I am not in any doubt. I think iv4n deserves a red tag and it should stay
In that case: there's your answer! Let the DT1-voting take care of it:
That part you quoted goes like this:
I am not in any doubt. I think iv4n deserves a red tag and it should stay but just for the sake of not having my thread about asking 1xbit promoters to refrain being flooded with pro-iv4n posts I created this and am willing to change the tag to neutral if the consensus shows it would be more conducive.
Again "pro-iv4n posts"... why posts? There was only one post... and that post is questionable:
I am also interested in what is the reason for applying the tag to this user,
because the link attached to the tag does not contain any archives but leads to this thread. Not that it bothered me, but from time to time I see this guy's
[iv4n] messages in the various sections of the message and I do not remember that he would have carried the 1xbit signature,
(although I do not exclude that I could overlook something).

I found a mention ... As it turned out, the tag is related to the review, but I think the tag is a bit biased, at least I see that you did not red tag other users participating in that discussion. In addition, iv4n did not say anything that significantly differs from the words of other users, he did not say "I recommend" but at the same time publicly expressed concerns and clarified that
(I highlighted some thoughts in red).Interesting site 1xbit! I never played there, and I am not sure should I start now... Too many unsolved accusations on your account, of course!
But I like easy registration, and I like the list of the coins you accept! Amazing! Also, the list of available games is awesome, I am looking around the site and to be honest I like what I see! I am tempted to deposit some amount and test you... but maybe I will get $30 for this "the-first-look-review"?!
Here is my 1xbit deposit address: bc1qxepaj5xp7klsv797ndgm2xgs98er9ydj0rt625
If I get the coins I will play and I will be able to say something more about 1xbit casino! Cheers!
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]I would like people to be objective, that's all... and give their honest opinion about this case! I think Jolly and some of his friends made some serious accusations without any logical arguments, all they have is "ONE POST" that can be interpreted in different ways, but is it really "Writing highly dubious and selective reviews for getting paid by scammers is unacceptable conduct:
https://archive.is/Ii3g6"?! Does it sound like I am begging for that money, that I am a parasite?
I went through the first 2 or 3 pages of that reviews thread and tagged the accounts I thought warranted it. When I have time I will go through all the pages and tag all those accounts that I feel warrant it.
Kind Regards
Feelings...
He did the same thing to me. I think JollyGood should be more objective in thinking. I am neither with 1xbit nor against them. If you read customer reviews on every gambling site, it is always positive and negative. If we make a conclusion based on the negative review, then every gambling site on the internet will be tagged SCAM
I made my own review and even gave transaction links just to show that I am not just making reviews for the money but as an authentic user of the platform. I support and promote freedom of expression but it is a bad idea when you are trying to keep people shut just because you do not agree with their opinion. It is a bad thing.