Search content
Sort by

Showing 6 of 6 results by trzl
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
trzl
on 30/05/2018, 19:07:27 UTC
iquidus has alot of bugs. prohashing and other yiimp based explorers are far more accurate.

Just out of curiousity in case your statement here is indeed the case (and i have some doubts about it), but just in case.

- So why is Verge using the most bugged explorer for its own currency?
- What's the prupose of having an official explorer nobody can rely on?
- What explorer do you use than while doing your own research/investigation if the official Verge Explorer can't be trusted due it's bugs?
- Was the possibility that the explorer shows the correct value actually investigated or you just think it's a bug?
- Any reference or example where this bug elsewhere happened and shows negative balance?

And there is still no answer to a whole lot of valid questions, maybe you won't to take a look into them as well.

P.S.: IF this guy here posting and offending people en mass here with lowest street language is really your moderator on the telegram channel
and representing Verges views/spirit/interest, than you should think about what bad taste such behavour leaves associated with Verge.
Just as a thought and side note.

Lolololol. Offending normal people ( which i dont ) or FUDDers ( which i will always) like you? I give FUDders extra treatment. Get used to my offensive behaviour until you keep spreading fake shit and asking vague question again and again to prove your shitty thing.

Let's get into technicalities. Very isn't even private. There is no private transaction or private ledger. Wraith is stealth addresses with Tor. All values are visible on the blockchain.

Lol they backpedalled on the private ledger after advertising it so heavily because "it went against their values" or something like that.

I'm gonna look for the post just for the lolz and compare it to what they were proposing for Wraith beforehand.

Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
trzl
on 30/05/2018, 19:01:17 UTC
iquidus has alot of bugs. prohashing and other yiimp based explorers are far more accurate.

Just out of curiousity in case your statement here is indeed the case (and i have some doubts about it), but just in case.

- So why is Verge using the most bugged explorer for its own currency?
- What's the prupose of having an official explorer nobody can rely on?
- What explorer do you use than while doing your own research/investigation if the official Verge Explorer can't be trusted due it's bugs?
- Was the possibility that the explorer shows the correct value actually investigated or you just think it's a bug?
- Any reference or example where this bug elsewhere happened and shows negative balance?

And there is still no answer to a whole lot of valid questions, maybe you won't to take a look into them as well.

P.S.: IF this guy here posting and offending people en mass here with lowest street language is really your moderator on the telegram channel
and representing Verges views/spirit/interest, than you should think about what bad taste such behavour leaves associated with Verge.
Just as a thought and side note.

Lolololol. Offending normal people ( which i dont ) or FUDDers ( which i will always) like you? I give FUDders extra treatment. Get used to my offensive behaviour until you keep spreading fake shit and asking vague question again and again to prove your shitty thing.


What has boxalex said that is fake or FUD? Nothing that I see.

Your friend box or whatever his name is fishing for anything just like rest of fudders. This thread was supposed to be on the alleged attack on Verge Network, which was unsuccessfull. Yet, he keeps going OFFTOPIC, now that sockpuppet of OCMiner chose a topic on Blockexplorer bug. I mean What the F? It seems like he wants to keep this discussion to go on forever.
It seems like we have a collection of Banned people over here.

Ya'all have adopted motto
" IF YOU CANT MAKE IT, FAKE IT "

This thread was started during the first attack back in April and continued to stay alive because of new attacks? Even though the latest attack was unsuccessful, the fact of the matter is that attempts are being made which warrants the existence of a place where these issue can be discussed.

You on the other hand have only responded with insults and 0 actual answers to any questions.

All you've manage to do successfully is project your insecurities.

It amazes me always that people with new accounts show up wit to ask same question again and again without even reading the whole post. Literally your account has been used for this thread.
I can bet, that you are one of the same person who were posting FUD and yet created new account to claim your concern.

If you want ur answer really, then have a look at older posts and DYOR.

And it amazed me that one isn't allowed to make an account to a site they've never registered for to be able discuss an issue of interest. I mean.. What the fuck is the point of forums existing... right? Not unless it's to kiss ass to a coin that is obviously faulty... Right?

I have looked at this thread since it was first created in April, and a lot of the questions that have been asked in the last few days simply have gone ignored. A lot of questions even before the last two legit attacks went unanswered because the issue was "fixed"...

People like you are why the general crypto community hates Verge. This will never change. Period. Stop deflecting you insecure child.

Either you start helping others out by linking them to sources, or shut the fuck and stop screaming FUD, because clearly you're doing nothing to help prevent the FUD...

Say what you want at this point. What's gonna matter more than words in the long run is legit progress from the Verge team, so I'll leave it at that.

Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
trzl
on 30/05/2018, 17:12:18 UTC
iquidus has alot of bugs. prohashing and other yiimp based explorers are far more accurate.

Just out of curiousity in case your statement here is indeed the case (and i have some doubts about it), but just in case.

- So why is Verge using the most bugged explorer for its own currency?
- What's the prupose of having an official explorer nobody can rely on?
- What explorer do you use than while doing your own research/investigation if the official Verge Explorer can't be trusted due it's bugs?
- Was the possibility that the explorer shows the correct value actually investigated or you just think it's a bug?
- Any reference or example where this bug elsewhere happened and shows negative balance?

And there is still no answer to a whole lot of valid questions, maybe you won't to take a look into them as well.

P.S.: IF this guy here posting and offending people en mass here with lowest street language is really your moderator on the telegram channel
and representing Verges views/spirit/interest, than you should think about what bad taste such behavour leaves associated with Verge.
Just as a thought and side note.

