Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 34 results by shutyourmouth
Firstly, Where can one find the burn address of ICN tokens? Should this address be accessible through the www.iconomi.net main page? The reason why I am asking is so someone like myself can understand the current increase in value/volume of ICN. I want to know if the price is being affected from mostly DAA's adding ICN, a buy on rumor for the announcement of utility, and/or buy-backs from recent realized profits on an exchange that offers little ICN? what does everyone else believe? it seems the public has been silent today.
Just realized I forgot my password to my wallet holding my ICN tokens. Guess my only option is to hodl :'p
Same thing is happening with me (almost same thing) I time locked my password so that I can't sell it for at least a year
There's hope I somehow remember it then lol. If not, I've already made contact with people that recover wallets so lets hope all goes well.
same here except my computer blew up
Its also great to see whales give in so soon
More cheapish ICN for everyoneYour excuse to talk about Chrono proves you know very little about the investment process. First of all everything is transparent and all investments can be seen here: https://ico.iconomi.net/about-icnx-index Second Iconomi will not consider investing into any ICO as any crypto has to be at least two months old to be considered in the Index. Please find your dumb investors elsewhere. Your presence here screams FOMO.
WTF are you talking about? While it's not confirmed, Iconomi could potentially invest in this ICO, just as it already did with Golem (surprise, you don't even know what we are talking about here, it's the performance fund not the index, get a clue).
I'm not shilling this ICO, we are just discussing it because there's speculation based on photos of Iconomi team with Chronobank people, just like it happened with Kraken. Wings DAO is a another ICO that I think Iconomi will take part in if it didn't already happen.
So please do your research first and understand the difference between the index and the performance fund before calling names and writing nonsense.
I didn't even realize the performance fund has already invested into Golem. I'm catching up on these articles now. I get that you think your accusations are solid theories now. But this thread is still for the Fund management platform. I do not want to hear your hopes and dreams with fake news.
I think what shutyourmouth meant to say was...
"I apologise. I was wrong, and I look like a fool now."
I had a bad day okay
I see ChronoBank is the next ICONOMI 
Hardly. Its a good project but its potential growth is smaller. First, adoption of crypto world in many countries is quite slow (from people point of view and also from government). Secondly, their idea can be much easier copied (it is not so revolutionary as Iconomi). And thirldy, Iconomi team made before Cashilla which is kind a complementary with Iconomi. Chronobank did not do anything similar in the past
I won't comment if ChronoBank will be successful or not long term since it's all speculation and we are still years away of crypto going truly mainstream. However your arguments could be applied just the same to Iconomi. They seem to have plenty of connections and experience with real companies and employees, they are not coming from nothing. If they manage to cut expenses compared to other options as they said, their business will flourish. I think this is similar to Lykke (that's much more focused on banking, money transfer, etc but I believe they still aim for services exchanges).
I think what distinguishes ChronoBank from other cryptoprojects is that LH tokens will actually have parity with current real world currencies. Let's face it, ETH, BTC, XMR are hardly spent or used daily because people hoard them. Volatility is the final nail on the coffin and the reason you can't really build a real world/daily business strictly based on cryptocurrencies other than a exchange or a betting site
The time tokens on the other hand are basically company shares which will receive dividends if the company grows (just like ICN).
I was a bit unfair to note just what I see from negative side. Of course your comment summarizes good points which I agree. I am still worried about those negative sides though
I've been doing some more research on ChronoBank and you can read a great review at https://www.smithandcrown.com/participate-chronobank-crowdsale/
What's very interesting is this Edway group...they are basically coming up with Chronobank to solve their own problems, so that basically guarantees the project will have clients and employees already. This is a major advantage since it's basically the hardest part for any ico or new company (Iconomi for example will have to heavily promote its service to fiat investors, unless they already have some).
Now, there are a lot of cons and question marks of course too but it's really a genuine and unique approach to actually use bring blockchain to the masses and be a solution, not a possibility. If crypto ever becomes a powerful industry in this new economy projects like Iconomi, Chronobank, Golem, Steem, Factom, Storj/Sia, ArcadeCity, etc, who are focused on a sector, niche or service will be the cornerstones of it.
