Hello everyone, I am pleased to introduce a brand-new MEME trading platform: SUPER EXCHANGE!

This is a MEME launch and trading platform based on the Solana blockchain, currently ranked first in the OKX Wallet's MEME tool section.

Here are its key features that set it apart from other similar platforms:

Unique Token Names: Each token has a unique and exclusive name that cannot be replicated or used by others. This prevents anyone from impersonating popular tokens by using their names.

Super Curve Replacing Liquidity Pools: The Super Curve will replace liquidity pools as the counterparty for transactions. It will always exist, be locked, and will not be removed. Therefore, there’s no need to worry about liquidity pool "rug pulls."

Platform Token – SUPER: The total supply is 1 billion. 50% of the transaction fees on Super Exchange will be used for token buybacks and burns, which occur in real-time. Currently, 58% of the tokens have been burned, and it is expected that after the burn is completed, approximately 30 million tokens will be in circulation.

Exclusive Method to Obtain SUPER: The only way to acquire SUPER tokens on the platform is through MEME token trading. You can earn points based on your trading volume, and these points determine how much SUPER you can buy. Points are distributed every 5 minutes.

Fixed Total Points: The total points available are limited to 1 billion. If you sell SUPER to the Super Curve, you will still need points to buy it again. Because the points are fixed, this creates additional deflation for SUPER.

Buyback Fees Entering the Super Curve: The buyback fees will enter the Super Curve and gradually form a large treasury to continuously increase the price of SUPER.

We welcome all MEME enthusiasts to come and experience it!

LINK:https://super.exchange/?ref=HY8MHP

Because I am Chinese, I have been using DS since December last year. Unfortunately, the popularity of DS has led to a frenzy of DDOS attacks (according to Chinese cybersecurity companies, most of the attacks came from the United States). I'm curious if there is a limit for you guys to sign up for DS now? I'm using DS now and I often get the "server busy" prompt, which is really unfortunate!

Yes, we can communicate on the forum first. You can refer to my discussion on this topic. I suspect that the initiator of this theme seems to have a suspicion of RUG.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5519726.0

Thank you for your reply. I have a few different opinions on your answer.
1. Although Forest Marketplace is a project based on the concept of Web3, it is an undeniable fact that it connects Web2 and offline entities (logistics industry). Therefore, this project is blurring boundaries and should not be considered as a web3 project alone. In order to break through the fortresses between the various fields, certain compromises must be made. So, I think it's necessary to make some information public. Of course, you can make public the multi-signature design of the wallet, some information of team members, and the certification information of sellers based on the web3 concept.
2. I found that many of the sellers of goods in the forest market are "forests", which seems to be a bit contrary to what you say about C2C? Can you explain? Again, as I said in my first point, I think sellers need to be certified and provide certain security measures.
3. Finally, if you need me to join, what do you think I need to have?

Very good, it's very much aligned with my dream, but I'm not a developer—I’ve decided to keep a long-term interest. Meanwhile, if you're interested in discussing ideas about project development that include online shopping and social platforms, I believe we can communicate via email at 593309959@qq.com. Please accept my email address, and I hope you don't mind.

