Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 103 results by siege3967
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 01/06/2018, 07:18:19 UTC
Not seeing too much similarity. Anyway, that doesn't matter because you most definitely copied your code from somewhere else. All of us know that your coin is literally a mish-mash of copy-pasted.

Lol and you guys say to the verge fam, they would only see what they want to see. Obviously, someone had a shit on your eyes... Unbelievable... I just wonder if anyone in this world is taking you serious in your real life? Or is it the same like here, that you are making a fool of your self the whole day? Are you a friend of boxalex? He has a doctor's appointment upcoming. Maybe you can go with him...
Please tell me the similarities you see.

-        if (!BN_div(&dv, &rem, &bn, &bn58, pctx))
+        if (!BN_div(dv.get(), rem.get(), bn.getc(), bn58.getc(), pctx))

-        if (!BN_mul(&bn, &bn, &bn58, pctx))
+        if (!BN_mul(bn.get(), bn.getc(), bn58.getc(), pctx))

cant put the code all in here, just compare the files:

complete bignum.h class

crypter.cpp

key.cpp

script.cpp

you really dont (want to) see that? LOL

At least that is explaining a lot...

So how is this going on now? There would be 2 possibilities:

1: You stop your ridiculous FUD!

2: You open a new Thread: "XSH copying code from XVG" and start a FUD-campaign about there Developers too.

I would prefer solution 1! But it is your decision...

I am out here now. Sold my XVG yesterday. I did not because i think it is a bad project, but i wanted to invest in another, smaller but very promising project.

So when i am thinking about it again, maybe you could continue with your ridiculous FUD for some time, so i could buy back some cheap verge in a few weeks...  Grin
The lines you quoted are different lol. Anyway, the shield devs have credited Verge devs. Verge devs didn't credit shield devs for the fix they copied.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 31/05/2018, 18:05:06 UTC
Not seeing too much similarity. Anyway, that doesn't matter because you most definitely copied your code from somewhere else. All of us know that your coin is literally a mish-mash of copy-pasted.
you are actually being ridiculous at this point because if you gonna talk about copy then you have to include all the crypto space starting by the second oldest coin LTC that is basically a copy pasta of BTC with some changes and it goes on and on the the rest of the coins so what is your exact point?
It's called open source for a reason. You're allowed to use others' implementation as long as you credit them for it and don't claim it's your own code. Justin Erik Valo does not credit the devs he copied code from. Go shill somewhere else.
Oh wait so now the problem is not the fact he might have copied it but the fact he didnt credit the ones that made it? Did the SHIELD core team credited Justin for the code they are also using by shilling on XVG fork? Where is the moral? How much more ridiculous stuff you guys gonna pull out of your asses to trash verge? Its actually reaching to a point that i can only laugh about it. Its like a constant attempt to find the smallest things or details to force a reason to fud or trash about verge. This is unfortunately the kind of crypto community we have.

You don't know how an open source license works do you? The shield devs I'm sure credited Justin Valo in their source.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 31/05/2018, 15:34:53 UTC
iquidus has alot of bugs. prohashing and other yiimp based explorers are far more accurate.

Just out of curiousity in case your statement here is indeed the case (and i have some doubts about it), but just in case.

- So why is Verge using the most bugged explorer for its own currency?
- What's the prupose of having an official explorer nobody can rely on?
- What explorer do you use than while doing your own research/investigation if the official Verge Explorer can't be trusted due it's bugs?
- Was the possibility that the explorer shows the correct value actually investigated or you just think it's a bug?
- Any reference or example where this bug elsewhere happened and shows negative balance?

And there is still no answer to a whole lot of valid questions, maybe you won't to take a look into them as well.

P.S.: IF this guy here posting and offending people en mass here with lowest street language is really your moderator on the telegram channel
and representing Verges views/spirit/interest, than you should think about what bad taste such behavour leaves associated with Verge.
Just as a thought and side note.