This assuming they have time to develop before the real boom and keep improving and adapting. That's why old giants like IBM, Microsoft and many others are still kings and trustable companies.
Guys... please fuck your selves elsewhere. no one here gives a shit about your chrono cunt fuck.
Actually we are discussing this because Iconomi most likely already invested on the ICO for the performance fund, so please don't be disrespectful.
Your excuse to talk about Chrono proves you know very little about the investment process. First of all everything is transparent and all investments can be seen here: https://ico.iconomi.net/about-icnx-index Second Iconomi will not consider investing into any ICO as any crypto has to be at least two months old to be considered in the Index. Please find your dumb investors elsewhere. Your presence here screams FOMO.
WTF are you talking about? While it's not confirmed, Iconomi could potentially invest in this ICO, just as it already did with Golem (surprise, you don't even know what we are talking about here, it's the performance fund not the index, get a clue).
I'm not shilling this ICO, we are just discussing it because there's speculation based on photos of Iconomi team with Chronobank people, just like it happened with Kraken. Wings DAO is a another ICO that I think Iconomi will take part in if it didn't already happen.
So please do your research first and understand the difference between the index and the performance fund before calling names and writing nonsense.
I didn't even realize the performance fund has already invested into Golem. I'm catching up on these articles now. I get that you think your accusations are solid theories now. But this thread is still for the Fund management platform. I do not want to hear your hopes and dreams with fake news.
I see ChronoBank is the next ICONOMI
Hardly. Its a good project but its potential growth is smaller. First, adoption of crypto world in many countries is quite slow (from people point of view and also from government). Secondly, their idea can be much easier copied (it is not so revolutionary as Iconomi). And thirldy, Iconomi team made before Cashilla which is kind a complementary with Iconomi. Chronobank did not do anything similar in the past
I won't comment if ChronoBank will be successful or not long term since it's all speculation and we are still years away of crypto going truly mainstream. However your arguments could be applied just the same to Iconomi. They seem to have plenty of connections and experience with real companies and employees, they are not coming from nothing. If they manage to cut expenses compared to other options as they said, their business will flourish. I think this is similar to Lykke (that's much more focused on banking, money transfer, etc but I believe they still aim for services exchanges).
I think what distinguishes ChronoBank from other cryptoprojects is that LH tokens will actually have parity with current real world currencies. Let's face it, ETH, BTC, XMR are hardly spent or used daily because people hoard them. Volatility is the final nail on the coffin and the reason you can't really build a real world/daily business strictly based on cryptocurrencies other than a exchange or a betting site
The time tokens on the other hand are basically company shares which will receive dividends if the company grows (just like ICN).
I was a bit unfair to note just what I see from negative side. Of course your comment summarizes good points which I agree. I am still worried about those negative sides though
I've been doing some more research on ChronoBank and you can read a great review at https://www.smithandcrown.com/participate-chronobank-crowdsale/
What's very interesting is this Edway group...they are basically coming up with Chronobank to solve their own problems, so that basically guarantees the project will have clients and employees already. This is a major advantage since it's basically the hardest part for any ico or new company (Iconomi for example will have to heavily promote its service to fiat investors, unless they already have some).
Now, there are a lot of cons and question marks of course too but it's really a genuine and unique approach to actually use bring blockchain to the masses and be a solution, not a possibility. If crypto ever becomes a powerful industry in this new economy projects like Iconomi, Chronobank, Golem, Steem, Factom, Storj/Sia, ArcadeCity, etc, who are focused on a sector, niche or service will be the cornerstones of it.
This assuming they have time to develop before the real boom and keep improving and adapting. That's why old giants like IBM, Microsoft and many others are still kings and trustable companies.
Guys... please fuck your selves elsewhere. no one here gives a shit about your chrono cunt fuck.
Actually we are discussing this because Iconomi most likely already invested on the ICO for the performance fund, so please don't be disrespectful.
