Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 28 results by toastee
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: Bitcoinware.net possible scam beware !!
by
toastee
on 14/06/2017, 17:37:55 UTC
Did you ever receive your order?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: bitcoinware.net
by
toastee
on 14/06/2017, 16:39:12 UTC
Did anyone ever find a contact number for these guys? I have an address of 10 Navy Wharf Court, Toronto but can't reach them regarding an order. They accepted my money within a couple hours (Interac E-Transfer) but since then it's been radio silence.
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: ChromaWallet (colored coins): issue and trade private currencies/stocks/bonds/..
by
toastee
on 17/04/2014, 04:00:49 UTC
So... it's been a month and not much action here. Is this project still alive?
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: ActiveMining thread mods are actively trying to scam people
by
toastee
on 28/03/2014, 20:07:11 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: Looking for investment of ~2500 BTC for music festival, return = ~150,000 BTC
by
toastee
on 28/03/2014, 20:04:43 UTC
Money is not the only thing required to book the kind of talent you would need for the returns you're forecasting. Regardless of if you have a DEMF/Paxahau guy on your side, most of the major booking agencies (SPIN, WME, AM Only, etc) will not even return your phone calls if they don't have a pre-existing relationship with you. While a good idea in theory, your post contains a lot of fluff and speculation. It also does not really belong in the securities section.
Post
Topic
Board MultiBit
Re: Watch-Only Address
by
toastee
on 11/03/2014, 05:22:33 UTC
I expect that public/ private extended HD keys will be supported in MultiBit HD (perhaps not initially).
This will give this functionality but admittedly not for individual addresses from private keys.


Thanks! Looking forward to it
Post
Topic
Board MultiBit
Topic OP
Watch-Only Address
by
toastee
on 10/03/2014, 19:05:29 UTC
Is there any chance of watch-only addresses (a la Blockchain.info or Armory) being added to Multibit? Would be great if I could keep track of the value I have in cold storage within the client.

Thanks for the great app
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
toastee
on 21/01/2014, 18:07:14 UTC
Hey,
just a small question:
what about the AMC-Tender shares from BF, do anybody know when they will be transferd?
 what about the dividends?

regards

Hey BF,

Ken is working on getting us listed on the new exchange Crypto-Trade over the next short while and has stated that this has become his new priority.

Look out for weekly announcements from Ken on Wednesdays at 2345hrs GMT, starting tomorrow night.

An account will be created automatically for you on Crypto-Trade and you will receive an email at the address you used for Bitfunder.

Colored Coins/ Chroma Wallet is to be a trading platform as well once it becomes viable.  You may be asked to choose one over the other in the near future so read up on the pros and cons of both options.

thank you for still being helpful - not all shareholders have the patience to follow this shit every day. kudos
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
toastee
on 21/01/2014, 14:44:56 UTC
So toastee is posting lies. He's from Canada.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=151400

So it's VE and testh does not exist. Pathetic.  

Wait, so I'm VE now...? LOL What did I post besides a sarcastic response gif to an obvious troll? Some of you guys really need to chill the fuck out and take the tinfoil hats off.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
toastee
on 21/01/2014, 04:22:05 UTC
Hi kslaughter, I buy 256Gh/s x 5, before decemebr and that is will in 31.12.2013, so already 21 days and I did not receive yet, what?HuhHuhHuh?? and I also send email several times and no answer, so what is?HuhHuhHuhHuhHuhHuhHuh? I dont like waiting from your, so please let me as soon as possible, thanks

Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
toastee
on 17/01/2014, 05:39:58 UTC
I plan on making paying someone to make the CC interface easy to use after the CC developers have the core tested and working.

please.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: Trading Platforms - Active Mining shareholders poll
by
toastee
on 16/01/2014, 17:31:16 UTC
Long term solution is CC

Short term CT


Ken has already said we only have the resources to do one. I'd rather wait for a long term solution with no risk of seizure by the Chinese.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
toastee
on 15/01/2014, 17:01:49 UTC
+1 for waiting for colored coins
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
toastee
on 15/01/2014, 04:47:50 UTC

I don't need to answer to you, dude. I've been a shareholder since IPO and I've been a regular in #ActiveMining for several months. Sorry I don't post in this clusterfuck of a thread enough to be considered important to you.
You signed up on Sept. 20th.

http://todaysdate.com/

You don't need an account to put a thread in your browser bookmarks... I'm sure tons of people lurk for ages with no interest in posting.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
toastee
on 15/01/2014, 04:09:15 UTC
so bargraphics, are you offended that Ken doesn't even want to talk to you?  

