Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 26 results by troubled_times
Why is adsense the main concern of this thread?
If you all care more about adsense than the faucet, I'll simply shut it down if that's what you all would prefer.
If you all care more about adsense than the faucet, I'll simply shut it down if that's what you all would prefer.
because 2-3 month later, adsense banned the majority of faucet in the forum and all owner cry "why ban me" , if you start a faucet and you know your violation of rules (because rules don't write "you can have 1 page with content", but all page when you have insert adsense get have content
Very well, I'll shut it down and release it later with adequate content.
Faucet: http://passivebits.com/faucet/
Blog: http://passivebits.com/
Rewards: 250 (30%), 500 (30%), 750 (30%), 1000 (10%) satoshi every 60 minutes.
Processor: Faucetbox
Referral: 15%
Subscribe to the newsletter on the blog for faucet updates, new blog posts, and more!
Blog: http://passivebits.com/
Rewards: 250 (30%), 500 (30%), 750 (30%), 1000 (10%) satoshi every 60 minutes.
Processor: Faucetbox
Referral: 15%
Subscribe to the newsletter on the blog for faucet updates, new blog posts, and more!
Re: [ANN] 1337 [Pure POS] MANDATORY WALLET UPDATE BEFORE APRIL 3Rd '16!!
Saw a blog that has his 1337 staking stats: https://passivebits.com
Re: [ANN] 1337 [Pure POS] MANDATORY WALLET UPDATE BEFORE APRIL 3Rd '16!!
Why is the Windows download for 1337 wallet no longer available?
The file you are trying to download is no longer available.
This could be due to the following reasons:
The file has been removed because of a ToS/AUP violation.
Invalid URL - the link you are trying to access does not exist
The file has been deleted by the user.
The file you are trying to download is no longer available.
This could be due to the following reasons:
The file has been removed because of a ToS/AUP violation.
Invalid URL - the link you are trying to access does not exist
The file has been deleted by the user.
Re: [ANN] 1337 [Pure POS] MANDATORY WALLET UPDATE BEFORE APRIL 3Rd '16!!
Saw an ad on btcclicks for a 1337 staking pool, testing it out.
http://stakeit.online/
Seems neat so far, says daily payments, I'm going to deposit and post tomorrow if it pays.
Supposed to pay in Bitcoins.
http://stakeit.online/
Seems neat so far, says daily payments, I'm going to deposit and post tomorrow if it pays.
Supposed to pay in Bitcoins.
Careful with that bro
What is stopping them from just running with your coins?
Any place can simply 'run with someones coins'. I'm choosing this place over juststake.online as over half of juststake.onlines website is just filler text: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor.
Re: [ANN] 1337 [Pure POS] MANDATORY WALLET UPDATE BEFORE APRIL 3Rd '16!!
Saw an ad on btcclicks for a 1337 staking pool, testing it out.
http://stakeit.online/
Seems neat so far, says daily payments, I'm going to deposit and post tomorrow if it pays.
Supposed to pay in Bitcoins.
http://stakeit.online/
Seems neat so far, says daily payments, I'm going to deposit and post tomorrow if it pays.
Supposed to pay in Bitcoins.
Re: [ANN] 1337 [Pure POS] MANDATORY WALLET UPDATE BEFORE APRIL 3Rd '16!!
Everything looking fine so far. both yobit and c-cex are on the new wallet now! I need to make a few new stake blocks to test the current APR, will update on that asap
did a withdrawal from yobit 45 minutes ago still not arrived, gonna give it til morning too tired to try and deal with yobit atm
Same, withdrew a few minutes ago and it never arrived.
Re: [ANN] • CYGNUS • [CYG] • X11 POW/POS • Consensus Polls • Dynamic Development
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/cygnus/
13,787,689 CYG Available Supply.
A whale could easily scoop all this up.
13,787,689 CYG Available Supply.
A whale could easily scoop all this up.
I am under the impression that one/a few basically have. However I could be wrong.
Technically no, the most in one address is : 4778096.51860200 CYG which is assumed to be held by an exchange.
Other than that the top 20 accounts do not even hold more than 1 Million CYG in one single account.
#1 : 4778096.51860200 CYG
#2 : 763086.63105030 CYG
#3 : 729449.87370954 CYG
#4 : 571958.73865366 CYG
#5 : 438200.64000000 CYG
From here it drastically lowers. Excluding the #1 wallet, the other top 19 have a total of around 5,670,754 CYG. That's 10 Million + controlled by 20 addresses, and a majority of the addresses are not staking. Also the dev stated, the 410000.00000000 wallet is the airdrop wallet, which hasn't been touched.