Your excuse to talk about Chrono proves you know very little about the investment process. First of all everything is transparent and all investments can be seen here: https://ico.iconomi.net/about-icnx-index Second Iconomi will not consider investing into any ICO as any crypto has to be at least two months old to be considered in the Index. Please find your dumb investors elsewhere. Your presence here screams FOMO.
This don't make sense to me. Why the dividends are not paid back as ICN? If it was to be paid in ICN, then ICN price will rise instead of ETH, right?
even being a noob.... stop and think... 
when Microsoft or other corporations pay dividends, to their stock holders, is always monthly/quartal/annually in dollars....
they will never pay the dividens in more stocks...
so why ICN should do that??
Like i wrote ... the dividends will be paid in ETH because the smart contract for the distribution is only paying in ETH, because ICN is an Ethereum based Token!
And I think the ICONOMI team mentioned there will be an option where you can automatically let your ETH dividends been sold at the ETH/ICN price at that time. So you will automatically will receive ICN if you wich!
How can ICN pay dividends in ICN if there's no inflation? The trolling here is out of control.
I think it would be a good idea for Iconomi to integrate a conversion utility built right into the platform (like shapeshift but also offering fiat) and charge fees for every transaction. A lot of people would want to convert that ETH into BTC or other currencies right away and this would be very profitable to do if they choose to do it onsite.
Buy from the market, duh. I didn't say they should create more.
If they buy Dividends from the market as ICN instead of ETH, then ICN price will go through the roof.
Weekly Dividends in ICN means ICN price could go to the Mars !
correct me if im wrong but I think we receive dividends bi weekly
Anybody remember the address of the ICN token for the ethereum wallet? Updated my wallet and my tokens are not listed anymore 
0x888666CA69E0f178DED6D75b5726Cee99A87D698
Thanks babe
That's a great way to show what Iconomi is, even Zcash "investors" could understand it...
It would be good to post it on the OP.
People should start spamming this on polo and bitt
Boy, I didn't know ICN would fall this fast in the market - it's lower than the ICO price... waiting for it to rise higher, don't know when that will be
Lower?
I got 4,549.67 ICN for 1 BTC which was locked at 605.89 USD
So 605.89 / 4,549.67 = 0,1331722960126778 USD for 1 ICN
if you look price on Kraken it is 0.000183 BTC for 1 ICN
So 0.000183 * 728.68 USD = 0,13334844 USD for 1 ICN
In my calculation current price is slightly higher than ICO price
Not if you bought in with BTC, like most people did. If you bought ICN with BTC you're 10% below ICO price.
That is because BTC rose in value. It has nothing to do with ICN value.
No, don't do that, Btc is the global denominator. Not the $.
So, if anyone from the ICN team is listening, drop everything you're doing, pump this shit to $80-100m to get noticed and be done with, cause right now crap like zcash,stratis and antshares are eating our meal.
Get serious and start pumping.
The iconomi project isn't about 'pump icn token'
so relax, you can always leave.I will leave, in 4 days, this is crypto world, you don't have the luxury of waiting. There's a critical time limit that if expectations are not met within you die.
You are a stupid lil shit for investing money you don't own.
ICN tokens are my ether tree seeds that will grow into my first ether tree by the time Q1 2017 arrives. (No matter the price I will not sell until 2018. Good luck to all weak hands. BTW I might be in the top 30.
Can we collect together 3 BTC for bittrex?
I can give 0.1 BTC
If you already have 3 BTC immediately contact richie bittrex, he quickly adds that ICN in minutes I can give 0.1 BTC
I can pay the 3 BTC but i dont wanted to pay it alone. I think collecting the amount will be fair.
What you think if Bittrex give us a BTC adress?
On this adress everyone can put btc how much he can offer.
If 3 Btc are collected ICN can list the coin?
That sounds good or not?
Why pathetic? If we collect 3 BTC than the Boom will come.
And 3 BTC is nothing. 30 people and each pay 0.1 BTC that really nothing.