Lolololol. Offending normal people ( which i dont ) or FUDDers ( which i will always) like you? I give FUDders extra treatment. Get used to my offensive behaviour until you keep spreading fake shit and asking vague question again and again to prove your shitty thing.

Let's get into technicalities. Very isn't even private. There is no private transaction or private ledger. Wraith is stealth addresses with Tor. All values are visible on the blockchain.

Lol they backpedalled on the private ledger after advertising it so heavily because "it went against their values" or something like that.

I'm gonna look for the post just for the lolz and compare it to what they were proposing for Wraith beforehand.


It's still mentioned in their "blackpaper" 😂

Wait. What. They dont have private ledger? What was half year Wraith hype about then ?
No private ledger. Wraith is literally stealth addresses run over Tor. Both of which already exist. They just used a catchy phrase for it.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 31/05/2018, 15:33:32 UTC
Not seeing too much similarity. Anyway, that doesn't matter because you most definitely copied your code from somewhere else. All of us know that your coin is literally a mish-mash of copy-pasted.

Lol and you guys say to the verge fam, they would only see what they want to see. Obviously, someone had a shit on your eyes... Unbelievable... I just wonder if anyone in this world is taking you serious in your real life? Or is it the same like here, that you are making a fool of your self the whole day? Are you a friend of boxalex? He has a doctor's appointment upcoming. Maybe you can go with him...
Please tell me the similarities you see.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 31/05/2018, 08:53:14 UTC
Well, its all over Social Media now that XVG's code is flawed, Sunerok doesnt have the capability to fix the code on his own so he needs to copy Shields code. Then blatantly lie about it in public.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/8nf4su/shield_uncovers_verge_xvg_deception/

https://twitter.com/coin_wars/status/1002026270530551808

Do your own research
you mean shield the coin that is a fork of XVG? What moral do they have to talk about copy past?? Irony at his best.
They forked because of the incompetency of the verge dev and now the verge dev copied their code. Classic lol
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 31/05/2018, 08:51:31 UTC
Not seeing too much similarity. Anyway, that doesn't matter because you most definitely copied your code from somewhere else. All of us know that your coin is literally a mish-mash of copy-pasted.
you are actually being ridiculous at this point because if you gonna talk about copy then you have to include all the crypto space starting by the second oldest coin LTC that is basically a copy pasta of BTC with some changes and it goes on and on the the rest of the coins so what is your exact point?
It's called open source for a reason. You're allowed to use others' implementation as long as you credit them for it and don't claim it's your own code. Justin Erik Valo does not credit the devs he copied code from. Go shill somewhere else.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 31/05/2018, 07:48:34 UTC
Not seeing too much similarity. Anyway, that doesn't matter because you most definitely copied your code from somewhere else. All of us know that your coin is literally a mish-mash of copy-pasted.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 30/05/2018, 22:41:17 UTC
iquidus has alot of bugs. prohashing and other yiimp based explorers are far more accurate.

Just out of curiousity in case your statement here is indeed the case (and i have some doubts about it), but just in case.

- So why is Verge using the most bugged explorer for its own currency?
- What's the prupose of having an official explorer nobody can rely on?
- What explorer do you use than while doing your own research/investigation if the official Verge Explorer can't be trusted due it's bugs?
- Was the possibility that the explorer shows the correct value actually investigated or you just think it's a bug?
- Any reference or example where this bug elsewhere happened and shows negative balance?

And there is still no answer to a whole lot of valid questions, maybe you won't to take a look into them as well.

P.S.: IF this guy here posting and offending people en mass here with lowest street language is really your moderator on the telegram channel
and representing Verges views/spirit/interest, than you should think about what bad taste such behavour leaves associated with Verge.
Just as a thought and side note.

Lolololol. Offending normal people ( which i dont ) or FUDDers ( which i will always) like you? I give FUDders extra treatment. Get used to my offensive behaviour until you keep spreading fake shit and asking vague question again and again to prove your shitty thing.