Lolololol. Offending normal people ( which i dont ) or FUDDers ( which i will always) like you? I give FUDders extra treatment. Get used to my offensive behaviour until you keep spreading fake shit and asking vague question again and again to prove your shitty thing.


What has boxalex said that is fake or FUD? Nothing that I see.

Your friend box or whatever his name is fishing for anything just like rest of fudders. This thread was supposed to be on the alleged attack on Verge Network, which was unsuccessfull. Yet, he keeps going OFFTOPIC, now that sockpuppet of OCMiner chose a topic on Blockexplorer bug. I mean What the F? It seems like he wants to keep this discussion to go on forever.
It seems like we have a collection of Banned people over here.

Ya'all have adopted motto
" IF YOU CANT MAKE IT, FAKE IT "

This thread was started during the first attack back in April and continued to stay alive because of new attacks? Even though the latest attack was unsuccessful, the fact of the matter is that attempts are being made which warrants the existence of a place where these issue can be discussed.

You on the other hand have only responded with insults and 0 actual answers to any questions.

All you've manage to do successfully is project your insecurities.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
trzl
on 30/05/2018, 17:04:38 UTC
⭐ Merited by Hueristic (1)
Patelkaran.8798's behavior is exemplerary of how I was treated on the XVG telegram and discord when asking legitimate questions 2 months ago back when I was thinking of investing.

Somehow a concerned question === FUD to the majority of their community. You guys are seriously overly paranoid, without ever citing anything other than the dev's own incomplete answers.

The groupthink within the community is leading to some childish behavior and its sickening to watch. Literally every coin experiences FUD and fake news. Get the fuck over it. What stands out from XVG is how the community responds, and it's worrisome.

It's clear that marketing and coin price is a bigger priority rather than innovating.

The deflection from the dev is beyond annoying. He'd put a lot of minds to ease if he actually answered using his own words instead of busting out the old "DYOR" response.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
trzl
on 29/05/2018, 23:47:02 UTC

I'm not invested in this XVG drama whatsoever since i could care less about privacy coins (privacy is an added feature that I could care less about since I'm not a shady fuck)...

I wonder when people will stop giving the "i got nothing to hide" reasoning. Privacy is important in this modern all-seeing world more than ever

Maybe because not all of us need to be able to hide transactions? It is a nice feature yes, but I look for more in cryptos than just being able to hide my transaction history. And even if I wanted it, there are other options? Is this not a free market? Am I not allowed to have options that don't have a sketchy recent history?
I like coins that aren't subject to network attacks like Verge.

And while I may get shit for this, I am one who actually likes the idea of paying taxes and whatnot... Maybe not under this current administration, but it is something I like to pay into nonetheless. So my transactions have no reason to go unrecorded... And there are plenty of other coins out there that are capable of transferring funds with better tech than XVG if that's all I wanted to do with it.

It's cool if others here have the need for privacy. That's fine. Simply put: there are better options.

Let the free market decide who comes out on top.


BTW this response isn't a knock on privacy coins. I own none. It's just that you're argument given the context of your pro-Verge position needed a new take on the situation at play.

Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Network Attack on XVG / VERGE
by
trzl
on 29/05/2018, 22:46:32 UTC
bitcointalk never fails to amuse me  Grin     this entire thread has gone to shit,  similar to the entire alt-cryptocurrency section of these forums... just LOL

sorry boys & girls this whole thing has been blown way out of proportion in what seems like a big mess of fud, trolls and people that are upset they never got enough coins the past year or two while the price was down lol Smiley

network is working fine atm and I even updated my vpn and ph sub's  along with buying some hot sauce with this coin...   yup it's ded... plz sell it all Smiley  hahahaha!



      -CC66 Tongue

I joined this site just to call you out. 4 years of lurking and your post is what it took to get me to join lmao.

I'm not invested in this XVG drama whatsoever since i could care less about privacy coins (privacy is an added feature that I could care less about since I'm not a shady fuck), but all it took was me looking at your recent post history to determine that you're clearly heavily invested in XVG and to call you out on it.

While this 3rd attack seems to be FUD, the premise of this thread still warrants its existence. And that's the fact that XVG was subject to attack when it this thread was created, and then again just a week ago.

This is simply inexcusable. Even if other cryptocurrencies are (or were) subject to attacks, the response on behalf of the Verge developer and the Verge community has been nothing but disgusting to watch from the sidelines.

One look at their Discord and Telegram and that's all it took to tell me that it was full of a bunch of strange people with "edgy" high school humor and who treat the crypto space as such. "Us vs them" mentality, yet somehow expect for the rest of the crypto space to somehow band with them for the sake of crypto's future and adoption....

This space will do just fine without this coin. Porn won't be the reason for mass crpyto adoption anyway.

And this is why the general community dislikes Verge... The constant deflection and lack of transparency.

A decent amount of this thread is full of deflection from the issues that were presented. And that seems to be the general theme behind Verge. Hide and deflect. If Telegram and Discord are any indication of the state of Verge's community (one who loves to use semantic jargon to go off on tangents and deflect with high school humor), then it simply can't survive.

The free market is a ruthless beast. Yes, it is what helped XVG gain traction during the last bull run (McAfee shill, which was huge exposure) and during the leadup to the Mindgeek announcement, however it's also going to be what takes it down. At the end of the day, no one is pointing a gun to anthers head to buy or sell a coin... Greed is...

Laissez faire. Let's see what this new codebase does for Verge and how the development team goes about releasing the next update, and we'll see from there.  Cheesy