Hello, mate.
I truly admire and am excited about your project (Forest Market)!
You can check out many of my posts on Bitcointalk—I have always dreamed of a scenario where one can purchase real-world goods using cryptocurrency!
Yes, your project has shown me a glimmer of hope.
Unfortunately, since I am in China, I am temporarily unable to enjoy your services.
However, I hope to participate in your project.
You know, the online shopping market in China is extremely thriving. Platforms like Taobao, JD.com, Pinduoduo, and Vipshop are world-class shopping sites, and I am an avid online shopper myself. Moreover, I started researching online shopping during my university days—even my graduation thesis was on this topic.
Here are some of my in-depth thoughts on your project. If you are interested, we can continue our discussion.
First, there are aspects of your project's credibility that raise doubts. You have not disclosed your registration information, team details, logistics information, or offline office address. This is an extremely dangerous signal and may lead people to believe that this is a scam website. After all, even when shopping online, people need to know — who am I buying the goods from, to whom is my money going, and from where will the goods be delivered? If these issues are not addressed, people will refuse to become your customers. I hope you can make all the convincing information public to eliminate doubts, so that the project can develop on a normal track.
Second, as a Chinese person, I am accustomed to using mobile devices for shopping, but it seems that your project has not developed a mobile app. Is this part of your future plans? Or do Americans prefer to purchase goods through websites? I believe that the information flow on mobile devices is smoother and more convenient.
Third, it seems that you have only set up one customer service email. My suggestion is to create a dedicated customer service channel for each product—ideally hiring live agents to respond to customer inquiries and needs in real time. This would provide an excellent experience, acting as an online “sales assistant.”
Fourth, the product descriptions are too simplistic and lack a standardized template, including details such as specifications, models, and physical demonstrations.
Fifth, logistics — which is the core of online shopping. I am not clear which logistics company your project is partnered with. How is your warehousing arranged, and what are your transportation and delivery processes? Logistics is the most critical competitive edge, and customers need to know the delivery process clearly, including timelines, transportation routes, and delivery personnel details.
Sixth, there is no bulk purchasing option—only single-item purchases are possible. This seems particularly disadvantageous on a blockchain, as the gas fees for single-item purchases exceed those for bulk purchases.
Seventh, similarly, since your project is based on a crypto platform, you should disclose your wallet address and transaction details.
Eighth, regarding the model of Forest Market, it should be a combination of B2C and C2C. I think it can be differentiated into two markets: one being a B2C market based on the United States, and the other a C2C market that allows for global expansion and enables merchants from around the world to join.
These are some of my thoughts. I wonder if you agree or if you have any deeper insights? I look forward to your reply, and I very much hope to join your project to realize my dream.

There is a crypto whale from China named Du Jun. He is funding public welfare projects in the field of encryption, and I think you can contact him.

Your Highness Equitoria Duke, LOL - Please allow me to address you thusly.
Establishing a sovereign nation in the cyberspace has been the dream of countless world citizens. However, it is difficult to achieve - after all, it is hard for even the leaders of real-world sovereign states to accept the fact that a self-proclaimed, territory-less, and citizen-less entity should be recognized diplomatically, even if the leaders of sovereign states were to become apes.
But nothing is inherently justified, including countries.
Let's build a nation together!

Next, I will humbly offer my suggestions.
NO.1 Our founding charter, or what flag will we raise?
Your Highness, from your statement, we can summarize the following points: this country is a virtual nation founded on a blockchain network; this country has its own sovereign token; this country has no taxes; this country is a direct democracy.
The formation of a country is the identification of people based on the same goal, and the gathering of their powers to achieve that goal. What powers do we need Equitoria citizens to cede? They need to identify with Equitoria's philosophy, accept Equitoria's sovereign currency, and accept Equitoria government's right to conduct diplomacy and mint coins. What can they get in return? They can get diplomatic protection from Equitoria government, tax exemption from Equitoria government, and voting rights.
Compare these powers ceded and benefits with those of real-world countries, we will find that the biggest draw is tax exemption.
But the virtual world is ultimately dependent on the real-world level. The money people get in the virtual world is only meaningful when it is consumed in the real world. However, real-world consumption is inevitably related to the issue of taxes - this will form a deadlock.
How to break this deadlock and make the tax-exempt promise a reality?
I humbly suggest: Equitoria will exempt its citizens from taxes, but "tariffs" and "corporate income tax" cannot be avoided.
In the virtual nation, "tariffs" have another term, "cross-chain transaction fee". And "corporate income tax" is aimed at organizations that rely on Equitoria this country - or this public chain, such as DEX.
The taxes obtained from these two aspects will be distributed to citizens in the form of subsidies, so that citizens can pay taxes when they consume in the real world. In another way to achieve citizens' "tax-exempt freedom".
Our slogan is only one - save citizens from taxes!

