Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 213 results by sunndil
Yes I think it is very important now as the majority of the hash power will be switched to the 2x chain. We need to show support for the core and our true bitcoin, we cannot be threatened by the miners to turn off the power from the main chain. If we will ignore 2x they will just come back to the real bitcoin, people should panic, we don't need that 80% of power. The difficulty will be adjusted after some time and everything will go back to normal.
The TRUE Bitcoin is the only REAL, TRUE money!
And if you control your private keys it IS indeed your only REAL money!!
And your real FREEDOM in this (to a very large extent) material would!
So I'm absolutely sure that running Bitcoin Core Full node, donating those 200 Gb free hdd space and some other tiny hardware donations - all that is just nothing compared to the Bitcoin's true value and prospects!!
Time for us to stand in solidarity with core. I am running those nodes on 3 computers - my small contribution. And everyone should. If you think this is not a big deal, you don't understand the powers at play here. 2x is an attempt to take over btc and if we don't be loud and clear, we will lose it for ever.
I don't believe Segwit2x is an "attack". It was, at first, an intent of a compromise. And the NYA folks most are businesses that very probably want to move Bitcoin forward - payment processors, wallet services etc. - and I think the reason they signed the NYA is that most of them (except miners/pools) would benefit from low transaction fees.
But I think that regarding the latest news, the most pragmatic stance is to support the Core/1MB chain while being careful with the private keys and treating the 2X chain as an altcoin.
Only if the Core chain really is attacked (double spending/51%) it is likely to succeed, and that would harm the whole ecosystem (and you should get out for a whole while of all the cryptocurrency stuff if you aren't a die-hard fan/hodler). According to the latest news a Segwit2x victory has a very low probability if even Coinbase doesn't use the BTC symbol for it.
Garzik's ICO may be another indication that he's not full-time dedicated to 2x and a loss of the Core manpower would be very problematic.
But I think that regarding the latest news, the most pragmatic stance is to support the Core/1MB chain while being careful with the private keys and treating the 2X chain as an altcoin.
Only if the Core chain really is attacked (double spending/51%) it is likely to succeed, and that would harm the whole ecosystem (and you should get out for a whole while of all the cryptocurrency stuff if you aren't a die-hard fan/hodler). According to the latest news a Segwit2x victory has a very low probability if even Coinbase doesn't use the BTC symbol for it.
Garzik's ICO may be another indication that he's not full-time dedicated to 2x and a loss of the Core manpower would be very problematic.
You have ignored the deliberate non implementation of replay attack. Do these guys realise that they are fucking with other peoples money. And this is not an attack!!?
Jeff Garzik: Today, bitcoin faces existential threats from forks, developer drama and so on. Knowing what we know and having a clean sheet of paper, we asked what would we build and the answer is this.
Some one please remind him he is criticising the drama he has created and shilling his new ico. Yeah, "probably want to move Bitcoin forward" - Garzik will laughing to the banks reading such shit.
I do not see that core's has any tenable objection to 2X.
[1] Tech has moved on, 2mb is not that big, HD space and bandwidth are much cheaper
[1] Tech has moved on, 2mb is not that big, HD space and bandwidth are much cheaper
Quote
2x is a "physical" blocksize increase to 4-6MB, not just 2MB. Regular SegWit already leads to 2-3MB blocks.
Thanks just to clarify, when I say 2x, I know segwit gives effective size, but I mean the commitment to make base blocks bigger so we can really make the "spammers" run ou of money and keep on chain fees lower, and give consumer choice.
[2] BCH has proved you can go bigger blocks and have significant value network, and BCH network has not collapsed.
Quote
BCH has barely any blocks that are larger than 50k because there are hardly any transactions being made, so it hasn't proven anything so far.
ok....I guess as far as it goes the network has no catastrophically died....I think there have be a few 8mb blocks or something mined, but your right not a real stress test
[3] It provides choice as to on chain or of chain transactions
Quote
Regular SegWit does as well.
your right....I should rephrase that that the price for on chain would be less. Also on point what then isentivices miners as block reward drops if they don't have enough transactions on chain?
[4] there is no such thing as spam in the network, but I will use the word "spam" as shorthand for transactions person A does not like.
Quote
Spam is defined as transactions that are made explicitely for the purpose of clogging up the network, akin to DDoS requests. While to my knowledge there's little "hard" proof that spam transaction exists, they are not simply "transactions person A does not like."
