I can't believe how good I have started this round. With Edmonton win and Reims losing I now have four out of five possible points. I can't remember when was the last time I started a round in this way. I'm also leading 4-2 against imarios. There are still three different answers so I can lose, but I hope that this two point lead will be enough for me to secure the win.


Don't let bad score bring you down. The season lasts long enough for you to make a comeback. I was in your situation, but I don't give up. In the first season I went from division 2 to division 1 without one loss. And then after only one season in division 1, I fell down all the way to division 3.

Kako se može prepoznati bez otvaranja uređaja? Jedino po tome što nema upozorenja u Trezor aplikaciji? Jer "obični" korisnici sigurno neće otvarati uređaj, a netko tko prvi put koristi Trezor sigurno ne zna da se treba pojaviti neko upozorenje. Čak niti ja koji imam Trezor (ali ga koristim vrlo rijetko) nemam pojma o kojem upozorenju se radi.

Takve stvari treba kupovati samo i isključivo izravno od proizvođača. Vjerujem da u našim trgovinama u Hrvatskoj nema lažnih uređaja ali nikad ne možeš biti previše oprezan.

I agree. I don't follow basketball and I really don't like watching it because almost every touch is a foul. That's more like a ballet to me than a sport. But when I have no idea about which answer to choose, I rely on past games. Especially when there is a couple of games played recently.

So, Oklahoma crushed Minnesota by winning 124-94. That means they covered -8,5 handicap and Gilgeous-Alexander scored 34 points (over 30,5). That result gave me my second point for the LMS and an important one point advantage in this round against imarios.

Looking at the past games against Minnesota, I'm not sure why so many of you went with Oklahoma covering -8,5 handicap and Gilgeous-Alexander scoring under 30,5 points. In all four games that Oklahoma won, Gilgeous-Alexander scored over 30,5 points so it was a no-brainer for me to go with that option.

Wow, it's funny that no one realized that there is a mistake in the question. We all probably didn't think about it and calculated that the "less than 8" includes 8 games. At least that is how I saw that answer. But it's fair to void the question if the correct answer is the one no one could have selected.

Ja kad pogledam javne grupe na Telegramu, ide mi na povraćanje. Kakve su to nebuloze i gluposti tamo... Ajde još poneka privatna grupa gdje je par desetaka ljudi. Ali grupe s nekoliko tisuća članova... To se odmah stiša i ne gleda. Tamo budem eventualno ako ganjam neki airdrop pa mi ostane. S vremena na vrijeme počistim Telegram i Discord grupe kad mi postane baš jako nepregledno. Ne sjećam se kad sam zadnji put otvorio bilo koju grupu koja ima više od cca 50 članova.

Ma siguran sam da ovdje ima jako puno naših ljudi koji samo čitaju i ne upuštaju se u diskusije. Pogotovo u zadnjih godinu-dvije kad nam lokalna sekcija više izgleda kao razgovor između frendova u kafiću nego kao rasprava na forumu. Ali to je tako kad nas ima malo pa svi znaju otprilike kako tko razmišlja.

Damn, Botafogo won the game 1-0 and I chose "both to score" so I lose that point. Luckily imarios went with "Universidad does not lose" so no one gets a point here. Since the second question is the same, I'll be looking for the result of Oklahoma game 5 to get my first point in this round. We have five more different answers so anything can happen.

Stvarno jesmo. Ali opet, kad pogledaš koliko je teško nešto promijeniti ili dobiti na forumu, super da imamo ovaj naš lokalni thread. Iako bi možda bolje bilo da se cijela sekcija zove Balkans (jer nismo svi iz Hrvatske). Bacio sam oko na srpski i slovenski thread i moram priznati da me malo razočaralo koliko se malo piše u slovenskom threadu. Nekako sam dojma da je Slovenija dosta ispred nas po razvoju kriptovaluta pa sam nekako očekivao da će thread biti aktivniji.

Srpski thread je aktivniji od slovenskog ali koliko vidim, tamo pišu sveprisutni katanic97 i examplens od "naših" članova ovdje i iv4n kojega nisam vidio da piše ovdje.

Jao kad se samo sjetim tog trenutka kad je uveden Merit sustav. Koji je to kaos nastao... Nas 10-tak u lokalnoj sekciji svi Full memberi i slično, jedan Merit source (mislim da je bio Regulus ili Daniel, nisam siguran). Baš je bilo teško napredovati.

You are right, I didn't know that the player pays the fee when withdrawing. But you are the one who brought it up so I thought that SwC covers the fee. As for the first part of your post, I don't want to get into why someone is playing poker and how much money he/she spends on it. I was just stating the fact that $10 is not worth the same in every part of the world.

Well, you can never know what amount of money is too high for someone. For example, $10 can be a month worth of salary in some parts of the world while in other parts it's barely enough to buy a cup of coffee. Since the Bitcoin network is not that clogged anymore and the fee is low, I think it would be great if they lower the minimum amount needed to withdraw.

When I see an example in the question, I always consider it as a trap. You can never rely on mafia to give us any sort of help I hate DOTA and all eSport questions but luckily we get only one question every few rounds. It's best just to write off that point and move on. That's what I do

Evo, upravo sam u onom Rikafipovom threadu o statistici lokalne sekcije najavio pohod na vrh liste najaktivnijih članova. Iako nisam baš siguran da ću uspjeti obzirom koliko je katanic97 aktivan (btw, sorry na tolikom spominjanju ako imaš Telegram bota aktivnog ).


Obzirom da u kampanji nemam minimalni broj postova, nisam baš siguran koliko je pametno kladiti se na mene.

Ajde, ajde... Dok nije došao katanic97, stalno ste se žalili kako nam je lokalni board zamro jer manje pišem nego inače. Evo, sad imamo par mlađih aktivnih članova, ja sam opet u kampanji i najavljujem svoj pohod na vrh. Iako, kad vidim količinu postova koje katanic97 napiše u mjesec dana, neće biti lako. Ali potrudit ću se

Thank you for this opportunity. I'm happy to be a part of this campaign.

That's truly commendable! Bitcointalk remains the OG forum for crypto enthusiasts, and staying engaged here is a smart and respectful move for any Bitcoin-focused platform - especially a poker site like SwC. This forum continues to attract both seasoned crypto veterans and newcomers looking for guidance, so maintaining a presence here is not just good business, it's the right thing to do.

Očito su procijenili da će im se isplatiti. Iako, netko tko zna što je hardware wallet vrlo vjerojatno ima iskustva s kripto prevarama tako da teško da će nasjesti. Ali opet, hardware wallet se koristi za long-term hold veće količine kripta. Da im samo 1% od deset tisuća poslanih pisama uspije, vrlo vjerojatno bi prevara višestruko vratila uloženu lovu i trud.

Najbolji savjet kad se radi o vlastitom walletu (bilo hardware walletu ili "običnom" walletu poput Metamaska) je da nikad, ali baš nikad ne treba ništa potvrđivati. To je tvoj wallet i bez pritiska na gumb na hardware walletu ili upisivanja seed phrase-a ne možeš izgubiti lovu. Kad se to shvati, onda je lako zaključiti da proizvođač walleta nikad neće tražiti da išta potvrdiš.

Čovječe... Evo i mene konačno u kampanji koja se plaća i to s uvjetima koji mi odgovaraju. Nema minimalnog broja postova, broje se lokalni postovi... Baš sam ugodno iznenađen i neka kampanja potraje...

Username: slackovic
BTC Address (bech32): bc1qqj35f6qlgvvapkxhlkgvpz8dwrhd7fvdch486j