No. 2 Where do our citizens come from?
Of course from the cryptoworld! Right? ！
Equitoria will be a public chain that will be an application based on biometric registration. We do not want citizens to be able to create countless wallet addresses - this will mean that you have countless avatars. We allow citizens to have a main address, as well as a backup address - you can purchase insurance, and when your funds are stolen on Equitoria, please immediately report to the Equitoria government, and the Equitoria government will cut off the outflow of your stolen funds. At the same time, compensation will be distributed to your backup address. If the stolen funds are recovered, they will also be sent to your backup address, and your main address will be permanently banned, your backup address will be upgraded to a main address, and you can establish another backup address.
Since this is based on biometric registration, every user of the Equitoria public chain will receive a soul-bound NFT (SBT) generated based on your biological features. This SBT is the citizen ID card of the Equitoria realm,

NO.3 How can our diplomacy be achieved?
It seems unrealistic to expect sovereign states in the real world to recognize us directly - perhaps Nauru would be willing to recognize us, but only for a price.
There are countless unrecognized political entities in the real world, which are our top priorities in diplomacy - just like huddling together for warmth, we all have the same aspirations, which will greatly reduce our diplomatic resistance.
Our citizens will gain access to other political entities based on their SBT and enjoy normal foreign citizen treatment.

NO.4 Do we need territory?
Do we need our own land?
I believe that the citizens of Equitoria do not need it, but the Senate (i.e. DAO organization) and government of Equitoria do.
We will learn from the Knights of Malta. Its citizens are spread all over the world, but it only has one building of its own - we also need such a building.
Yes, this is based on the Westphalian System. We must have actual territory in order to finally shake hands with the real world.

No.5 Where do our income sources come from?
Your Highness Duke of Equitoria, you tried to invest the treasury. Permit me to say frankly, the investment of sovereign funds is still too risky for Equitoria in the initial stage.
As I said, why not try operating Equitoria as a public chain?
Only by becoming a public chain can we obtain various benefits from gas, nodes, cross-chain, DEFI, thereby supporting Equitoria's tax-free dream.
Only with these benefits can we have the ability to build our treasury.

These are some suggestions that I came up with off the top of my head.
I believe that the establishment of the Equitoria nation should follow the following steps:
1. Form an initial team for the Equitoria public chain, including management, technical, operation, and publicity personnel.
2. Publicize and introduce the project to obtain seed round investment.
3. Make a DEMO and obtain angel round investment.
4. Test the chain and launch it to attract public interest and seek public recognition.
5. Open the donation channel and obtain public donations, which will be recorded for future proof of title.
6. Launch diplomatic relations with other unrecognized political entities.
7. Attract external teams to join the Equitoria public chain application development.
8. Launch the A round of financing to build cross-chain channels.
9. Test Equitoria's consumption linkage with sovereign nations.
10. Launch the B round of financing.
11. Announce the list of recipients of honors and the rules of referendums.
12. Launch the C round of financing.
13. Launch the Odyssey event.
14. The public chain will officially go live for operation.

respect！

A month ago, I went to Laos on behalf of the company to investigate the local organic fertilizer industry. Although the investigation was fruitless because the company changed its investment direction, it triggered a thought in my mind: Why can't crypto funds invest in industry or agriculture?

Chapter 1 The world is not divided
It seems that the government and crypto enthusiasts agree that their directions of progress are opposite: the former is sprinting towards centralization, and the latter is moving towards decentralization. But the real world and the crypto world cannot be completely separated: credit currency is still the unit of account, a large amount of consumption still relies on credit currency (although there are some cryptocurrency consumption cases, it is still not mainstream), and OTC is still one of the most profitable tracks in the crypto world. The close connection between the two worlds still relies on the convenience of the financial industry. Stripping off the surface attributes of credit currency and cryptocurrency, they are still capital and liabilities in essence. From this point of view, cryptocurrency can be circulated in various fields as capital, just like credit currency.