I don't quite buy that definition. I see a transaction as away to signal to the market. Just because someone wants to send a different signal does not make it less valid, then your transaction. But as I said I will use the moniker "spam" for ease of conversation
[5] If you say go 8 times the blocksize and 1/2 the price for fees it will be 4 times more costly to "spam" a block while providing much lower fees. Given there are limited bitcoins, the spammer will run out of BTC to spam.
Quote
Agreed.
Yeah I see this as a way of quickly running spammers out of funds, by allowing more people to signal and so get information to the market.
I welcome any discussion as why I am in error, but as it stand to not 2x then a few years later 4x and so on, seem in bad faith by core. It forces the question cui bono?
Quote
Problem being, that this approach would require a hardfork any time a block size increase takes place. While it went fairly OK with BCH, a hardfork is always a risky endeavour.
Your right hardforks have risks, I "feel" though that not hard forking can have risks of stultification. I wonder if some sort of dynamic scaling would allay your hard for concerns.
Thanks for your considered opinions by the way. I like it when you address point by point.
And it is not about not forking, but about forking without replay protection. That is a deliberate attack. So much for cherry coating 2x.
According to Coindance, almost all nodes still support Core. btc1 nodes (Segwit2x) have almost no one using it.
There's a difference between running a node with X software, and supporting the positions of the related development team.
Talking as if running software = support is something that needs to stop. It's not correct.
I run a bitcoin core node but I often do not agree with the decisions made by the core team. There aren't millions of clients to cater to everyone's minute differences of opinion, so it's not exactly easy to 'show' your support in this manner.
I will be running a full node for the first time in my life. That at least you would say is support. Also the discussion is not about supporting every decision or opinion of core (and core dev themselves differ virulently every now and then), but about 2x in particular.
Why Garzik scam ico? Will garzik be accepting 1b2x = 1btc for his ico. I know where i am dumping my b2x then
I do not see that core's has any tenable objection to 2X.
[1] Tech has moved on, 2mb is not that big, HD space and bandwidth are much cheaper
[2] BCH has proved you can go bigger blocks and have significant value network, and BCH network has not collapsed.
[3] It provides choice as to on chain or of chain transactions
[4] there is no such thing as spam in the network, but I will use the word "spam" as shorthand for transactions person A does not like.
[5] If you say go 8 times the blocksize and 1/2 the price for fees it will be 4 times more costly to "spam" a block while providing much lower fees. Given there are limited bitcoins, the spammer will run out of BTC to spam.
I welcome any discussion as why I am in error, but as it stand to not 2x then a few years later 4x and so on, seem in bad faith by core. It forces the question cui bono?
[1] Tech has moved on, 2mb is not that big, HD space and bandwidth are much cheaper
[2] BCH has proved you can go bigger blocks and have significant value network, and BCH network has not collapsed.
[3] It provides choice as to on chain or of chain transactions
[4] there is no such thing as spam in the network, but I will use the word "spam" as shorthand for transactions person A does not like.
[5] If you say go 8 times the blocksize and 1/2 the price for fees it will be 4 times more costly to "spam" a block while providing much lower fees. Given there are limited bitcoins, the spammer will run out of BTC to spam.
I welcome any discussion as why I am in error, but as it stand to not 2x then a few years later 4x and so on, seem in bad faith by core. It forces the question cui bono?
On your point 2, yeah anon miners mining empty blocks in significant value i suppose. Only think BCH has proved is no one cares for BTC forks. They are just another shit coin to most of us. Also, if you guys already have big blocks in BCH, why don't you go party there. Shouldn't this be simple. Big blockers got BCH and we got BTC. So now you want another big block fork!!?
I do not see that core's has any tenable objection to 2X.
[1] Tech has moved on, 2mb is not that big, HD space and bandwidth are much cheaper
[2] BCH has proved you can go bigger blocks and have significant value network, and BCH network has not collapsed.
[3] It provides choice as to on chain or of chain transactions
[4] there is no such thing as spam in the network, but I will use the word "spam" as shorthand for transactions person A does not like.
[5] If you say go 8 times the blocksize and 1/2 the price for fees it will be 4 times more costly to "spam" a block while providing much lower fees. Given there are limited bitcoins, the spammer will run out of BTC to spam.
I welcome any discussion as why I am in error, but as it stand to not 2x then a few years later 4x and so on, seem in bad faith by core. It forces the question cui bono?