Let's get into technicalities. Very isn't even private. There is no private transaction or private ledger. Wraith is stealth addresses with Tor. All values are visible on the blockchain.

Lol they backpedalled on the private ledger after advertising it so heavily because "it went against their values" or something like that.

I'm gonna look for the post just for the lolz and compare it to what they were proposing for Wraith beforehand.


It's still mentioned in their "blackpaper" 😂
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 30/05/2018, 22:40:11 UTC
I really just want a simple question answered.

JUSTIN: Would that be possible? Can you answer?

Why does this sampling of blocks from 2205900 -> 2205923  - which were added to the chain as valid, only switch between 2 different algo's? According to the consensus code in Verge, shouldn't these have been discarded as invalid?


Code:
2205923 - 62b24a19f15716f1679bad531ef4b7c14b3d58d980c5490a0a135c2b1857a139 22nd May 2018 06:55:17 lyra2re
2205922 - f11c4423c21bbe77907937ea40d45ad69572498f2ee3d160b90c0afed2b941cf 22nd May 2018 06:55:17 lyra2re
2205921 - 65ecfa324c69ff64fcbb6657eb70e981289f0b6c922435c89db3451ab0f960e4 22nd May 2018 06:55:17 lyra2re
2205920 - 03fd6163763bd2d686d39ae6e1c3b4663cdaed206e7ea0284e847d13e6d6198c 22nd May 2018 06:55:17 lyra2re
2205919 - 7e458fc3c5706ec9ddf95cedc254d616dda49764d0c34f788d5bd92519cff0ca 22nd May 2018 06:55:16 lyra2re
2205918 - 078ddfdc760995dbb96ccce33fc37dec853f1465b95eeb87bd499048f7e6333b 22nd May 2018 06:55:16 lyra2re
2205917 - 00000000083bb16892848cc890317370315f52ed3566e364c4264be4e20f77de 22nd May 2018 06:55:16 scrypt
2205916 - 000000001a16b654d11d879efc7bb9fef711f946c69df324a1cc5a2fb240a4a6 22nd May 2018 06:55:16 scrypt
2205915 - 0000000004b4258574fefe34f3a0690ff3d8d7050fc67773ff5e349767306086 22nd May 2018 06:55:16 scrypt
2205914 - 000000000d2edddbc12448148b710c4c49794e6e74fb820069377da1633dd447 22nd May 2018 06:55:16 scrypt
2205913 - 000000001f507a7a23a1a55860c19c1226d5edba0453043db4b884cb6de5c028 22nd May 2018 06:55:15 scrypt
2205912 - 0000000049fb9df391abbd8ab42cdb77cffb7b4941bb65ed3aa5589a100e8594 22nd May 2018 06:55:15 scrypt
2205911 - 81e8d7899d20b0e1ea00a458e92bffc4716389e55cf3e4947d44eed220e873b8 22nd May 2018 06:55:15 lyra2re
2205910 - 70d35dbf84cbf4a1b3cd1ed2e12d65c4e0776c2186aa1cec956b7c7382b7b6a3 22nd May 2018 06:55:15 lyra2re
2205909 - d8017bd566bcc7359c6b995357756fccb325e1a8ef0e6153c7587c1434dc982b 22nd May 2018 06:55:15 lyra2re
2205908 - 2079b84323d04234895f4ee6da8c28518b52e97b59da4501a1195349f9f94467 22nd May 2018 06:55:15 lyra2re
2205907 - 0d14bc8be431ae5734c8cd791cf5e285338a5cec1a8bb4c9849209da5921b77b 22nd May 2018 06:55:14 lyra2re
2205906 - f6a63a5c746b91d4ab6f79aaa799c80e899d2026032c515a2cf482bd0e97b85f 22nd May 2018 06:55:14 lyra2re
2205905 - 000000001a8645b501a5ca405883c34aa0c5edebfe4343ed967d978e66a45d95 22nd May 2018 06:55:14 scrypt
2205904 - 00000000233ee973c1ee798b3ae073953bc43b0280e5eef9bfeaea15c8c44c60 22nd May 2018 06:55:14 scrypt
2205903 - 000000000326ed66ebda4c4b0c391757648ecf6668d2da9b1ab03d19ecc46bcf 22nd May 2018 06:55:14 scrypt
2205902 - 000000007f4bf76e0bc1f0ecabeac939f924dde177d01364a725778902a5565b 22nd May 2018 06:55:14 scrypt
2205901 - 0000000050dd9cea6865263e4f64f8121560476ce400803dedf2c34e68b1c971 22nd May 2018 06:55:13 scrypt
2205900 - 00000000a8c64d3176a056c35722f9255e5231191d4b5dfc2f039256586d3ad8 22nd May 2018 06:55:13 scrypt



