Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 238 results by rambeazle
Re: Bitmain announces plan to create altcoin if BIP148 succeeds
Do you feel you are being censored here? You're sprouting your horseshit and people are free to agree with it, yet somehow no one does. Apart from the mentally disabled useful idiot Ver, there is no one with any significat amount of BTC that supports jihancoin. Lets just let the market decide, cant wait to sell my jihan altcoins.
You must be a new bitcoiner.
Supporting larger blocks is simply adhering to Satoshi's original vision, Large Blocks is not "jihancoin" it is simply scaling Bitcoin the way that it was originally intended. Using that kind of vocabulary only reveals yourself as either being New, Brainwashed or having Low intelligence, or possibly all three.
Anyone worth their salt knows that Blockstream are the ones attempting to fundamentally alter Bitcoin, and nothing is more worthy of being called an altcoin than the Astroturf'd UASF crapcoin. Segwit in itself is also a radical change, much more radical than simply increasing the blocksize.
Get off r/bitcoin and go read a book or something.
Ive been around longer than you have buddy. Not gonna waste time with refuting your BS, you buy your large-block altcoin, I'll buy the core one. Good luck.
Re: Bitmain announces plan to create altcoin if BIP148 succeeds
Only centralized shitcoin will be Cores UASF who has a very minority support.
And how would a UASF chain mined by ACTUAL bitcoin users be centralized?
You're saying Jihan and the many big blockers aren't actual bitcoiners? Sounds like an emotional thing to say. And to answer your question, maybe it won't be centralized, but it definitely won't be bitcoin with minority hash power. Don't fall for the lies. We will soon have a superior bitcoin with large blocks and we may also have a Core/Segwit altcoin. Ignore false narratives that try and flip this.
Good luck with your altcoin goals, you fucking idiot.
Real nice buddy.
Even Theymos has always said that anything that changes consensus rules without overwhelming majority or any client that isn't Bitcoin Core is an altcoin. UASF fails both of these. He is a hypocrite and you will be the one on an altcoin as UASF support is seemingly nonexistent outside of censored echochambers.
Do you feel you are being censored here? You're sprouting your horseshit and people are free to agree with it, yet somehow no one does. Apart from the mentally disabled useful idiot Ver, there is no one with any significat amount of BTC that supports jihancoin. Lets just let the market decide, cant wait to sell my jihan altcoins.
o rly
https://vote.bitcoin.com/
i suppose this is all just roger voting right?
yes (literally)
Re: Bitmain announces plan to create altcoin if BIP148 succeeds
Only centralized shitcoin will be Cores UASF who has a very minority support.
And how would a UASF chain mined by ACTUAL bitcoin users be centralized?
You're saying Jihan and the many big blockers aren't actual bitcoiners? Sounds like an emotional thing to say. And to answer your question, maybe it won't be centralized, but it definitely won't be bitcoin with minority hash power. Don't fall for the lies. We will soon have a superior bitcoin with large blocks and we may also have a Core/Segwit altcoin. Ignore false narratives that try and flip this.
Good luck with your altcoin goals, you fucking idiot.
Real nice buddy.
Even Theymos has always said that anything that changes consensus rules without overwhelming majority or any client that isn't Bitcoin Core is an altcoin. UASF fails both of these. He is a hypocrite and you will be the one on an altcoin as UASF support is seemingly nonexistent outside of censored echochambers.
Do you feel you are being censored here? You're sprouting your horseshit and people are free to agree with it, yet somehow no one does. Apart from the mentally disabled useful idiot Ver, there is no one with any significat amount of BTC that supports jihancoin. Lets just let the market decide, cant wait to sell my jihan altcoins.
Re: Bitmain announces plan to create altcoin if BIP148 succeeds
Only centralized shitcoin will be Cores UASF who has a very minority support.
And how would a UASF chain mined by ACTUAL bitcoin users be centralized?
