Search content
Sort by
Showing 12 of 12 results by rawrats
Re: [OFFICIAL] [SAFEX] Safe Exchange Coin [website www.safex.io]
Your homepage is well looking. Your intro text about exchange and "protection of the users' privacy" fits nicely to this page - LoL
https://www.sec.gov
https://www.sec.gov
Stop is not a stop!!! It does not sell at the price you set. Why cant it not be so easy? Because otherwise Bitfinex and Bitstamp and other exchanges can not manipulate. Bitfinex sell at any point of past price! Here is a screen dump where I lost $20 ...
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fMOW1Va366UFa5WMcu1g0yuooreceBKv/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fMOW1Va366UFa5WMcu1g0yuooreceBKv/view?usp=sharing
Be lucky with partially filled. Otherwise you may lose $20 as I did ...
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fMOW1Va366UFa5WMcu1g0yuooreceBKv/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fMOW1Va366UFa5WMcu1g0yuooreceBKv/view?usp=sharing
Your personal data can be processed, manually, electronically or via computer, directly by BitGrail or by third parties who, with suitable experience, technical skills, professionalism and reliability, carry out processing operations on behalf of our company; to offer a better service and guarantee maximum satisfaction of your needs, complying with the security and confidentiality of information.
The full, updated list of processors can be requested to BitGrail S.r.l., Via Pier Capponi, 89, 50132 Florence (FI), Italy.
https://bitgrail.com/privacy
Please, put the list here if some of letters has got answered, so we can ask for our account info from third party because asking Bitgrail directly may have a risk the Bomber delete or manipulate the data. Get your lawyer or legal witness then ask for how much you have in funds, so you really can claim it. Hopefully that is one of ways to do it.
Here is the terms of use. Does it free him just by say all is on the users risk?
https://bitgrail.com/terms
The full, updated list of processors can be requested to BitGrail S.r.l., Via Pier Capponi, 89, 50132 Florence (FI), Italy.
https://bitgrail.com/privacy
Please, put the list here if some of letters has got answered, so we can ask for our account info from third party because asking Bitgrail directly may have a risk the Bomber delete or manipulate the data. Get your lawyer or legal witness then ask for how much you have in funds, so you really can claim it. Hopefully that is one of ways to do it.
Here is the terms of use. Does it free him just by say all is on the users risk?
https://bitgrail.com/terms
I am interested to get my currency back. I have no money pay to lawyers. Maybe should I report to local police and they can verify ungrounded accusions and lies from Bomber making him a suspect. Bomber has closed the reports but still it is possible to see wallet, so some witness with legal authority or police should notice that and share with international police.
Is it really okay that a criminal can make it legal to steal funds and say it is on our risk because all responsibility is cleared by some terms of use? If so then all psycho criminals accusing whatever can be freed because they claim all risk is on the users. Is it really legal to write such terms of use? That could be analyzed by authority.
It is of cource not possible to make a currency that opens an exchange for access from outside, so it must be an insider job!
It is a very clear point, that could be verified by some Nano devs. Then it also free the Nano team from Bombers groundless accusions. Bombers lies should be notified and police should ask Reddit why they have removed some posts from him.
Is it really okay that a criminal can make it legal to steal funds and say it is on our risk because all responsibility is cleared by some terms of use? If so then all psycho criminals accusing whatever can be freed because they claim all risk is on the users. Is it really legal to write such terms of use? That could be analyzed by authority.
It is of cource not possible to make a currency that opens an exchange for access from outside, so it must be an insider job!
It is a very clear point, that could be verified by some Nano devs. Then it also free the Nano team from Bombers groundless accusions. Bombers lies should be notified and police should ask Reddit why they have removed some posts from him.
Why should Nano pay because Bomber has stolen all currency on Bitgrail? It is impossible to code a backdoor in a cryptocurrency that opens an exchange for access from outside. So it is very clear that it is an insider job. And from Bombers postings it is for me clear who did it. It seems there are someone removing his lies.
non capisco il suo intervento, mi son letto due volte la pagina.
E' colpa del team nano ? No
E' colpa di bitgrail ? No
vuoi vedere che ora è colpa degli utenti che si son fidati, a suo dire, di una tecnologia ancora instabile?
secondo me faceva meglio a non scrivere niente
Non è "colpa" degli utenti, ma mettere migliaia di euro su una moneta emergente non lo consiglia mica il medico, ci si e' assunti un rischio, ed è quello che dico a tutti coloro che intasano reddit e telegram con discorsi tipo: "gneee gneee non voglio solo il 20 percento non è gggiusto chiamo la mamma e mio cuggino, perche non spalmi anche le altcoin a tutti, cosi riusciro' ad ottenere un fantastico 23-24%" (rubando nel contempo il 77-76% a chi non aveva nano) certo capisco la frustrazione di chi magari 5 minuti prima aveva comprato nano (quindi aria inesistente) con l'intento di fare scalping e rivendere subito.
secondo me bisogna vederla cosi: "ok ho investito su qualcosa ad altissimo rischio, facciamo finta che il mercato sia collassato dell'80%" (cosa peraltro possibile per bitcoin figurati per una alt)
P.s.: questo post che so che sara' impopolare, l'ho scritto in ottica "i want to believe" ossia dando al 100% per buona la versione di Bomber.
