Huh If you thinking about playing in SWC Poker, first you should read this topic :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5528929.0

Can I ask the source? I know this forum is not a fan of GPT, but I am a premium subscriber for $200 a month.
I checked it now by doing ‘deep research’ in o1_pro model .
Model analyzed all hands for about 10minutes with a script in python.
I got this result :

Went to River / Went to Showdown
gd1990 vs caroline93     30   17
gd1990 vs MichaelDE    39   23
MichaelDE vs caroline93   18   11

Original output in a readable format :
https://i.ibb.co/mrnPWYYD/2025-06-05-11h29-15.png

GPT also created a file for me where only the hands are.
https://paste.ee/p/U4ZTnKlG



@Kalaea - This hand to you may be collusion, and to me and others it may not look like collusion at all.

Player with Aces (MichaelDE): He used a passive trap strategy (slow play).
He deliberately showed weakness (limp, calle) to provoke aggression, not wanting to scare out of the hand.

His last check was a combination of stubbornness and logic. He recognized that his opponent's aggression on a threatening table was a likely bluff after a bad hand. At the same time, with such a large pot on the table (pot-committed) and still a very strong hand (AA), folding from his perspective was simply too difficult and costly a decision already. He decided to “catch the bluff” instead of cheating.

  If you thinking about playing in SWC Poker, first you should read this topic :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5528929.0

1. Quick note on the delay 
I’ve been busy and honestly came to terms with the loss, so I don’t refresh the thread every day. Catching up now.

2. “Zero show-downs = chip-dump”? – No. 
The first 43 hands were 3-handed at 200/400. Small-pot poker often ends pre-flop or on the flop. Tiny pots, no shove/fold transfers. Nothing unusual.

3. @LastcallS – still no proof you were even at that table. 
Twice I asked for a 1-minute screen-recording: log in, open any hand, show you’re BillySwords or Eazy1. Twice you ignored it. 
No HH from you, no screenshot of the alleged 112 800-chip refund. Your posts look identical to the SWC style—lots of claims, zero data.

4. Access for my account 
@memehunter offered to audit raw HH. I’m fine with that—but my SWC account is LOCKED, so I can’t pull fresh exports. The chat history I posted is real; SWC and LastcallS can verify or upload history it from their side.
Confirmation about locked account : https://i.ibb.co/sdm8M6FH/2025-06-04-11h12-22.png

5. Nutildah - “No clashes between the three accounts”? – Wrong. 
In the public HH there are lots of show-downs between gd1990, caroline93 and MichaelDE, including all-ins. So much for “soft-play”.
Example : https://i.ibb.co/7xFMbg71/2025-02-05-11h28-47.png

6. Fold pre-flop with KK 
One hand shows me timing out/folding KK. I was juggling ERC-20/degen day-trades and real life (alerts, child, toilet break). Check the rest of the log—I’m usually stealing SB/BB, not folding KK from this position when other players pass.

7. It’s SWC accusing me of multi-accounting—yet you’ve shown zero evidence. 
- If those 3 accounts were really funded by the same BTC wallet, publish the transaction hashes. The blockchain is public; nothing disappears.
- Add IP logs, operating systems, browser fingerprints—that’s standard in any serious investigation.
- I’ve already published the full 10-hour hand history, which you refused to share.
- I also posted other materials, while you censor posts, ban people on Telegram/Twitter for asking questions, delete messages in your self-moderated Bitcointalk thread, and freeze winning accounts without explanation. How is the community supposed to trust you?

Why should I have to prove my innocence? If you have no hard proof, the payout belongs to its rightful owner.
The rule is simple: when a company withholds a player’s funds, the burden of proof is on the company to show a violation.

8. SWC just deleted another post of mine 
I asked (again) for hashes + fingerprints in their self-moderated thread—deleted within hours. They only show up here to post fluff, never data.

Flag still open: 
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3394

@LastcallS
Recording a short screen-capture—log in, open a hand, show you’re really BillySwords or Eazy1—would settle this instantly. 
I ask you about it. I was sure you wouldn’t do it, and I wasn’t wrong. Instead we get more empty words

Feelings aren’t evidence. A retroactive chip credit only proves SwC can move chips, not that I cheated.
Show a video or specific hand IDs, or stop calling people cheaters.

@FreeMarketCapitalist

I reviewed your ChatGPT prompt and the response you got.
ChatGPT spit out a generic “red flags” list for collusion but never examined a single hand. There’s not one hand ID or example showing “soft-play” or “chip-dump”—just high-level speculation.
It didn’t analyze the session data at all; instead it defaulted to random internet quotes (PokerStars, PokerListings, SFGATE, bezy.co.uk).
ChatGPT is a powerful tool, but you must guide it with a precise prompt. For a real analysis, rework your prompt and paste the entire .txt hand history directly into the model rather than just linking.


I’d like to add one more important point.
The big all-in wins did NOT come from MichaelDE or Caroline93 (the accounts they claim were mine). Instead, they came from regular players like Easy1, BillySwords, and Valentinos77.