I'm pretty sure larges project do not need to pay the listing fee, and if they do, then they can pay it from the ICO funds, 3 BTC out of 10 million dollars is nothing.
And Kraken is already good enough, I think it's better than Bittrex.
I agree with you all the way. If you or anybody else would want to set up a legit crowdsale I'll throw something more reasonable like .03 btc.. I believe ICN putting any man on the moon depends on how well this coin is distributed among new investors by the time the plaform goes live.
I dont get why 70% of icn tokens belong to the same eth address even though distribution is over....anyone???
Where are you seeing this? I would only assume this value belongs to those that invested but never provided an Ethernet address and is currently being shared with the 13 mil that was reserved for the Iconomi team.
Well there was a month gap between Iconomi's whitepaper formalisation and the ICO so I would say about a month but it could be more or less. It's hard say without the knowledge of Iconomi's representatives.
so it just matter now whether they have the right dev team who can do all these in a matter of days?
IMHO,. Iconomi deserves its own blockcain. Why couldn't a separate blockchain interact with an ethereum smart contract? Then expand the platform's limits with DApp development. And give investors the option to choose how individual dividends are paid whether it be Lisk or Eth. Why put 3500 *+ investor's trust and value at risk (especially fiat investors) because Iconomi's success is currently dependent on Ethereum. Stratis released its own blockchain built to create private blockchains for a fraction of Iconomi's ICO investments. If others understand where I'm getting at... I think its fair to vote on a better solution such as an independent blockchain. And do this by treating every account as a delegate. Personally I would rather wait until Iconomi has the best opportunity to go public then go out on a limb with Ethers current status on work load stability. I bet we would have easily seen 21000 BTC if the DAO hack never happened...
PS: I really like the idea behind Iconomi but I'd rather get dividends in lisk.
All iconomi shares are sold out now. From now these can only be bought on the market. So all people who buy them are okay with receiving dividends in ETH.PS: I really like the idea behind Iconomi but I'd rather get dividends in lisk.
Why give iconomi token holders other options? To pump the price for iconomi token?
New investors can invest into index fund, performance fund and the fund management platform. That's good for them and good for iconomi token holders.
Your suggestion is nice to have, but I am not sure it is more important than the above.
while investors can buy index fund and performance fund, the price pump can be good for marketing. it will grab the attention of new investors too.
someone111 I dont think the shares are set in stone as the Iconomi team were still mining the tokens last week. Also its not the fact that it could attract new investors but could be the difference between Iconomi's success and no success. Could you imagine a half working platform's index with >3% invested in its own parent blockchain. Dividends are based on ethers success or else no one would spend their precious euro for ether. If that was the case who would want to hold a coin that gets dividends in Eth. There's a reason why ETC is a thing and has more volume and why there will be duplicates of Iconomi in the future because the idea behind dividends are a great idea, just not always in ether.
IMHO,. Iconomi deserves its own blockcain. Why couldn't a separate blockchain interact with an ethereum smart contract? Then expand the platform's limits with DApp development. And give investors the option to choose how individual dividends are paid whether it be Lisk or Eth. Why put 3500 *+ investor's trust and value at risk (especially fiat investors) because Iconomi's success is currently dependent on Ethereum. Stratis released its own blockchain built to create private blockchains for a fraction of Iconomi's ICO investments. If others understand where I'm getting at... I think its fair to vote on a better solution such as an independent blockchain. And do this by treating every account as a delegate. Personally I would rather wait until Iconomi has the best opportunity to go public then go out on a limb with Ethers current status on work load stability. I bet we would have easily seen 21000 BTC if the DAO hack never happened...
PS: I really like the idea behind Iconomi but I'd rather get dividends in lisk.
PS: I really like the idea behind Iconomi but I'd rather get dividends in lisk.
Thats a good suggestion but that is if users can wait before its going to be fully implemented. I would also want to have ETH for my dividends. How long do you think its can be done?
Well there was a month gap between Iconomi's whitepaper formalisation and the ICO so I would say about a month but it could be more or less. It's hard say without the knowledge of Iconomi's representatives.