You're saying Jihan and the many big blockers aren't actual bitcoiners? Sounds like an emotional thing to say. And to answer your question, maybe it won't be centralized, but it definitely won't be bitcoin with minority hash power. Don't fall for the lies. We will soon have a superior bitcoin with large blocks and we may also have a Core/Segwit altcoin. Ignore false narratives that try and flip this.
Good luck with your altcoin goals, you fucking idiot.
Re: [ANN] æternity blockchain ∞ GET AE TOKEN ∞ [PoS x PoW | Smart Contracts]
Guys,
If you have issues using your voucher code, please get in touch with Ledger directly.
Regarding the ration - we currently have no intention of changing it.
Regards,
Vlad
If you have issues using your voucher code, please get in touch with Ledger directly.
Regarding the ration - we currently have no intention of changing it.
Regards,
Vlad
What do you say about the fact that your only developer openly disagrees with how youre running this ico, and thinks that you will probably waste the money raised?
https://github.com/aeternity/testnet/blob/master/docs/warning.md
This seriously makes you look like a clown. Care to comment?
This text is a general warning from Zack. He likes to be fair and treat everyone equal. But most the time he expects the worst to happen and that's why he feels obliged to point out the obvious risks when investing in bloclchain projects.
Thanks for taking the time to answer.
How many other actual developers are working on the project?
Re: [ANN] æternity blockchain ∞ GET AE TOKEN ∞ [PoS x PoW | Smart Contracts]
Guys,
If you have issues using your voucher code, please get in touch with Ledger directly.
Regarding the ration - we currently have no intention of changing it.
Regards,
Vlad
If you have issues using your voucher code, please get in touch with Ledger directly.
Regarding the ration - we currently have no intention of changing it.
Regards,
Vlad
What do you say about the fact that your only developer openly disagrees with how youre running this ico, and thinks that you will probably waste the money raised?
https://github.com/aeternity/testnet/blob/master/docs/warning.md
This seriously makes you look like a clown. Care to comment?
Re: ►►BETCOIN.AG-ETHER ACCEPTED!-The #1 ɃTC, ETH, LTC Poker, Sports, Casino, Dice◄◄
I have written support about what I believe to be a serious security issue, yet no one has replied to me for over a week. Could you confirm that you've received my message?
Did you send this via ticket to www.betcoin.ag/support. If you could confirm there is a ticket on this I can follow up with the progress. Thank you.
I did, but i unfortunately did not keep the ticket number. Should I resubmit?
Re: ►►BETCOIN.AG-ETHER ACCEPTED!-The #1 ɃTC, ETH, LTC Poker, Sports, Casino, Dice◄◄
I have written support about what I believe to be a serious security issue, yet no one has replied to me for over a week. Could you confirm that you've received my message?
Re: BITDICE - 🎲🎲🎲 THIS WEEK 105BTC GOES TO ASH AND 75BTC TO SOOP! 🎰🎰🎰
Did this site get hacked or something? The top wagered all have 200btc+ wagered with 100btc+ profits, all over the course of the last couple of days..
Alex, I did warn you about the server seed issue several months ago. I hope it was not abused in this case.
Alex, I did warn you about the server seed issue several months ago. I hope it was not abused in this case.
Re: Fuck: SegWit, LN, Blockstream, Core, Adam Back, and GMazwell
This is exactly what is happening to Bitcoin due to Core's roadmap.
They may be expert programers, but they don't understand that Bitcoin is only valuable if it is useful, and their roadmap is destroying its usefulness.
Full blocks and the high fees and backlog that they create are destroying Bitcoin's comparative advantage and driving people to use alt coins instead.
Absolute bullshit, based on NO economic theory whatsoever. They may be expert programers, but they don't understand that Bitcoin is only valuable if it is useful, and their roadmap is destroying its usefulness.
Full blocks and the high fees and backlog that they create are destroying Bitcoin's comparative advantage and driving people to use alt coins instead.
Roger is perpetuating a myth, that only those that do not understand economic theory will believe in. It is absolutely not true that raising bitcoin's transaction capacity will raise its value. Doing so will destroy bitcoin's quality as a digital gold. Ver wants control of bitcoin and he wants to break it because he is a power hungry child that has absolutely no understanding of economics.