It's funny that you would say that. Gerald did make it extremely clear that one of the main reasons ActiveMining doesn't give out any detailed information is due to them originally telling you about the eASIC deal before it was confirmed and you harassing eASIC to the point where the deal almost fell through.

While I don't think this is a legitimate reason for ActM to hold back information to it's shareholders, from the sounds of it you have done more to harm this company than any actual troll out there.

This absolutely fucking infuriates me.

Really another member that joined today.   And who might you be?Huh Introduce yourself.  Now that Crumbs and espically VE can only be taken as serious as a my little pony tea set...will we be seeing more of these new "shareholders", or is this their death rattle till they pop....and we see them on the news?

Joined today? uhh... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=151400;sa=showPosts lol

I don't need to answer to you, dude. I've been a shareholder since IPO and I've been a regular in #ActiveMining for several months. Sorry I don't post in this clusterfuck of a thread enough to be considered important to you.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
toastee
on 15/01/2014, 03:43:36 UTC
so bargraphics, are you offended that Ken doesn't even want to talk to you? 

It's funny that you would say that. Gerald did make it extremely clear that one of the main reasons ActiveMining doesn't give out any detailed information is due to them originally telling you about the eASIC deal before it was confirmed and you harassing eASIC to the point where the deal almost fell through.

While I don't think this is a legitimate reason for ActM to hold back information to it's shareholders, from the sounds of it you have done more to harm this company than any actual troll out there.

This absolutely fucking infuriates me.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
toastee
on 03/01/2014, 19:22:22 UTC


What do you think hacking is?  The actual laws broken were "unauthorized access to computers and computer networks."  If you know that you don't belong on a system (like being B&), and you get on the system anyway (unlawful access), you could be V&.  Find out about that, it's kind of creepy.  Google it.
Again, I'm not saying that anyone will go after some kid d*cking around on a forum, but the laws are there.  No need to bring China into this.

*Getting B& is not a crime, but logging on after being banned is.  Just because something is a crime doesn't mean that you will surely get punished, only that you *could*, if things go wrong.  And i'm pretty sure you knew what i meant without me typing an essay about it.

Holy hell thanks for the laugh. There is no hacking going on by joining a forum over and over. None. There could be charge pressed if they accessed the admin panel and removed the ban, and you could prove it; or they are making some kind of death threats and the like. There is no illegal activity in being a troll on a forum. You have to ban the IP and so forth to mitigate the trolls/spambots and so forth.

I would love to see a case where a forum owner sued a troll tho. That would be classic.
FYI, here you go since you were too lazy to link it yourself.
http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=96783

It's not against the law but it is almost definitely against your ISP's ToS to use their network to evade bans and if bitcointalk cared enough to email abuse@yourisp.com they can warn you/suspend your service if you're a repeat offender. It's the internet equivalent of trespassing.

Source: used to mod a forum with 20,000+ active users and contacted ISP's regularly
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
toastee
on 03/01/2014, 00:37:53 UTC
While it would be great if it were  ACtM hardware, it doesn't matter at the end of the day. Ken is still close to assembling and shipping our hardware and he just said we are going to have a great year ahead. I'm more than happy with that assessment - from the man who has the details.

I've lost faith in this venture and feel that it's at a standstill. Ken is blowing smoke up all our asses with the BS weekly updates. We DO NOT have shares in anything at this point. All of this going back and forth you guys are doing is useless nonsense that is getting none of you anywhere.

It's 2014 and we are not mining, trading or shipping. GAME OVER.

Not yet.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
toastee
on 02/01/2014, 03:00:00 UTC
Ken, thanks for the update but for shareholders this is simply not enough. We need to know when we can trade our shares on CT like you said. This is now way overdue. Please address this immediately.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
toastee
on 31/12/2013, 06:22:25 UTC
In case anyone cares, here's the full chat:

http://pastebin.com/ByfnWX2T