At current prices from people dumping, you can easily pick up 100K + for around 0.15 Bitcoin, doesn't take a whale to do this.
Re: [ANN] • CYGNUS • [CYG] • X11 POW/POS • Consensus Polls • Dynamic Development
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/cygnus/
13,787,689 CYG Available Supply.
A whale could easily scoop all this up.
13,787,689 CYG Available Supply.
A whale could easily scoop all this up.
Re: [ANN] • CYGNUS • [CYG] • X11 POW/POS • Consensus Polls • Dynamic Development
I'm having a 500k sell wall at 300. This coin will never fly, understand?
Thats a laughably small amount. I won't do it, but you do realize I could eat a 500K sell wall and not even move a fraction of my BTC. Its hilarious when people try to play whale.
It's hilarious when people are boasting about how "rich they are"
Prove how rich you are......
Donations are welcome
Fine, I just market bought 200K CYG on YOLObit, because I can
you whale you
I'm no whale those are the guys with 10,000+ BTC. That was my point, when someone like me can easily eat up a large amount of the coins. Statements like "This coin will never fly, understand?" In reference to 1-2 BTC sell walls, is absurd.
Yep, people fail to realize that unlike most POS coins that have hundreds of millions to billions of coins released, CYG only has 13 Million at the moment. Someone can easily buy up the available supply and control the price from there.
Re: [ANN] • CYGNUS • [CYG] • X11 POW/POS • Consensus Polls • Dynamic Development
Why did the supply just drop 3 million coins?
Dropped from 13 million to 10.2 Million
10 Minutes or so later, went from 10.2 Million to 10,920,569 CYG
Then back up to 13,170,660 CYG
Re: FORTUNEJACK.COM | No.1 for Cryptocurrency Gambling | Provably Fair | 3 BTC BONUS
The dealer did not Blackjack also.
The dealer had a 3 card 21, not a Blackjack.
The dealer had a 3 card 21, not a Blackjack.
I know. The second part is just a mistake I found.
Player BJ + Dealer BJ = push
Player BJ + Dealer 21 = Player Win
We know this, they don't.
Never happened to me the case like this btw, i just wish fj could clarify and solve this problem asap .
This was the case with the player: Player BJ + Dealer BJ = push. We checked the hand ID provided and gave the answer.
You are mixing withe the previous hand when you had 8 and 6 and the dealer had 6, 7 and 8.
I am not mixing anything up.
Provide proof.
I want the hash, screenshots, everything.
Stop wasting time and provide the evidence.
Since your check bet does not work, and it provides a player nothing but a 'bet number' you can fabricate any evidence you want. There is NO transparency here.
Your system cannot be trusted.
I know for a fact the dealer did not have a Blackjack, that's the whole reason I'm pissed off. The system cheats and you're just trying to cover it up.
I had Blackjack and the dealer had 6,7,8 , which is the 3 card 21.
You've basically clarified the fact that I stated the dealer did have a 3 card 21, just you're lying about the rest!
Once again, the Hand ID that you submitted for examination we gave you the answer that you had the push. The previous game you lost because you had 14 and the dealer 21. Please read carefully our text and refrain from disseminating the wrong information. You have to accept the fact that you had the push.
Provide the evidence, fix your bet id system on the website, provide the hash so it can be checked.
Stop trying to cover your asses over a 0.053 Bitcoin Blackjack and hiding the fact your system cheats.
You're hurting your reputation.
Re: FORTUNEJACK.COM | No.1 for Cryptocurrency Gambling | Provably Fair | 3 BTC BONUS
The dealer did not Blackjack also.
The dealer had a 3 card 21, not a Blackjack.
The dealer had a 3 card 21, not a Blackjack.
I know. The second part is just a mistake I found.
Player BJ + Dealer BJ = push
Player BJ + Dealer 21 = Player Win
We know this, they don't.
Never happened to me the case like this btw, i just wish fj could clarify and solve this problem asap .
This was the case with the player: Player BJ + Dealer BJ = push. We checked the hand ID provided and gave the answer.
You are mixing withe the previous hand when you had 8 and 6 and the dealer had 6, 7 and 8.
I am not mixing anything up.
Provide proof.
I want the hash, screenshots, everything.
Stop wasting time and provide the evidence.
Since your check bet does not work, and it provides a player nothing but a 'bet number' you can fabricate any evidence you want. There is NO transparency here.
Your system cannot be trusted.
I know for a fact the dealer did not have a Blackjack, that's the whole reason I'm pissed off. The system cheats and you're just trying to cover it up.
I had Blackjack and the dealer had 6,7,8 , which is the 3 card 21.
You've basically clarified the fact that I stated the dealer did have a 3 card 21, just you're lying about the rest!