Chapter 2 We can't build castles in the air
We still have to return to the original question: What is currency? Why did Satoshi Nakamoto need to create Bitcoin?
Yes, currency is actually a bond, a bond imposed on people by the government using its ruling power. Since the right to issue currency is in the hands of the government, it can plunder the wealth of the people based on its own needs. The birth of Bitcoin is a rebellion against this hegemony. It allows people to not passively accept the oppression of hegemony.
But what is currency used for? It is used for investment, consumption, and to eliminate unfavorable factors in the future. It is not gold, but for savings and appreciation. From this point of view, Bitcoin is closer to gold than currency in the minds of crypto enthusiasts.
So Bitcoin separated most of its currency functions - this gave rise to altcoins such as Ethereum and stablecoins.
Originally, these altcoins and stablecoins should have taken over the currency functions of Bitcoin, although they partially did so. But today, we see that various public chains, various L2s, various altcoins, and meme coins continue to emerge, and the crypto market has become a bloody slaughterhouse of zero-sum games, like a dark forest. They build magnificent buildings in the air, but completely ignore the foundation. The incremental funds brought by VC will plunder more money from ordinary crypto enthusiasts. They have not brought steady progress to the crypto world, but have only continuously produced garbage and bloody bait. Behind a myth of getting rich overnight are the wails of ten bankrupts.
We know that wealth is created: we dig mines, smelt metals, and manufacture machinery in order to create more value-added consumer goods. In the real world, the circulation of finance is also for practical needs.

Chapter 3 Why can't we use the real world to build a foundation for the crypto world?
From this, we return to our topic: using the funds of the crypto world to invest in the industries of the real world, thereby realizing a crypto world with strong underlying asset support.
I am definitely not the first person to come up with this idea. But why is it difficult to implement? I think the key difficulty lies in the conflict between the anonymity of the crypto world and the legal status of the legal entity of the real world industry.
Let's assume: if there are 100 crypto enthusiasts, they jointly set up a crypto fund. The size of this fund pool is about 1,000 ETH. They hope that these ETH can realize value-added in the fund pool. So who will manage the fund pool? The 100 people decided to vote for a 10-member committee, which will jointly manage the fund in the form of multi-signature. The committee can establish a legal entity in the real world. As a result, it has the right to invest in the real world. The committee pledges the fund on the Ethereum network, and at the same time, it uses the fund as collateral to raise funds from the real financial industry and obtain legal currency. In this way, with legal currency, it can enter the industry in the form of equity or directly set up production.
Since the financing and mortgage are carried out in the real world, this ETH must have a lock-up period. Therefore, investors must accept a lock-up period. During the lock-up period, it cannot be redeemed and can only receive dividends. At the same time, ETH faces the risk of being liquidated after being pledged, which requires the committee to carry out prudent financial control and risk hedging plans. Finally, industrial investment faces the risk of loss, which is also a fact that investors and the committee must accept.
But on the other hand: because there are real assets as a solid foundation, the fund pool committee also has the conditions to issue tokens-the issued tokens are also a means of fundraising and profit for the foundation. The fund pool tokens are initially used only for dividends and have no governance rights. The governance rights are still in the hands of the initial investors - they can be converted into equity shares of the fund pool for trading later.

Is anyone interested? Let's discuss it together and try to make it happen together!

