Quote from: GraBitCoin on August 23, 2018, 06:56:43 PM

Quote from: sneg5555 on August 23, 2018, 06:44:01 PM

Quote from: ANTIMANIA on August 21, 2018, 04:44:16 AM

Here is what I read on github:

Quote

yuriy77k commented 13 hours ago
If you interesting in audit this project http://tradelize.com you can ask their team to make request for our free audit. If it's not a scam they will agree, in other way no audit needed.

@AmirSlavo

AmirSlavo commented an hour ago
@yuriy77k They will tell me that the audit is conducted and will give a link to their company of auditors or which they bought. And what would you advise further, oh my "smart" friend? Maybe you're an expert in the audit, but as an analyst you're shit.
Free advice. Order the research in a good analytical company. Let them advise you, programming geniuses, on what clients you need to count on. Several hundred developers or several hundred thousand investors? If for you the answer is unobvious!

Order a market research from specialists. You have the means.

In my understanding, the investor is right. They are more than a thousand times. This investors are the main customers of this project!

Or did you decide to make a school of programmers? And your goal is to point out the mistakes of newcomers and thereby increase the number of good specialists?

P.S.
I'll make a last effort to work with you. I'll order contextual advertising. If, after orders from there, you refuse to pay under the pretext that it is not the developers ordered, then I'm sorry, I'll write everything that I think about it.

As it was mentioned on our white paper, and on our site: We doing audits for developers not for investors.

We can't and won't audit smart contracts without direct connection with the developer. Our disclosure policy clearly states that critical vulnerabilities should be reported to the smart contract developer.

When you asking us for the audit of smart contact for the third party, you basically pushing us to help hackers doing free security research and making them available for the general public.

To make it clear: we do not audit smart contracts by third-party requests.

So stimulating the use of CLO to speed up the audit of smart contracts is not your priority?

P.S.
About github.
I know for sure that the developers sent 3 smart contracts, which the senders of can confirm by sending ETH from the addresses of the creators. They do not have and never had a github account. They have registered specifically for this.
If you had more desire to find clients, then you would have found out with them in the correspondence.
I will not invite anyone else (until you figure it out).

I've told you many times, in plain English. Our priority - security for blockchain ecosystem, in particular: free smart contract audits for developers.

Are you kidding? Smart contract developer running ICO, and never had a GitHub account?

I would rather block your affiliate account for fraudulent attempts, then believe in such bs.

sneg5555

Posts

Merits