Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 58 results by silverman
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: To Magical Tux
by
silverman
on 23/06/2011, 06:42:46 UTC
Personally I think a proactive approach to countering claims made by those two senators is a good thing. I am glad someone did it.

My point was that this thread was about the malicious trade and not about Tux's letter to the DEA.
But I see you like to twist words and sentences out of their original context, good luck with that, but I have got better things to do.

What letter? The Goxmeister is bringing in the DEA now?!!

This guy is a loose cannon. First he gives away the customer database and passwords, and now he's bringing in the DEA???

Whisky tango foxtrot. I want to see that letter!



Here you go bro: http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=17693.0;all

Thanks for the info, tavi. I've been looking for this letter since our enchanted Tux announced he was going to the "authorities". First this creep leaked our identities, then he called in the DEA.

From Wikipedia:

Judas Goat: A Judas goat is a trained goat used at a slaughterhouse and in general animal herding. The Judas goat is trained to associate with sheep or cattle, leading them to a specific destination. In stockyards, a Judas goat will lead sheep to slaughter, while its own life is spared. Judas goats are also used to lead other animals to specific pens and on to trucks.


The Bitcoin idea was excellent, but the people involved just couldn't handle the responsibility. Game, set, match. Party over.



Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Is There A Good Reason To Still Be Calling BTC Money/Currency?
by
silverman
on 23/06/2011, 04:28:58 UTC
Bitcoin is not money, it is not cash, it is not dollars, it is not currency, it is not legal tender. These are buzzwords the Establishment uses to keep their franchises safe from competition.

It most certainly is a currency.  It facilitates trade.  That's what currencies do.  That's why I gave the etymology of the word.  It comes from the word meaning 'to flow' -- it permits trade to flow.

And unlike a commodity, it has no use other than to facilitate trade.  Hell, I could argue that a US Dollar Bill is more of a commodity than a bitcoin is -- because if nothing else, I could light it on fire and generate heat from the paper.  Or I could use them to wallpaper my room.  Bitcoins have absolutely no other use than to facilitate trade.  


One more attempt. Maybe somebody out there is reachable.

Quote
Currency. Coined money and such banknotes and other paper money as are authorized by law and do in fact circulate from hand to hand as the medium of exchange. (citations omitted.) -- Blacks Revised Fourth

It continues:

Quote
The term "money" is synonymous with "currency," and imports any currency, token, bank notes, and other circulating medium in general use as the representative of value. (citations omitted)

Don't argue with me. Argue with the guy in the black robe. Maybe he will be impressed with your knowledge of legal jargon. I'm sure not.

This is so unnecessary. All it takes is a rational survey of the terminology and issues, and an agreement on which terms are proper to describe Bitcoin.

But everybody is such an expert...


Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: To Magical Tux
by
silverman
on 23/06/2011, 04:02:33 UTC
Personally I think a proactive approach to countering claims made by those two senators is a good thing. I am glad someone did it.

My point was that this thread was about the malicious trade and not about Tux's letter to the DEA.
But I see you like to twist words and sentences out of their original context, good luck with that, but I have got better things to do.

What letter? The Goxmeister is bringing in the DEA now?!!

This guy is a loose cannon. First he gives away the customer database and passwords, and now he's bringing in the DEA???

Whisky tango foxtrot. I want to see that letter!

Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Opening a BitCoin exchange is futile - ready why
by
silverman
on 22/06/2011, 22:44:24 UTC
Lets just for a moment pretend that someone succeeds making an exchange with the following attributes

- Safe
- Stable
- Secure
- Has no thoughts of stealing money or scamming its user

Lets pretend that the exchange runs just fine for months after months. It even exceeds the turnover and stability that MtGox ever had, and it does that successfully for a long time.

The portal allows for Dwolla, Liberty Reserve and Wire (Iban/SWIFT/BIC) transfers.

Under the rules of the current world that we live in, administrating any form of financial business requires approval and requires the so-called institution to register with the respective financial authority of the country it is residing in. In well known cases this can be FSA (UK), SEC (USA) or any equivalent financial authority.

Operating an exchange platform would mean that money has to move through it (third party funds) and stored on a medium of exchange (a bank) which would be operating in a country (thus being regulated by a financial authority).

Therefore I dont see how anyone successfully, long term, and stable (from a regulatory point of view) would be able to operate without downtime.

While it is true that funds are secured once they reach the BitCoin network, it is also true that the greatest challenge we face is the exchange medium which has to be both stable and reliable in many aspects. The technology part is only one of them. At the end of the day receiving third party funds is where the heavy battle lies.

And unless someone with a license steps into the BitCoin exchange game, and more or less jeopardize their license (due to the fact nobody knows how a government would intervene against a regulated exchange).

So what is our solution? Some rich individual humouring the BitCoin society by testing the waters, or a governmental body in a country stamping BitCoin as an allowed crypto currency and exchange medium (the latter being unreasonable to think would happen).