Last month, I led a team to visit an organic fertilizer manufacturer in Laos. Organic fertilizer is a very environmentally friendly product, which is made by fermenting livestock manure and straw. Although my boss gave up the investment plan due to its small scale, I still think it is a business worth considering.
Then I looked for investment everywhere, and many people were interested, but because Laos is very poor, investors think the market is too small and not worth entering - if it is in Thailand or Vietnam, they are very happy.
This caused me to think: the factors of production come from investment, and can investment come from the crypto world?
In other words: Can the funds in the crypto world directly invest in industry, agriculture, and services?
This is an interesting topic. The crypto world has always existed in the virtual world as a "escape from the government, escape from regulation, and escape from the world". However, the interaction between cryptocurrencies and traditional currencies has forced many crypto projects to be forced into limited government supervision. Despite this, the crypto world is still happy to build its own "virtual world" and wander in the cracks of the world with a gray image.
However, stripping away the appearance, the inner part of the crypto world is still the flow of capital - how similar is this to traditional finance. Since capital is flowing, why can't it be invested in any field that can make it profitable? Why must it be limited to POS, pledge, and DEFI? Why can't it be invested in production, planting, breeding, and smelting?
Therefore, I envisioned a model:
A. Set up a DAO organization on the chain. The authority of the DAO organization is to: build a fund pool; vote for the fund pool manager to establish a decision-making committee; decide the investment direction and location; review and decide the financial plan of the decision-making committee; remove the decision-making committee.
B. The authority of the decision-making committee is limited to: fund pool fundraising; formulate investment plans and propose to the DAO organization; formulate financial plans; hire and supervise the management team of the investment industry; be responsible for the management of funds according to the decision-making intention of the DAO organization.
C. The management team of the investment industry has the authority to: formulate the development plan of the industry; be responsible for the daily operation of the industry; hire staff; and implement the fund plan.
In this model, the DAO organization has the highest authority. It has decision-making power over the entire fund pool. The decision-making committee works under the leadership of the DAO organization and implements the actual financial plan. The management team of the investment industry works under the leadership of the decision-making committee and implements the actual production plan.
At the same time, because the decision-making committee is specific to individual entities, it can establish an entity with legal status in reality, which forms an interaction between the real world and the crypto world. Similarly, because the decision-making committee is an entity with legal status, it can refer to the laws of the real world to conduct de facto supervision and control over the management team of the investment industry.
The fund pool is deposited in the crypto world with cryptocurrency on a daily basis and operates through a robust value-added plan. Only when the decision-making committee proposes a financial plan and is approved by the DAO organization can the funds be converted into real currency according to the needs of the financial plan and flow to specific industries through the legal entity of the decision-making committee.
Similarly, the profit income of the industry will also return to the fund pool through this channel.
You can give more suggestions for discussion.

15 years ago, I was facing graduation from college and needed to submit a paper. Although I was a student majoring in finance, I saw the online shopping platform that had not yet become a trend. I found a company in Beijing called "e-country 1 hour". It claims that as long as you live in the urban area of ​​Beijing, as long as you place an order on its platform, even if it is just a bottle of Coca-Cola, it can still be delivered to you within 1 hour.

After studying its business logic and current situation, I asserted that it was about to go bankrupt. Yes, it went bankrupt soon. But it had a profound impact on me.

From its rise and fall, I found that the core point of the online shopping platform is to have a strong logistics system. This logistics system can ensure the life cycle of completing orders while still allowing merchants to make profits.

Since then, I have become more and more interested in online shopping platforms. From Taobao, Amazon, eBay, JD.com, to today's TEMU, giants are fighting fiercely in this market. Now, online shopping is the jewel in the crown of business, and everyone is eager to get it.

Pinduoduo and its subsidiary TEMU have launched a subversive revolution against the old giants in recent years. In the past, merchants needed to pay high fees to the platform to ensure their exposure on the platform and obtain valuable traffic. These costs were eventually transferred to the consumer side. However, Pinduoduo innovated the business logic: it obtained a huge amount of "deterministic orders" from the seller side, forcing merchants to compete with each other - whoever has a lower price can get these orders.

As a result, the cost of consumers has been greatly reduced, and merchants have obtained stable and deterministic orders. They do not need to worry about inventory and are only responsible for production.

But the problem follows: the products born under such logic are useless from brand to quality. Why is Pinduoduo still successful?

The answer still lies in consumers - these consumers are at the bottom of society, their number is so large, their Engel coefficient is so high, their income is meager, but they still yearn for a better life.

Nobel Prize winner and Indian economist Banerjee wrote a famous research book "The Nature of Poverty", which contains counterintuitive statistics: in many families who are so poor that they can't even afford to eat, after finally earning some money, they will choose to buy entertainment products such as game consoles.