[1] Tech has moved on, 2mb is not that big, HD space and bandwidth are much cheaper
[2] BCH has proved you can go bigger blocks and have significant value network, and BCH network has not collapsed.
[3] It provides choice as to on chain or of chain transactions
[4] there is no such thing as spam in the network, but I will use the word "spam" as shorthand for transactions person A does not like.
[5] If you say go 8 times the blocksize and 1/2 the price for fees it will be 4 times more costly to "spam" a block while providing much lower fees. Given there are limited bitcoins, the spammer will run out of BTC to spam.
I welcome any discussion as why I am in error, but as it stand to not 2x then a few years later 4x and so on, seem in bad faith by core. It forces the question cui bono?
Reading you first point, i am sure you have never run a full node. This is what 2x is only good at. Mis information or half baked knowledge.
i used to run core, but im worried about the 2x fork and what that means
will the 2x take over existing BTC chain? or will there be separate chain for the 2x fork?
will the 2x take over existing BTC chain? or will there be separate chain for the 2x fork?
the chain that will be chosen as the dominatn one is that with the most nodes running up. So if you support Bitcoin Core you must run a Bitcoin Core node and accept and check transactions with it.
good luck
Yes. Take an old computer and run a node. Thousands of people should do that. Tens of thousands. Think it over.
I concur. Lets do this. Lets show the Xapos and the Roger Verrs that the nodes make up the economic majority and it is us who validate the protocol rules.
Greetings to all good will people!
Now, when the bunch of deceitful, greedy, incompetent, irresponsible idiots and scoundrels from B2X (sorry for some harshness) are really endangering the Bitcoin,
All of us who are smart enough and responsible should immediately start a Bitcoin core (best of all the latest 0.15.0.1 version) full node client!
If until now you haven't started your own bitcoin core client - just do it right now!
Believe me it is so simple!
Personally I have been running mine for 3 months already.
For those of you who perchance are afraid of keeping money in a wallet which is constantly connected to the Internet, and even accepting incoming connections (be sure to turn this option on), I want to say that you do absolutely not need to store any money in your Core full node client!
You may just keep somewhere offline just a key phrase for recovering your bitcoin private keys and addresses (your real wallet). Or you may run somewhere on another computer the electrum wallet, or any other wallet that allows you, and no one else, have full control over your wallet's private keys.
In my own full node bitcoin core 0.15.0.1 client, for example, I keep absolutely no bitcoins at all.
I run it solely for supporting the true bitcoin network!
The most important thing is that your Bitcoin Core full node should be ONLINE as much as possible!
(After you setup your Core full node do obligatorily check that you really have the 8333 port open and accessible from outside. You may check if your node is seen from outside here for example : https://bitnodes.21.co
Yes i know how to run a bitcoin core remotely but i donot understand why you are using this abusive language towards the b2x developers.Now, when the bunch of deceitful, greedy, incompetent, irresponsible idiots and scoundrels from B2X (sorry for some harshness) are really endangering the Bitcoin,
All of us who are smart enough and responsible should immediately start a Bitcoin core (best of all the latest 0.15.0.1 version) full node client!
If until now you haven't started your own bitcoin core client - just do it right now!
Believe me it is so simple!
Personally I have been running mine for 3 months already.
For those of you who perchance are afraid of keeping money in a wallet which is constantly connected to the Internet, and even accepting incoming connections (be sure to turn this option on), I want to say that you do absolutely not need to store any money in your Core full node client!
You may just keep somewhere offline just a key phrase for recovering your bitcoin private keys and addresses (your real wallet). Or you may run somewhere on another computer the electrum wallet, or any other wallet that allows you, and no one else, have full control over your wallet's private keys.
In my own full node bitcoin core 0.15.0.1 client, for example, I keep absolutely no bitcoins at all.
I run it solely for supporting the true bitcoin network!
The most important thing is that your Bitcoin Core full node should be ONLINE as much as possible!
(After you setup your Core full node do obligatorily check that you really have the 8333 port open and accessible from outside. You may check if your node is seen from outside here for example : https://bitnodes.21.co
They are implementing something that they thing will be good for bitcoin.
Support them or not is your personal issue and choice ,but please try to be respectfull,they are doing their jobs you do yours.
Not really. The one and only 2x dev is doing is own scammy ico. I ain't even making this crazy shit up.
Re: [ANN][ICO] Modulum - The first modular connected object on blockchains
Your hard cap is HUGE. Why do you need so much?
