzle 135 has a larger keyspace—which I acknowledge—with the speed you attribute to these bots, don’t you think there has been ample time since the creation of these puzzles for the private key of Puzzle 135 to be discovered and the funds to be transferred? It appears that some of these claims may be misleading. Could it be that you are the same individual who took the Puzzle 69 funds from the person who found it?

What you're saying makes no sense. Because if there were a bot that could access the private key of Puzzle 71 in just a few seconds by revealing its public key and steal the funds, then surely it could access the private key of Puzzle 135 in just a few minutes as well! And you're claiming this is due to the public key of Puzzle 135 being exposed? Your claim is completely baseless and biased. It seems your only intent is to deceive and mislead other users. If you really found a puzzle's private key, you can go ahead and use your own method to send your transaction—but don’t try to lay that trap for us again

In my opinion, no website should be used to send transactions at all. The best way to send a secure transaction is through the Electrum wallet, so the transaction won't be stolen and there's no need to worry about the delivery.

Is it possible to limit maximum fee somehow?

"In response to your question, I have conducted studies on the elliptic curve that allow me to simplify some key encryption calculations. One of these is the calculation of the compressed address of the private key. To compute this, we first determine the decimal representation of the key and then multiply the result by 256. This gives us the decimal number of the private key for the compressed address we are looking for."
5HpHagT65TZzG1PH3CSu63k8DbpvD8s6GJmReYUvFeeoYmkGcfC
Uncompressed: 1LG2ZwyaX8GdofxzBoApa3D9vjjd3iguk9
Dec: 404560468236045398516257
404560468236045398516257 × 256 = 103567479868427622020161792
Dec Compressed : 103567479868427622020161792
KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi6EZR5nhxE3fBrTAEyMEVe
1PBVLeJdrLTBVx2j3NqxbPAQ3s8hzLat78

Trezor Safe уже более поздняя модель, которая устранила старый недостаток. Я писал про старый Trezor One, там нет SE элемента.

Я до трезора так и не добрался, кошелек не поддерживает некоторые экосистемы, которые мне нужны.

I think the electricity company makes payment variations so that the consumer doesn't notice it too much. That way I know that I'll pay more or less within that amount, whether the AC is on or not, or whether or not an extra 3060 is on that must be it.  My whole life has been like this... I'm 54 years old now and the electricity is always within those values, whether it's cold or hot. Im in Portugal..but i beleave is different country to country

At the end of the month, electricity always costs between $80 and $150. And when summer comes, it can reach $200 with the AC on in the room. I can made pay

true...but it won't affect me at all whether I spend 100 watts a day or 270 watts a day. At the end of the month it won't be very significant. Of course, for those who invest heavily in this, I believe they need to do a lot of calculations to know if it will be worth it or not

Resources? My PC has been on 24 hours a day every year long before I knew about this puzzle. So for me the costs are what they already were