Search content
Sort by
Showing 9 of 9 results by rockhill
Re: [NEM] NEM -New Economy Movement - No Envy Movement - Updates+Discussion thread
Interesting times at the moment, do you agree? Lot of bad words of nem regarding
the time what you have spend with the project. Some persons can see what it means.
Quick release means bad result. Those who are patient enough are clearly the winners,
just wait and see
good pointthe time what you have spend with the project. Some persons can see what it means.
Quick release means bad result. Those who are patient enough are clearly the winners,
just wait and see
Re: CoinMarketCap.com - Market Cap Rankings of All Cryptocurrencies!
Dear CoinMarketCap.com,
could you please add NEM (www.ournem.com) to your ranking?
NEM is going to be one of the biggest and successful project not only this year,be sure.
Thank you for cooperation.
+NEM could you please add NEM (www.ournem.com) to your ranking?
NEM is going to be one of the biggest and successful project not only this year,be sure.
Thank you for cooperation.
Re: [NEM] NEM -New Economy Movement - No Envy Movement - Updates+Discussion thread
Dear Friend! Please add Your voice as well here:
write to coin market cap!!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=199685.msg7034258#msg7034258
Best wishes, community!
A lot of fuzz coming from NEMsters in that thread... If the coinmarketcap guys want to have some rest, they should add NEM in the ranking asap!
Re: [NEM] NEM -New Economy Movement - No Envy Movement - Updates+Discussion thread
so, i read what you are saying, correctly.
You say that,
because sockpuppets were not anticipated to be such a problem,
and because the devteam decided to deny them access to this project on a date later than the announcement
then socks should be accepted, because they were accepted in the beginning.
is this correct?
do you need to correct my statement anywhere, to reflect better what you are saying?
Let me repeat it, for the record, with less words. Please corret me if i am wrong somewhere.
Because socks where not stopped on day 1, they should be accepted.
If socks are not acepted, then the devteam is not fair.
Do the above two lines reflect your issue, or do you need to correct it?
You say that,
because sockpuppets were not anticipated to be such a problem,
and because the devteam decided to deny them access to this project on a date later than the announcement
then socks should be accepted, because they were accepted in the beginning.
is this correct?
do you need to correct my statement anywhere, to reflect better what you are saying?
Let me repeat it, for the record, with less words. Please corret me if i am wrong somewhere.
Because socks where not stopped on day 1, they should be accepted.
If socks are not acepted, then the devteam is not fair.
Do the above two lines reflect your issue, or do you need to correct it?
No, the issue has nothing to do with what I think, it's all to do with interpreting UP's statements, like the one below. I've said enough - obviously
- why don't you read utopian's statement below and try and point to anything that justifies naming and shaming people who created multiple accounts prior to Jan 29. "I won't prevent multiple buy-in. It is impossible to prevent people making two- three accounts and register for them. But it won't matter much as our user bases would be huge. Furthermore, it takes time to make multiple accounts. It takes time to manage multiple accounts. Later on you would need to provide me passwords on these accounts. That's a lot of work already and if someone can go through all of that they have shown a lot of interest in NEM and probably deserve their stakes. And at this point, more accounts means more development fund to NEM. So I don't see the need to prevent multiple buy-in. It is very different from someone putting 10.000 NXT in and buy 10% stake of NEM. I very much doubt anyone can have more than 5-6 buy-ins. I hope this explanation clears the worry about double buy-in."
edit: I'm just the messenger
What CPU-Miner to use for UTC?
I'm Using the CPU Miner which is used for Velocitycoin -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=390767.0, depending on the age of your CPU u've to try out those different Exe's avx is the newst one.
If this works for u, UTC donations are welcome: Ui1KS7wJjuUbq66fNTuUpeAkJ8k2YAbrkg :-)
I'm Using the CPU Miner which is used for Velocitycoin -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=390767.0, depending on the age of your CPU u've to try out those different Exe's avx is the newst one.
If this works for u, UTC donations are welcome: Ui1KS7wJjuUbq66fNTuUpeAkJ8k2YAbrkg :-)