Here is a non-exhaustive list of our ambitions:
- Design Hardware & Software for 2 IoT products (Light & Full version) and for an uncountable number of add-ons
- New team members for our constant growing software (which is going to include more and more blockchains)
- Industrialization, tests, international experimentations, certifications of both versions and all add-ons
- Creation of a blockchain ecosystem around the product, including: Modulum company, users, external services, creators, resellers, renters...
- Creation of an infrastructure for devices management and for our own services (like the Modulum service rental thanks to MDL tokens)
- Marketing & sales
- International events planning, contests
- and everything else described in our whitepaper page 17 & 23
Not buying it. This much raise is juts money grab. You need funding for the next 2 years on day one. Earn your rights to spend big on marketing.
Re: [ANN]INNOVA - when security is the main focus. ASIC resistance. Neoscrypt coin.
On telegram the dev for SWP was called Innova
The SWP dev dumped all his coin and scammed a supporter.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2152304.160
Buyer beware.
The SWP dev dumped all his coin and scammed a supporter.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2152304.160
Buyer beware.
This is concerning.
I am starting a new masternode coin. This is a very serious project and I am looking for a single lead developer.
A little on my background. I am a crypto investor from two years. I have also invested in and run masternodes of different coins myself. I am also community manager for quite a few coin communities and all of it has given me great insight.
As for the project, I am nearly done with the whitepaper, though some things will change depending on the design choices we make. Domain name, website, marketing roadmap and all that will be taken care of and should not be a problem.
So if you are a coin developer specifically, and would like to be part in the birth of a interesting crypto with a long term value proposition, feel free to pm me. If you have any queries, which is not specific to the project specs, you can post it here. For everything else Pm me.
I can assure you that the project will challenge and excite you if you are up for it. The idea is, whatever we do, we do it good.
A little on my background. I am a crypto investor from two years. I have also invested in and run masternodes of different coins myself. I am also community manager for quite a few coin communities and all of it has given me great insight.
As for the project, I am nearly done with the whitepaper, though some things will change depending on the design choices we make. Domain name, website, marketing roadmap and all that will be taken care of and should not be a problem.
So if you are a coin developer specifically, and would like to be part in the birth of a interesting crypto with a long term value proposition, feel free to pm me. If you have any queries, which is not specific to the project specs, you can post it here. For everything else Pm me.
I can assure you that the project will challenge and excite you if you are up for it. The idea is, whatever we do, we do it good.
Re: [ANN] ✅ Xios PoS/PoW No ICO/No airdrop/No Premine/ ⚡ Masternode Ready 🔥Scrypt🔥
HI,
Why there is a fall in the price of XIOS in yobit.net? Stop pouring so your cheap coins !!!
Why there is a fall in the price of XIOS in yobit.net? Stop pouring so your cheap coins !!!
Let them.... great time to buy!
Trying to set up a second masternode, ROI is very good.Same here. Good time to accumulate all alts.
Re: [ANN]INNOVA - when security is the main focus. ASIC resistance. Neoscrypt coin.
very promise project, hope i can buy INNOVA for MN soon
If this shitcoin ever will be on the exchange, you can buy it by 1 sat. Dev will sell everyone his premine
Basically he trolls every MN coin in which he is not already invested. So Monacco and Interzone is all good. Others all bad. Luckily, this is ASIC resistant, so he had to edit his copy paste reply. Just check his post history. Epic level copy paste troller, ironically trolling coins for copy pasting
Re: [ANN]INNOVA - when security is the main focus. ASIC resistance. Neoscrypt coin.
Is there a slack channel or telegram channel?
Just started a telegram group for Innova. Join in guys. Lets gets this coin rolling.
Telegram: https://t.me/InnovaCoin
Re: [ANN]INNOVA - when security is the main focus. ASIC resistance. Neoscrypt coin.
got the airdrop, ty
Please tell me how to join the airdrop, thanks. I dont see guideline for the airdrop from the main thread of the annoucement.Airdrop was over yesterday. Hence the link has been removed. I think dev forgot to edit the heading.
One last question, Is there a minimum daily/weekly post requirement for the signatures?
One post daily.
I haven't read about any such requirement. Did i miss something?
Re: [ANN]INNOVA - when security are the main focus. ASIC resistance. Neoscrypt coin.
Hello,
we are sending the coins on airdrop and it will take some time.
we are sending the coins on airdrop and it will take some time.
Received my airdrop. Thank you much. WTB @ 1k sats. Pm me.