The reason is somewhat similar to the theory of pacifiers: day-to-day poverty will gradually dispel a person's expectation that the future will be better, so they would rather not spend money to verify the change - such as learning a skill - and satisfying the desire to live in the present is the most important, so even if they live in areas with high incidence of malaria, between only being able to buy a mosquito net and a box of potato chips, most of the experimental subjects will choose the latter without hesitation.

The world is still poor. From the perspective of the long tail theory, they are the real market.

Now, if there is a shopping platform based on blockchain, these poor consumers buy goods on this platform at low prices, and they will receive block rewards for every purchase and the amount of purchase. And this shopping platform implements the Pinduoduo model, and the goods provided by the platform will be unbranded and guaranteed to be of the lowest quality. Therefore, these consumers can not only get the guarantee of quality of life, but also get extra subsidies from their shopping behavior.

They can even abandon their own junk currency and rely on the stable currency issued in the blockchain to ensure that they will not be affected by inflation.

They can try to learn DEFI and open up additional income channels for themselves. They can learn to pledge and make their own contributions to the security of the system. The most important point is that they can hold the money in their own hands and avoid being exploited by the strong.

Blockchain should not be a game for technical hackers and big capitalists to make money, nor should it be a castle in the air limited to the cyber world. The essence of blockchain technology is to save people in the real world from the exploitation of centralized power - whether it is political centralization or financial centralization.

This is a grand dream, but I know that I can't do it all by myself. I hope someone is willing to discuss this with me, or even willing to act with me.

I have also previously envisioned a plan for a Cryptoworld Insurance Fund. In my plan, there are the following participants: the insurance fund, users, and security alliances (divided into two categories: one is the Full-Chain Security Alliance, including major exchanges, major projects, major public chain platforms, and law firms. According to the Full-Chain Security Alliance agreement, accounts suspected of hacking and stolen assets can be precisely locked and provide highly operational retrieval. The second type is the Technical Security Alliance. There will be strict boundaries between the fund and this type of alliance to ensure a highly certain "no evil" space. The fund will purchase corresponding technical services from this type of alliance for the use of risk contracts.). Users can purchase insurance for the assets in their current wallet. This insurance is designed as a contract. After the contract is signed, a key will be generated, which will be the only proof of the policy. In the event of a security incident, the insurance fund will initiate the following procedures: First, verification. The fund will work with the security alliance to review the stolen process to confirm it as a security incident (to avoid malicious claims). Second, after confirming it as a true security incident, the fund will notify the partners to blacklist the hacker's wallet and conduct real-time monitoring. At the same time, public announcements will be made on social media. Third, the fund will request participants to provide a new, secure wallet for claims according to the conditions of the hedge contract. Fourth, the fund will also require participants to sign a partial waiver statement, transferring the litigation rights of the stolen assets to the foundation. At the same time, the foundation will obtain partial ownership of the stolen assets (about 50%) after successfully recovering the stolen assets. Fifth, compensation will be made based on the immediate value of the stolen assets at the time of signing the waiver statement.

This is a good project, but I would like to raise a few questions prudently:

First, what is the origin of the concept of "nano learning platform"? Did you create it yourself? What does it mean? Where is the advancement?

Second, there are 5 language options on your website, but your language teaching courses are based on English teaching, right? So what is the user market you are targeting? According to my understanding, there are many projects on children’s English teaching on the Internet. What are your advantages?

Third, it seems that you are trying to graft blockchain onto your project, which will create an incentive system. Have you considered whether you will encounter legal risks in this process?

Apart from these problems, I still think this is a good project. If you use the language of today's encryption world, what you are trying to try should be "learn to earn". Parents download the program, guide their children's learning, and obtain incentive tokens, forming a positive cycle of material and spiritual win-win. In fact, too many projects in the current encryption world are castles in the air, and it is difficult to produce positive effects based on the real world.

I am from China, a country with a huge demand for children to learn English. I have two children. They are using an English teaching platform called "Jili Guala". The average class period is about 10 minutes. I am very happy. Share with you the specific details of a project like this.

