Announcment :

On the 31st of January, 2019, MOAC Mainnet Chain received a so called 51% attack between block 1796517 and 1796972. The attack was from a well-known MOAC mining pool BYLT.GQ. In the past, the hashrate of this pool was about 5% of all MOAC network. Between the UTC time 2019-01-31 8am and 10am, this mining pool manipulated the network for a short period of time. BYLT.GQ disconnected its mining nodes from the Mainnet and then loaded with around 600GH/s of calculation hashpower to its mining nodes for about 153 blocks. Then, it connected back to the Mainnet for about 20mins and launched a similar manipulation again. Totally, it mined 259 blocks and replaced about 186 blocks during the period.

The MOAC team quickly noticed this incident and contacted the owner of the BYLT.GQ. We received responds from the BYLT.GQ pool soon after we contacted them. BYLT.GQ claimed to perform this attack to help MOAC network to be aware of this weakness. They also issued an announcement on their website about this attack (https://moac.bylt.gq).

The MOAC team had been working on solution against this kind of attack already. We fully understand the situation and its impact. This incident will speed up our progress. We will release an update promptly and share our approach with community. We thank for BYLT.GQ and its owner @artdoe (telegram id) by providing this warning.

We also contacted the exchanges and notified them about the attack. So far, we did not identify any double spending or fraudulent transactions during this period.

For teams with applications running on MOAC Mainnet network, some of them may found their applications were briefly impacted by the attack during the 2 hours of the attack, such as delay of the transaction or revert of some of the contract call. The MOAC explorer experienced some data display error for the information during this short period. The MOAC team will continue investigate the incident and keep the community updated. Again, we will release an update to protect against similar attack in the future.

So stimulating the use of CLO to speed up the audit of smart contracts is not your priority?

P.S.
About github.
I know for sure that the developers sent 3 smart contracts, which the senders of  can confirm by sending ETH from the addresses of the creators. They do not have and never had a github account. They have registered specifically for this.
If you had more desire to find clients, then you would have found out with them in the correspondence.
I will not invite anyone else (until you figure it out).

Here is what I read on github:

Order a market research from specialists. You have the means.

In my understanding, the investor is right. They are more than a thousand times. This investors are the main customers of this project!

Or did you decide to make a school of programmers? And your goal is to point out the mistakes of newcomers and thereby increase the number of good specialists?

P.S.
I'll make a last effort to work with you. I'll order contextual advertising. If, after orders from there, you refuse to pay under the pretext that it is not the developers ordered, then I'm sorry, I'll write everything that I think about it.

can someone please show us where to get an updated roadmap for this coin (whitepaper if available but i really don't care about that at this point).

also, is CLO pushing for exchange adds?  lol this coin is nothing but dead since launch as it has the usual pnd, just like ETC pumped once this was hype and then etc dumped to shit too LOL.  so much useless shit if nothing gets done. so let's see some results.

The purpose of audit of smart contracts is to create a large queue of orders in order for customers to buy CLO for placement on a deposit in order to speed up the audit of their smart contract?
If YES, then why do you prevent me from creating this queue?

If some error prevents the development of the project, then you must correct it.

It will be fair if the investor checks the suspicious project before investing.

Note: Don't know if that is November 2018 or what? . But overall, that article is useful and full of good sense about the Callisto network activity. This will be the most easiest way to understand the system itself, well done!

I have never seen a worst negative marketing plan than this. This person does not seem to know that Google Adwords have started banning cryptocurrency advertisements and Facebook stopped since the start of 2018.

Прошу прощения за грубость, но не слишком ли жирно 10%???
Вы, конечно без сомнения,  ребята с достаточно высокой репутацией... Но 10 - это какая-то дикая цифра. Может быть она чем-то обусловлена? Чем-то более разумным, нежели банальная жажда наживы и значков доллара в глазах.