Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 184 results by radus
Yes bitcoin is great for student so they can be working students and they can earn money by the way what are u talking about?
Bitcoin is helpful to for the college student for the studio purpose. It will use to part_time job for the future improvement and gather more information for the business investment. So it will help to the some purposs study.
yeah kinda like that, many people not want to toss some dollar for the one who need. but in the exchange of when we help the one who need, they get too clingy is true. yeah maybe all of us should working and stop clingy to another people. that's what i thought 
It some country people use for the future saving and growth business process. It will affect the other poepol and country. Scam it not good for the other people life.
Re: [ANN] MULTIWALLET |X11| Multiple Coin Support | MultiShift Anon | Fiat Trading|
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains / XBridge / true cross-chain P2P
I'm gonna pass on this. I don't trust Dan Metcalf and I especially don't like the newbie accounts spamming in this thread with half-assed english. Good luck though, I know how hard this business can be and I truly do hope that this is not just another scam.
Currently Dan is unable to pull a scam, since he is known face-to-face so to speak, and he was present at a hearing (if I remember well).
Currently Dan is the most trustworthy altcoin dev out there.
And btw, since when did using a perfect english on a multi-national forum became a mandatory thing you prick? Are you the kind who thinks that english "must" be perfectly spoken by everybody on this world? If yes, go kill more of your own kind for petrol
Wow, that has got to be one of the most hateful posts I've seen so far. Enjoy your placement on my ignore list.
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains / XBridge / true cross-chain P2P
Just curious why you would say you don't trust Dan?! Isn't he now one of the most respected devs in crypto?!?!
Sorry, I mistook the name for someone else (brainfart). Most respected? Probably... I'm not convinced though, but I have nothing against him.
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains / XBridge / true cross-chain P2P
I'm gonna pass on this. I don't trust Dan Metcalf and I especially don't like the newbie accounts spamming in this thread with half-assed english. Good luck though, I know how hard this business can be and I truly do hope that this is not just another scam.
Re: [ANN][APT] Aptcoin★ASIC Resistant Scrypt In-Motion(NM) w/Aptcurve Retargeting
So I was reading the white paper and realized that the best way of explaining this kind of stuff is with an infographic or something, so after a decent bit of procrastinating my other work I created this.
Not sure if it truly explains the coin but I would like some feedback.
Not sure if it truly explains the coin but I would like some feedback.
I should probably clarify, the number represent the N block numbers, the square in the asic is the N block the asic is made for
Uhm... just pointing out the obvious here.
If you need to explain it, it probably isn't too good.
Re: [ANN]<MULTIWALLET|X11|Multiple Coin Support|unique Anon MultiShift|Fiat Trading|
Re: [ANN][APT] Aptcoin★ASIC Resistant Scrypt In-Motion(NM) w/Aptcurve Retargeting
Sorry for the double-post in advance.
Some of you might have noticed the wallets inability to sync for the last 6 hours or so - that Is entirely my doing.
No, the wallet is not broken and it is still perfectly capable of synchronizing - there just hasn't been generated any blocks for the last 6 hours.
I went through the code and noticed that the new algorithm for difficulty retargeting is, although whole-heartedly meant to be better... but in fact it's not.
Doing a few preliminary tests (offline) showed that difficulty retargeting is extremely agressive when a lot of hashing power is thrown at it. I wanted to bring this into light while also showing the downside to this new algorithm.
So I threw all my hashing-power against the network and thus got the difficulty for a n-factor 13 block up to something in the vicinity of 1.7k compared to the roughly 220 it was before. Don't worry, when the current block is solved, difficulty should be down quite drastically - although that might take some time.
TL;DR - devs... fix your new diff. algo.
Some of you might have noticed the wallets inability to sync for the last 6 hours or so - that Is entirely my doing.
No, the wallet is not broken and it is still perfectly capable of synchronizing - there just hasn't been generated any blocks for the last 6 hours.
I went through the code and noticed that the new algorithm for difficulty retargeting is, although whole-heartedly meant to be better... but in fact it's not.
Doing a few preliminary tests (offline) showed that difficulty retargeting is extremely agressive when a lot of hashing power is thrown at it. I wanted to bring this into light while also showing the downside to this new algorithm.
So I threw all my hashing-power against the network and thus got the difficulty for a n-factor 13 block up to something in the vicinity of 1.7k compared to the roughly 220 it was before. Don't worry, when the current block is solved, difficulty should be down quite drastically - although that might take some time.
