Search Posts

A slight confusion, one of your goal is to reduce cost spent by both job seeker and hirer by acting as a bridge for both side. While this aim can be reached and actualized on the job seeker's side, doesn't the opposite effect happen to the job hirer side? To recruit employee, companies had allocated certain funds bestowed to HR department. Now, because they hire you as their bridge, they'll need a higher cost as they had to pay to use your service as well as still has to funds their HR dept.

Dear Miiike,

thank you for your interesting question, it's good to be able to clarify elements of our project through your help.

I run several rounds of hire and the real cost from hiring side is in the time spent by the HR or the headhunter going through hundreds of CVs and trying to figure out which experience matches their expectations.
You may understand how much would cost even a week of analysis run by a team of 2 (normally you have 2 people, one expert in recruitment and the second expert in the field.

Our aim is to reduce this cost to the minimum: by having a more focused group of candidates, the team may concentrate on the actual experiences and lookup the certificator's skills.

Querying through Fiduxa would not be a cost if the candidate sends the certified CV to the company, only when the company wants to select directly candidates.

Let me know if we've been able to clarify your question

BR
Fiduxa Team

So basically your goal to cut the company's budget is by offering the HR an already sorted and more focused list and of candidates so that they don't have to waste time to sort the candidates by themselves?

That is one of the aims of Fiduxa. There is much more to it though. Another area where companies will save is in the validation of any candidate they select, however they select them. For example, to validate qualifications and past experience today, companies often hire external validation companies at significant cost. Likewise, if the qualifications and experience is trustworthy, then costs for head hunter services and HR admin processing can be reduced. Further costs can be saved for high value employees or in many industries where a great deal of documentation is required and costs allot of money today. In industries such as healthcare, engineering, oil and gas, transportation and others there is severe time and cost friction to the hiring process. Another case is hiring cross countries. Millions of people get jobs in countries outside their own every year and its a growing trend. A further case is in attestation of certifications for official processes, where companies have to submit documentation to governments or regulatory authorities. Lastly, for now, there is a case for helping universities and companies to attest documents. So Fiduxa have a clear aim, save companies money, save people time and money, create an ecosystem around the data. However there are multiple use cases that will be developed over time. Thanks for the question and please do let the team know if you want more info.