Well, no, this is allowed. This is the commit that mitigate the timewarp attack using a single algorithm https://github.com/vergecurrency/VERGE/commit/80c81aef63272231fc39c2af4b8db9f3f2e9d328
It seems that the purpose of the patch is to only allow 5 of the last teen blocks to be mined with the same algorithm, which it seems to achive (there seems to be a small bug which allows 6 blocks with the same algorithm in a row. Not sure if that is on purpose, but it is probably not too critical).

Ummmmm that's not how coding works. If it's programmed to only let 5, it should not let 6. So either his code is flawed or there's another exploit they're using.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 30/05/2018, 18:58:17 UTC
iquidus has alot of bugs. prohashing and other yiimp based explorers are far more accurate.

Just out of curiousity in case your statement here is indeed the case (and i have some doubts about it), but just in case.

- So why is Verge using the most bugged explorer for its own currency?
- What's the prupose of having an official explorer nobody can rely on?
- What explorer do you use than while doing your own research/investigation if the official Verge Explorer can't be trusted due it's bugs?
- Was the possibility that the explorer shows the correct value actually investigated or you just think it's a bug?
- Any reference or example where this bug elsewhere happened and shows negative balance?

And there is still no answer to a whole lot of valid questions, maybe you won't to take a look into them as well.

P.S.: IF this guy here posting and offending people en mass here with lowest street language is really your moderator on the telegram channel
and representing Verges views/spirit/interest, than you should think about what bad taste such behavour leaves associated with Verge.
Just as a thought and side note.

Lolololol. Offending normal people ( which i dont ) or FUDDers ( which i will always) like you? I give FUDders extra treatment. Get used to my offensive behaviour until you keep spreading fake shit and asking vague question again and again to prove your shitty thing.


What has boxalex said that is fake or FUD? Nothing that I see.

Your friend box or whatever his name is fishing for anything just like rest of fudders. This thread was supposed to be on the alleged attack on Verge Network, which was unsuccessfull. Yet, he keeps going OFFTOPIC, now that sockpuppet of OCMiner chose a topic on Blockexplorer bug. I mean What the F? It seems like he wants to keep this discussion to go on forever.
It seems like we have a collection of Banned people over here.

Ya'all have adopted motto
" IF YOU CANT MAKE IT, FAKE IT "

This thread was started during the first attack back in April and continued to stay alive because of new attacks? Even though the latest attack was unsuccessful, the fact of the matter is that attempts are being made which warrants the existence of a place where these issue can be discussed.

You on the other hand have only responded with insults and 0 actual answers to any questions.

All you've manage to do successfully is project your insecurities.

It amazes me always that people with new accounts show up wit to ask same question again and again without even reading the whole post. Literally your account has been used for this thread.
I can bet, that you are one of the same person who were posting FUD and yet created new account to claim your concern.

If you want ur answer really, then have a look at older posts and DYOR.

