Lol, people are submitting KYC to no name companies for a $5 worth of tokens airdrop and they would even be willing to send a DNA and sperm sample for $25 and you're asking if they would perform KYC for a few thousand or even tens of thousands in winnings, comparing that to actually losing money?

Is this even a question in the reality around nowadays?  

Well, I got my win, the chain of suffering is broken, and I did not expect it at all, the moment he had to give back the 1st place I thought it was over but, well, seems like something did change, I don't know what but it won't make me double down on another win this season.

Now, on the McLaren move, this bs has to stop, they are turning the whole thing into a farce.

You have to love it...
-Round one, Inter beats the crap out of Torino, huray for Chivu, he started well, he knows the team, he was a good choice
-Round two, Inter loses with Udine, oh, Chivu is young, is inexperienced, Inter made a mistake..

At this point, I'm almost cheering to see Inter lose one game with 3-0 then win one with 4-0, just to see the mood swing on this topic, cause right now it's more entertaining than the actual games themselves.

Lol, so they can't write transfer to person X in their expenditure, but they can freely write taken from X in the revenue column?
How could this be considered even remotely legal, taking money from strangers but KYCing them when they need to be paid?

You are either KYC-free or you request every document before allowing people to deposit, choose one!


Those rules don't apply to deposits? Or are AML rules only when you have to pay winnings? 
I really want to hear one case of a non-KYC casino that prevented one guy from depositing because of suspicious behaviour, one example!

Neither do the bookies!
I'm glad I bet as always on his win and didn't have to take him at 2.90.
It's still Lando at 2.35, Max at 2.90 and Oscar at 3.20, probably the closest ever a top 3 was this season.

I will look a bit into the specials, some insurance if he doesn't win, the single bet on McLaren at 1.45 is not attractive enough, some H2H but the odds are so low for almost everyone, Leclerc is just  1.17 against Hamilton, there must be something of value in there..

First thing, why in the name of God would you do that?
The main problem is that withdrawals can be delayed and the address will expire in some mixers even as quickly as 24 hours, some in 72. If the casino takes longer than that to process it, your money is gone.

Then, it offers no advantage. You can simply withdraw to a different fresh address every time and then send those to the mixer address. Since the mixer itself will have one collection transaction for your funds, there will be at least three hops between the withdrawals and the actual mixing process. That is pretty hard for anyone to keep track of, especially if you use that address from time to time to deposit to an instant exchange or something like that.

Which is illegal anyhow, Casinos could write whatever they want in the ToS that doesn't mean a thing in court.
They could for example, add that in case of multiple winnings, they will only pay in cash at their home office, so if you win over 10k, you need to fly to Curacao, would that be legal just because they wrote it in their ToS? 


If a casino can accept money from a stranger without KYC, then they can also pay that stranger the winnings without KYC. It is selective scamming, fishing for people who will not be able to provide such documents or who, for various reasons, have problems with their papers. For example, I had no utility bill in my name for a while, since while we were finishing the new house we stayed at my wife's previous apartment for three months. If they had demanded such a document during that time, I would have had nothing to offer.

It's not laziness, it's greed!

Not all people who are looking for quick money are lazy, the problem is the possible reward, if someone manages to triple his money in two days no way he will look at 3 months' worth of work and say it's the same thing, he will obviously choose gambling as long as he makes money from it, gambling hasn't risen to be such a problem in soem countries becuase people were lazy it has to do with the amoutns you cna get from working and the amoutn you can theroreticlayy get from gambling and in no scenario could those two compare.

I am profitable from horse racing, I could probably earn more by increasing the betting amounts, but I would still not quit my job, not because I am such a working guy that likes to work, but because I would need hundreds of thousands in a bankroll to match what I get from working for my company.

Wow, so Italy beats Estonia with 5-0 , after not managing to score a single goal in the first half and suddenly they are world champions material again...
It's Estonia!!!!

The team that got beaten 5-1 by Poland, 5-0 by Belgium, 5-0 by Sweden and 5-0 by the Netherlands...and 2-0 by Azerbaijan of all things!!!
At least let's wait for the match against Israel, beat them by a wide margin as they normally should beat a team that has never qualified to the WC since 1970!!!!!