Take a look:

KK vs QQ (flop 9, K, Q) – a hand against @Easy1
https://i.ibb.co/DDZ0BGk6/2025-02-05-11h26-12.png

AA vs JQ (flop 8, Q, 6 → turn J…)
https://i.ibb.co/7xFMbg71/2025-02-05-11h28-47.png

3A vs 9A (flop A, 3, 9)
https://i.ibb.co/9kQxmqW4/2025-02-05-11h42-23.png

There were more such hands where 2 players have strong cards & flop.
Does 3 vs 3 or 2 pair vs 2 pair look like cheating? 

🟥 SWC Poker - it's a SCAM
My review and true story 👇

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5528929.0

@SwC_Poker – linking to the flag you’re trying to down-vote isn’t a defence. 
Instead of proof you post “please support us” and keep deleting my replies in your own self-moderated thread.

Here’s the PM notice for the latest deletion (today 5hours ago): 
https://i.ibb.co/Jw0fQrr3/2025-05-16-23h39-36.png

So much for “decentralized BTC Poker”.

Reminder for anyone following: 
• I published the full 700-hand history (page 2 of this topic). 
• SWC said they “can’t” show HH for privacy – yet I just did. No collusion lines, no chip-dump. 
• Still no TX-hashes, no IP logs, no evidence from SWC.

If a site withholds winnings, the burden of proof is on them – not on the player they froze.

🚩 Support the flag if you think facts > censorship: 
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3394

And for anyone curious why SWC keeps erasing my posts, their self-mod thread is here (watch how fast this one disappears too): 
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5068812.0

Deleting questions won’t erase what’s on-chain and what's here. Show the hashes or stop calling people “cheaters.”

Ehhhh.... 

My posts are being deleted again 

So I invite you to my topic, where I have made available the full story of the 10-hour game 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5528929.new#new

You may want to throw in GPT or another large ML model to do an analysis of whether or not he thinks it was collusion. Data very much ...

From myself, I will add, I have now uploaded to GPT_3o . Here is the answer :

https://i.ibb.co/HfJ28YY0/2025-05-16-20h49-15.png

Sorry for the late reply – I was on short holiday and have just now caught up with the thread.

1⃣ I see @SwC_Poker deleted yet another one of my posts in their self-moderated topic a few days ago. 
   Here, however, they keep posting more “empty” messages: lots of words, zero hard data – no TX hashes, no IP logs, no sample hand histories.
https://i.ibb.co/1GmnyQqp/2025-05-16-20h08-07.png

2⃣ @LastcallS has joined the discussion. Frankly, I don’t believe you were at that table. 
   If you’re really BillySwords or Easy1 from SWC, show a short-video of any hand after logging into your account. 
   I suspect you won’t, because you’re “friendly” with SWC-Poker and here to defend them.

3⃣ NEW DATA: while cleaning my laptop I found the complete hand history from my 10-hour session. 
   Since SWC refuses to publish it, I will. 
   • Who played, when, and with what cards. 
   • Exactly where my chips came from.

   https://paste.ee/p/6b8k2Ziv

Judge for yourselves.

🚩 The flag (Type 3) is still active – please support it if you believe a poker site should provide evidence instead of deleting questions: 
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3394

@SwC_Poker: last chance to publish blockchain data, IP logs, fingerprints, OS etc.

Without facts, your only tool is the “Delete” button in your self-moderate topic. Meanwhile, I’m posting the data you’re hiding.

@iv4n– thanks for saying what many of us are thinking.

If this post vanishes too, the full story (with screenshots) is archived in a separate, non-moderated thread:

• Full discussion → https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5528929.0 
• Flag (Type 3 – funds withheld) → https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3394

Feel free to read, comment, or support the flag. 
Deleting questions doesn’t make them disappear – it just proves the point.

Another round of silence, deletions – and zero proof from @SwC_Poker

1. SWC keeps wiping any question that asks for evidence 
I posted (again) in their self-moderated ANN thread. Result? Immediate deletion + PM from the forum bot. 
https://i.ibb.co/Qvr2b5xH/2025-05-06-21h21-49.png 
(Automated notice = post removed by the topic-starter, not a mod.)

2. They “quote” my reply in this public thread 
Below is their entire answer – still no hashes, no IP logs, no screenshots, no table history, just the same accusation:


3. Zero transparency: 
• No BTC-blockchain TX hashes linking the “3 accounts” 
• No IP/device data/fingerprints/OS etc
• No hand-history proving collusion 
• No answer why every Telegram/Bitcointalk post asking for evidence is deleted

4. Fresh “defender” account 
A brand-new user wondering1 (created 3 days ago) turns up in the self-moderated thread, pushes a Medium article praising SWC and attacks anyone who questions them. Multi-account? You decide.