I dont see any of the two happening, and thus I see a bit problem with BitCoin. Without a stabile price, or price fluctuation it will just be a shadow currency, where exchanging money in and out from will be harder than just purchasing the equivalent in diamonds and getting on a plane or whatever is required to move money anonymously.

OP, you correctly identify the exchange as the weak point of the Bitcoin system. The King does not like competition, and will come down on the exchanges with every tool in his kingdom.

Just wait until The King makes it profitable to rat on exchanges! Do you see any tools here today?





Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Is There A Good Reason To Still Be Calling BTC Money/Currency?
by
silverman
on 22/06/2011, 22:18:21 UTC
For the moment, at least, bitcoin is recognized (legally) as more of a product or commodity....

"Product or commodity" gives BTC a much better chance of being legal in many countries, so why does our official site/wiki still call it money/currency?
Another option could be "trading units" or anything else related to barter.

Is There A Good Reason To Still Be Calling BTC Money/Currency?

You have no idea how hard I fought this one back in the "early days" of Bitcoin, but I got hooted down. The Bitcoin community has stepped in shit up to its ankles, and there's no way to wipe it off now.

Bitcoin is a program, it is an algorithm, it is a convenience to keep the community's accounts in order.

Bitcoin is not money, it is not cash, it is not dollars, it is not currency, it is not legal tender. These are buzzwords the Establishment uses to keep their franchises safe from competition.

Bitcoin is not "worth" Dollars, or Euros, or Pogs. But it can be traded for them.

There was no good reason to misuse any of the above loaded terms. There were plenty of other options. But the Bitcoin community was invincible, and could call things whatever they damn well wanted.

Now that the Bitcoin community has brought in "The Authorities" to solve their dumbass error of divulging customer identities on Mt.Gox. We will see just how shortsighted this policy of tweaking the nose of the legal system will turn out to be.



Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: To Magical Tux
by
silverman
on 22/06/2011, 13:49:29 UTC
I'm not mad at MtGox for getting hacked. They're a huge target and in some ways a hack was inevitable. They've handled the hack as well as possible with the shutdown, audit and rollback.

However, I have a BIG PROBLEM with MtGox contacting the CIA or FBI or whoever. It's bad enough that I have to worry about whoever getting my information from the leaked database. Now I have to worry about the Feds looking through my account and coming for my bitcoins? Hell no...

This isn't the first time that MtGx has considered running to the Feds:
http://www.forexyard.com/en/news/Bitcoin-exchanges-offer-anti-money-laundering-aid-2011-06-15T220113Z

If you think that the Feds are friends of BTC or that their involvement is going to help the BTC community in any way, then you're sorely mistaken.

MagicalTux, don't be a stupid snitch. Improve your security and learn your lesson, otherwise I'll be joining the tradehill exodus....

MagicalTux, first you gave away the keys to the store. Then you brought in "the authorities", who will be using every bit of information they can gather against this Bitcoin community. And you are less than forthcoming about what actually happened. You might want to consider what would happen if you were to make these little mistakes in Chicago of the '20s, or maybe in Central America today.

I lost nothing, and certainly do not call for violence. I do hope that you will lose every Bitcoin you ever gained, hand over the Mt.Gox project to someone who is competent, understand what a fuckup you are, and live a long and happy life.





Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Give MtGox a break
by
silverman
on 21/06/2011, 14:47:08 UTC
I think I agree with the rollback. I'm not really sure.

But I won't give Mt.Gox a break because :

1. They gave away private customer information to an outside party, who then spread it across the net.

2. They apparently have called in some authority who will doubtless be asking for even more information.

3. Have not been as transparent with us about these issues as they have been with those who might use the information to take down Bitcoin and us Bitcoin users.

Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Who has the authority?
by
silverman
on 21/06/2011, 14:28:15 UTC
The concept of fraud seems beyond the OP.  Either that, or he believes in a world where nobody can go after anyone legally for fraud.


And the question is who has the authority to prosecute?

I think it's not a good idea to give anyone that authority, especially one of the world's present governments, but that's just my opinion.

Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Protest against new moderation rules
by
silverman
on 21/06/2011, 14:19:36 UTC
Quote
You own a gun, I don't. I need society to keep me safe because I simply don't want to pack heat, I'm not familiar with it, and never have been attracted to firearms, but I respect anyone who chooses to own one.

Now I know for a fact that there is at-least one person in your life you care about who doesn't own a gun, and you rely on the system that we currently live in, to protect your loved ones. You see they may not own a gun , but people who own LOTS of guns are only 15 seconds away with a 3 digit phone call. You claiming independence from our governmental system is like a bee claiming independence from it's hive, it can sting once and die, but if it calls for help the bee triples it's power.

Thread hijack. I have no problem with something like this being deleted.

I may or may not agree with the subject, but the form is improper, and only adds to the noise level.

Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Who has the authority?
by
silverman
on 21/06/2011, 14:09:44 UTC
A contract is a contract. Its form is irrelevant.

If the parties do not agree that the contract has been fulfilled, who you gonna call, Ghostbusters?

I think it is stupid to call in the government. Look at the mess they have made with their own fiat money.

But it seems that half of the people here will not be happy until Big Brother comes to settle their arguments.

Too bad they won't stick with their own fucked-up money and legal system, and leave Bitcoin alone.

Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Protest against new moderation rules
by
silverman
on 21/06/2011, 13:42:58 UTC
Well, I AM somewhat libertarian, and I agree with the OP. Valid comment is being spiked, while juvenile babbling is left untouched. I can tell the difference, and I wish the mods could too!

Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: MtGox flash-crash rollback - Requesting full disclosure or referal to SEC/JSDA
by
silverman
on 21/06/2011, 13:36:13 UTC
Referral to SEC/JSDA, huh?

If you wanted to kill off Bitcoin, what more could you do than to call in Big Government?

I wish you folks would just stay with the fucked up Federal Reserve/Euro system that you allowed to happen, and just leave Bitcoin alone.


Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: MtGox should be arrested
by
silverman
on 21/06/2011, 02:54:03 UTC
If the police are involved, then a case number should be provided...

2.  Nobody forced anyone to use MtGox!  The issue here is the one between MtGox and the hacker...

Don't we wish!

Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: MtGox should be arrested
by
silverman
on 21/06/2011, 02:46:15 UTC
This is potentially a 5-10m heist.  No one knows what's going on.  

This should open up lawsuits and criminal proceedings.  We don't know if MtGox stole it or what his intentions were.  We don't know ANYTHING.

You guys are blind religious fanatics for trusting this idiot.  I hope he contacts the FBI.  He's at least negligent and worst, a criminal.

We already have criminal proceedings in process against whoever did the hack.

First, that was a really stupid thing to do; to give out our privileged account information to outsiders, to be spread across the internet.

Second, to expose the Bitcoin community to the authority of the state.

Third, I call Royal Bullshit on you, MagicalTux: Name the jurisdiction and venue, or it didn't happen.

Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Should the "I'm MtGox, here's my side" have been locked?
by
silverman
on 21/06/2011, 02:35:10 UTC
Should the "I'm MtGox, here's my side" thread have been locked?

I say no! We were starting to get to some issues that Mt. Gox tried to soft-pedal.

Like giving away the customer info, to have it spread across the internet. Like "calling in the authorities". Who the hell are they? Do we want them subpoenaing around for more?

Why doesn't the admin just ban Synaptic, and instantly remove half the juvenile content of this forum?

Questions, questions.




Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Cash4Bitcoins - the Mt. Gox Alternative
by
silverman
on 21/06/2011, 02:07:37 UTC
I know you're just having fun, but your "alternative company" is too close to the name one of our most venerated, and reliable vendors. Can you change it?

-----

On a totally different note, I think that everyone here will agree that Synaptic is an obnoxious little prick. Can we vote for him to go away?


Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: eBay Deleting All Bitcoin Listings
by
silverman
on 20/06/2011, 14:46:17 UTC
Since major brands now have "stores" on eBay...

I cannot boycott any business who does business with eBay.

However, what you and I CAN do is:

(1)    Scream it far and wide.  Tell EVERYONE you come in contact with about how evil eBay-PayPal is.   How they seize your money and never return it... for no reason at all.

(2)     If you do browse eBay, there's always a way to contact the seller directly.  Get their contact information.   Tell the seller that you REFUSE to do business through the eBay or PayPal system.  Tell them you insist on taking your business out of ( bypassing ) eBay-Paypal's evil claws.

(3)     Never never never pay fees to eBay or PayPal.   Never buy a listing on eBay.  And certainly, never attach any bank account to PayPal.

Support the blooming new alternatives springing up fast now.

See http://bitcoinme.com and the Shopping tab.


+1

Ebay = PayPal = Federal Reserve lackey

Bring on the "the blooming new alternatives",  please!


Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Warning: Bitcoin4Cash trades cancelled! Won't do business with Madhatter again.
by
silverman
on 20/06/2011, 14:33:39 UTC
I'm sorry for all the grief you receive, The Madhatter, for providing your service. It's the penalty you pay for being useful.

Now, you'll have a new crapload of complications with this Mt. Gox thing. I sure hope you don't get discouraged. You've been straight with me in the past, and I'd like to do more trades with you in the future!

silverman

Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Hacking MT GOX = Robbing The Federal Reserve. IDIOTS!
by
silverman
on 20/06/2011, 13:15:58 UTC
Dumb analogy.

Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Organize class-action suit if our BTC and/or $$$ is gone after MtGox is back up
by
silverman
on 20/06/2011, 00:11:58 UTC

Freaking BRILLIANT idea of the month, TKE406!

Maybe we can have the Feds regulate the rest of the Bitcoin industry too?