That's the thing, the list is available for every casino in the country.
It's not different from how those lists work in the EU or US, so you don't need to hack any government central server, you just need one licensed casino to gain access to that, so any rogue employee could have done so.

It has nothing to do with centralization, everyone should be able to check if the name of any of their customers is on that list, so you can't make it secret!

It would make no difference, and also the site is not a mirror, if it were one, you could log in with your normal betpanda account, which you can't, as I tried it just now!

And speaking of banned gambling in Japan, I find it funny that they actually do have the bets odds for Japan's horse racing, one of the few things for which gambling is not banned in Japan, too  so bad I need to wake up at 6 am to bet on them:

Take look at any casino that has a ticker with the latest bets, high rollers and so on, barely any Bitcoin users and a lot of USDT, Bitcoin betting has decreased when the fees were through the roof and it hasn't come back again, poeple like that 1 usdt =1 usd, the fees are low, transfers are nearly instant and they really don't care about anythign else, privacy matters close to nothign these days and anyhow, what privacy when you complete KYC after KYC with the worst and worst requirements these days.


Volatility goes both ways, it could easily be worth 120$ and if someone were able to predict a 20% they would be making millions from shorting it rather than gambling.

Completely irrelevant!

First, a lot of casinos are partners with different companies to take care of the KYC process, Veriff, Idenfy, Netverify and many others, so if an established casino migrates to a newer KYC check service, how would you even quantify this?

Actually, I would rather be a bit concerned if the casino is doing those checks on themselves, how are they even doing this in the first place?

Lol...So:
- guy signs papers without knowing English
- plays a total of 1.5 billion at a casino
- does all this between 2007 and 2021
- he is disguising his payments to avoid AML controls

Yeah, right, he also didn't know a word in English when he bought properties and land and run a business there for a decade?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14350543/fame-cove-nsw-mid-north-coast.html

Well, considering that every top team beat the other with 3-0 with the exception of the Paraguay Ecuador match in which both were on a qualifying position, it's really hard to see these results as anything, if we exclude Venezuela and Bolivia, the rest are playing just for the sake of playing the match and go home.


It's called qualification for a reason, if you had top-tier teams paying against each other right now what would be the point of the cup itself anymore?

Nowadays, nobody should treat that bonus like something that can be even remotely profitable anymore, just as free credits to play more, you deposit x, play with the x and hope that after destroying it in a few rounds, your luck will change when you play with real money.As I rarely play slots and only sports and those are sometimes not even counted or are just taken 20% of the bet as a wagering requirement, even in a 30x in 14 days is impossible, especially if you also cap the max bet to 20 or 25.

Fortunately, they have a good odds provider for horse racing, so I guess this is where I'm going to lose my sig money for a while.

And that would have been a terrible idea since in the last four matches the score was twice 1-1 and 2-0, so you would have had a lot of time with over 2.5, you would have half lost half the time with BTTS, 
Also, one bet will not be counted as
- Liverpool winning means at least one more goal than Manchester
- BTTS means Manchester must score, so Liverpool will have to score at least twice, 1+2 > 2.5
An over 2.5 bet here is useless

What censorship are you talk about?
The newspaper said that the name have been released, if the hacker had had anything else they would have also shown a bit of those, that's how all hacks that brag about do, share a "sample" of the hack with a few names with all the details.
Since they only showed the names and all of them, then it means no IDs were also collected alongside this.

This is not about restrictions, such lists exist in all countries or at least should exist in all, probably there are some shithoes out there that don't give a damn about this, the only problem is that a list which should have been confidential has been leaked. One good thing is that the article talks only about names, not IDs, so if it's only the name, the whole thing is negligible, I mean,  I don't think that in a country with 110 million people there are too many people that don't share both names with each other.

Closer to zero than 1%..

The only advantage for it is the choice, but you have to be damn sure about some things, not just that one team would win, but it will do so with more or fewer goals or you know something about how teams play during each half, but in all seriosness, if you're able to read that much in a single game you could probbaly do for more than one, and just stick with a way less riskier parlay full of handicaps.

I could count on my fingers the number of games I was that confident about something in a game and the betbuilder would give me anything close to a 2x  to a way more secure and comfortable single bet.