You are perpetuating a scam and I hope you feel bad about it.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 30/05/2018, 18:54:35 UTC
iquidus has alot of bugs. prohashing and other yiimp based explorers are far more accurate.

Just out of curiousity in case your statement here is indeed the case (and i have some doubts about it), but just in case.

- So why is Verge using the most bugged explorer for its own currency?
- What's the prupose of having an official explorer nobody can rely on?
- What explorer do you use than while doing your own research/investigation if the official Verge Explorer can't be trusted due it's bugs?
- Was the possibility that the explorer shows the correct value actually investigated or you just think it's a bug?
- Any reference or example where this bug elsewhere happened and shows negative balance?

And there is still no answer to a whole lot of valid questions, maybe you won't to take a look into them as well.

P.S.: IF this guy here posting and offending people en mass here with lowest street language is really your moderator on the telegram channel
and representing Verges views/spirit/interest, than you should think about what bad taste such behavour leaves associated with Verge.
Just as a thought and side note.

Lolololol. Offending normal people ( which i dont ) or FUDDers ( which i will always) like you? I give FUDders extra treatment. Get used to my offensive behaviour until you keep spreading fake shit and asking vague question again and again to prove your shitty thing.

Let's get into technicalities. Very isn't even private. There is no private transaction or private ledger. Wraith is stealth addresses with Tor. All values are visible on the blockchain.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 30/05/2018, 13:36:38 UTC
Would any verge supporter like to explain this? Negative balance: https://verge-blockchain.info/address/D7sbycsrSQpj6AjfjsHPb54fvEzN6JH3fp

this thread gets too much watered with intention by the XVG fanboyz. Putting all important unanswered questions at the end of the topic until it's answered .....

what are you? 10yr old?Did you even know how to read. It seems so much hard for yaall to comprehend simple info.
NEGATIVE BALANCE IS AN EXPLORER BUG !!
go to prohashing explorer instead of official vergeexplorer.

How does this explorer bug work when it's supposed to just directly read off the blockchain? So the blockchain is bugged, not the explorer. The other explorer probably deals with negative values as 0.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 30/05/2018, 13:34:46 UTC
⭐ Merited by Hueristic (1)
OK. This 'XSH copy' shit worries me as a big XVG holder/fan.

I really think the VergeDev needs to answer directly to the accusations and questions mentioned here.
Some show links to codes where XVG is copying another source. Other say the drift fix came 1 month after another coin had the same code!
so what is true or false?

I would like a true explanation from the VerdeDev without the usual 'LOLL'ing'. This is serious business.
The biggest partnership and more to come but you need to be professional about your product and be straight!

So is it all FUD or does it have some truth?
I want proof please.

Verge dev has provided proof numerous times all this timestamps posts being shared only shows the half truth. After the first attack verge dev committed and reverted a code on  github that some Shield Noobs are claiming to copy. So it practically was committed and reverted and then the second exploit happened, so he had to push the code that was reverted back after first attack that he should not have revert it at first place. In the mean time shield copied the Verge code and pushed the same commit ( that verge dev reverted after first attack)to their repo between 1st and 2nd attack on verge . Hence they are claiming that verge dev copied the code. Its just a publicity stunt. So they are whining abt the credit thing.
The fix he applied was nothing like the fix he introduced this month. The fix he introduced this month is word-for-word copied from shield.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 30/05/2018, 09:23:28 UTC
Good afternoon! How can I get more information as an investor, are the project developers reliable and trustworthy?

I would say DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH bcoz here you will get biased advice. Do not take advice from anyone regarding investment in cryptoverse. Especially bitcointalk thread, reddit is cancerous. Have a good day.
DYOR by coming into our telegram chat so we can brainwash you. Also make sure you don't look at Reddit or this thread so you can remained brainwashed. There, I simplified it for you Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 30/05/2018, 09:22:34 UTC
it's amusing to me that you people act like this matters in the long run 'at all'..... way to go short term vision... lol cause every other coin on earth hasn't had an issue from time to time lololololol



No other coin son earth were hacked several times through the exact same exploit that was supposingly fixed. As an investors, I wouldn't put a cent into a system which isn't proven secure.