🚩 Flag update 
The more they delete, the clearer the pattern becomes: censorship > transparency. 
If you agree that crypto poker sites should back accusations with on-chain proof, please support the flag (Type 3):

➡️ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3394

Only a handful of users have clicked “Support” so far – I’d appreciate any community help to hold SWC accountable.

5. Invitation still stands 
@SwC_Poker: publish the TX hashes, IP logs or full hand history. If you can prove I cheated, I’ll retract the flag and public article. Also send my my Bitcoin. Until then, deleting posts just confirms the worst.

Thanks to everyone who has spoken up & supported the flag. The more voices, the safer the next player’s bankroll.

@SwC_Poker – please stop deleting my posts and address the evidence.

Summary in one line: You froze my account after a big win, accused me of multi‑accounting, and never showed a single hash, IP log, or any proof.

Full case (screenshots + timeline): 
➡️ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5528929.0

Official flag (Type 3 – damages, no payout): 
🚩 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3394 
If you care about transparency in crypto poker, please review and support.

@SwC_Poker – you promised to provide blockchain evidence to the community. 
• Post the deposit TX hashes linking the “three accounts”. 
• Post IP/device logs showing it was one user. 
• Or admit the mistake and pay what you owe.

Deleting every message that asks for proof is not decentralization – it’s censorship. 

Thanks for the input, both of you!

• @GxSTxV – sorry you went through something similar. The pattern really seems to be: 
 accusation → zero proof → silence/deletion. Why burn a long‑standing brand for short‑term gains? No idea, but that’s exactly what seems to be happening.

• @alani123 – yes, SWC is one of the oldest crypto poker rooms, which is why this is so disappointing. 
 I realise the deletion notices are automated, but the fact remains: they deleted every post asking for evidence instead of replying. 
 I’ll keep posting in their ANN thread until they address the accusations—or until they prove (with hashes/IP logs) that I’m wrong.

🚩 I’ve created an official flag against SWC_Poker (Type 3 – violation, damages). 
If you agree that players deserve transparency, please support it here: 
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3394


The invitation still stands: if anyone from SWC Poker wants to provide actual blockchain proof, IP logs, or device fingerprints, I’ll happily retract the flag and update my article. 
Until then, I’ll keep warning others so they don’t lose their satoshis the same way I did.

Thanks again for the support, and if anyone else has had trouble with SWC, please share your story or PM me. The more evidence we gather, the stronger the case.

Fully agreed. They knew exactly what they were doing when they made their ANN thread self-moderated.

It’s sad that your posts were also deleted. Clearly, they’re actively removing anything that exposes their actions.

I'll definitely consider creating a flag here on Bitcointalk. Thanks for your support—I appreciate it. Hopefully, together we can ensure enough people get warned about their scammy behavior.

If anyone else has been scammed by SWC Poker, please speak up. The more evidence we gather, the stronger our case becomes.

Update – April 2025

I logged in today to see whether the SWC Poker team had finally answered my request for evidence in their official Bitcointalk thread (the one linked earlier by @alani123).

• They have been here: the account “@SwC_Poker” posted on 11 March 2025 in this topic : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5068812.1820
• They gave no answer to my questions.
• Instead, because it’s a self‑moderated topic, they simply deleted my all posts, - They deleted post from other users too.

Here’s the PM I received after the deletion:


https://i.ibb.co/vxPWwLRk/2025-04-22-12h45-46.png

Once again SWC‑Poker shows its true centralized nature: ban, delete, silence.
They do it here, they do it on their Telegram. Evidence requests? No justification, and no evidence. They stole from me and are silent.

Is there really nothing the community can do about scammers who hide behind self‑moderation? Suggestions welcome.

Fully agreed. I am eagerly waiting for the SWC team to respond here. Providing proof—like transaction history (BTC address links), IP logs, or device fingerprints—is not difficult at all.

But I also believe they will stay silent. I know this case better than anyone, and I didn’t cheat or scam anyone. They will stay silent because it involves a significant amount of money they don’t want to return.

It’s a real shame. When I first discovered SWC Poker, I truly thought I had found a poker room I could stick with for years...

Thank you so much @alani123 for the information about this thread! 🙏
✅ I posted there too - we will see.

@SwC_Poker – I am requesting an official response to my case.

I played a long session on SWC, won big, and when I tried to withdraw my winnings, my account was frozen without any explanation or proof.
SWC accused me of multi-accounting, claiming that three accounts were linked via BTC deposits, yet they never provided any blockchain evidence (transaction hashes) to support this claim.

I asked for proof, they promised transparency, then quickly banned me and deleted all related messages.
If you truly have evidence, post it here for everyone to see.

I wrote my history here:
➡️ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5528929.msg65025463#msg65025463

@SwC_Poker – will you respond and prove your accusations, or will you stay silent? 

I also had a conversation with their ambassador on Twitter. He defended them without any arguments—he send me just memes, when I sent him evidence and arguments .
I gave up , waste of time.

Anyway - Do you know any good alternatives to play poker with crypto/BTC?
If not, I guess I’ll just go back to Web2 poker