At the same time, my wife is a university teacher, specializing in child care and maternal and infant care. She has profound attainments in related majors. So I have a strong desire to participate in your project, and I will contact you on TG.

I wish you success.

The difference between Simplified Chinese and Traditional Chinese is: homophones, synonyms, and different shapes. From the perspective of a Chinese user, the two scripts will not cause reading difficulties at all. Of course from a computer coding perspective, the input may be different. Within Greater China, mainland Chinese users can seamlessly switch between reading Simplified Chinese and Traditional Chinese, while Chinese users in non-mainland areas may be more accustomed to Traditional Chinese.

Sorry, I'm sorry for causing confusion to you. The publisher posted his game in another thread. I tried it and got some feedback, but I did not reply to his other thread. That's all.

I'm trying your game. First of all, I'm curious, why do you come to bitcointalk to promote your work?
If I guess correctly, you want to make this game a web3 game based on blockchain. In this way, it has the meaning of "PLAY-TO-EARN". From this perspective, there's a lot to think about in your game.
First: your game is a Sims-like work. Games like this seem to be rare in the P2E mode, maybe it’s a gimmick. However, P2E games have a typical problem: "playability" and "payback cycle" are difficult to balance. If players come for P2E purposes, then the importance of "playability" will give way to the "recovery cycle."
Second: the production speed of gold coins. If gold coins correspond to game tokens on the chain, inflation must be considered. How to achieve balance between "output and consumption" and whether you have reliable market-making means to control the depreciation speed of gold coins are issues that need to be considered.
Third: the balance of characters. I found that among the characters that can be created, Superman seems to have the best attributes. Why did you design it this way?
Fourth: interactivity. I'm personally very interested in street racing and fights. Based on your game, I have an idea. If a dual-token system is implemented, gold coins are the base currency and diamonds are in limited supply. Then we could set up a leaderboard based on street races and fights. Statistics are conducted daily or weekly, and the top 100 or even the top 1,000 on the list will be awarded different amounts of diamonds. Diamonds can buy more advanced equipment and more special assets. In this mode, gold coins will only serve the character's attributes, and players need more gold coins to exchange for resources to strengthen themselves.
Fifth: Web games seem outdated. You should have the idea of ​​making an APP.
If you think my suggestion is good, I hope we can communicate in more detail. This is my email: qzl9799@gmail.com.
At the same time, I also hope to join your team and try an interesting thing together.

Yesterday, my NFT was stolen. The NFT that I spent all my money to buy, the NFT that can give me a bright future, was stolen. This isn't the first time I've been robbed.

So this made me take another look at WEB3. This time the theft was due to the leak of the private key.

Yes, in the blockchain world, private keys are everything. It is the highest authority, and the only thing that can reduce its importance is multisig.

But for ordinary users, multi-signing is a high threshold and difficult to complete. So, is there a tool that can "lock" your wallet?

This "lock" does not review incoming assets, but only reviews assets when they flow out. It can be a secondary password, or a fingerprint verification. This "lock" must follow the address, not a single wallet. As you can imagine, even if the thief logs in to the wallet with the private key from another place, the "lock" existing in the address is still in effect. It may be able to steal your private key, but it cannot steal your secondary password or physical characteristics.

Is this "lock" technically difficult to implement?

In our eyes, the foundation of this bull market will be built on the prosperity of the BTC ecosystem. From this point on, the current representative is the inscription. We believe that ORDI represents the most primitive spirit of blockchain: freedom, fairness, and not being controlled by powerful conglomerates. Anyone can post their own inscription on BTC, driven by the community. Institutions can no longer obtain a large amount of tokens from the beginning and manipulate the market. This increases the cost of the institution and lowers the participation threshold for ordinary people.

Yesterday, the core developer LUKE expressed opposition to the inscription, although he quickly adjusted his attitude. But we can see how intense the controversy is. Surprisingly, this time, the community and miners stood firmly together against LUKE. This represents a desire, as if it were an internal controversy within religion.

Do you need non-technical jobs? Like marketing or finance?