TL;DR - devs... fix your new diff. algo.
It looks like everything is back to normal now, But good to know there are people testing this stuff out! So do you think this is worse than before the retargeting or not?
Definitely worse, but it can become better with a little tweaking.
Radus, thanks for testing :-)
I'm curious why you think this algorithm is worse than before though. For example, in the past we were stuck on blocks (i.e. a handful) for many days, and that has not happened again and our network continues (or would you disagree?).
Glad that you noticed the algorithm is aggressive, but from what you describe, it sounds like you're trying to make the algorithm re-target up, and you should see that we specifically dampened the re-target up. Where we're really aggressive is targeting difficulty back down, which is why the network is chugging along despite this test. We're not sure that we fully understand the scenario that you're testing, but we did test ramping up hash power and seeing what happens after a stuck block quite a bit. Can you help us to understand better what you did and why it caused problems? From here things appear to be the expected outcome, but it sounds like we missed something. What would you suggest?
I'm gonna have to say sorry here. The preliminary test was over the course of a few hours. I've done some testing now over the last 2 days and I've gotta say, it's definitely better, but difficulty doesn't scale quite as well as I had hoped (for each n-factor). It's still easy for me to ramp up the difficulty and let it hang at a high n-factor for a few hours, but then it drops significantly more than I previously believed. I don't know what went wrong in my previous test. Disregard my previous statement. The new algo is working much better, but I still feel it could handle a little tweaking - but that can wait for another required hardfork. Well done devs
Re: [ANN]<MULTIWALLET|X11|Multiple Coin Support|unique Anon MultiShift|Fiat Trading|
Seems lile MWC gets delistet on C-CEX.com 
Yeah well no ones uses or trades (MWC) there, so it's only natural
Re: [ANN][APT] Aptcoin★ASIC Resistant Scrypt In-Motion(NM) w/Aptcurve Retargeting
Sorry for the double-post in advance.
Some of you might have noticed the wallets inability to sync for the last 6 hours or so - that Is entirely my doing.
No, the wallet is not broken and it is still perfectly capable of synchronizing - there just hasn't been generated any blocks for the last 6 hours.
I went through the code and noticed that the new algorithm for difficulty retargeting is, although whole-heartedly meant to be better... but in fact it's not.
Doing a few preliminary tests (offline) showed that difficulty retargeting is extremely agressive when a lot of hashing power is thrown at it. I wanted to bring this into light while also showing the downside to this new algorithm.
So I threw all my hashing-power against the network and thus got the difficulty for a n-factor 13 block up to something in the vicinity of 1.7k compared to the roughly 220 it was before. Don't worry, when the current block is solved, difficulty should be down quite drastically - although that might take some time.
TL;DR - devs... fix your new diff. algo.
Some of you might have noticed the wallets inability to sync for the last 6 hours or so - that Is entirely my doing.
No, the wallet is not broken and it is still perfectly capable of synchronizing - there just hasn't been generated any blocks for the last 6 hours.
I went through the code and noticed that the new algorithm for difficulty retargeting is, although whole-heartedly meant to be better... but in fact it's not.
Doing a few preliminary tests (offline) showed that difficulty retargeting is extremely agressive when a lot of hashing power is thrown at it. I wanted to bring this into light while also showing the downside to this new algorithm.
So I threw all my hashing-power against the network and thus got the difficulty for a n-factor 13 block up to something in the vicinity of 1.7k compared to the roughly 220 it was before. Don't worry, when the current block is solved, difficulty should be down quite drastically - although that might take some time.
TL;DR - devs... fix your new diff. algo.
It looks like everything is back to normal now, But good to know there are people testing this stuff out! So do you think this is worse than before the retargeting or not?
Definitely worse, but it can become better with a little tweaking.
Re: [ANN][APT] Aptcoin★ASIC Resistant Scrypt In-Motion(NM) w/Aptcurve Retargeting
Sorry for the double-post in advance.
Some of you might have noticed the wallets inability to sync for the last 6 hours or so - that Is entirely my doing.
No, the wallet is not broken and it is still perfectly capable of synchronizing - there just hasn't been generated any blocks for the last 6 hours.
I went through the code and noticed that the new algorithm for difficulty retargeting is, although whole-heartedly meant to be better... but in fact it's not.