Is it hard to see that Bomber is a psycho who fuck us when possible because it was possible to claim we put our money on his exchange on our own risk? That is so easy for a thief to make it legal to close exchange and take it all blaming KYC, blaming exchange growing too fast, accusing Nano team, blaming the bank not opening account the same day Bomber stole it and chat with Nano 8 feb, blaming whatever and bullshitting? It is very clear it is an insider job or a bug in his code. All manipulations and fucking from Bomber that gets removed is not nessecary from his side. Because he can he spend time fuck us instead of solving the problems. I think that man loves to walk on the edge of law. He is not answering questions!!! To say "I have answered" is not an answer to a question that have not been asked on the thread. It should be easy for him to answer but he just want to put an effort on provoke. There was no reason to close exchange and blame it on whatever and not tell exactly what of all that the real reason is and give the details asked for.
For me it is very clear he is the thief because an exchange can't be hacked if there is a bug in a coin. That is impossible to make a backdoor in a coin to open exchange for access from outside.
Hello I would like to have some opinon about the secutiy of the Tangle.
I red from a member of this forum that is hackable, he said this:
I red a lot of bad things about IOTA I just want to know what do you think about it. Is him right saying that things? What does he mean with SW?
I red from a member of this forum that is hackable, he said this:
Hackable means for me it is possible to modify transactions and get a lot of money.
How you can do this. You need a lot of nodes which have a special SW on board. IOTA needs
only small runtime consumption. So maybe it is possible to infect computers with this
special SW. Maybe hundred thousand of computer and now you have the possibility to
modify the transactions. Or there is a very popular website including special JavaScript
on it.
And how will the team handle security items?
They don't discuss about this. And why I know this. Because last security issue on the self
made hash function.
They kept in silence. The MIT have found some hash isues and informed them.
Only silence and after some weeks a security update. No discussions only arrogant beahviour of the
developer team. And now you want to trust this currency?
I am certainly not. Maybe you. But I love my money. I earned this very hard.
How you can do this. You need a lot of nodes which have a special SW on board. IOTA needs
only small runtime consumption. So maybe it is possible to infect computers with this
special SW. Maybe hundred thousand of computer and now you have the possibility to
modify the transactions. Or there is a very popular website including special JavaScript
on it.
And how will the team handle security items?
They don't discuss about this. And why I know this. Because last security issue on the self
made hash function.
They kept in silence. The MIT have found some hash isues and informed them.Only silence and after some weeks a security update. No discussions only arrogant beahviour of the
developer team. And now you want to trust this currency?
I am certainly not. Maybe you. But I love my money. I earned this very hard.
I red a lot of bad things about IOTA I just want to know what do you think about it. Is him right saying that things? What does he mean with SW?
He is not right - it is just speculations. To say it is hackable needs a proof. Why he bother to use caps lock and spend kognitive energy to translate software into SW?
Iota has never been hacked. I can only find people who have selected too easy seeds or downloaded a scam seed generator that gives same seed everytime, but that meens not that the tangle is hackable. The tangle is quantum resistant.
yes but many people say it's hackable, you have not answered to this problem... it's a big problem if the tangle is ''hackable'', that's why iota does not skyrocket. Who would invest in an hackable currency?
You repeat "hackable" three times! With much repetition it becomes a truth with no proof? Don't listen to Core + Blockstream trolls. Investigate:
https://satoshiwatch.com/coins/iota/articles/glaring-dishonesty-mit-researchers
Never has Iota been hacked
är denna sida fortfarande trovärdig? någon som handlat nyligen? 
Jag försöker handla där på FYB-SE för första gången, men det är omöjligt. De vill först ha in en liten säkerhetsdeposition på kontot, för att få swisha in det på kontot. Vilka idioter! Jag kan alltså inte swisha in pengar för att köpa bitcoin för! Och då kan ju ingen annan det heller. Det står:
Insättning SEK P2P (Swish)
Ditt konto behöver 0.05 BTC som säkerhetsdeposition
Sedan har de kastat om orden köp och sälj högst upp också.