Several times doesnt means twice btw. Its more than twice. Verge's blockchain has been exploted twice. And yes i mean exploit ! I wonder where were ya'all when bitcoin had many bugs in its early days and when it was hacked, exploited or whatever you wanna call. Verge is basing codebase to bitcoin 0.16
Anyways its your opinion, your money. I wish you good luck with your future choices Smiley

Bitcoin was never hacked twice in 2 months with the same exploit and their devs never ignored people when people pointed out that a fix wasn't enough. Anyway, Verge is going to copy the rebasing from Shield GitHub and we'll all have proof of this because of the magic that is timestamps. And then we'll show you how the verge dev copied the rebasing effort from Shield GitHub. And you'll call it FUD cause your comprehension skills are 0.

Again. Verge hasnt been hacked this time. Yet you keep goingon and offtopic. To the shield thing, lol ask shield devs , i have heard they will have their code private. Please enlighten us how can Verge copy the code being private 😂😂 btw LTC and many other copied BTC. Go fud urself.
Height of stupidity can be seen in your post.
Btw i still call it FUD.

It hasn't been hacked yet, but it will happen. It was attempted today. Their code won't be private because that's going against what crypto stands for. Yeah LTC and many other copied BTC but they credited them in the code. Your dev does not and there are multiple examples of this.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 30/05/2018, 09:10:06 UTC
Good afternoon! How can I get more information as an investor, are the project developers reliable and trustworthy?
Verge is vaporware. It's not even private. Only one dev and he copy-pastes most of his code.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 30/05/2018, 08:55:25 UTC
Would any verge supporter like to explain this? Negative balance: https://verge-blockchain.info/address/D7sbycsrSQpj6AjfjsHPb54fvEzN6JH3fp
has explaination on this been told?
No they simply can't explain it because they don't understand what's happening.

Crickets.

That's OK tho. While I shouldn't need to, I'll break it down a little bit for them.

Notice anything suspicious about the transactions associated with that address?

No one? Little drummer dick drummerjdb666, you don't want to take a guess?

Will check back after dinner time, but it's ugly

It takes a while for a NOOB or schizophrenic to comprehend the information which has been provided twice. With loved one's support Schizophrenia can be handled. I wonder if your loved ones knows abt your condition. I wonder if OCminer is paying the medical bills for you. 🤔
Aren't you the idiot who posted saying that antpool admin said all the transactions were theirs even though he said that before OCMiner said anything? And did you not use that as "proof" for no attack happening? 😂😂😂 Stupid Karan Patel.

Schizophrenic Stroke in Action again ? 😂

Anyways it seems spoonfeeding you info wont help.
Your Master OCMiner's tone wasnt like "Attack in progress", he was like attack was suceesfull when it wasnt.
I and many other have reason to believe that this recent attacks have something to do with OCMiner due to multiple reasons
1. as his ego was hurt after getting banned in our telegram chat.
2. Due to personal differences with Verge dev or sponsored FUD
And so on..

But dont wry, What Goes around always Comes Around.
Just like it did with Monero, after their dev fudded abt Verge,  their blockchain got hacked as well.
If you know what i mean.

Karma will find its way to Shady OCMINER as well Smiley



OCMiner posted after Antpool miner posted his post. Your comprehension and skills are shit, that's why you're into Verge.

Again. Keep talking shit. This entire shit started by OCMiner. Like i said its hard for you to accept that your Master's Alleged Attack was unsuccesfull. Keep brabbing shit and look stupid.
Why did you think the Antpool's post is proof? You clearly have no understandimg of blockchain. You're probably one of the Verge marketing admins. You idiots have 0 knowledge of the tech.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 30/05/2018, 08:54:31 UTC
it's amusing to me that you people act like this matters in the long run 'at all'..... way to go short term vision... lol cause every other coin on earth hasn't had an issue from time to time lololololol



No other coin son earth were hacked several times through the exact same exploit that was supposingly fixed. As an investors, I wouldn't put a cent into a system which isn't proven secure.