Satoshi built this system, much like the foundation for the US government system, such that a faction like Ver's brigade CANNOT override the consensus mechanism and usurp the system's security.
There is absolutely no scientifically founded argument for the drivel Ver is spouting which is exactly why he never says anything but things like "Bitcoin is like Starbux therefore...".
Thinking bitcoin needs more and more uses cases and that we must guard bitcoin's utility as a coffee money is to completely not understand bitcoin's macro-economic relationship to our global economy. Raising bitcoin's transaction capacity solves no significant problem whatsoever.
People like Roger that subscribe to this myth do not understand what money is for. Money as a medium of exchange is not a significant solution to anything. The significant purpose for money to exist is to provide a pricing mechanism for the markets so that they may operate efficiently.
It is the VALUE proposition that must be guarded in regard to bitcoin and changing the implied tps absolutely alters and effectively destroys the stability of this proposition.
Ver will never enter dialogue with me on this because I will absolutely school him on the subject with truth founded in accepted and basic (macro)-economic argument.
Keep yelling, keep having tantrums, keep banning people from your community who will explain what is wrong with your understanding. You have only one hope Roger, to destroy your wealth, it's logically impossible to do what you are trying to do. Satoshi is laughing at you, Szabo is laughing at, and anyone who understands economics is appalled by your argument.
You are a communist block-chain Keynesian in (not very good) disguise, you do NOT understand economics and you have no idea what money is for or how it works.
https://medium.com/@rextar4444/the-absurdity-of-communism-and-hard-forking-bitcoin-to-coup-core-4486aa9191c8#.ouf5gdbgz
Great post. Fuck Roger Ver.
Re: BITDICE CASINO - CONGRATULATIONS TO WONTON FOR WINNING 300BTC
i lost 1 btc at the old edition , it was very hard to win and no provably fair as now
Bitdice has always been provably fair.
Indeed,i would rather play at Fortunejack dice and other reputable Dice sites as of now on which they have proven theirselves that they do have a good reputation and fairness regarding on the game but on this i would say its just a start but there are many complaints about withdrawals which really a bad start for a new dice site.
Of course you have the right to choose where to play.
Someone is challenging big payrate in www.gooddice.us
http://image.prntscr.com/image/e22c8134507d423493125bb10d22f51a.png
you still have not paid out my withdrawals. not that I expect you to, I would just like to reiterate that you are thieves and this site is a scam.
I was the first one to deposit.
Tell others your own experience.
I am, you stole from me.
Indeed,i would rather play at Fortunejack dice and other reputable Dice sites as of now on which they have proven theirselves that they do have a good reputation and fairness regarding on the game but on this i would say its just a start but there are many complaints about withdrawals which really a bad start for a new dice site.
Of course you have the right to choose where to play.
Someone is challenging big payrate in www.gooddice.us
http://image.prntscr.com/image/e22c8134507d423493125bb10d22f51a.png
you still have not paid out my withdrawals. not that I expect you to, I would just like to reiterate that you are thieves and this site is a scam.
(0.02)^12, or about 1 in 244,140,625,000,000,000,000, of losing 12 times in a row, 82533->82544.
More then likely, the site is unfair/manipulates the rolls.
Everything may happen when you are playing game with chance.
Luck shows some time , black luck comes some time.
No one can control it , but god.
You are a disgusting scammer.
Tried to withdraw a tiny amount, nothing came through. This seems like a scam, do not deposit.
All withdraw sent
Don't try to frame us up.
Show the proof of your account , your deposit, your bets, and your withdraw.
Anything can be proof is welcome.
this seems to be the address where they pool deposits:
https://blockchain.info/address/15tpY3AFRirwPmMRwDigYoUTK2bMq98Eyk
0.02 btc there, a far cry from 50k.
I need to show proof of my bets so you process my withdrawal? Yeah, thanks, not really interested in this debate. You can show proof of your bankroll first.
Again, apparent scam site, avoid.