That is the virustotal check on the dropbox site which is obviously clean.  here is the report on your zip

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/b0a74f94e483900a54e80b993cc93b735ff8660ba1ccb381c70bb44ecadad5c4/analysis/

I think these are all bitcoin miner false positives.

Trojan/Win32.Tgenic

uploaded by a guy with 1 post

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/8b50154f14ff24d8f4dfc6a1123c9d83ac846d0cc55575d034f4798b2c4e35f6/analysis/

 

high school math not required to post here apparently.  I guess that's why the devs got away with saying "1% premine" this entire time.

I mined some and yes you can have it but:

The fact is the coin bet its future on its name and it has been disowned by its namesake.  For this coin to get out of the toilet (yes, 3-4 satoshi is still the toilet) it will have to attract investors, how are you going to do that with public internal conflict?  I pulled my buy order immediately after hearing that.   Please prove me wrong and you can have my existing coins (at market valuation).

- cryptorush withdraws fucked
- movement leaders denied coin
- nearing 1 satoshi trap

I'm out, good luck

20 mins to go and no response.. but you guys keep sending money

Hi, I'm an investor with some questions


1. Show me your 157+BTC address by sending a satoshi to my Devnull address below to prove you can support the IPO


2. Define your terms here, "few people" "large support". In numbers.  And explain what will be premined and where it will go if this case occurs.  Also explain what will happen to IPO funds already sent.

3.  Explain why you aren't using an escrow service that can actually guarantee #2

Thanks

Intensity - raw(?) - xintensity
13   8192           2.90909090909091
14   16384   5.81818181818182
15   32768   11.6363636363636
16   65536   23.2727272727273
17   131072   46.5454545454545
18   262144   93.0909090909091
19   524288   186.181818181818
20   1048576   372.363636363636
21   2097152   744.727272727273
22   4194304   1489.45454545455

So you are suggesting an xintensity which corresponds to between 21 and 22 whereas he's saying a value closer to 18 (93) reduces rejects.

In my own setup I tested xintensity keeping other values constant.  Values higher than ~372 (such as 1100 and 702) were causing some throttling issues i'm assuming due to gaps in utilization (temp pretty cool throughout).  Values lower than ~372 (such as 176 and 93) reduced the hash rate with no improved thermal performance.  I don't have any reject % numbers though and I will test that again later.

Why this #?  People here say try 1000 + x*10 and I guess that makes sense. What speeds under 1000 should be tried?

Thanks for the reply.

The TC is from 2816 * 8 + 1 and just a guess.  Where the heck is 24000 24550 32765 from?

2816 * 5  + 1 = 14081
2816 * 6  + 1 = 16897
2816 * 7  + 1 = 19713
2816 * 8  + 1 = 22529
2816 * 9  + 1 = 25345
2816 * 10  + 1 =  28161
2816 * 11  + 1 = 30977
2816 * 12  + 1 = 33793

It doesn't seem happy using more than 30k thread concurrency so I'm using *8 at the moment.  I can remove the shaders line but I am pretty sure the card has 2816 shaders so I doubt it makes a difference.  I'm willing to entertain other numbers but I'd like to hear a reason.

I want to keep the fan low (hence 60-85) and the temps low to increase overall longevity of the card and avoid a bad time when summer hits.  I'm willing to give up some kh/s to do it but I also want to run an optimal setting.  Giving up 10% so far seems like an OK deal but 5% would be nice.  I'll try a single gpu thread and see where that gets me.  And more trial and error.  I think it was generally better than 2 in my attempts earlier.

I have a Sapphire Tri-X 290x with stock bios, using sgminer 4.1.0.  I have terrible case cooling -- don't ask.

I'm unable to get 950+ at any settings.  I can push 900k but the temps go over 90cGPU/100cVRM.  I tried memclk 1500 and it worked for awhile then started crashing hard.

I found I can drop GPU Engine down to 875/1250mem and still get about 830khs with 75cGPU/80cVRM at 85% fan, but I'm still not sure how to tweak the settings for this.  Shooting 5 variables in the dark at an interation speed of once per 5minutes to let it stabilize, not fun.

So I'm sure these settings are not optimal but I could use help figuring out what to change.  My #1 priority is low temp and 85% fan max.

lol

I am really looking forward to this coin by the way.  I was excited about HeavyCoin's PoW algorithm ideas but ultimately disappointed by the way the devs dismissed the botnet issue outright, showing lack of planning.  This is the only CPU coin I have seen with actual long term resilience baked in.

I strongly suggest considering a smaller amount.  Trillion is ridiculous just conceptually and as you say will probably lead to bugs.  But more importantly, at that amount the valuation will have to be too high to trade directly in BTC.  The coin will be stuck in LTC trade at the start and dead in the water.

ManOnTheMoon go back under your bridge

I am calling this deliberately misleading at this point, after days of people pointing this out the Devs seem only interested in acknowledging the positive voices in the room. They continue to ignore the threat of botnets.  They continue to ignore potential increased revenue via escrow.  Now they seem to be refusing a partial refund for their #1 investor through inaction.

shits going down on mintpal
http://i.imgur.com/MXUg1Cq.gif

he says buy Mintcoin!

Because literally speaking they must mine 5+1.5m prior to anyone else mining.  It is not 98% of coins that are available to miners, it's 90-95%