Several times doesnt means twice btw. Its more than twice. Verge's blockchain has been exploted twice. And yes i mean exploit ! I wonder where were ya'all when bitcoin had many bugs in its early days and when it was hacked, exploited or whatever you wanna call. Verge is basing codebase to bitcoin 0.16
Anyways its your opinion, your money. I wish you good luck with your future choices Smiley

Bitcoin was never hacked twice in 2 months with the same exploit and their devs never ignored people when people pointed out that a fix wasn't enough. Anyway, Verge is going to copy the rebasing from Shield GitHub and we'll all have proof of this because of the magic that is timestamps. And then we'll show you how the verge dev copied the rebasing effort from Shield GitHub. And you'll call it FUD cause your comprehension skills are 0.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 30/05/2018, 08:47:46 UTC
Would any verge supporter like to explain this? Negative balance: https://verge-blockchain.info/address/D7sbycsrSQpj6AjfjsHPb54fvEzN6JH3fp
has explaination on this been told?
No they simply can't explain it because they don't understand what's happening.

Crickets.

That's OK tho. While I shouldn't need to, I'll break it down a little bit for them.

Notice anything suspicious about the transactions associated with that address?

No one? Little drummer dick drummerjdb666, you don't want to take a guess?

Will check back after dinner time, but it's ugly

It takes a while for a NOOB or schizophrenic to comprehend the information which has been provided twice. With loved one's support Schizophrenia can be handled. I wonder if your loved ones knows abt your condition. I wonder if OCminer is paying the medical bills for you. 🤔
Aren't you the idiot who posted saying that antpool admin said all the transactions were theirs even though he said that before OCMiner said anything? And did you not use that as "proof" for no attack happening? 😂😂😂 Stupid Karan Patel.

Schizophrenic Stroke in Action again ? 😂

Anyways it seems spoonfeeding you info wont help.
Your Master OCMiner's tone wasnt like "Attack in progress", he was like attack was suceesfull when it wasnt.
I and many other have reason to believe that this recent attacks have something to do with OCMiner due to multiple reasons
1. as his ego was hurt after getting banned in our telegram chat.
2. Due to personal differences with Verge dev or sponsored FUD
And so on..

But dont wry, What Goes around always Comes Around.
Just like it did with Monero, after their dev fudded abt Verge,  their blockchain got hacked as well.
If you know what i mean.

Karma will find its way to Shady OCMINER as well Smiley



OCMiner posted after Antpool miner posted his post. Your comprehension skills are shit, that's why you're into Verge.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
siege3967
on 30/05/2018, 07:27:09 UTC
Would any verge supporter like to explain this? Negative balance: https://verge-blockchain.info/address/D7sbycsrSQpj6AjfjsHPb54fvEzN6JH3fp
has explaination on this been told?
No they simply can't explain it because they don't understand what's happening.

Crickets.

That's OK tho. While I shouldn't need to, I'll break it down a little bit for them.

Notice anything suspicious about the transactions associated with that address?

No one? Little drummer dick drummerjdb666, you don't want to take a guess?

Will check back after dinner time, but it's ugly

It takes a while for a NOOB or schizophrenic to comprehend the information which has been provided twice. With loved one's support Schizophrenia can be handled. I wonder if your loved ones knows abt your condition. I wonder if OCminer is paying the medical bills for you. 🤔
Aren't you the idiot who posted saying that antpool admin said all the transactions were theirs even though he said that before OCMiner said anything? And did you not use that as "proof" for no attack happening? 😂😂😂 Stupid Karan Patel.