Doing a few preliminary tests (offline) showed that difficulty retargeting is extremely agressive when a lot of hashing power is thrown at it. I wanted to bring this into light while also showing the downside to this new algorithm.
So I threw all my hashing-power against the network and thus got the difficulty for a n-factor 13 block up to something in the vicinity of 1.7k compared to the roughly 220 it was before. Don't worry, when the current block is solved, difficulty should be down quite drastically - although that might take some time.
TL;DR - devs... fix your new diff. algo.
Some of you might have noticed the wallets inability to sync for the last 6 hours or so - that Is entirely my doing.
No, the wallet is not broken and it is still perfectly capable of synchronizing - there just hasn't been generated any blocks for the last 6 hours.
I went through the code and noticed that the new algorithm for difficulty retargeting is, although whole-heartedly meant to be better... but in fact it's not.
Doing a few preliminary tests (offline) showed that difficulty retargeting is extremely agressive when a lot of hashing power is thrown at it. I wanted to bring this into light while also showing the downside to this new algorithm.
So I threw all my hashing-power against the network and thus got the difficulty for a n-factor 13 block up to something in the vicinity of 1.7k compared to the roughly 220 it was before. Don't worry, when the current block is solved, difficulty should be down quite drastically - although that might take some time.
TL;DR - devs... fix your new diff. algo.
Re: [ANN][APT] Aptcoin★ASIC Resistant Scrypt In-Motion(NM) w/Aptcurve Retargeting
Dev,Could we have a stand-alone miner?
Build-in miner is not efficiet.
Build-in miner is not efficiet.
please read the ANN and the forum. You will see that there is already an independent miner released.
Re: [ANN][WHRL] WhirlCoin | WhirlPool Algorithm | Sloped Rewards |AMD + CUDA Equal
if anyone is interested, I can take over this coin when the one I'm currently working on is "done".
Sooo what are we waiting for?!?! What do you need radus?
As I stated above, I "need" to finish my current project.
Re: [ANN][WHRL] WhirlCoin | WhirlPool Algorithm | Sloped Rewards |AMD + CUDA Equal
Hey guys! What's so quiet here? any news? any new exchanges or old ones? anything???
e: my wallet can't catch any connection.. is it the end?
e: my wallet can't catch any connection.. is it the end?
Mine is perfectly synced...
I'm mining it , Its pure algo with some nice oppertunity to me...
I download wallet from here: https://mega.co.nz/#!wVICAIJK!U4VtzxDxjUHPHSqR0X_JebSih845KpNwBc8wL73zFrg
Info: "No block source available"
I've been waiting about 2-3 hours and nothing.. :/ Should I wait longer? Some ideas what can i do?
Code:
addnode=162.248.4.167
addnode=183.21.162.89
addnode=92.244.112.153
addnode=107.150.46.123
addnode=90.155.222.162
addnode=151.48.154.149
addnode=66.69.8.121
addnode=whirl.suprnova.cc
addnode=moria.dwarfpool.com
addnode=erebor.dwarfpool.com
addnode=183.21.162.89
addnode=92.244.112.153
addnode=107.150.46.123
addnode=90.155.222.162
addnode=151.48.154.149
addnode=66.69.8.121
addnode=whirl.suprnova.cc
addnode=moria.dwarfpool.com
addnode=erebor.dwarfpool.com
Re: [ANN][WHRL] WhirlCoin | WhirlPool Algorithm | Sloped Rewards |AMD + CUDA Equal
Hey guys! What's so quiet here? any news? any new exchanges or old ones? anything???
e: my wallet can't catch any connection.. is it the end?
e: my wallet can't catch any connection.. is it the end?
You just need to add the proper nodes and you should be fine. I believe you can find a config paste on page 52 or 53.
However, there hasn't been a single word from the dev in 3 weeks now and the coin cannot be traded on any exchange.
There are still a couple of deluded miners in this forum, who think they can turn a profit on this worthless coin (probably the last few bagholders). Hashrate varies between 20-30 Mh/s which is equivalent of 3-4 R9 280 or 2-3 R9 290 cards, probably a few CPUs thrown in also. I had the pleasure of speaking with the dev back in august - he doesn't know how to really code any features. Lost contact with the dev around 4 weeks ago, so I doubt he's around anymore. No one is stopping you from mining though, although you could probably find something better to throw your hashing power at.